-
1.
Food, Acid Supplementation and Drug Absorption - a Complicated Gastric Mix: a Randomized Control Trial.
Surofchy, DD, Frassetto, LA, Benet, LZ
Pharmaceutical research. 2019;(11):155
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of food on gastric pH and the ability of over the counter betaine hydrochloride (BHCl) acid to reacidify gastric pH after food-induced elevations in gastric pH. METHODS This open-label cross over clinical study (NCT02758015) included 9 subjects who were randomly assigned to one of 16 possible, 4-period cross-over sequences to determine the impact and relationship of food and gastric pH with acid supplementation. Subjects were administered various doses (1500 mg, 3000 mg and 4500 mg) of betaine hydrochloride (BHCl) to determine the ability of acid supplementation to reacidify gastric pH after the elevation of gastric pH caused by the ingestion of food. RESULTS Following the administration of food and the resulting elevation in gastric pH, time to return to baseline gastric pH levels without acid supplementation was 49.7 ± 14.0 min. Administering 4500 mg of BHCl acid in capsules was able to reacidify gastric pH levels back to baseline following the administration of food in approximately 17.3 ± 5.9 min. AUCpH of each treatment were similar and not statistically different. Mean max pH following the administration of food was 3.20 ± 0.55. CONCLUSION The ability of food to elevate and maintain gastric pH levels in the presence of acid supplementation was made evident throughout the study. A 4500 mg dose of BHCl was required to reacidify gastric pH after the administration of food. This study details the difficulty faced by clinicians in dosing a poorly soluble, weakly basic drug to patients receiving acid reducing agents where administration with food is recommended to avoid gastric side effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02758015.
-
2.
Inhibiting gastric acid production does not affect intestinal calcium absorption in young, healthy individuals: a randomized, crossover, controlled clinical trial.
Wright, MJ, Sullivan, RR, Gaffney-Stomberg, E, Caseria, DM, O'Brien, KO, Proctor, DD, Simpson, CA, Kerstetter, JE, Insogna, KL
Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2010;(10):2205-11
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most potent gastric acid suppressing drugs available, and their use is widespread. An emerging concern about chronic PPI therapy is whether these drugs impair intestinal calcium absorption, resulting in a negative calcium balance and thereby potentially causing bone loss. The objective of this study was to evaluate the acute effect of the PPI esomeprazole or placebo on intestinal calcium absorption in healthy adults. Twelve young adults participated in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study. There were two 3-week interventions that included a 14-day adjustment period (designed to stabilize calcium homeostasis) followed by 6 days of a diet containing 800 mg of calcium and 2.1 g/kg of protein (intervention). During the last 3 days of the adjustment period and throughout the intervention period, subjects consumed esomeprazole or placebo. Half the subjects underwent 24-hour continuous gastric acid pH monitoring. Intestinal calcium absorption was measured using dual-stable calcium isotopes at the end of each intervention. Treatment with esomprazole significantly increased gastric pH (mean pH on PPI 5.38 +/- 0.13, mean pH on placebo 2.70 +/- 0.44, p = .005). Neither calcium absorption (PPI 34.2% +/- 2.4%, placebo 31.5% +/- 2.1%, p = .24) nor urinary calcium (PPI 321 +/- 38 mg/34 hours, placebo 355 +/- 37 mg/34 hours, p = .07) differed between the PPI and placebo groups. It is concluded that short-term gastric acid suppression by PPIs does not attenuate intestinal calcium absorption in healthy young adults.
-
3.
Clinical trial: evaluation of gastric acid suppression with three doses of immediate-release esomeprazole in the fixed-dose combination of PN 400 (naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium) compared with naproxen 500 mg and enteric-coated esomeprazole 20 mg: a randomized, open-label, Phase I study in healthy volunteers.
