-
1.
A Randomized Trial Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate and Polyethylene Glycol/Bisacodyl (The Bowklean Study).
Hung, SY, Chen, HC, Chen, WT
Scientific reports. 2020;(1):5604
Abstract
Bowel cleansing is essential for a successful colonoscopy, but the ideal clearing agent and the volume have yet to be determined. A small-volume cleanser is important for patient compliance. This study aimed to compare the bowel cleansing efficacy, safety, tolerability, and acceptability of a 300-mL small-volume sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (PSMC) preparation-Bowklean with one 2-L polyethylene glycol (PEG)/bisacodyl-Klean-Prep/Dulcolax preparation under identical dietary recommendations. This multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, pre-specified noninferiority study enrolled 631 outpatients scheduled to undergo colonoscopy (Bowklean = 316 and Klean-Prep/Dulcolax = 315). After bowel preparation, an independent evaluator blinded to the subject's treatment allocation rated the quality of the colon cleansing. Efficacy was evaluated using the Aronchick Scale and Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (OPBS). Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. Tolerability and acceptability were measured via a patient questionnaire. Bowklean was non-interior to Klean-Prep/Dulcolax in overall colon cleansing but was associated with significantly better preparation quality. Notably, Bowklean was associated with significantly greater tolerability and acceptability of bowel preparations than Klean-Prep/Dulcolax. Safety profiles did not differ significantly between the groups. Our data indicate that Bowklean is a more effective and better-tolerated bowel cleansing preparation before colonoscopy than Klean-Prep/Dulcolax. Bowklean may therefore increase positive attitudes toward colonoscopies and participation rates.
-
2.
Improved high-quality colon cleansing with 1L NER1006 versus 2L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate or oral sulfate solution.
Repici, A, Coron, E, Sharma, P, Spada, C, Di Leo, M, Noble, CL, Gschossmann, J, Bargalló García, A, Baumgart, DC
Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver. 2019;(12):1671-1677
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Colonoscopy requires bowel cleansing for gut mucosa visualization; high-quality cleansing facilitates lesion detection. NER1006 is a 1L polyethylene glycol (PEG) bowel preparation. This post hoc analysis of two randomized trials investigated cleansing efficacy assessed, as in clinical practice, by site endoscopists. METHODS Patients received NER1006, 2L PEG + ascorbate (2LPEG), or oral sulfate solution (OSS) as a 2-day evening/morning regimen (N2D) or NER1006 morning-only dosing (N1D). Treatment-blinded site endoscopists assessed cleansing using the Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS). Analyses were conducted in a modified full analysis set, including (mFAS; n = 1378) or excluding (mFAS2; n = 1319) imputed failures, and in patients with 100% treatment adherence (mFAS100; n = 1047). Overall cleansing success (HCS grade A/B), overall high-quality cleansing (HCS grade A), and high-quality segments (HCS 3-4) per treatment population were analyzed. RESULTS Overall cleansing success was higher with N2D than 2LPEG (92.7-97.5% vs. 87.9-93.0%), and more patients had overall high-quality cleansing with N2D and N1D than 2LPEG (68.0-72.1% and 64.0-68.4% vs. 50.7-56.0%). Without imputed failures, N2D delivered more overall high-quality cleansing than OSS (74.5-77.3% vs. 67.8-69.8%). More high-quality segments were demonstrated with N2D and N1D versus 2 LPEG (82.5-87.1% and 79.4-84.4% vs. 70.4-76.3%) and with N2D versus OSS (82.7-89.5% vs. 78.1-84.4%). CONCLUSION When assessed by site endoscopists, NER1006 delivers greater high-quality cleansing than 2LPEG or OSS.
-
3.
Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome.
