1.
Twelve-month angiographic and clinical outcomes of the XINSORB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold and a metallic stent in patients with coronary artery disease.
Wu, Y, Shen, L, Yin, J, Chen, J, Qian, J, Ge, L, Ge, J, ,
International journal of cardiology. 2019;:61-66
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies showed bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) increased risks of late target lesion failure (TLF) and thrombosis. XINSORB scaffold is a poly-L-lactic acid based BRS. METHODS The study included randomization and registry parts. Eligible patients with one or two de novo lesions were randomly 1:1 assigned to XINSORB scaffold and sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in randomization part. These patients were clinically and angiographically assessed. In registry part, patients were treated with XINSORB scaffold only and were clinically assessed. The primary endpoint was in-segment late luminal loss (LLL) at 12-month in randomization part. The secondary endpoint was 12-month TLF in all XINSORB-treated patients. RESULTS Total 395 and 798 patients were enrolled in randomization and registry part, respectively. Device success was 98.0% (1069/1091) in all XINSORB-treated and 100% (221/221) in SES-treated lesions. The primary endpoint of in-segment LLL at 12-month was 0.19 ± 0.32 mm in XINSORB and 0.31 ± 0.41 mm in SES (P = 0.003), which met the noninferior margin of 0.195 mm (95% CI: -0.20, -0.04, P ≪ 0.0001). No difference was found in TLF between two devices. In all XINSORB-treated patients, 12-month TLF was 0.8% (8/998), which also met the noninferior margin of 9.0% (95% CI: 0.3%, 1.4%, P ≪ 0.0001). Only one device thrombosis was recorded in all XINSORB-treated patients while none in SES. CONCLUSIONS In the multicenter clinical trial, XINSORB BRS was noninferior to sirolimus-eluting stent for the primary endpoint of in-segment LLL at 12-month in patients with simple and moderate complex de novo coronary lesions. TLF at 12-month was low and comparable.
2.
First report of a novel abluminal groove filled biodegradable polymer rapamycin-eluting stent in de novo coronary artery disease: results of the first in man FIREHAWK trial.
Qian, J, Xu, B, Lansky, AJ, Yang, YJ, Qiao, SB, Wu, YJ, Chen, J, Hu, FH, Yang, WX, Mintz, GS, et al
Chinese medical journal. 2012;(6):970-6
Abstract
BACKGROUND Durable polymers used for first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) potentially contribute to persistent inflammation and late DES thrombosis. We report the first in human experience with the rapamycin-eluting biodegradable polymer coated cobalt-chromium FIREHAWK stent with abluminal groove. METHODS A total of 21 patients with stable or unstable angina, or prior myocardial infarction, with single de novo native coronary stenoses < 30 mm in length in vessel sizes ranging from 2.25 to 4.0 mm were enrolled. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (Q and non-Q), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. Secondary endpoints include device, lesion, and clinical success rates, 4-month in-stent late lumen loss by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), proportion of uncovered or malapposed stent struts by optical coherence tomograpphy (OCT) at 4 months, and MACE at 4, 12, 24 and 36-month follow-up. RESULTS Device success was 95.7%, lesion and clinical success was 100.0%. There were no MACE events at 30 days. One patient died of non-cardiac hemorrhagic stroke 5 days after index procedure. At 4 months, in-stent late loss was (0.13 ± 0.18) mm, and complete strut coverage was 96.2% by OCT with 0.1% strut malapposition. At 4-month follow-up there was no additional MACE events, and a single target vessel (non-target lesion) revascularization. CONCLUSIONS The FIREHAWK abluminal groove biodegradable polymer rapamycin-eluting stent demonstrated feasibility, safety and efficacy in this first in human experience. OCT findings indicated excellent stent strut coverage 4 months after implantation. Larger studies are required to confirm whether the early FIREHAWK stent results translate into longer term restenosis and thrombosis benefits.
3.
Observation of efficacy and safety of converting the calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus in renal transplant recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy.
Chen, J, Li, L, Wen, J, Tang, Z, Ji, S, Sha, G, Cheng, Z, Sun, Q, Cheng, D, Liu, Z
Transplantation proceedings. 2008;(5):1411-5
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of converting from a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to sirolimus among renal transplant recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). METHODS In 16 patients with CAN, substituted sirolimus for CsA or FK506 and observed the incidence of acute rejection and changes in serum creatinine, triglycerides, cholesterol, blood uric acid, and peripheral blood leukocyte/platelet counts within 12 months. All recipients underwent an allograft biopsy before conversion. The targeted sirolimus level was 4-8 ug/L. RESULTS After conversion to sirolimus, the creatinine level of 7 cases decreased and the efficacy rate was (43.8%). No acute rejection occurred during the follow-up. The cases with hypercholesteremia increased from 3 to 7 after conversion; hypertriglyceridemia increased from 3 to 5; leukopenia occurred in 2; subnormal platelet counts increased from 2 to 3; and hyperuricemia increased from 6 to 7. Meanwhile, the average level of peripheral blood leukocytes obviously decreased in the first month, the average peripheral blood cholesterol increased over 12 months, but the average content of peripheral blood platelets, triglyceride and blood uric acid failed to display as statistic difference. Eight patients showed C4d deposition in peritubular capillary in graft tissue before conversion, 7 cases of whom showed no improvement in renal function. In 6 cases there was no C4d deposition in peritubular capillary in graft tissue. Only 2 of 6 cases showed no improvement in renal function. There were 6 patients whose creatinine level was <2.48 mg/dL before conversion, and renal function in 5 of them improved in a year after conversion. In contrast, among 10 patients whose blood creatinine level was >2.48 mg/dL, only 2 cases improved. CONCLUSION It is safe for patients with CAN to use substitute sirolimus for CNI; the incidence of acute rejection did not increase. In this study, 43.8% of patients showed improved renal function. The main adverse reactions after conversion to sirolimus were hypercholesteremia and decreased peripheral blood leukocytes. The serum creatinine level and the deposition of C4d in peritubular capillary were important factors influencing therapeutic efficacy.