0
selected
-
1.
Effects of Gut Microbiome Modulation on Reducing Adverse Health Outcomes among Elderly and Diabetes Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial (IMPACT Study).
Wong, MCS, Zhang, L, Ching, JYL, Mak, JWY, Huang, J, Wang, S, Mok, CKP, Wong, A, Chiu, OL, Fung, YT, et al
Nutrients. 2023;15(8)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Worldwide, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed a substantial challenge in terms of its induced morbidity and mortality to the general population. Patients with diabetes and elderly individuals are particularly vulnerable during the pandemic. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a novel microbiome immunity formula (SIM01) in reducing adverse health outcomes in the elderly and patients with type two diabetes mellitus during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study was a double-blind, randomised, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a microbiome immunity formula (SIM01) or placebo in a 1:1 ratio for three months. Results showed that SIM01, could reduce adverse health outcomes, improve quality of life, and restore gut dysbiosis among elderly subjects and patients with type two diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. In fact, SIM01 not only replenished Bifidobacteria but also favoured the coexistence of other beneficial species. Authors conclude that their findings provide significant societal implications for strategies that could protect these vulnerable individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Abstract
Gut microbiota is believed to be a major determinant of health outcomes. We hypothesised that a novel oral microbiome formula (SIM01) can reduce the risk of adverse health outcomes in at-risk subjects during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In this single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, we recruited subjects aged ≥65 years or with type two diabetes mellitus. Eligible subjects were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive three months of SIM01 or placebo (vitamin C) within one week of the first COVID-19 vaccine dose. Both the researchers and participants were blinded to the groups allocated. The rate of adverse health outcomes was significantly lower in the SIM01 group than the placebo at one month (6 [2.9%] vs. 25 [12.6], p < 0.001) and three months (0 vs. 5 [3.1%], p = 0.025). At three months, more subjects who received SIM01 than the placebo reported better sleep quality (53 [41.4%] vs. 22 [19.3%], p < 0.001), improved skin condition (18 [14.1%] vs. 8 [7.0%], p = 0.043), and better mood (27 [21.2%] vs. 13 [11.4%], p = 0.043). Subjects who received SIM01 showed a significant increase in beneficial Bifidobacteria and butyrate-producing bacteria in faecal samples and strengthened the microbial ecology network. SIM01 reduced adverse health outcomes and restored gut dysbiosis in elderly and diabetes patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
-
2.
Effects of low-carbohydrate diets versus low-fat diets on metabolic risk factors in overweight and obese adults: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Lei, L, Huang, J, Zhang, L, Hong, Y, Hui, S, Yang, J
Frontiers in nutrition. 2022;9:935234
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Low carbohydrate diets (LCD) and Low-fat diets (LFD) have both been shown to aid weight loss, however comparisons of the two have shown inconsistent results. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 33 studies involving 3939 individuals aimed to compare the effects of LFD and LCD on metabolic risk factors and weight loss. The results showed that compared with LFD, individuals on LCD had a greater reduction in fat circulating around the body, blood pressure, weight, and a greater increase in good cholesterol in the short-term. However, individuals on LFD had a greater decrease in bad cholesterol. In the long-term the benefits were the same for both diets. It was concluded that in the short-term LCD and LFD may have specific effects on body morphology and chemistry however over longer periods of time the benefits are similar. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that different diets should be recommended to achieve different outcomes.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Low-carbohydrate diets (LCD) and low-fat diets (LFD) have shown beneficial effects on the management of obesity. Epidemiological studies were conducted to compare the effects of the two diets. However, the results were not always consistent. This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the long-term effects of LCD and LFD on metabolic risk factors and weight loss in overweight and obese adults. METHODS We performed a systematic literature search up to 30 March, 2022 in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. The meta-analysis compared the effects of LCD (carbohydrate intake ≤ 40%) with LFD (fat intake < 30%) on metabolic risk factors and weight loss for ≥6 months. Subgroup analyses were performed based on participant characteristics, dietary energy intake, and the proportions of carbohydrates. RESULTS 33 studies involving a total of 3,939 participants were included. Compared with participants on LFD, participants on LCD had a greater reduction in triglycerides (-0.14 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.18 to -0.10 mmol/L), diastolic blood pressure (-0.87 mmHg; 95% CI, -1.41 to -0.32 mmHg), weight loss (-1.33 kg; 95% CI, -1.79 to -0.87 kg), and a greater increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (0.07 mmol/L; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.09 mmol/L) in 6-23 months. However, the decrease of total cholesterol (0.14 mmol/L; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.20 mmol/L) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (0.10 mmol/L; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.14 mmol/L) was more conducive to LFD in 6-23 months. There was no difference in benefits between the two diets after 24 months. Subgroup analyses showed no significant difference in the reduction of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and blood pressure between the two diets in participants with diabetes, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia. CONCLUSION The results suggest that LCD and LFD may have specific effects on metabolic risk factors and weight loss in overweight and obese adults over 6 months. At 24 months, the effects on weight loss and improvement of metabolic risk factors were at least the same. These indicated that we might choose different diets to manage the overweight and obese subjects. However, the long-term clinical efficacy and effects of various sources of carbohydrates or fat in the two diets need to be studied in the future.