Miner, P, Plachetka, J, Orlemans, E, Fort, JG, Sostek, M
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2010;(3):414-24
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND PN 400 is a fixed-dose combination formulated to provide sequential delivery of immediate-release (IR) esomeprazole and enteric-coated (EC) naproxen. AIM: To evaluate gastric acid suppression with three doses of esomeprazole in PN 400 compared with EC esomeprazole 20 mg. METHODS In this Phase I, randomized, open-label study, 28 healthy adults received PN 400 b.d. (naproxen 500 mg plus esomeprazole 10, 20 and 30 mg) and non-EC naproxen 500 mg b.d. plus EC esomeprazole 20 mg o.d., each for 9 days in a crossover fashion. The primary endpoint was percentage of time on day 9 that intragastric pH was >4.0; secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics and safety. RESULTS Day 9 percentage of time where intragastric pH was >4.0 was 76.5%, 71.4%, 40.9% and 56.9% [corrected] for PN 400 containing 30, 20 and 10 mg esomeprazole, and naproxen plus esomeprazole 20 mg respectively. This was significantly greater for PN 400 containing 30 and 20 mg esomeprazole vs. naproxen plus esomeprazole 20 mg (95% CI: 13.0-26.0 and 7.8-20.7 respectively). The pharmacokinetics of PN 400 were consistent with its formulation. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION PN 400 containing 20 mg esomeprazole was the lowest dose to achieve gastric acid suppression comparable to EC esomeprazole 20 mg and was selected for further evaluation.
-
4.
Enhancement of intragastric acid stability of a fat emulsion meal delays gastric emptying and increases cholecystokinin release and gallbladder contraction.
Marciani, L, Wickham, M, Singh, G, Bush, D, Pick, B, Cox, E, Fillery-Travis, A, Faulks, R, Marsden, C, Gowland, PA, et al
American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology. 2007;(6):G1607-13
Abstract
Preprocessed fatty foods often contain calories added as a fat emulsion stabilized by emulsifiers. Emulsion stability in the acidic gastric environment can readily be manipulated by altering emulsifier chemistry. We tested the hypothesis that it would be possible to control gastric emptying, CCK release, and satiety by varying intragastric fat emulsion stability. Nine healthy volunteers received a test meal on two occasions, comprising a 500-ml 15% oil emulsion with 2.5% of one of two emulsifiers that produced emulsions that were either stable (meal A) or unstable (meal B) in the acid gastric environment. Gastric emptying and gallbladder volume changes were assessed by MRI. CCK plasma levels were measured and satiety scores were recorded. Meal B layered rapidly owing to fat emulsion breakdown. The gastric half-emptying time of the aqueous phase was faster for meal B (72 +/- 13 min) than for meal A (171 +/- 35 min, P < 0.008). Meal A released more CCK than meal B (integrated areas, respectively 1,095 +/- 244 and 531 +/- 111 pmol.min.l(-1), P < 0.02), induced a greater gallbladder contraction (P < 0.02), and decreased postprandial appetite (P < 0.05), although no significant differences were observed in fullness and hunger. We conclude that acid-stable emulsions delayed gastric emptying and increased postprandial CCK levels and gallbladder contraction, whereas acid-instability led to rapid layering of fat in the gastric lumen with accelerated gastric emptying, lower CCK levels, and reduced gallbladder contraction. Manipulation of the acid stability of fat emulsion added to preprocessed foods could maximize satiety signaling and, in turn, help to reduce overconsumption of calories.
-
5.
Oral pantoprazole in the form of granules or tablets are pharmacodynamically equivalent in suppressing acid output in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and a history of erosive oesophagitis.
