-
1.
The Results of Pars Plana Vitrectomy in the Treatment of Intraocular Retinoblastoma: A Retrospective Study and Literature Review.
Li, L, He, T, Su, Y, Wu, L, Chen, C
Technology in cancer research & treatment. 2021;:15330338211048634
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) as a treatment for intraocular retinoblastoma (RB) patients. Methods: Twenty-eight RB patients who had PPV were recruited in this retrospective case study, using the digital wide-angle retinal imaging device to record and assess disease condition. Results: The mean value of follow-up time was 79.4 months from diagnosis and 73.1 months from PPV. Up to the end of the follow-up time after PPV, the 5-year survival rate was 96.4%. Ultimately, 35.7% patients underwent enucleation of the eyeball. Among patients with salvaged eyes, 50% had no light perception vision. During the postoperative follow-up time, 14.3% of patients required no further antitumor treatment, and the remaining patients still need to continue to receive systemic or local antitumor treatment, such as chemotherapy, arterial interventional therapy, laser treatment, cryotherapy, and so on. The complication after PPV include cataracts (46.4%), iris adhesion (7.1%), emulsification of the silicone oil (17.9%), band degeneration of the cornea (10.7%), glaucoma (3.6%), and retinal neovascularization (3.6%). Conclusion: According to our observations, we recommend that the utmost care should be taken when considering PPV for the treatment of activated RB. When weighing the risk of tumor recurrence and metastasis, PPV is not suitable for routine treatment. It is necessary to fully grasp the operative indications and strictly observe operation specifications, which includes close postoperative follow-up.
-
2.
Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factors, panretinal photocoagulation and combined treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Fallico, M, Maugeri, A, Lotery, A, Longo, A, Bonfiglio, V, Russo, A, Avitabile, T, Pulvirenti, A, Furino, C, Cennamo, G, et al
Acta ophthalmologica. 2021;(6):e795-e805
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE To conduct a systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) versus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment alone or in combination with PRP, for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). METHODS PubMed, Medline and Embase databases were searched for RCTs comparing PRP versus intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy and/or combined PRP and intravitreal anti-VEGF for PDR. The primary outcome measures were the mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change and the regression of neovascularization. Mean change of central macular thickness (CMT), the subgroup analyses of patients without diabetic macular oedema (DME) and the rate of vitreous haemorrhage and vitrectomy were secondary outcomes. Frequentist NMAs were performed. RESULTS Twelve RCTs were included. For the 12-month mean BCVA change, NMA showed a better visual outcome in both the anti-VEGF group and combined group compared to PRP [anti-VEGF vs PRP, mean difference (MD) = 3.42; standard error (SE) = 1.5; combined vs PRP, MD = 3.92; SE = 1.65], with no difference between combined group and anti-VEGF (MD = -0.50; SE = 1.87). No difference in neovascularization regression was found between PRP and anti-VEGF alone or in combination with PRP, but there was significant inconsistency (p = 0.016). Subgroup analyses in patients without DME yielded no difference for the 12-month visual outcome between the three interventions, but with significant inconsistency (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION This NMA showed limited evidence of comparable efficacy in terms of neovascularization regression between PRP and anti-VEGF therapy alone or in combination with PRP, but better visual outcomes were associated with anti-VEGF use. Intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy could be a valid therapeutic option in association with PRP.
-
3.
Clinical efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept injection versus vitrectomy with panretinal photocoagulation for patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hu, Y, Shen, J, Peng, Y
Medicine. 2021;(14):e25354
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the current literature, it is still controversial whether intravitreal aflibercept injection can provide better vision restoration compared with vitrectomy with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) patients. Given that there is no high-quality meta-analysis or review to incorporate existing evidence, the purpose of this study is to systematically review the level I evidence in the literature to ascertain whether intravitreal aflibercept injection can provide better vision restoration compared with vitrectomy with PRP for PDR patients. METHODS The systematic literature review is structured to adhere to PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses), which include requirements deemed essential for the transparent reporting of results. A systematic search will be performed in Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane Library up to and inclusive of March 19, 2021. The method of data extraction will follow the approach outlined by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The primary outcome is change in best-corrected visual acuity. The secondary outcomes are change in area of neovascularization and change in area of retinal nonperfusion. Where disagreement occurs, this will be resolved through discussion. All outcomes are pooled on random-effect model. A P value of < .05 is considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS The results of our review will be reported strictly following the PRISMA criteria. CONCLUSIONS The hypothesis of the study was that visual acuity recovery would be faster with vitrectomy because the blood is mechanically cleared during surgery. REGISTRATION NUMBER 10.17605/OSF.IO/NCAXW.
