-
1.
Reduced Hypoglycemia Risk in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Switched to/Initiating Insulin Glargine 300 vs 100 U/ml: A European Real-World Study.
Escalada, J, Bonnet, F, Wu, J, Bonnemaire, M, Gupta, S, Cambron-Mellott, JM, Nicholls, C, Müller-Wieland, D
Advances in therapy. 2020;(9):3863-3877
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Randomized controlled trials and real-world data from the USA have shown similar glycemic control with insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) and insulin glargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100) and reduced hypoglycemia risk with Gla-300. This real-world study describes the efficacy and safety of Gla-300 and Gla-100 in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in France, Spain, and Germany. METHODS This retrospective chart review analysis used anonymized data for adults with T2D switching basal insulin analog (BIA) therapy to Gla-300 or Gla-100, or insulin-naïve patients initiating Gla-300 or Gla-100. Outcomes included change from baseline to 6-month follow-up in glycated hemoglobin A1c (A1C), total and severe hypoglycemia incidences and events, insulin dose, and reasons for BIA choice. RESULTS Six hundred sixty-five physicians (33.8% Spain, 31.7% France, 34.4% Germany) provided chart data for patients switching to Gla-300 (n = 679) or Gla-100 (n = 429) or initiating Gla-300 (n = 719) or Gla-100 (n = 711). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, A1C reductions from baseline were similar for patients switching to Gla-300 or Gla-100 (- 0.87% vs. - 0.93%; p = 0.326) while those switched to Gla-300 vs. Gla-100 had a significantly greater mean reduction in hypoglycemic events (- 1.29 vs. - 0.81 events during 6 months; p = 0.012). Mean insulin doses after titration were 0.43 ± 0.36 and 0.40 ± 0.28 U/kg in Gla-300 and Gla-100 switchers, respectively. Factors that significantly influenced BIA choice included a lower risk of hypoglycemia (for Gla-300) and physician familiarity (for Gla-100). Outcomes for insulin-naïve patients were broadly similar to those of switchers. CONCLUSIONS In this real-world European study, patients with T2D who switched therapy to Gla-300 or Gla-100 had improved glycemic control and reduced hypoglycemia at 6 months, with significant hypoglycemia advantages with Gla-300.
-
2.
Neutrophil subsets and their gene signature associate with vascular inflammation and coronary atherosclerosis in lupus.
Carlucci, PM, Purmalek, MM, Dey, AK, Temesgen-Oyelakin, Y, Sakhardande, S, Joshi, AA, Lerman, JB, Fike, A, Davis, M, Chung, JH, et al
JCI insight. 2018;(8)
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with enhanced risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease not explained by Framingham risk score (FRS). Immune dysregulation associated to a distinct subset of lupus proinflammatory neutrophils (low density granulocytes; LDGs) may play key roles in conferring enhanced CV risk. This study assessed if lupus LDGs are associated with in vivo vascular dysfunction and inflammation and coronary plaque. METHODS SLE subjects and healthy controls underwent multimodal phenotyping of vascular disease by quantifying vascular inflammation (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT [18F-FDG-PET/CT]), arterial dysfunction (EndoPAT and cardio-ankle vascular index), and coronary plaque burden (coronary CT angiography). LDGs were quantified by flow cytometry. Cholesterol efflux capacity was measured in high-density lipoprotein-exposed (HDL-exposed) radioactively labeled cell lines. Whole blood RNA sequencing was performed to assess associations between transcriptomic profiles and vascular phenotype. RESULTS Vascular inflammation, arterial stiffness, and noncalcified plaque burden (NCB) were increased in SLE compared with controls even after adjustment for traditional risk factors. In SLE, NCB directly associated with LDGs and associated negatively with cholesterol efflux capacity in fully adjusted models. A neutrophil gene signature reflective of the most upregulated genes in lupus LDGs associated with vascular inflammation and NCB. CONCLUSION Individuals with SLE demonstrate vascular inflammation, arterial dysfunction, and NCB, which may explain the higher reported risk for acute coronary syndromes. The association of LDGs and neutrophil genes with vascular disease supports the hypothesis that distinct neutrophil subsets contribute to vascular damage and unstable coronary plaque in SLE. Results also support previous observations that neutrophils may disrupt HDL function and thereby promote atherogenesis. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00001372FUNDING. Intramural Research Program NIAMS/NIH (ZIA AR041199) and Lupus Research Institute.
