0
selected
-
1.
Metabolic Bone Disease of Prematurity: Risk Factors and Associated Short-Term Outcomes.
Avila-Alvarez, A, Urisarri, A, Fuentes-Carballal, J, Mandiá, N, Sucasas-Alonso, A, Couce, ML
Nutrients. 2020;(12)
Abstract
Despite the importance of early recognition of metabolic bone disease (MBD) of prematurity, there is still significant variability in screening practices across institutions. We conducted an observational study of infants born at ≤32 weeks of gestation with a birth weight of ≤1500 g (n = 218) to identify clinical factors associated with biochemical indicators of MBD. Bone mineral status was assessed by measuring alkaline phosphatase and phosphate levels between weeks 3 and 5 of life. Two comparisons were performed after classifying infants as either MBD (cases) or non-MBD (controls), and as either high or low risk for MBD, as determined based on the results of MBD screening. In total, 27 infants (12.3%) were classified as cases and 96 (44%) as high-risk. Compared with controls, MBD infants had a significantly lower gestational age and birth weight, and a longer duration of parenteral nutrition and hospital stay. Respiratory outcomes were significantly poorer in high- versus low-risk infants. Multivariate logistic regression showed that birth weight was the only independent risk factor for MBD (odds ratio [OR]/100 g, 0.811; confidence interval [CI95%], 0.656-0.992; p = 0.045) and that birth weight (OR/100 g, 0.853; CI95%, 0.731-0.991; p = 0.039) and red blood cell transfusion (OR, 2.661; CI95%, 1.308-5.467; p = 0.007) were independent risk factors for high risk of MBD. Our findings provide evidence of risk factors for MBD that could help clinicians to individualize perinatal management. The association of red blood cell transfusion with MBD is a novel finding that may be related to iron overload and that merits further study.
-
2.
Fracture Prevention with Zoledronate in Older Women with Osteopenia.
Reid, IR, Horne, AM, Mihov, B, Stewart, A, Garratt, E, Wong, S, Wiessing, KR, Bolland, MJ, Bastin, S, Gamble, GD
The New England journal of medicine. 2018;(25):2407-2416
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bisphosphonates prevent fractures in patients with osteoporosis, but their efficacy in women with osteopenia is unknown. Most fractures in postmenopausal women occur in those with osteopenia, so therapies that are effective in women with osteopenia are needed. METHODS We conducted a 6-year, double-blind trial involving 2000 women with osteopenia (defined by a T score of -1.0 to -2.5 at either the total hip or the femoral neck on either side) who were 65 years of age or older. Participants were randomly assigned to receive four infusions of either zoledronate at a dose of 5 mg (zoledronate group) or normal saline (placebo group) at 18-month intervals. A dietary calcium intake of 1 g per day was advised, but calcium supplements were not provided. Participants who were not already taking vitamin D supplements received cholecalciferol before the trial began (a single dose of 2.5 mg) and during the trial (1.25 mg per month). The primary end point was the time to first occurrence of a nonvertebral or vertebral fragility fracture. RESULTS At baseline, the mean (±SD) age was 71±5 years, the T score at the femoral neck was -1.6±0.5, and the median 10-year risk of hip fracture was 2.3%. A fragility fracture occurred in 190 women in the placebo group and in 122 women in the zoledronate group (hazard ratio with zoledronate, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.50 to 0.79; P<0.001). The number of women that would need to be treated to prevent the occurrence of a fracture in 1 woman was 15. As compared with the placebo group, women who received zoledronate had a lower risk of nonvertebral fragility fractures (hazard ratio, 0.66; P=0.001), symptomatic fractures (hazard ratio, 0.73; P=0.003), vertebral fractures (odds ratio, 0.45; P=0.002), and height loss (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The risk of nonvertebral or vertebral fragility fractures was significantly lower in women with osteopenia who received zoledronate than in women who received placebo. (Funded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12609000593235 .).
-
3.
Risk of Fracture in Women with Sarcopenia, Low Bone Mass, or Both.
Harris, R, Chang, Y, Beavers, K, Laddu-Patel, D, Bea, J, Johnson, K, LeBoff, M, Womack, C, Wallace, R, Li, W, et al
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2017;(12):2673-2678
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine whether women with sarcopenia and low bone mineral density (BMD) are at greater risk of clinical fractures than those with sarcopenia or low BMD alone. DESIGN Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Observational and Clinical trials. SETTING Three U.S. clinical centers (Pittsburgh, PA; Birmingham, AL; Phoenix/Tucson, AZ). PARTICIPANTS Women (mean age 63.3 ± 0.07) with BMD measurements (N = 10,937). MEASUREMENTS Sarcopenia was defined as appendicular lean mass values corrected for height and fat mass. Low BMD was defined as a femoral neck T-score less than -1.0 based on the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey reference database for white women. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We followed women for incident fractures over a median of 15.9 years. RESULTS Participants were classified into mutually exclusive groups based on BMD and sarcopenia status: normal BMD and no sarcopenia (n = 3,857, 35%), sarcopenia alone (n = 774, 7%), low BMD alone (n = 4,907, 45%), and low BMD and sarcopenia (n = 1,399, 13%). Women with low BMD, with (HR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.44-2.06) or without sarcopenia (HR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.37-1.83), had greater risk of fracture than women with normal BMD; the difference remained statistically significant after adjustment for important covariates. Women with low BMD, with (HR = 2.78, 95% CI = 1.78-4.30 and without (HR = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.63-3.59) sarcopenia had higher risk of hip fractures. Women with sarcopenia alone had similar HRs to women with normal BMD. CONCLUSION Compared to women with normal BMD.
