1.
Effects of vitamin C stimulation on rehabilitation of dysphagia after stroke: a randomized trial.
Wang, J, Chang, E, Jiang, Y
European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine. 2022;58(4):558-564
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Stroke refers to a clinical syndrome of localized or global brain dysfunction caused by cerebrovascular disease. It has the characteristics of rapid onset, high morbidity, high mortality, and high disability. After a stroke, various dysfunction can be caused, and dysphagia is one of the most common symptoms. The acidity of vitamin C can promote the secretion of saliva by stimulating the tongue, which can accelerate the swallowing action, thereby improving the swallowing function. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of vitamin C stimulation on the rehabilitation process, Nourishment State Index and immune function indicator of stroke patients with dysphagia. This study is a randomised controlled trial which enrolled 120 participants with dysphagia. The participants were randomly assigned into control group and vitamin C stimulation group, with 60 cases in each group. Results show that vitamin C acid stimulation significantly improves rehabilitation, and the Nourishment State Index and Immune Function Index of stroke patients with dysphagia. Authors conclude that Vitamin C acid stimulation can further improve the nutritional status and immune function after stroke and promote post-operative recovery of patients. Thus, vitamin C stimulation therapy can be widely used in stroke rehabilitation management.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stroke is a clinical syndrome of localized or global brain dysfunction caused by cerebrovascular disease. AIM: The aim of this study was to explore the effect of vitamin C acid stimulation on the rehabilitation process, Nourishment State Index and immune function indicators of stroke patients with dysphagia. DESIGN This is a prospective cohort study. SETTING This study was conducted at our hospital. POPULATION We analyzed stroke patients with dysphagia. METHODS A total of 120 stroke patients with dysphagia were randomly divided into a routine group and a test group, with 60 cases in each group. Routine swallowing training was performed in the routine group, and the test group was stimulated with vitamin C acid. The water swallow test (WST) and video fluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) were used to compare the rehabilitation of dysphagia in the two groups. Nourishment State Index was evaluated by BMI, serum albumin, total serum protein and hemoglobin. Immune Function Index was evaluated by IgA, IgM and IgG. RESULTS Compared with the control group, the WST level of patients treated with vitamin C acid stimulation intervention were significantly reduced, and the VFSS score were significantly increased. Serum levels of hemoglobin, albumin, total protein, IgA, IgM and IgG in the vitamin C acid stimulation group were remarkably increased than those in the control group. CONCLUSIONS Vitamin C acid stimulation exhibits a good application effect in patients with dysphagia after stroke. Moreover, vitamin C acid stimulation can further improve the nutritional status and immune function after stroke and promote postoperative recovery of patients. Therefore, we believe that vitamin C stimulation therapy can be widely used in stroke rehabilitation management. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT Vitamin C acid stimulation significantly improves rehabilitation of stroke patients with dysphagia and ameliorates the nutritional status and immune function of patients.
2.
Effects of Fecal Microbiome Transfer in Adolescents With Obesity: The Gut Bugs Randomized Controlled Trial.
Leong, KSW, Jayasinghe, TN, Wilson, BC, Derraik, JGB, Albert, BB, Chiavaroli, V, Svirskis, DM, Beck, KL, Conlon, CA, Jiang, Y, et al
JAMA network open. 2020;3(12):e2030415
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Obesity has become a global pandemic even in adolescents. Lifestyle interventions have had limited impact on this cohort and drugs targeting obesity are often unlicensed in children. The gut microbiome has a role in weight regulation and may be a new target in adolescents with obesity. This randomised control trial of 87 adolescents with obesity over 26 weeks, aimed to assess if faecal microbiome transfer (FMT), which is a method whereby faecal matter is transplanted from one person to another, can be used to treat obesity. The results showed that FMT did not have an effect on body mass index (BMI) and the intervention group had a marginally increased BMI after FMT. Other disorders associated with obesity such as blood sugar levels were also unaffected by FMT, however there was a reduction in fat storage around the middle. It was concluded that FMT alone is not adequate to improve obesity in adolescents, but may reduce fat stored around the middle. Healthcare professionals could use this study to understand that simply transplanting one person’s gut microbiome to another, may not be enough. Targeted personalised approaches may be required, however further research is needed.
