1.
Analysis of Lipoprotein Subfractions in 920 Patients With and Without Type 2 Diabetes.
Zhao, X, Zhang, HW, Zhang, Y, Li, S, Xu, RX, Sun, J, Zhu, CG, Wu, NQ, Gao, Y, Guo, YL, et al
Heart, lung & circulation. 2017;(3):211-218
Abstract
BACKGROUND It has been demonstrated that diabetic dyslipidaemia is the chief bridge between diabetes and incremental risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. However, the characteristics of lipoprotein subfractions distribution in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have not been fully investigated. The aim of present study was to evaluate the distributions of lipoprotein subfractions in T2D patients. METHODS A total of 920 patients, who have not received lipid-lowering drug treatment previously, were consecutively enrolled in this study. Based on the evidence of diabetes, patients were divided into T2D group (n=204) and non-T2D group (n=716). Both low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL- and HDL-C) subfractions were analysed using the Quantimetrix Lipoprint System. The distributions of lipoprotein subfractions were evaluated in patients with and without T2D. RESULTS Compared with non-T2D individuals, the T2D group manifested significantly lower large HDL-C concentration/HDL subfraction percentage, smaller mean LDL particle size but higher small HDL-C and LDL-C concentrations as well as small HDL and LDL subfraction percentages. Moreover, the data indicated that the small HDL-C/ LDL-C concentrations, the small and large HDL subfraction percentages along with the mean LDL particle size were independently related to the existence of T2D (95% CI=1.009-1.067, p=0.009; 95% CI=0.938-0.983, p=0.001; 95% CI=1.023-1.135, p=0.005; 95% CI= 1.005-1.048, p=0.014; 95% CI=0.940-0.999, p=0.040; respectively) assessed by logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS The present study indicated that the changes of lipid profile in patients with T2D are characterised by abnormal distributions of lipoprotein subfractions apart from clinically atherogenic dyslipidaemia.
2.
Effects of cigarette reduction on cardiovascular risk factors and subjective measures.
Hatsukami, DK, Kotlyar, M, Allen, S, Jensen, J, Li, S, Le, C, Murphy, S
Chest. 2005;(4):2528-37
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of continued smoking and smoking reduction on cardiovascular biomarkers (eg, WBC count, cholesterol concentrations, BP, heart rate). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This study, conducted at the University of Minnesota, randomized smokers interested in significantly reducing cigarette use but not quitting to either start 12 weeks of smoking reduction immediately (n = 102), assisted by nicotine replacement therapy, or to a 6-week wait list (n = 49). Those starting smoking reduction were required to reduce smoking by 25% for 2 weeks, 50% for 2 weeks, and 75% during the final 2 weeks. After 6 weeks, the subjects were asked to maintain a 50% reduction or quit. Nicotine gum and, if necessary, nicotine patch were used to achieve reduction goals. The wait list group (n = 49) smoked ad libitum for 6 weeks and then reduced smoking as previously described. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS Cardiovascular biomarkers (eg, WBC count, cholesterol concentrations, BP, heart rate) were assessed at several time points after enrollment. During ad libitum smoking, cardiovascular biomarkers remained relatively stable with correlation coefficients across the various time measurements, ranging from 0.44 to 1.00 (p < 0.01 for all measures). Among successful nonabstinent reducers (64 of 151 subjects), significant improvements were found in many biomarkers (eg, hemoglobin, hematocrit, RBC and WBC counts, lipids, BP, heart rate, respiratory symptoms, all p < 0.0167). CONCLUSIONS These results show the availability of reliable and dose-sensitive biomarkers and that reduction in smoking can lead to significant but only modest changes in cardiovascular risk factors in healthy smokers. It is not known whether the reductions in cardiovascular risk factors observed after smoking reduction are also associated with reduced disease risk. Additional research is necessary to address this issue.