Hogan, D, Pratha, V, Riff, D, Ducker, S, Schwartz, H, Soffer, E, Wang, W, Rath, N, Comer, GM
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2007;(2):249-56
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIM: To demonstrate the pharmacodynamic comparability between oral 40 mg pantoprazole delayed-release granules and tablets. METHODS This was a multicentre, randomized, open-label, 2-period, 2-sequence, 9-week crossover study in patients aged 18-65 years with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and documented erosive oesophagitis. The primary endpoint was a comparison of the inhibition of pentagastrin-stimulated maximum acid output (MAO) at steady state after once daily dosing for 1 week and 23 h after the last dose of pantoprazole granules and tablets. Basal acid output was measured prior to MAO. Standard safety evaluations were performed. The one-sided t-test was used to test the null hypothesis that granules - 1.2 x tablet ≥ 0 against the alternative hypothesis that this difference was <0 for both MAO and basal acid output values. RESULTS Sixty patients completed the study. The mean MAO values were 7.11 +/- 4.98 and 7.29 +/- 4.77 mmol/h, while the mean basal acid output values were 0.74 +/- 0.91 and 0.58 +/- 0.63 mmol/h for the granules and tablets, respectively. The two formulations were shown statistically to be pharmacodynamically equivalent in suppressing MAO (P = 0.006), safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION Patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease who are unable to swallow the tablet may safely be prescribed the pantoprazole sodium granules.
-
6.
Intragastric acid control in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users: comparison of esomeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole.
Goldstein, JL, Miner, PB, Schlesinger, PK, Liu, S, Silberg, DG
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2006;(8):1189-96
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies to date have not directly compared the pharmacodynamic efficacies of different proton pump inhibitors in controlling intragastric acidity in patients treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. AIM: To compare acid suppression with once-daily esomeprazole 40 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg in patients receiving non-selective or cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy. METHODS In this multicentre, open-label, comparative, three-way crossover study, adult patients (n = 90) receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were randomized to one of six treatment sequences. At the study site, patients were administered esomeprazole 40 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg for 5 days each, with a washout period of > or =10 days between each treatment. Twenty-four-hour pH testing was performed on day 5 of each dosing period. RESULTS The mean percentage of time during the 24-h pH monitoring period that gastric pH was >4.0 was significantly greater with esomeprazole (74.2%) compared with lansoprazole (66.5%; P < 0.001) and pantoprazole (60.8%; P < 0.001), and significantly greater with esomeprazole (P < 0.05) than with the comparators regardless of whether using non-selective vs. cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. CONCLUSIONS At the doses studied, esomeprazole treatment provides significantly greater gastric acid suppression than lansoprazole or pantoprazole in patients receiving non-selective or cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
-
7.
Intragastric acid suppression and pharmacokinetics of twice-daily esomeprazole: a randomized, three-way crossover study.
Katz, PO, Castell, DO, Chen, Y, Andersson, T, Sostek, MB
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2004;(4):399-406
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, extra-oesophageal reflux symptoms, Barrett's oesophagus, or Zollinger-Ellison syndrome may require greater acid suppression than that obtained with once-daily esomeprazole. AIM: To assess gastric acid suppression (determined by intragastric pH) and pharmacokinetics of twice-daily vs. once-daily esomeprazole. METHODS In a randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover study, healthy subjects received esomeprazole 40 mg once daily, 20 mg twice daily, or 40 mg twice daily for five consecutive days. Twenty-four-hour continuous ambulatory intragastric pH was recorded on day 5. RESULTS Esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily provided a mean of 19.2 h with intragastric pH > 4.0 (80.1% of a 24-h time period; 95% confidence interval 74.5-85.7%) vs. 14.2 h with 40 mg once daily (59.2%; 95% CI 53.7-64.7%) and 17.5 h with 20 mg twice daily (73.0%; 95% confidence interval 67.4-78.5%) in 25 subjects. Intragastric pH was maintained >4.0 for a similar percentage of time during active and sleeping periods for all doses. CONCLUSIONS Esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily provides significantly greater acid suppression (number of hours in a 24-h period with pH > 4.0) than once-daily dosing and may be a reasonable consideration for patients requiring greater acid suppression for acid-related disease.
-
8.