Anderson, JC, Baron, JA, Ahnen, DJ, Barry, EL, Bostick, RM, Burke, CA, Bresalier, RS, Church, TR, Cole, BF, Cruz-Correa, M, et al
Gastroenterology. 2017;(8):1933-1943.e5
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Endoscopists do not routinely follow guidelines to survey individuals with low-risk adenomas (LRAs; 1-2 small tubular adenomas, < 1 cm) every 5-10 years for colorectal cancer; many recommend shorter surveillance intervals for these individuals. We aimed to identify the reasons that endoscopists recommend shorter surveillance intervals for some individuals with LRAs and determine whether timing affects outcomes at follow-up examinations. METHODS We collected data from 1560 individuals (45-75 years old) who participated in a prospective chemoprevention trial (of vitamin D and calcium) from 2004 through 2008. Participants in the trial had at least 1 adenoma, detected at their index colonoscopy, and were recommended to receive follow-up colonoscopy examinations at 3 or 5 years after adenoma identification, as recommended by the endoscopist. For this analysis we collected data from only participants with LRAs. These data included characteristics of participants and endoscopists and findings from index and follow-up colonoscopies. Primary endpoints were frequency of recommending shorter (3-year) vs longer (5-year) surveillance intervals, factors associated with these recommendations, and effect on outcome, determined at the follow-up colonoscopy. RESULTS A 3-year surveillance interval was recommended for 594 of the subjects (38.1%). Factors most significantly associated with recommendation of 3-year vs a 5-year surveillance interval included African American race (relative risk [RR] to white, 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.75), Asian/Pacific Islander ethnicity (RR to white, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.22-2.43), detection of 2 adenomas at the index examination (RR vs 1 adenoma, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.27-1.71), more than 3 serrated polyps at the index examination (RR=2.16, 95% CI, 1.59-2.93), or index examination with fair or poor quality bowel preparation (RR vs excellent quality, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.66-2.83). Other factors that had a significant association with recommendation for a 3-year surveillance interval included family history of colorectal cancer and detection of 1-2 serrated polyps at the index examination. In comparisons of outcomes, we found no significant differences between the 3-year vs 5-year recommendation groups in proportions of subjects found to have 1 or more adenomas (38.8% vs 41.7% respectively; P = .27), advanced adenomas (7.7% vs 8.2%; P = .73) or clinically significant serrated polyps (10.0% vs 10.3%; P = .82) at the follow-up colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS Possibly influenced by patients' family history, race, quality of bowel preparation, or number or size of polyps, endoscopists frequently recommend 3-year surveillance intervals instead of guideline-recommended intervals of 5 years or longer for individuals with LRAs. However, at the follow-up colonoscopy, similar proportions of participants have 1 or more adenomas, advanced adenomas, or serrated polyps. These findings support the current guideline recommendations of performing follow-up examinations of individuals with LRAs at least 5 years after the index colonoscopy.
-
4.
Habit training versus habit training with direct visual biofeedback in adults with chronic constipation: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Norton, C, Emmanuel, A, Stevens, N, Scott, SM, Grossi, U, Bannister, S, Eldridge, S, Mason, JM, Knowles, CH
Trials. 2017;(1):139
Abstract
BACKGROUND Constipation affects up to 20% of adults. Chronic constipation (CC) affects 1-2% of adults. Patient dissatisfaction is high; nearly 80% feel that laxative therapy is unsatisfactory and symptoms have significant impact on quality of life. There is uncertainty about the value of specialist investigations and whether equipment-intensive therapies using biofeedback confer additional benefit when compared with specialist conservative advice. METHODS/DESIGN A three-arm, parallel-group, multicentre randomised controlled trial. OBJECTIVES to determine whether standardised specialist-led habit training plus pelvic floor retraining using computerised biofeedback is more clinically effective than standardised specialist-led habit training alone; to determine whether outcomes are improved by stratification based on prior investigation of anorectal and colonic pathophysiology. Primary outcome measure is response to treatment, defined as a 0.4-point (10% of scale) or greater reduction in Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) score 6 months after the end of treatment. Other outcomes up to 12 months include symptoms, quality of life, health economics, psychological health and qualitative experience. HYPOTHESES (1) habit training (HT) with computer-assisted direct visual biofeedback (HTBF) results in an average reduction in PAC-QOL score of 0.4 points at 6 months compared to HT alone in unselected adults with CC, (2) stratification to either HT or HTBF informed by pathophysiological investigation (INVEST) results in an average 0.4-point reduction in PAC-QOL score at 6 months compared with treatment not directed by investigations (No-INVEST). Inclusion: chronic constipation in adults (aged 18-70 years) defined by self-reported symptom duration of more than 6 months; failure of previous laxatives or prokinetics and diet and lifestyle modifications. Consenting participants (n = 394) will be randomised to one of three arms in an allocation ratio of 3:3:2: [1] habit training, [2] habit training and biofeedback or [3] investigation-led allocation to one of these arms. Analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis. DISCUSSION This trial has the potential to answer some of the major outstanding questions in the management of chronic constipation, including whether costly invasive tests are warranted and whether computer-assisted direct visual biofeedback confers additional benefit to well-managed specialist advice alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN11791740. Registered on 16 July 2015.
-
5.
Effects of supplemental calcium and vitamin D on the APC/β-catenin pathway in the normal colorectal mucosa of colorectal adenoma patients.