-
3.
Intravenous iron vs blood for acute post-partum anaemia (IIBAPPA): a prospective randomised trial.
Chua, S, Gupta, S, Curnow, J, Gidaszewski, B, Khajehei, M, Diplock, H
BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2017;(1):424
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute post-partum anaemia can be associated with significant morbidity including a predisposition for postnatal depression. Lack of clear practice guidelines means a number of women are treated with multiple blood transfusions. Intravenous iron has the potential to limit the need for multiple blood transfusions but its role in the post-partum setting is unclear. METHODS/DESIGN IIBAPPA is a multi-centre randomised non-inferiority trial. Women with a primary post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) >1000 mL and resultant haemoglobin (Hb) 5.5-8.0 g/dL after resuscitation with ongoing symptomatic anaemia who are otherwise stable (no active bleeding) are eligible to participate. Patients with sepsis or conditions necessitating rapid Hb restoration are excluded. Eligible participants are randomised to receive a blood transfusion or a single dose of intravenous iron polymaltose calculated using the Ganzoni formula. Primary outcome measures include Hb, Ferritin and C-Reactive Protein levels on Day 7. Secondary outcomes evaluate (i) Hb, Ferritin and CRP levels on Day 14, 28, (ii) anaemia symptoms on Day 0, 7, 14 and 28 using structured health related quality of life questionnaires, (iii) treatment safety by assessing adverse reactions and infection endpoints and (iv) the quantitative impact of anaemia on breast feeding quality using a hospital designed questionnaire. DISCUSSION If equivalence in Hb and ferritin levels, symptom scores and safety endpoints is demonstrated, intravenous iron may become the preferred treatment for women with acute post-partum anaemia to minimise transfusion reactions and costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12615001370594 on 16th December, 2015 (prospective approval).
-
4.
Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer in individuals with previous colorectal neoplasia: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Dulai, PS, Singh, S, Marquez, E, Khera, R, Prokop, LJ, Limburg, PJ, Gupta, S, Murad, MH
BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2016;:i6188
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of candidate agents (low and high dose aspirin, non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), calcium, vitamin D, folic acid, alone or in combination) for prevention of advanced metachronous neoplasia (that is, occurring at different times after resection of initial neoplasia) in individuals with previous colorectal neoplasia, through a systematic review and network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, Web of Science, from inception to 15 October 2015; clinical trial registries. STUDY SELECTION Randomized controlled trials in adults with previous colorectal neoplasia, treated with candidate chemoprevention agents, and compared with placebo or another candidate agent. Primary efficacy outcome was risk of advanced metachronous neoplasia; safety outcome was serious adverse events. DATA EXTRACTION Two investigators identified studies and abstracted data. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed and relative ranking of agents was assessed with surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities (ranging from 1, indicating that the treatment has a high likelihood to be best, to 0, indicating the treatment has a high likelihood to be worst). Quality of evidence was appraised with GRADE criteria. RESULTS 15 randomized controlled trials (12 234 patients) comparing 10 different strategies were included. Compared with placebo, non-aspirin NSAIDs were ranked best for preventing advanced metachronous neoplasia (odds ratio 0.37, 95% credible interval 0.24 to 0.53; SUCRA=0.98; high quality evidence), followed by low-dose aspirin (0.71, 0.41 to 1.23; SUCRA=0.67; low quality evidence). Low dose aspirin, however, was ranked the safest among chemoprevention agents (0.78, 0.43 to 1.38; SUCRA=0.84), whereas non-aspirin NSAIDs (1.23, 0.95 to 1.64; SUCRA=0.26) were ranked low for safety. High dose aspirin was comparable with low dose aspirin in efficacy (1.12, 0.59 to 2.10; SUCRA=0.58) but had an inferior safety profile (SUCRA=0.51). Efficacy of agents for reducing metachronous colorectal cancer could not be estimated. CONCLUSIONS Among individuals with previous colorectal neoplasia, non-aspirin NSAIDs are the most effective agents for the prevention of advanced metachronous neoplasia, whereas low dose aspirin has the most favorable risk:benefit profile. REGISTRATION PROSPERO (CRD42015029598).