-
4.
Comparison of macular buckling and vitrectomy for the treatment of macular schisis and associated macular detachment in high myopia: a randomized clinical trial.
Liu, B, Chen, S, Li, Y, Lian, P, Zhao, X, Yu, X, Li, T, Jin, C, Liang, X, Huang, SS, et al
Acta ophthalmologica. 2020;(3):e266-e272
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of macular buckling and vitrectomy for myopic traction maculopathy showing macular schisis (MS) and associated macular detachment (MD) but without full-thickness macular hole (FTMH). DESIGN Prospective, randomized, parallel, open-label study. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to either buckling or vitrectomy group. Macular buckling and intravitreal C3F8 gas injection were performed in the buckling group. Small gauge vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane peeling (ILMP) and C3F8 gas tamponade were performed in the vitrectomy group. The patients were followed for 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 12 months. RESULTS A total of 85 patients were randomized, 80 eyes were included (41 receiving buckling, 39 received vitrectomy), and 78 patients completed the study. There were less eyes determined as surgical failure and required a second surgery in the buckling group than vitrectomy the group (2.4% versus 18.4%, p = 0.021). After surgery, macular buckling achieved more improvement in BCVA (+21.7 versus +4.5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters, p = 0.002). FTMH development was observed in only 1 (2.4%) eye, after removing of the implant due to recurrent conjunctival erosion, in the buckling group and 10 (26.3%) eyes (seven with-, three without MD) in the vitrectomy group (p < 0.001). More eyes developed cataracts in the vitrectomy group than did in the buckling group (28.9% versus 7.5%, p = 0.014). Macular buckling-associated strabismus (esotropia), binocular diplopia and implant exposure were observed in limited cases. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Macular buckling is superior to vitrectomy with ILM peeling plus gas injection for surgical treatment of MS and associated MD in high myopia.
-
5.
The effect of adjunctive intravitreal conbercept at the end of diabetic vitrectomy for the prevention of post-vitrectomy hemorrhage in patients with severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a prospective, randomized pilot study.
Jiang, T, Gu, J, Zhang, P, Chen, W, Chang, Q
BMC ophthalmology. 2020;(1):43
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the effect of intravitreal conbercept (IVC) injections on the incidence of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage (VH) in eyes undergoing surgery for severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy. METHODS This was a pilot prospective, comparative, and randomized study. Thirty patients, who underwent vitrectomy for severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy, were assigned randomly to either group 1 (intravitreal conbercept [IVC] injection at the end of pars plana vitrectomy) or group 2 (no IVC injection). Postoperative follow-up was performed on the first day, first week, first month, third month, sixth month and first year after surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative VH. Secondary outcomes were the initial time of vitreous clearing (ITVC), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) after surgery. RESULTS A total of 30 eyes, from 30 patients, were included. Fifteen eyes were enrolled in the IVC group and fifteen in the control group. The incidence of early and late postoperative VH was not significantly different between the control and IVC groups. ITVC was shorter in the IVC group than that in the control group, but this was not significant (7.38 ± 10.66 vs 13.23 ± 17.35, P = 0.31). Final BCVA, 1 year after surgery, showed significant improvement compared to baseline in both groups. However, analysis of the BCVA at any postoperative visit after surgery showed no significant differences between the two groups. There were two cases of recurrent VH identified at 3 and 6 months after surgery in each group, requiring a second round of surgery. Foveal thickness was significantly different between the two groups at the 3-month, 6-month and 1-year follow-up visits. CONCLUSIONS In this pilot study, the effect of IVC injection in reducing the incidence of postoperative VH after diabetic vitrectomy at the end of vitrectomy was not shown. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. (Reference Number: ChiCTR1800015751).
-
6.