Liu, S, Barry, EL, Baron, JA, Rutherford, RE, Seabrook, ME, Bostick, RM
Molecular carcinogenesis. 2017;(2):412-424
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
APC/β-catenin pathway malfunction is a common and early event in colorectal carcinogenesis. To assess calcium and vitamin D effects on the APC/β-catenin pathway in the normal-appearing colorectal mucosa of sporadic colorectal adenoma patients, nested within a larger randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, partial 2 × 2 factorial chemoprevention clinical trial of supplemental calcium (1200 mg daily) and vitamin D (1000 IU daily), alone and in combination versus placebo, we assessed APC, β-catenin, and E-cadherin expression in colon crypts in normal-appearing rectal mucosa biopsies from 104 participants at baseline and 1-yr follow up using standardized, automated immunohistochemistry and quantitative image analysis. For vitamin D versus no vitamin D, the ratio of APC expression to β-catenin expression in the upper 40% (differentiation zone) of crypts (APC/β-catenin score) increased by 28% (P = 0.02), for calcium versus no calcium it increased by 1% (P = 0.88), and for vitamin D + calcium versus calcium by 35% (P = 0.01). Total E-cadherin expression increased by 7% (P = 0.35) for vitamin D versus no vitamin D, 8% (P = 0.31) for calcium versus no calcium, and 12% (P = 0.21) for vitamin D + calcium versus calcium. These results support (i) that vitamin D, alone or in combination with calcium, may modify APC, β-catenin, and E-cadherin expression in humans in directions hypothesized to reduce risk for colorectal neoplasms; (ii) vitamin D as a potential chemopreventive agent against colorectal neoplasms; and (iii) the potential of APC, β-catenin, and E-cadherin expression as treatable, pre-neoplastic risk biomarkers for colorectal neoplasms. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
-
6.
Nicotine chewing gum for the prevention of postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery: a multicenter, double-blind, randomised, controlled pilot study.
Lambrichts, DPV, Boersema, GSA, Tas, B, Wu, Z, Vrijland, WW, Kleinrensink, GJ, Jeekel, J, Lange, JF, Menon, AG
International journal of colorectal disease. 2017;(9):1267-1275
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE When postoperative ileus is not resolved after 5 days or recurs after resolution, prolonged POI (PPOI) is diagnosed. PPOI increases discomfort, morbidity and hospitalisation length, and is mainly caused by an inflammatory response following intestinal manipulation. This response can be weakened by targeting the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, with nicotine as essential regulator. Chewing gum, already known to stimulate gastrointestinal motility itself, combined with nicotine is hypothesised to improve gastrointestinal recovery and prevent PPOI. This pilot study is the first to assess efficacy and safety of nicotine gum in colorectal surgery. METHODS Patients undergoing elective oncological colorectal surgery were enrolled in this double-blind, parallel-group, controlled trial and randomly assigned to a treatment protocol with normal or nicotine gum (2 mg). Patient reported outcomes (PROMS), clinical characteristics and blood samples were collected. Primary endpoint was defined as time to first passage of faeces and toleration of solid food for at least 24 h. RESULTS In total, 40 patients were enrolled (20 vs. 20). In both groups, six patients developed PPOI. Time to primary endpoint (4.50 [3.00-7.25] vs. 3.50 days [3.00-4.25], p = 0.398) and length of stay (5.50 [4.00-8.50] vs. 4.50 days [4.00-6.00], p = 0.738) did not differ significantly between normal and nicotine gum. There were no differences in PROMS, inflammatory parameters and postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS We proved nicotine gum to be safe but ineffective in improving gastrointestinal recovery and prevention of PPOI after colorectal surgery. Other dosages and administration routes of nicotine should be tested in future research.
-
7.
CON-COUR study: Interferential therapy in the treatment of chronic constipation in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Vitton, V, Benezech, A, Honoré, S, Sudour, P, Lesavre, N, Auquier, P, Baumstarck, K
Trials. 2015;:234
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of chronic constipation is about 15 % in Western countries with a significant impact on quality of life and health care costs. The first-line therapy, based on medical treatment combined with laxatives and dietary rules, is often disappointing. Interferential therapy is a new treatment that has demonstrated its efficiency in the treatment of chronic constipation in children and encouraging results in adults. The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of interferential therapy during 8 weeks in adult patients. The secondary objectives are to assess this new and noninvasive therapy in terms of persistence of the clinical efficacy, colonic transit time, ano-rectal manometry, patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL), and tolerance. DESIGN multicenter, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind, two-parallel groups study. SETTING nine French adult gastroenterology centers. INCLUSION CRITERIA adult patients with a history of chronic constipation refractory to medical treatment for at least 3 months. Treatment groups: (1) interferential-experimental group (effective stimulation); (2) placebo-control group (sham stimulation). RANDOMIZATION 1:1 allocation ratio. Evaluation times: inclusion (T0, randomization), baseline assessment (T1), start of stimulation (T2), intermediary assessment (T3, 4 weeks), end of stimulation (T4, 8 weeks), follow-up (T5 and T6, 1- and 6-month). ENDPOINTS (1) primary: short-term efficacy at T4 (treatment response defined as three or more spontaneous, complete bowel movements per week); (2) secondary: efficacy at T5 and T6, symptoms (Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms questionnaire), colonic transit time, anorectal manometry, patient satisfaction (analogical visual scale), patient QoL (Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire), side/unexpected effects. SAMPLE SIZE 200 individuals to obtain 80 % power to detect a 20 % difference in treatment response at T4 between the two groups (15 % of lost to follow-up patients expected). DISCUSSION The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design is the most appropriate to demonstrate the efficacy of a new experimental therapeutic (Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group classification). National and international recommendations could be updated based on the findings of this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current controlled trials NCT02381665 (registration date: February 13, 2015).