-
4.
An open, prospective, non-randomized, controlled, multicentre study to evaluate the clinical outcome of implant treatment in women over 60 years of age with osteoporosis/osteopenia: 1-year results.
Temmerman, A, Rasmusson, L, Kübler, A, Thor, A, Quirynen, M
Clinical oral implants research. 2017;(1):95-102
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteoporosis has been called a potential risk factor for bone healing around implants. AIM: The aim of this multicentre study was to verify the clinical performance of fluoridated implants in the maxilla of subjects with diagnosed systemic primary osteoporosis/osteopenia. MATERIAL AND METHODS Postmenopausal women in need of 2-8 splinted implants in maxilla underwent bone mineral density measurements in the hip and spine, using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. Based on their T-scores, they were divided into two study groups: Group O (osteoporosis/osteopenia group) subjects had a T-score ≤-2, Group C (control group) had a T-score of ≥-1, and subjects with a T-score <-1 but >-2 were excluded. Implants were placed with a two-stage procedure and loaded 4-8 weeks after abutment surgery. At 6 months and 1 year after functional loading, clinical parameters (including peri-apical radiographs) were assessed. RESULTS One hundred and forty-eight implants were placed in 48 subjects (mean age: 67 years (range [59-83]). Sixty-three implants were placed in 20 osteoporosis subjects (Group O, mean age: 69 years; range [59-83]), and 85 were placed in control subjects (Group C, mean age: 65 years; range [60-74]). The cumulative survival rate, on an implant level, was 99.3% (Group O: 98.4%; Group C: 100.0%). The cumulative survival rate, on a subject level, was 97.9% (Group O: 94.7%; Group C: 100.0%). Marginal bone level (MBL) alterations from functional loading to the 1-year follow-up visit were measured on an implant level and a subject level. The overall MBL alteration on an implant level was -0.01 ± 0.51 mm (Group O: -0.11 ± 0.49 mm; Group C: 0.05 ± 0.52 mm). The overall MBL alteration on a subject level was -0.04 ± 0.27 mm (Group O: -0.17 ± 0.30 mm; Group C: 0.04 ± 0.23 mm). CONCLUSION Within the limitations of this prospective, non-randomized, controlled, multicentre study, it can be concluded that oral implant therapy in patients suffering from osteoporosis/osteopenia is a reliable treatment option with comparable integration rates as in healthy patients. Long-term follow of the study groups is necessary to compare marginal bone alterations and treatment outcomes.
-
5.
Effect of low-dose alendronate treatment on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in Chinese postmenopausal women with osteopenia and osteoporosis.
Li, M, Zhang, ZL, Liao, EY, Chen, DC, Liu, J, Tao, TZ, Wu, W, Xia, WB, Lu, YJ, Sheng, ZF, et al
Menopause (New York, N.Y.). 2013;(1):72-8
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of low-dose alendronate (ALN) treatment on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers in Chinese postmenopausal women with osteopenia and osteoporosis. METHODS This study was a large-sample, randomized, open-label, prospective, multicenter, clinical trial with a 12-month follow-up. A total of 639 postmenopausal women (aged 62.2 ± 7.0 y) with osteopenia or osteoporosis were randomized into two groups: low-dose ALN (70 mg every two weeks) and standard-dose ALN (70 mg weekly). All patients were also supplemented with calcium (600 mg) and vitamin D3 (125 IU) daily. BMD (measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; Hologic and Lunar) and levels of serum bone turnover markers (bone resorption marker, carboxy-telopeptide of type I collagen; bone formation marker, alkaline phosphatase) were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment. BMD and bone turnover markers were compared between the baseline and the end of treatment, and the changes in BMD and bone turnover markers were also compared between the low-dose ALN group and the standard-dose ALN group. RESULTS No significant differences in age, years since menopause, body mass index, BMD, 25-hydroxy vitamin D level, and serum biochemical markers were found at baseline between the two dose groups. A total of 558 (87.3%) and 540 (84.5%) women completed the treatment at the 6th and 12th months, respectively. After the 12-month treatment, lumbar spine and hip BMD increased and serum bone turnover markers decreased significantly in both of the treatment groups (P < 0.01), and no differences in percentage changes in BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and hip were found between the low-dose group (5.60%, 3.87%, and 3.28%, respectively) and the standard-dose group (5.07%, 2.93%, and 3.80%, respectively; P > 0.05). However, levels of serum alkaline phosphatase and carboxy-telopeptide of type I collagen in the standard-dose group decreased moderately compared with those in the low-dose group (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01). The women tolerated the two doses of ALN quite well. Adverse effects were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with low-dose ALN (70 mg every two weeks) in women with postmenopausal osteopenia or osteoporosis effectively increases lumbar spine and hip BMD, similar to treatment with standard-dose ALN. Low-dose ALN may be a cost-effective and safe protocol for treating osteopenia or osteoporosis in Chinese women.