Role of Vital Dyes in Chromovitrectomy.
Bergamo, VC, Caiado, RR, Maia, A, Magalhães, O, Moraes, NSB, Rodrigues, EB, Farah, ME, Maia, M
Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.). 2020;(1):26-38
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Chromovitrectomy, the intraocular application of dyes to assist visualization of preretinal tissues during vitreoretinal surgery, was introduced to avoid ocular complications related to internal limiting membrane peeling, inadequate removal of the vitreous, and incomplete removal of epiretinal membranes. Since 2000, chromovitrectomy has become a popular approach among vitreoretinal specialists. The first vital dye used in chromovitrectomy, indocyanine green, facilitated identification of the fine and transparent internal limiting membrane. Following indocyanine green, trypan blue was introduced to identify epiretinal membranes, and triamcinolone acetonide stained the vitreous well. Recently, additional natural dyes such as lutein and anthocyanin from the açaí fruit have been proposed for intraocular application during vitrectomy. The main goal of this review was to study the role of vital stains in chromovitrectomy and report the latest findings in the literature.
-
7.
Perioperative anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents treatment in patients undergoing vitrectomy for complicated proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a network meta-analysis.
Wang, DY, Zhao, XY, Zhang, WF, Meng, LH, Chen, YX
Scientific reports. 2020;(1):18880
Abstract
Currently, controversies regarding the optimal time-point of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pretreatment before pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) still exist. To clarify this, we conducted a network meta-analysis, 26 randomized controlled trials including 1806 PDR patients were included. Compared with the sham group, performing anti-VEGF injection at preoperative (Pre-Op) 6 to 14 days could significantly improve post-operative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and decrease the incidence of recurrent vitreous hemorrhage (VH). Meanwhile, it could significantly reduce the duration of surgery. Performing anti-VEGF injection at Pre-Op more than 14 days, 6 to 14 days or 1 to 5 days could significantly reduce the incidence of intra-operative bleeding, while no significant benefit existed at the end of PPV (P > 0.05). No significant difference existed between all those strategies and sham group in reducing the rate of silicone oil tamponade. Based on currently available evidence, performing the anti-VEGF pretreatment at pre-operative 6 to 14 days showed best efficacy in improving post-operative BCVA, reducing the duration of surgery and incidence of recurrent VH, it also achieves satisfactory effect in reducing the incidence of intra-operative bleeding.
-
8.
Effect of Face-Down Positioning vs Support-the-Break Positioning After Macula-Involving Retinal Detachment Repair: The PostRD Randomized Clinical Trial.
Casswell, EJ, Yorston, D, Lee, E, Heeren, TFC, Harris, N, Zvobgo, TM, Tarafdar, S, Xing, W, Bourmpaki, E, Bunce, C, et al
JAMA ophthalmology. 2020;(6):634-642
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
IMPORTANCE A lack of consensus exists with regard to the optimal positioning regimen for patients after macula-involving retinal detachment (RD) repair. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of face-down positioning vs support-the-break positioning on retinal displacement and distortion after macula-involving RD repair. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A prospective 6-month single-masked randomized clinical trial was conducted at a multicenter tertiary referral setting from May 16, 2016, to May 1, 2018. Inclusion criteria were fovea-involving rhegmatogenous RD; central visual loss within 14 days; patients undergoing primary vitrectomy and gas surgery, under local anesthetic; patients able to give written informed consent; and 18 years old and older. Analysis was conducted following a modified intention-to-treat principle, with patients experiencing a redetachment or failure to attach the macula being excluded from analysis. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive face-down positioning or support-the-break positioning for a 24-hour period postoperatively. Positioning compliance was not monitored. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The proportion of patients with retinal displacement on autofluorescence imaging at 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included proportion of patients with displacement at 2 months; amplitude of displacement at 2 and 6 months; corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity; objective Distortion Scores; and quality of life questionnaire scores at 6 months. RESULTS Of the 262 randomized patients, 239 were analyzed (171 male [71.5%]; mean [SD] age, 60.8 [9.8] years). At 6 months, retinal displacement was detected in 42 of 100 (42%) in the face-down positioning group vs 58 of 103 (56%) in the support-the-break positioning group (odds ratio, 1.77; 95%CI, 1.01-3.11; P = .04). The degree of displacement was lower in the face-down group. Groups were similar in corrected visual acuity (face-down, 74 letters vs support-the-break, 75 letters), objective D Chart Distortion Scores (range: 0, no distortion to 41.6, severe distortion; with face-down at 4.5 vs support-the-break at 4.2), and quality of life scores (face-down 89.3 vs support-the-break 89.0) at 2 and 6 months. Retinal redetachment rate was similar in both groups (face-down group, 12.2% and support-the-break group, 13.7%). Retinal folds were less common in the face-down positioning group vs the support-the-break positioning group (5.3% vs 13.5%, respectively; odds ratio, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-7.4; P = .03). Binocular diplopia was more common in the support-the-break group compared with the face-down positioning group (7.6% vs 1.5%, respectively; odds ratio, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.3-24.6; P = .03). Amplitude of displacement was associated with worse visual acuity (r = -0.5; P < .001) and distortion (r = 0.28; P = .008). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, findings suggest that face-down positioning was associated with a reduction in the rate and amplitude of postoperative retinal displacement after macula-involving RD repair and with a reduction in binocular diplopia. No association was found with visual acuity or postoperative distortion. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02748538.