-
5.
Differences in Weight Loss Between Persons on Standard Balanced vs Nutrigenetic Diets in a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Frankwich, KA, Egnatios, J, Kenyon, ML, Rutledge, TR, Liao, PS, Gupta, S, Herbst, KL, Zarrinpar, A
Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2015;(9):1625-1632.e1
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Many companies provide genetic tests for obesity-related polymorphisms (nutrigenetics) and make dietary recommendations for weight loss that are based on the results. We performed a randomized controlled trial to determine whether more participants who followed a nutrigenetic-guided diet lost ≥5% of their body weight than participants on a standard balanced diet for 8 and 24 weeks. METHODS We performed a prospective study of 51 obese or overweight U.S. veterans on an established weight management program at the Veterans Administration San Diego Healthcare System (the MOVE! program). Participants were randomly assigned to groups placed on a nutrigenetic-guided diet (balanced, low-carbohydrate, low-fat, or Mediterranean; n = 30) or a standard balanced diet (n = 21). Nutrigenetic diets were selected on the basis of results from the Pathway FIT test. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the percentage of participants on the balanced diet vs the nutrigenetic-guided diet who lost 5% of their body weight at 8 weeks (35.0% ± 20.9% vs 26.9% ± 17.1%, respectively; P = .28) or at 24 weeks. Both groups had difficulty adhering to the diets. However, adherence to the nutrigenetic-guided diet correlated with weight loss (r = 0.74; P = 4.0 × 10(-5)), but not adherence to standard therapy (r = 0.34; P = .23). Participants who had low-risk polymorphisms for obesity lost more weight than all other participants at 8 weeks (5.0% vs 2.9%, respectively; P = .02) and had significantly greater reductions in body mass index (6.4% vs 3.6%, respectively; P = .03) and waist circumference (6.5% vs 2.6%, respectively; P = .02) at 24 weeks. CONCLUSIONS In a prospective study, a nutrigenetic-based diet did not increase weight loss compared with a standard balanced diet. However, genetic features can identify individuals most likely to benefit from a balanced diet weight loss strategy; these findings require further investigation. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01859403.
-
6.
Comparative effectiveness of a complex Ayurvedic treatment and conventional standard care in osteoarthritis of the knee--study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Witt, CM, Michalsen, A, Roll, S, Morandi, A, Gupta, S, Rosenberg, M, Kronpass, L, Stapelfeldt, E, Hissar, S, Müller, M, et al
Trials. 2013;:149
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditional Indian Ayurvedic medicine uses complex treatment approaches, including manual therapies, lifestyle and nutritional advice, dietary supplements, medication, yoga, and purification techniques. Ayurvedic strategies are often used to treat osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee; however, no systematic data are available on their effectiveness in comparison with standard care. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of complex Ayurvedic treatment in comparison with conventional methods of treating OA symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis. METHODS AND DESIGN In a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, 150 patients between 40 and 70 years, diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the knee, following American College of Rheumatology criteria and an average pain intensity of ≥40 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale in the affected knee at baseline will be randomized into two groups. In the Ayurveda group, treatment will include tailored combinations of manual treatments, massages, dietary and lifestyle advice, consideration of selected foods, nutritional supplements, yoga posture advice, and knee massage. Patients in the conventional group will receive self-care advice, pain medication, weight-loss advice (if overweight), and physiotherapy following current international guidelines. Both groups will receive 15 treatment sessions over 12 weeks. Outcomes will be evaluated after 6 and 12 weeks and 6 and 12 months. The primary endpoint is a change in the score on the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) after 12 weeks. Secondary outcome measurements will use WOMAC subscales, a pain disability index, a visual analog scale for pain and sleep quality, a pain experience scale, a quality-of-life index, a profile of mood states, and Likert scales for patient satisfaction, patient diaries, and safety. Using an adapted PRECIS scale, the trial was identified as lying mainly in the middle of the efficacy-effectiveness continuum. DISCUSSION This trial is the first to compare the effectiveness of a complex Ayurvedic intervention with a complex conventional intervention in a Western medical setting in patients with knee osteoarthritis. During the trial design, aspects of efficacy and effectiveness were discussed. The resulting design is a compromise between rigor and pragmatism. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01225133.
