1.
Clinical Impact of Supplementation of Vitamins B1 and C on Patients with Sepsis-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Yoo, JW, Kim, RB, Ju, S, Lee, SJ, Cho, YJ, Jeong, YY, Lee, JD, Kim, HC
Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases. 2020;83(3):248-254
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition that commonly develops in patients with sepsis. Patients with ARDS require admission to intensive care and invasive mechanical ventilation. Vitamin B1 and C deficiencies have been reported in critically ill patients with sepsis. Vitamin B1 is involved in aerobic metabolism, and vitamin C has anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects. The aim of this Korean retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the clinical impact of vitamin B1 and C supplementation in patients with sepsis-related ARDS. Patients with ARDS requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) were included in this study. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients administered with vitamin B1 (200 mg/day) and C (2 g/day) between June 2018-May 2019 (the supplementation group) and those who did not receive vitamin B1 and C administration between June 2017-May 2018 (the control group). Seventy-nine patients were included. Thirty-three patients received vitamin B1 and C, and 46 patients did not. There were no significant differences in the number of deaths between the patients who received vitamin B1 and C and those who did not. The mean number of days not requiring ICU admission or ventilation was greater in patients supplemented with vitamin B1 and C than that in the control patients, but the difference was not statistically significant. Steroid administration was more frequent in patients receiving vitamin B1 and C supplementation than in those without it. The authors concluded that Vitamin B1 and C supplementation at the doses used in this study did not reduce the death rates in ARDS patients.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although few studies have reported improved clinical outcomes with the administration of vitamin B1 and C in critically ill patients with septic shock or severe pneumonia, its clinical impact on patients with sepsis-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association with vitamin B and C supplementation and clinical outcomes in patients with ARDS. METHODS Patients with ARDS requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) were included in this study. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients administered with vitamin B1 (200 mg/day) and C (2 g/day) June 2018-May 2019 (the supplementation group) and those who did not receive vitamin B1 and C administration June 2017-May 2018 (the control group). RESULTS Seventy-nine patients were included. Thirty-three patients received vitamin B1 and C whereas 46 patients did not. Steroid administration was more frequent in patients receiving vitamin B1 and C supplementation than in those without it. There were no significant differences in the mortality between the patients who received vitamin B1 and C and those who did not. There were not significant differences in ventilator and ICU-free days between each of the 21 matched patients. CONCLUSION Vitamin B1 and C supplementation was not associated with reduced mortality rates, and ventilator and ICU-free days in patients with sepsis-related ARDS requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.
2.
Effect of Smartphone-Based Lifestyle Coaching App on Community-Dwelling Population With Moderate Metabolic Abnormalities: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cho, SMJ, Lee, JH, Shim, JS, Yeom, H, Lee, SJ, Jeon, YW, Kim, HC
Journal of medical Internet research. 2020;22(10):e17435
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Metabolic disorders are established precursors to cardiovascular disease. The aim of the study was to evaluate the longitudinal effect of smartphone-based health care app on metabolic parameters in a sample of the general population with moderate metabolic abnormalities. The study is a single-blind 3-arm parallel-design randomized controlled trial delivering a 6-month primary prevention program via mobile app. One hundred twenty-nine smartphone users, aged between 30-59 years with at least 2 metabolic abnormalities, have been recruited. Results showed that the simultaneous diet/exercise logging and lifestyle coaching yielded greater body weight reduction, specifically via body fat mass reduction. On the other hand, the systolic blood pressure did not change notably between the 3 groups at any follow-up examinations. Authors conclude that future studies focusing on comparative effectiveness using alternative study designs are needed to integrate these apps in everyday lives and clinic practice.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metabolic disorders are established precursors to cardiovascular diseases, yet they can be readily prevented with sustained lifestyle modifications. OBJECTIVE We assessed the effectiveness of a smartphone-based weight management app on metabolic parameters in adults at high-risk, yet without physician diagnosis nor pharmacological treatment for metabolic syndrome, in a community setting. METHODS In this 3-arm parallel-group, single-blind, randomized controlled trial, we recruited participants aged 30 to 59 years with at least 2 conditions defined by the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program expert panel (abdominal obesity, high blood pressure, high triglycerides, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high fasting glucose level). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by block randomization to either the nonuser group (control), the app-based diet and exercise self-logging group (app only), or the app-based self-logging and personalized coaching from professional dieticians and exercise coordinators group (app with personalized coaching). Assessments were performed at baseline, week 6, week 12, and week 24. The primary outcome was change in systolic blood pressure (between baseline and follow-up assessments). Secondary outcomes were changes in diastolic blood pressure, body weight, body fat mass, waist circumference, homeostatic model of assessment of insulin resistance, triglyceride level, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level between baseline and follow-up assessments. Analysis was performed using intention-to-treat. RESULTS Between October 28, 2017 and May 28, 2018, 160 participants participated in the baseline screening examination. Participants (129/160, 80.6%) who satisfied the eligibility criteria were assigned to control (n=41), app only (n=45), or app with personalized coaching (n=43) group. In each group, systolic blood pressure showed decreasing trends from baseline (control: mean -10.95, SD 2.09 mmHg; app only: mean -7.29, SD 1.83 mmHg; app with personalized coaching: mean -7.19, SD 1.66 mmHg), yet without significant difference among the groups (app only: P=.19; app with personalized coaching: P=.16). Instead, those in the app with personalized coaching group had greater body weight reductions (control: mean -0.12, SD 0.30 kg; app only: mean -0.35, SD 0.36 kg, P=.67; app with personalized coaching: mean -0.96, SD 0.37 kg; P=.08), specifically by body fat mass reduction (control: mean -0.13, SD 0.34 kg; app only: mean -0.64, SD 0.38 kg, P=.22; app with personalized coaching: mean -0.79, SD 0.38 kg; P=.08). CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous diet and exercise self-logging and persistent lifestyle modification coaching were ineffective in lowering systolic blood pressure but effective in losing weight and reducing body fat mass. These results warrant future implementation studies of similar models of care on a broader scale in the context of primary prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03300271; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03300271.