-
9.
Glue-assisted retinopexy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (GuARD): A novel surgical technique for closing retinal breaks.
Tyagi, M, Basu, S
Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2019;(5):677-680
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE This study describes a novel surgical technique of fibrin glue-assisted retinopexy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (GuARD) without oil or gas tamponade after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). METHODS This pilot clinical trial included five eyes of five patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RD). A complete PPV was done in all cases followed by fluid-air exchange, laser photocoagulation around the break/s, and application of 0.1-0.2 mL of fibrin glue. No air, long-acting gas or silicone oil was used subsequently. No specific postoperative positioning was prescribed. The primary outcome measure was efficacy of the procedure defined as successful anatomical retinal reattachment. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and complications. RESULTS The median age of patients was 55 (range: 36-61 years) years and median duration of symptoms was 15 (range: 7-60) days. All eyes were pseudophakic, four eyes had inferior and one eye had total RD. Successful retinal reattachment was achieved in all (100%) cases and was maintained at the end of 3-8 months of follow-up. The median BCVA improved from 20/100 preoperatively to 20/80 at 1-week and 20/50 at 1-month postoperatively. None of the eyes had any postoperative complications such as elevated intraocular pressures or unexpected inflammation. CONCLUSION The findings of this study suggest that GuARD is a promising technique for treatment of rhegmatogenous RD that may allow early visual recovery while avoiding the problems of gas or oil tamponade and obviating the need of postoperative positioning.
-
10.
Adjunctive dexamethasone implant in patients with atopic dermatitis and retinal detachment undergoing vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade: an interventional case series.
Cho, AR, Yoon, YH
BMC ophthalmology. 2019;(1):86
Abstract
BACKGROUND To report the clinical course and outcomes of adjunctive dexamethasone implants in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and retinal detachment (RD) undergoing vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade. METHODS This retrospective, interventional case series included AD patients with RD and various degrees of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) who were scheduled to undergo vitrectomy. Following total vitrectomy and retinopexy, silicone oil tamponade was performed. Finally, an intraocular dexamethasone implant was injected intravitreally. Anatomical and functional outcomes were assessed at 12 months, and extended follow-up data were also collected. RESULTS Seven eyes from six patients (five male, one female) were included. The median age was 29 (range, 20-38) years. Preoperatively, six eyes were pseudophakic, two eyes had a history of previous vitreoretinal surgery, and one had uveitis. Postoperatively, best-corrected visual acuity improved in two eyes, worsened in one, and remained similar in four. Retinal attachment was maintained in all eyes at 12 months. The major complication was an increase in postoperative intraocular pressure in six eyes, requiring either medical or surgical treatment. During the extended follow-up period (15-37 months), retinas remained attached in all eyes and stable visual acuity was maintained in five. CONCLUSIONS Injection of an intraoperative dexamethasone implant to silicone oil-filled eyes appears tolerable and may be beneficial in the surgical management of AD patients with RD and PVR.