1.
Effect of proanthocyanidins on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Ren, J, An, J, Chen, M, Yang, H, Ma, Y
Pharmacological research. 2021;:105329
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypertension is a common chronic disease that can lead to serious health problems. Previous studies have not drawn a consistent conclusion about the effect of proanthocyanidins (PCs) on blood pressure (BP). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of PCs supplementation on blood pressure (BP). METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed in 6 databases (Pubmed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase and Google Scholar) to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the BP-lowering effect of PCs. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the potential heterogeneity. Meta-regression analysis was used to evaluate dose effects of PCs on BP. RESULTS A total of 6 studies comprising 376 subjects were included in our meta-analysis to estimate the pooled effect size. This meta-analysis suggested that PCs supplementation could significantly reduce systolic blood pressure (SBP) (WMD: -4.598 mmHg; 95 % CI: -8.037, -1.159; I2 = 33.7 %; p = 0.009), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (WMD: -2.750 mmHg; 95 % CI: -5.087, -0.412; I2 = 0.0 %; p = 0.021) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) (WMD: -3.366 mmHg; 95 % CI: -6.719, -0.041 mmHg; I2 = 0.0 %; p = 0.049), but had no significant effect on pulse pressure (PP) (WMD: -2.131 mmHg; 95 % CI: -6.292, 2.030; I2 = 0.0 %; p = 0.315). When the studies were stratified according to the duration of the study, there was a significant reduction on SBP in the subset of the trials with <12 weeks of duration. On the contrary, there was a significant reduction on DBP in the subset of the trials with ≥12 weeks of duration. The Subgroup analysis by BMI indicated that a significant reduction on SBP for people with a higher BMI (BMI ≥ 25) and a significant reduction on DBP for people with a lower BMI (BMI < 25). Additional subgroup analysis revealed low-dose-PCs (<245 mg/day) could significantly reduce SBP, DBP and MAP. The meta-regression analyses did not indicate the dose effects of PCs on SBP, DBP, PP and MAP. CONCLUSION Based on the current findings, PCs supplementation may be a useful treatment of hypertensive patients as well as a preventive measure in the prehypertensive and healthy subjects. However, further investigation is needed to confirm these results.
2.
Antihypertensive therapy and regression of coronary artery disease: insights from the Comparison of Amlodipine versus Enalapril to Limit Occurrences of Thrombosis (CAMELOT) and Norvasc for Regression of Manifest Atherosclerotic Lesions by Intravascular Sonographic Evaluation (NORMALISE) trials.
Brener, SJ, Ivanc, TB, Poliszczuk, R, Chen, M, Tuzcu, EM, Hu, T, Frid, DJ, Nissen, SE
American heart journal. 2006;(6):1059-63
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), therapies designed to prevent clinical events are not always associated with significant reduction in coronary obstruction, as measured by quantitative coronary angiography. We set out to explore the relationship between quantitative coronary angiography parameters, baseline characteristics, and clinical events in a large trial of CAD regression with antihypertensive agents. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients randomized to amlodipine, enalapril, or placebo in the CAMELOT trial were followed for 24 months for major ischemic events. Among 431 patients participating in the angiographic and intravascular ultrasound substudy NORMALISE, 298 (99 amlodipine, 96 enalapril, and 103 placebo) had complete angiographic and intravascular ultrasound data. The patients did not differ significantly with respect to baseline characteristics (except for diabetes) or extent of CAD. After 24 months, the change in minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was -0.02 +/- 0.13 for amlodipine, -0.03 +/- 0.12 for enalapril, and -0.03 +/- 0.17 mm for placebo (P = .40). Major ischemic events occurred in 20.2%, 24%, and 25.2%, respectively (P = .68). There was no significant correlation between change in MLD and age, sex, statin therapy, or systolic blood pressure at baseline. The change in MLD did not differ in patients with and without cardiovascular events, regardless of treatment assignment (P = .54). Only the extent of CAD was independently predictive of ischemic events. CONCLUSION As compared to placebo, amlodipine treatment resulted in fewer ischemic events after 24 months of therapy, but the clinical benefit was not associated with a commensurate improvement in arterial lumen dimensions.