-
8.
Global DNA hypomethylation (LINE-1) in the normal colon and lifestyle characteristics and dietary and genetic factors.
Figueiredo, JC, Grau, MV, Wallace, K, Levine, AJ, Shen, L, Hamdan, R, Chen, X, Bresalier, RS, McKeown-Eyssen, G, Haile, RW, et al
Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2009;(4):1041-9
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Global loss of methylated cytosines in DNA, thought to predispose to chromosomal instability and aneuploidy, has been associated with an increased risk of colorectal neoplasia. Little is known about the relationships between global hypomethylation and lifestyle, demographics, dietary measures, and genetic factors. METHODS Our data were collected as part of a randomized clinical trial testing the efficacy of aspirin and folic acid for the prevention of colorectal adenomas. At a surveillance colonoscopy approximately 3 years after the qualifying exam, we obtained two biopsies of the normal-appearing mucosa from the right colon and two biopsies from the left colon. Specimens were assayed for global hypomethylation using a pyrosequencing assay for LINE-1 (long interspersed nucleotide elements) repeats. RESULTS The analysis included data from 388 subjects. There was relatively little variability in LINE methylation overall. Mean LINE-1 methylation levels in normal mucosa from the right bowel were significantly lower than those on the left side (P < 0.0001). No significant associations were found between LINE-1 methylation and folate treatment, age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol use, dietary intake, or circulating levels of B vitamins, homocysteine, or selected genotypes. Race, dietary folic acid, and plasma B(6) showed associations with global methylation that differed between the right and the left bowel. The effect of folic acid on risk of adenomas did not differ according to extent of LINE-1 methylation, and we found no association between LINE-1 methylation and risk of adenomas. CONCLUSIONS LINE-1 methylation is not influenced by folic acid supplementation but differs by colon subsite.
-
9.
Prospective, randomized, parallel-group trial to evaluate the effects of lactulose and polyethylene glycol-4000 on colonic flora in chronic idiopathic constipation.
Bouhnik, Y, Neut, C, Raskine, L, Michel, C, Riottot, M, Andrieux, C, Guillemot, F, Dyard, F, Flourié, B
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2004;(8):889-99
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although lactulose and polyethylene glycol are osmotic laxatives widely used in the treatment of chronic constipation, no study has been conducted to compare their actions on the colonic bacterial ecosystem, which has an important influence on host health. AIM: To assess the effects of lactulose and polyethylene glycol on the composition and metabolic indices of the faecal flora in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation. METHODS Sixty-five patients with chronic idiopathic constipation were included in this controlled, multi-centre, randomized, parallel-group study. Participants received lactulose (Duphalac) or polyethylene glycol-4000 (Forlax) powders for the first week at a fixed dosage at night (20 g/day); in the second week, patients were given the option to vary the dose according to efficacy and tolerance (10-30 g/day); for the last 2 weeks, treatment was administered at a fixed dosage based on the results of the second week (10-30 g/day). Stools were recovered for bacteriological analysis at days -1, 21 and 28. RESULTS Clinical efficacy and tolerance were similar with both treatments. In the lactulose group, an increase in faecal bifidobacteria counts (P = 0.04) and beta-galactosidase activity (P < 0.001) was observed from day -1 to day 28, whereas, in the polyethylene glycol group, there was a decrease in total short-chain fatty acids (P = 0.02), butyrate (P = 0.04), acetate (P = 0.02) and faecal bacterial mass (P = 0.001). No differences were observed in stools with regard to the following parameters: counts of Lactobacillus, clostridial spores, Bacteroides and enterobacteria, pH, biliary acids and neutral sterol concentrations. CONCLUSIONS Both lactulose and polyethylene glycol are efficacious and well tolerated. However, although lactulose can be considered as a pre-biotic in constipated patients, polyethylene glycol produces signs of decreased colonic fermentation in the stool.