1.
Prevalence and Impact on Stroke in Patients Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis versus Peritoneal Dialysis: A Prospective Observational Study.
Fu, J, Huang, J, Lei, M, Luo, Z, Zhong, X, Huang, Y, Zhang, H, Liu, R, Tong, J, He, F
PloS one. 2015;(10):e0140887
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients undergoing maintenance dialysis are at increased risk of stroke, however, less is known about the prevalence and impact on stroke in the patients. METHODS In this prospective cohort study, 590 patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD; n = 285) or peritoneal dialysis (PD; n = 305) from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2012 were recruited. Baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected. Timeline incidence data were analyzed using a Poisson model. The Cox proportional hazards regression assessed adjusted differences in stroke risk, a multivariate analysis was also performed. RESULTS 62 strokes occurred during 1258 total patient-years of follow-up. Stroke occurred at a rate of 49.2/1,000 patient-years with a predominance in HD patients compared with PD patients (74.0 vs. 31.8/1,000 patient-years). The cumulative hazard of developing stroke was significantly higher in HD patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-3.62; p = 0.046) after adjusting for potential confounders. HD patients had an increased risk of ischemic stroke (HR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.56-4.58; p = 0.002). The risk of hemorrhagic stroke was not significantly different between PD and HD patients. On multivariate Cox analysis, risk factors of stroke in both HD and PD patients were older age, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Other independent risk factors of stroke were lower albumin-corrected calcium in HD patients and higher triglycerides in PD patients. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing PD were less likely to develop ischemic stroke than those undergoing HD. Comprehensive control of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, calcium-phosphorus metabolism, and triglyceride levels may be useful preventive strategies for stroke in dialysis patients.
2.
Effects of vitamin E-coated dialysis membranes on anemia, nutrition and dyslipidemia status in hemodialysis patients: a meta-analysis.
Huang, J, Yi, B, Li, AM, Zhang, H
Renal failure. 2015;(3):398-407
Abstract
BACKGROUND This was controversial whether vitamin E-coated dialyzer therapy was beneficial for the complications associated with hemodialysis. Therefore, we performed this systematic review to evaluate the effects of vitamin E-coated dialyzer. METHODS Related trials were searched from multiple electronic databases. We conducted meta-analysis to assess changes in the predefined outcomes using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS Meta-analysis showed vitamin E-coated dialyzer therapy could decrease erythropoietin (EPO) resistance index (SMD, -0.24; 95% CI, -0.47 to -0.01; p = 0.04). However, pooled-analysis showed vitamin E-coated dialyzer therapy could not decrease weekly EPO dose (SMD, -0.11; 95% CI, -0.32 to 0.09; p = 0.28) and intima-media thickness (IMT) of the carotid artery (MD, -0.09; 95% CI, -0.2 to 0.01; p = 0.09), and vitamin E-coated dialyzer therapy did not improve the serum hemoglobin (MD, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.13; p = 0.74), albumin levels (SMD, -0.64; 95% CI, -1.62 to 0.34; p = 0.2), in addition, there was no significant difference in serum cholesterol (SMD, -0.07; 95% CI, -0.45 to 0.31; p = 0.71), triglycerides (MD, -2.77; 95% CI, -32.42 to 26.87; p = 0.85), high density lipoprotein (HDL) (SMD, 0.24; 95% CI, -0.14 to 0.62; p = 0.22) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) (SMD, 0.00; 95% CI, -0.38 to 0.37; p = 0.98) levels. CONCLUSIONS Vitamin E-coated dialyzer may reduce the EPO resistance, but there is no conclusive evidence that vitamin E-coated dialyzer can improve the renal anemia, malnutrition, dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis status in hemodialysis (HD) patients. However, high-quality trials with hard clinical endpoints are required to fully elucidate the clinical value of vitamin E-coated dialyzer therapy.