1.
Primary versus secondary cardiorenal prevention in type 2 diabetes: Which newer anti-hyperglycaemic drug matters?
Giugliano, D, Ceriello, A, De Nicola, L, Perrone-Filardi, P, Cosentino, F, Esposito, K
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2020;(2):149-157
Abstract
We are observing a resurgence of major diabetic vascular complications after a period of dramatic decrease during the period 1990 to 2010. The classical division of cardiovascular prevention into primary (with an event) and secondary (without an event) is largely used to describe cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes (T2D); however, there is evidence that the cardiovascular risk in diabetes may range from highest in patients who experienced a previous cardiovascular event to mild in patients with the main risk factors at target. Herein, we present details of the 14 cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) published to date, including the total population investigated, and their separation into primary (T2D + multiple risk factors) and secondary prevention (T2D + established cardiovascular disease [CVD]) populations as detailed within the trials. We also summarize evidence for the effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) and sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) versus placebo on the risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE), heart failure (HF) and diabetic kidney disease (DKD). In primary prevention, SGLT-2i reduce both the risk of hospitalization for HF and progression of DKD; in secondary prevention, SGLT-2i are effective on the three endpoints, DPP-4i are neutral, while GLP1-RA show mixed results.
2.
Defective intracellular antioxidant enzyme production in type 1 diabetic patients with nephropathy.
Ceriello, A, Morocutti, A, Mercuri, F, Quagliaro, L, Moro, M, Damante, G, Viberti, GC
Diabetes. 2000;(12):2170-7
Abstract
There is an individual susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy, and oxidative stress is believed to play an important role in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications. Active oxygen species induce antioxidant enzyme expression in tissues, an effect considered to be a defensive mechanism. To test whether altered intracellular antioxidant enzyme production might explain the predisposition to diabetic nephropathy, we studied the effect of long-term (12 weeks) exposure to normal (5 mmol/l) or high (22 mmol/l) glucose concentrations on fibroblast antioxidant enzyme gene expression and protein activity in type 1 diabetic patients with and without nephropathy, nondiabetic nephropathic patients, and nondiabetic control subjects. Under conditions of normal glucose concentration in the culture media, CuZnSuperoxide-dismutase, MnSuperoxide-dismutase, catalase, and glutathione-peroxidase activity and mRNA expression were not different among the four groups. Under high-glucose conditions, CuZnSuperoxide-dismutase mRNA and activity increased similarly in all groups (P < 0.001 vs. basal), whereas MnSuperoxide-dismutase did not change. In contrast, catalase mRNA and activity as well as glutathione-peroxidase mRNA and activity increased in fibroblasts from type 1 diabetic patients without nephropathy (P < 0.001), in fibroblasts from nondiabetic nephropathic patients (P < 0.001), and in fibroblasts from nondiabetic control subjects (P < 0.001), but not in fibroblasts from type 1 diabetic patients with nephropathy. Exposure to high glucose concentrations significantly increased lipid peroxidation in cells, higher levels being found in cells from diabetic patients with nephropathy (P < 0.001). These data, while confirming that exposure to high glucose concentrations induces an antioxidant defense in skin fibroblasts from normal subjects, demonstrate a failure of this defensive mechanism in cells from type 1 diabetic patients with nephropathy, whereas skin fibroblasts from diabetic patients without complications or from nondiabetic nephropathic patients have an intact antioxidant response to glucose-induced oxidative stress.