1.
Effects of vitamin C stimulation on rehabilitation of dysphagia after stroke: a randomized trial.
Wang, J, Chang, E, Jiang, Y
European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine. 2022;58(4):558-564
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Stroke refers to a clinical syndrome of localized or global brain dysfunction caused by cerebrovascular disease. It has the characteristics of rapid onset, high morbidity, high mortality, and high disability. After a stroke, various dysfunction can be caused, and dysphagia is one of the most common symptoms. The acidity of vitamin C can promote the secretion of saliva by stimulating the tongue, which can accelerate the swallowing action, thereby improving the swallowing function. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of vitamin C stimulation on the rehabilitation process, Nourishment State Index and immune function indicator of stroke patients with dysphagia. This study is a randomised controlled trial which enrolled 120 participants with dysphagia. The participants were randomly assigned into control group and vitamin C stimulation group, with 60 cases in each group. Results show that vitamin C acid stimulation significantly improves rehabilitation, and the Nourishment State Index and Immune Function Index of stroke patients with dysphagia. Authors conclude that Vitamin C acid stimulation can further improve the nutritional status and immune function after stroke and promote post-operative recovery of patients. Thus, vitamin C stimulation therapy can be widely used in stroke rehabilitation management.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stroke is a clinical syndrome of localized or global brain dysfunction caused by cerebrovascular disease. AIM: The aim of this study was to explore the effect of vitamin C acid stimulation on the rehabilitation process, Nourishment State Index and immune function indicators of stroke patients with dysphagia. DESIGN This is a prospective cohort study. SETTING This study was conducted at our hospital. POPULATION We analyzed stroke patients with dysphagia. METHODS A total of 120 stroke patients with dysphagia were randomly divided into a routine group and a test group, with 60 cases in each group. Routine swallowing training was performed in the routine group, and the test group was stimulated with vitamin C acid. The water swallow test (WST) and video fluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) were used to compare the rehabilitation of dysphagia in the two groups. Nourishment State Index was evaluated by BMI, serum albumin, total serum protein and hemoglobin. Immune Function Index was evaluated by IgA, IgM and IgG. RESULTS Compared with the control group, the WST level of patients treated with vitamin C acid stimulation intervention were significantly reduced, and the VFSS score were significantly increased. Serum levels of hemoglobin, albumin, total protein, IgA, IgM and IgG in the vitamin C acid stimulation group were remarkably increased than those in the control group. CONCLUSIONS Vitamin C acid stimulation exhibits a good application effect in patients with dysphagia after stroke. Moreover, vitamin C acid stimulation can further improve the nutritional status and immune function after stroke and promote postoperative recovery of patients. Therefore, we believe that vitamin C stimulation therapy can be widely used in stroke rehabilitation management. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT Vitamin C acid stimulation significantly improves rehabilitation of stroke patients with dysphagia and ameliorates the nutritional status and immune function of patients.
2.
Do nutrition labels influence healthier food choices? Analysis of label viewing behaviour and subsequent food purchases in a labelling intervention trial.
Ni Mhurchu, C, Eyles, H, Jiang, Y, Blakely, T
Appetite. 2018;121:360-365
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Nutrition labels provide point-of-purchase information on the nutritional content of pre-packaged foods. This study is a post-hoc exploratory analysis of recorded label information viewing behaviour and associated packaged food purchases of study participants over the four-week intervention period. For this study combined data from all three intervention groups carried out in a previous study were analysed. Participants who scanned at least one product label and/or purchased at least one packaged food or non-alcoholic beverage over the four-week study intervention period were included. Results show that label information was viewed for approximately one fifth of all purchased products. Shoppers were most likely to view labelling information for convenience foods, cereals, snack foods, breads, and oils. Authors conclude that nutrition labels may influence healthier food purchases by those consumers who choose to use them.
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are few objective data on how nutrition labels are used in real-world shopping situations, or how they affect dietary choices and patterns. DESIGN The Starlight study was a four-week randomised, controlled trial of the effects of three different types of nutrition labels on consumer food purchases: Traffic Light Labels, Health Star Rating labels, or Nutrition Information Panels (control). Smartphone technology allowed participants to scan barcodes of packaged foods and receive randomly allocated labels on their phone screen, and to record their food purchases. The study app therefore provided objectively recorded data on label viewing behaviour and food purchases over a four-week period. A post-hoc analysis of trial data was undertaken to assess frequency of label use, label use by food group, and association between label use and the healthiness of packaged food products purchased. RESULTS Over the four-week intervention, study participants (n = 1255) viewed nutrition labels for and/or purchased 66,915 barcoded packaged products. Labels were viewed for 23% of all purchased products, with decreasing frequency over time. Shoppers were most likely to view labels for convenience foods, cereals, snack foods, bread and bakery products, and oils. They were least likely to view labels for sugar and honey products, eggs, fish, fruit and vegetables, and meat. Products for which participants viewed the label and subsequently purchased the product during the same shopping episode were significantly healthier than products where labels were viewed but the product was not subsequently purchased: mean difference in nutrient profile score -0.90 (95% CI -1.54 to -0.26). CONCLUSIONS In a secondary analysis of a nutrition labelling intervention trial, there was a significant association between label use and the healthiness of products purchased. Nutrition label use may therefore lead to healthier food purchases.