-
7.
Sentinel node biopsy versus low axillary sampling in women with clinically node negative operable breast cancer.
Parmar, V, Hawaldar, R, Nair, NS, Shet, T, Vanmali, V, Desai, S, Gupta, S, Rangrajan, V, Mittra, I, Badwe, RA
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2013;(6):1081-6
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) was initially conceived as excision of the first station axillary lymph node(s) (LN) identified by radioactive and/or blue dye uptake. The definition was subsequently enlarged to also include palpable lymph nodes in the vicinity of sentinel node(s) (SN). We reasoned that the excision of this combination of nodes might be best achieved by sampling the lower axilla. METHODS Each patient underwent low axillary sampling (LAS) and identification of SN in the excised specimen followed by complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). LAS was defined as excision of all fibrofatty tissue overlying the second digitation of serratus anterior below the intercostobrachial nerve and was carried out following a pre-operative injection of radioactive colloid and an intra-operative injection of blue dye. Blue and/or hot nodes (B&/HN) in the dissected tissue and remaining axilla, along with any palpable nodes within the sampled tissue, were defined as SN. The primary endpoint of the study was to compare false negative rates (FNR) of SN with that of LAS in predicting axillary LN status (NCT00128362). FINDINGS The study was performed between March 2004 and December 2011 in 478 women with clinically node negative axilla. On histopathological evaluation the median tumor size was 2.5 cm and axillary nodal metastases were found in 34.1% of patients. The FNR of SNB (12.7%, 95% CI 8.1-19.4) and LAS (10.5%, 95% CI 6.6-16.2) were not significantly different (p = 0.56). The FNR of B&/HN alone, without palpable nodes, (29.0%, 95% CI 22.5-36.6) was significantly inferior to those of SNB (p = 0.0007) and LAS (p = 0.0003). INTERPRETATION LAS is as accurate as SNB in predicting axillary LN status in women with clinically node negative operable breast cancer. Confining SNB procedure to excision of B&/HN, significantly increases the risk of leaving behind metastatic lymph nodes in the axilla. LAS is an effective and low cost procedure that minimizes axillary surgery and can be implemented widely. Registry Name: Clinicaltrials.gov. REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT00128362.
-
8.
Clinical benefits of two different dosing schedules of recombinant human erythropoietin in anemic patients with advanced head and neck cancer.
Gupta, S, Singh, PK, Bhatt, ML, Pant, MC, Sundar, S, Verma, J, Paul, S, Kumar, D, Shah, A, Gupta, R, et al
Bioscience trends. 2010;(5):267-72
Abstract
A total of 100 patients with stage III or IV head or neck cancer, a performance status of 0-1, and anemia with hemoglobin (Hb) < 10 g/dL at baseline who where to receive chemotherapy concomitantly or sequentially with radiotherapy were randomized to receive either epoetin beta 10,000 IU thrice weekly (TW) (n = 52) and oral iron starting 10-15 days before the start of treatment or epoetin beta 30,000 IU once weekly (OW) (n = 48) and oral iron before the start of treatment. The mean Hb in patients on the thrice weekly (11.96 g/dL) and once weekly (12.50 g/dL) dosing schedules increased significantly (p < 0.01) at the end of the treatment in comparison to respective baseline values of 9.38 g/dL and 9.41 g/dL; levels were 1.2-fold higher, which was significant (p < 0.01), for patients on the once weekly schedule. That said, there was significant improvement (p < 0.01) in mean linear analog scale assessment (LASA) scores for energy level (EL), ability to perform daily activities (AL), and overall quality of life (QOL) for patients on both dosing schedules but these improvements did not differ significantly between schedules (p > 0.05). The 2-year overall survival for patients on both dosing schedules did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). Epoetin beta therapy was found to be equally beneficial and well tolerated for patients on both thrice weekly and once weekly dosing schedules.