-
3.
Impact of 18-Month Soy Protein Supplementation on Steroid Hormones and Serum Biomarkers of Angiogenesis, Apoptosis, and the Growth Hormone/IGF-1 Axis: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Males Following Prostatectomy.
Bosland, MC, Huang, J, Schlicht, MJ, Enk, E, Xie, H, Kato, I
Nutrition and cancer. 2022;74(1):110-121
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Studies focusing on the effect of soy on risk for breast cancer are extensive, however there is very little research assessing its affects in men with prostate cancer. This post-hoc analysis of individuals enrolled in a randomised control trial looking at individuals on a soy protein isolate or milk protein placebo aimed to determine if soy had any effect on prostate cancer. The results showed that both circulating testosterone and its carrier molecule, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), were both decreased in individuals consuming the soy protein. All other hormones and measures related to cancer cell death and growth remained unaffected. It was concluded that 18 months of consumption of soy protein isolate reduced circulating testosterone and SHBG but had little effect on other measures related to cancer development. This study could be used by healthcare professionals that a diet high in soy may have limited effect on prostate cancer.
Abstract
Many studies have addressed the effects of dietary supplementation with soy protein on cancer risk and mortality, but there are only few randomized studies with soy in males. We used serum samples from a two-year trial of soy protein isolate supplementation in middle-aged to older males at risk of recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy to determine soy effects on steroid hormones involved in prostate cancer (testosterone, SHBG, and estradiol) and explore the effects on biomarkers of the growth hormone/IGF-1 axis, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. Compared with a casein-based placebo, 18 mo, of consumption of 19.2 g/day of whole soy protein isolate containing 24 mg genistein-reduced circulating testosterone and SHBG, but not free testosterone, and did not affect serum concentrations of estradiol, VEGF, IGF-1, IGFBP-3, IGF-1/IGFBP-3 ratio, soluble Fas, Fas-ligand, and sFas/Fas-ligand ratio. Thus, soy protein supplementation for 18 mo, affected the androgen axis, but the effects on other cancer biomarkers remain to be more definitively determined. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00765479).
-
4.
Association Between Plant and Animal Protein Intake and Overall and Cause-Specific Mortality.
Huang, J, Liao, LM, Weinstein, SJ, Sinha, R, Graubard, BI, Albanes, D
JAMA internal medicine. 2020;180(9):1173-1184
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
High-quality protein diets have been shown in previous studies to have health benefits, mainly due to associated fat loss. However, studies examining dietary protein sources and death has not been extensively researched and is often controversial. This cohort study of 400,000 participants aimed to examine whether plant and animal protein intake from various sources effects death rates over 16 years. The results showed that increased intakes of plant protein were associated with lower rates of death by any cause in both men and women, whereas animal protein intake was not. Plant protein intake was associated with lower death rates from heart disease and stroke combined but did not affect death rates due to heart disease alone, cancer or respiratory disease. Interestingly when substituting 3% energy from animal protein to plant protein an association with lower death rates from all causes and heart disease was observed, which was especially apparent when substituting red meat and egg protein but not white meat protein. It was concluded that dietary modifications in favour of plant protein may incur health benefits resulting in longer life. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that recommending dietary changes to increase plant protein intake may increase longevity.