Meal-stimulated gastric acid secretion and integrated gastric acidity in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
Gardner, JD, Sloan, S, Miner, PB, Robinson, M
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2003;(7):945-53
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND No current methods exist to determine meal-stimulated gastric acid secretion in humans under conditions that approximate those of daily living with the ingestion of breakfast, lunch and dinner. METHODS Gastric and oesophageal pH were measured in 26 healthy subjects and in 59 subjects with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Meal-stimulated gastric acid secretion was calculated from the buffer capacity of the meals determined in vitro and from the time required for the gastric pH to decrease to pH 2 in vivo following ingestion of the meal. RESULTS There was a significant correlation between gastric secretion with each meal and the corresponding post-prandial integrated gastric acidity. There was also a significant correlation between meal-stimulated gastric secretion and integrated gastric acidity from 09.00 to 22.00 h in both subjects with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and controls. In subjects with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, gastric secretion and integrated gastric acidity from 09.00 to 22.00 h were significantly higher than those in controls. There was a significant correlation between oesophageal acidity and integrated gastric acidity from 09.00 to 22.00 h in subjects with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. CONCLUSIONS As post-prandial gastric acidity is increased in subjects with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, it seems likely that increased gastric acidity is an important aetiological factor in this disease.
-
9.
Measurement of meal-stimulated gastric acid secretion by in vivo gastric autotitration.
Gardner, JD, Ciociola, AA, Robinson, M
Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985). 2002;(2):427-34
Abstract
Measurement of meal- stimulated gastric acid secretion using manual intragastric titration is demanding in terms of personnel and specialized equipment. In the present study, we used a new method, in vivo gastric autotitration, to determine meal-stimulated gastric acid secretion. Gastric pH was measured every 4 s before, during, and after ingestion of a standard meal in 24 healthy subjects. Placebo, ranitidine (150 mg), ranitidine (75 mg), or famotidine (10 mg) was given 1 h after the beginning of the meal. Meal-stimulated gastric acid secretion was calculated from the amount of HCl required to titrate the homogenized standard meal to pH 2 in vitro (119 mmol) and the time required for the pH of the ingested meal to decrease to pH 2 in vivo. Values for pH were also converted to acid concentration (mM), and integrated acidity was calculated from the cumulative, time-weighted means of the acid concentrations for every fourth second of the postprandial recording period. Control meal-stimulated gastric acid secretion was 60 (40-71) mmol/h (median; interquartile range), and each histamine H(2)-receptor antagonist significantly decreased secretion by approximately 50%. Meal-stimulated acid secretion correlated directly with postprandial integrated gastric acidity (r = 0.72; P = 0.0001). Thus intragastric autotitration is a convenient, reproducible method for measuring gastric acid secretion after ingestion of a solid meal and offers several advantages over manual intragastric titration.
-
10.
Effect of inhibition of gastric acid secretion on antropyloroduodenal motor activity and duodenal acid hypersensitivity in functional dyspepsia.
Schwartz, MP, Samsom, M, Van Berge Henegouwen, GP, Smout, AJ
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2001;(12):1921-8
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heightened visceroperception and a decreased duodenal motor response to intraduodenal acid infusion have been reported in functional dyspepsia. AIM: To investigate the effect of treatment with a proton pump inhibitor on sensorimotor impairment in 19 patients with functional dyspepsia. METHODS Patients were assigned double-blind to pantoprazole (n=10) or placebo (n=9) treatment for 2 weeks. Antropyloroduodenal manometry was performed before and after treatment, using a 21-channel catheter, and the responses to intraduodenal infusion of 5 mL of saline and acid were assessed. Nausea, fullness and epigastric pain were scored before and after each infusion. RESULTS Acid induced a modest duodenal motor response and suppression of antral pressure waves, not altered by either treatment. However, acid evoked isolated pyloric pressure waves after pantoprazole treatment (P < 0.02), and not after placebo. Saline induced no motor response. Acid (not saline) induced nausea, both before and after treatment in both groups (all P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis of the seven acid-hypersensitive patients (37%) showed a tendency towards a decrease in nausea in all four pantoprazole-treated patients (P=0.07), in contrast to the three placebo-treated patients (P=1.0). CONCLUSIONS In functional dyspepsia, pantoprazole influenced the acid-induced duodenogastric feedback mechanism, but not the impaired duodenal motor response. Duodenal acid hypersensitivity was decreased to some extent.