1.
Influence of combined treatment with naltrexone and memantine on alcohol drinking behaviors: a phase II randomized crossover trial.
Krishnan-Sarin, S, O'Malley, SS, Franco, N, Cavallo, DA, Tetrault, JM, Shi, J, Gueorguieva, R, Pittman, B, Krystal, JH
Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020;(2):319-326
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Glutamate and opioid systems play important roles in alcohol drinking behaviors. We examined if combined treatment with the NMDA antagonist memantine and the opioid antagonist naltrexone, when compared with naltrexone alone, would have a greater influence on alcohol drinking behaviors. Fifty-six, non-treatment-seeking heavy drinkers, with alcohol dependence and a positive family history (FHP) of alcoholism, participated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, including two 6-8 days treatment periods, separated by a 6-day washout, and 3 alcohol drinking paradigm (ADP) sessions. After the first baseline (BAS) ADP1 session, participants were randomized to receive either naltrexone (NTX; 50 mg/day) + placebo memantine, or NTX (50 mg/day) + memantine (MEM; 20 mg/day), during the first treatment period, following which they completed ADP2. After a 6-day washout, participants were crossed over to the treatment they did not receive during the first treatment period, following which they completed ADP3. During each ADP, participants received a priming drink of alcohol followed by 3 1-hour, self-administration periods during which they had ad-lib access to 12 drinks. Individually, both NTX and NTX + MEM, when compared to BAS ADP1, significantly reduced the number of drinks consumed (p's < 0.001) and craving (p's < 0.001). When comparing NTX + MEM vs. NTX on number of drinks consumed, there was a significant treatment* sequence interaction (p = 0.004). Specifically, when NTX + MEM followed NTX alone, NTX + MEM resulted in a further reduction in drinking (mean: -1.94; 95% CI: -2.6, -0.8, p = 0.0005). However, when NTX alone followed NTX + MEM, NTX alone did not lead to further reduction in drinking (mean: 0.59; 95% CI: -0.67, 1.43, p = 0.47). Similar patterns were observed for alcohol craving; specifically, a significant reduction in craving was observed when NTX + MEM followed NTX alone (p = 0.009), but craving reduction was maintained when NTX + MEM was followed by NTX alone. Neither treatment condition significantly influenced alcohol-induced stimulation or sedation. Memantine (at a dose of 20 mg/day) enhances the efficacy of naltrexone (50 mg/day) in reducing alcohol drinking and craving among FHP drinkers with beneficial effects that appear to carryover after discontinuation of memantine treatment.
2.
Efficacy and safety of memantine in children with autism spectrum disorder: Results from three phase 2 multicenter studies.
Hardan, AY, Hendren, RL, Aman, MG, Robb, A, Melmed, RD, Andersen, KA, Luchini, R, Rahman, R, Ali, S, Jia, XD, et al
Autism : the international journal of research and practice. 2019;(8):2096-2111
Abstract
Three phase 2 trials were conducted to assess the efficacy and long-term safety of weight-based memantine extended release (ER) treatment in children with autism spectrum disorder. MEM-MD-91, a 50-week open-label trial, identified memantine extended-release treatment responders for enrollment into MEM-MD-68, a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal trial. MEM-MD-69 was an open-label extension trial in which participants from MEM-MD-68, MEM-MD-91, and open-label trial MEM-MD-67 were treated ⩽48 weeks with memantine extended release. In MEM-MD-91, 517 (59.6%) participants were confirmed Social Responsiveness Scale responders at week 12; mean Social Responsiveness Scale total raw scores improved two to three times a minimal clinically important difference of 10 points. In MEM-MD-68, there was no difference between memantine and placebo on the primary efficacy parameter, the proportion of patients with a loss of therapeutic response (defined as ⩾10-point increase from baseline in Social Responsiveness Scale total raw score). MEM-MD-69 exploratory analyses revealed mean standard deviation improvement in Social Responsiveness Scale total raw score of 32.4 (26.4) from baseline of the first lead-in study. No new safety concerns were evident. While the a priori-defined efficacy results of the double-blind trial were not achieved, the considerable improvements in mean Social Responsiveness Scale scores from baseline in the open-label trials were presumed to be clinically important.
3.
Crossover trial of gabapentin and memantine as treatment for acquired nystagmus.
Thurtell, MJ, Joshi, AC, Leone, AC, Tomsak, RL, Kosmorsky, GS, Stahl, JS, Leigh, RJ
Annals of neurology. 2010;(5):676-80
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
We conducted a masked, crossover, therapeutic trial of gabapentin (1,200mg/day) versus memantine (40 mg/day) for acquired nystagmus in 10 patients (aged 28-61 years; 7 female; 3 multiple sclerosis [MS]; 6 post-stroke; 1 post-traumatic). Nystagmus was pendular in 6 patients (4 oculopalatal tremor; 2 MS) and jerk upbeat, hemi-seesaw, torsional, or upbeat-diagonal in each of the others. For the group, both drugs reduced median eye speed (p < 0.001), gabapentin by 32.8% and memantine by 27.8%, and improved visual acuity (p < 0.05). Each patient improved with 1 or both drugs. Side effects included unsteadiness with gabapentin and lethargy with memantine. Both drugs should be considered as treatment for acquired forms of nystagmus.
4.
The effects of the glutamate antagonist memantine on brain activation to an auditory perception task.
van Wageningen, H, Jørgensen, HA, Specht, K, Eichele, T, Hugdahl, K
Human brain mapping. 2009;(11):3616-24
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Glutamate is critically involved in the regulation of cognitive functions in humans. There is, however, sparse evidence regarding how blocking glutamate action at the receptor site during a cognitive task affects brain activation. In the current study, the effects of the glutamate antagonist memantine were examined with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Thirty-one healthy adults were scanned twice in a counter-balanced design, either in a no-drug session or after administration of memantine for 21 days. The subjects performed a simple auditory perception task with consonant-vowel stimuli. Group-level spatial independent component analysis (ICA) was used to decompose the data and to extract task-related activations. The focus was on four task-related ICA components with frontotemporal localization. The results showed that glutamate-blockage resulted in a significant enhancement in one component, with no significant effect in the other three components. The enhanced effect of memantine was in the middle temporal gyrus, superior frontal gyrus, and middle frontal gyrus. It is suggested that the results reflect effects of glutamatergic processes primarily through non-N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor pathways. Moreover, the results demonstrate that memantine can be used as a probe which allows for studying the effect of excitatory neurotransmission on neuronal activation.