Abstract
Importance: Although emphasis has recently been placed on the importance of high-protein diets to overall health, a comprehensive analysis of long-term cause-specific mortality in association with the intake of plant protein and animal protein has not been reported. Objective: To examine the associations between overall mortality and cause-specific mortality and plant protein intake. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study analyzed data from 416 104 men and women in the US National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study from 1995 to 2011. Data were analyzed from October 2018 through April 2020. Exposures: Validated baseline food frequency questionnaire dietary information, including intake of plant protein and animal protein. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hazard ratios and 16-year absolute risk differences for overall mortality and cause-specific mortality. Results: The final analytic cohort included 237 036 men (57%) and 179 068 women. Their overall median (SD) ages were 62.2 (5.4) years for men and 62.0 (5.4) years for women. Based on 6 009 748 person-years of observation, 77 614 deaths (18.7%; 49 297 men and 28 317 women) were analyzed. Adjusting for several important clinical and other risk factors, greater dietary plant protein intake was associated with reduced overall mortality in both sexes (hazard ratio per 1 SD was 0.95 [95% CI, 0.94-0.97] for men and 0.95 [95% CI, 0.93-0.96] for women; adjusted absolute risk difference per 1 SD was -0.36% [95% CI, -0.48% to -0.25%] for men and -0.33% [95% CI, -0.48% to -0.21%] for women; hazard ratio per 10 g/1000 kcal was 0.88 [95% CI, 0.84-0.91] for men and 0.86 [95% CI, 0.82-0.90] for women; adjusted absolute risk difference per 10 g/1000 kcal was -0.95% [95% CI, -1.3% to -0.68%] for men and -0.86% [95% CI, -1.3% to -0.55%] for women; all P < .001). The association between plant protein intake and overall mortality was similar across the subgroups of smoking status, diabetes, fruit consumption, vitamin supplement use, and self-reported health status. Replacement of 3% energy from animal protein with plant protein was inversely associated with overall mortality (risk decreased 10% in both men and women) and cardiovascular disease mortality (11% lower risk in men and 12% lower risk in women). In particular, the lower overall mortality was attributable primarily to substitution of plant protein for egg protein (24% lower risk in men and 21% lower risk in women) and red meat protein (13% lower risk in men and 15% lower risk in women). Conclusions and Relevance: In this large prospective cohort, higher plant protein intake was associated with small reductions in risk of overall and cardiovascular disease mortality. Our findings provide evidence that dietary modification in choice of protein sources may influence health and longevity.
-
5.
Mixed Spices at Culinary Doses Have Prebiotic Effects in Healthy Adults: A Pilot Study.
Lu, QY, Rasmussen, AM, Yang, J, Lee, RP, Huang, J, Shao, P, Carpenter, CL, Gilbuena, I, Thames, G, Henning, SM, et al
Nutrients. 2019;11(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
An increasing body of evidence suggests that the gut microbiota has a profound impact on human health. While the microbiome of a healthy individual is relatively stable, gut microbial dynamics can be influenced by host lifestyle and dietary choices. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of mixed spices (cinnamon, oregano, ginger, black pepper, and cayenne pepper) at culinary doses consumed over 2 weeks in a standardized 5g capsule on the production of gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids The study is a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind pilot study carried out with a total of 31 healthy women and men aged between 18 and 65. The subjects were randomly allocated to one of the two intervention groups. Results indicate that daily intake of 5g of mixed spices for 2 weeks in healthy subjects resulted in a significant reduction in the relative abundance of the phylum Firmicutes (bacteria), and a trend of increasing in phylum Bacteroidetes (bacteria) as compared with a matched control group. Authors conclude that a mixture of spices at culinary doses affects the composition of gut microbiota.
Abstract
Spices were used as food preservatives prior to the advent of refrigeration, suggesting the possibility of effects on microbiota. Previous studies have shown prebiotic activities in animals and in vitro, but there has not been a demonstration of prebiotic or postbiotic effects at culinary doses in humans. In this randomized placebo-controlled study, we determined in twenty-nine healthy adults the effects on the gut microbiota of the consumption daily of capsules containing 5 g of mixed spices at culinary doses by comparison to a matched control group consuming a maltodextrin placebo capsule. The 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing data were used for microbial characterization. Spice consumption resulted in a significant reduction in Firmicutes abundance (p < 0.033) and a trend of enrichment in Bacteroidetes (p < 0.097) compared to placebo group. Twenty-six operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were different between the spice and placebo groups after intervention. Furthermore, there was a significant negative correlation between fecal short-chain fatty acid propionate concentration and Firmicutes abundance in spice intervention group (p < 0.04). The production of individual fecal short-chain fatty acid was not significantly changed by spice consumption in this study. Mixed spices consumption significantly modified gut microbiota, suggesting a prebiotic effect of spice consumption at culinary doses.