Abstract
Importance: Treatment of pediatric obesity is challenging. Preclinical studies in mice indicated that weight and metabolism can be altered by gut microbiome manipulation. Objective: To assess efficacy of fecal microbiome transfer (FMT) to treat adolescent obesity and improve metabolism. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial (October 2017-March 2019) with a 26-week follow-up was conducted among adolescents aged 14 to 18 years with a body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 30 or more in Auckland, New Zealand. A total of 87 individuals took part-565 individuals responded to advertisements, 328 were ineligible, and 150 declined participation. Clinical data were analyzed from September 2019 to May 2020. Interventions: Single course of oral encapsulated fecal microbiome from 4 healthy lean donors of the same sex or saline placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was BMI standard deviation score at 6 weeks using intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes included body composition, cardiometabolic parameters, well-being, and gut microbiome composition. Results: Eighty-seven participants (59% female adolescents, mean [SD] age 17.2 [1.4] years) were randomized 1:1, in groups stratified by sex, to FMT (42 participants) or placebo (45 participants). There was no effect of FMT on BMI standard deviation score at 6 weeks (adjusted mean difference [aMD] -0.026; 95% CI -0.074, 0.022). Reductions in android-to-gynoid-fat ratio in the FMT vs placebo group were observed at 6, 12, and 26 weeks, with aMDs of -0.021 (95% CI, -0.041 to -0.001), -0.023 (95% CI, -0.043 to -0.003), and -0.029 (95% CI, -0.049 to -0.008), respectively. There were no observed effects on insulin sensitivity, liver function, lipid profile, inflammatory markers, blood pressure, total body fat percentage, gut health, and health-related quality of life. Gut microbiome profiling revealed a shift in community composition among the FMT group, maintained up to 12 weeks. In post-hoc exploratory analyses among participants with metabolic syndrome at baseline, FMT led to greater resolution of this condition (18 to 4) compared with placebo (13 to 10) by 26 weeks (adjusted odds ratio, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.45; P = .007). There were no serious adverse events recorded throughout the trial. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of adolescents with obesite, there was no effect of FMT on weight loss in adolescents with obesity, although a reduction in abdominal adiposity was observed. Post-hoc analyses indicated a resolution of undiagnosed metabolic syndrome with FMT among those with this condition. Further trials are needed to confirm these results and identify organisms and mechanisms responsible for mediating the observed benefits. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ACTRN12615001351505.
3.
Do nutrition labels influence healthier food choices? Analysis of label viewing behaviour and subsequent food purchases in a labelling intervention trial.
Ni Mhurchu, C, Eyles, H, Jiang, Y, Blakely, T
Appetite. 2018;121:360-365
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Nutrition labels provide point-of-purchase information on the nutritional content of pre-packaged foods. This study is a post-hoc exploratory analysis of recorded label information viewing behaviour and associated packaged food purchases of study participants over the four-week intervention period. For this study combined data from all three intervention groups carried out in a previous study were analysed. Participants who scanned at least one product label and/or purchased at least one packaged food or non-alcoholic beverage over the four-week study intervention period were included. Results show that label information was viewed for approximately one fifth of all purchased products. Shoppers were most likely to view labelling information for convenience foods, cereals, snack foods, breads, and oils. Authors conclude that nutrition labels may influence healthier food purchases by those consumers who choose to use them.
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are few objective data on how nutrition labels are used in real-world shopping situations, or how they affect dietary choices and patterns. DESIGN The Starlight study was a four-week randomised, controlled trial of the effects of three different types of nutrition labels on consumer food purchases: Traffic Light Labels, Health Star Rating labels, or Nutrition Information Panels (control). Smartphone technology allowed participants to scan barcodes of packaged foods and receive randomly allocated labels on their phone screen, and to record their food purchases. The study app therefore provided objectively recorded data on label viewing behaviour and food purchases over a four-week period. A post-hoc analysis of trial data was undertaken to assess frequency of label use, label use by food group, and association between label use and the healthiness of packaged food products purchased. RESULTS Over the four-week intervention, study participants (n = 1255) viewed nutrition labels for and/or purchased 66,915 barcoded packaged products. Labels were viewed for 23% of all purchased products, with decreasing frequency over time. Shoppers were most likely to view labels for convenience foods, cereals, snack foods, bread and bakery products, and oils. They were least likely to view labels for sugar and honey products, eggs, fish, fruit and vegetables, and meat. Products for which participants viewed the label and subsequently purchased the product during the same shopping episode were significantly healthier than products where labels were viewed but the product was not subsequently purchased: mean difference in nutrient profile score -0.90 (95% CI -1.54 to -0.26). CONCLUSIONS In a secondary analysis of a nutrition labelling intervention trial, there was a significant association between label use and the healthiness of products purchased. Nutrition label use may therefore lead to healthier food purchases.