1.
Efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.
Li, Z, Liu, Z, Wu, Y, Li, H, Sun, Z, Han, C, Zhang, X, Zhang, J
Thoracic cancer. 2021;(21):2838-2848
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through pooling of open published data. METHODS The electronic databases of Medline (1960-2021.5), Cochrane central register of controlled trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE(1980-2021.5) and Wan fang (1986-2021.5) were systematically searched by two reviewers to identify the relevant clinical trials related to the above subject. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and drug relevant adverse reactions were pooled and demonstrated by risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The statistical heterogeneity across studies was assessed by I-square test. The publication bias was evaluated by Egger's line regression test and demonstrated by Begg's funnel plot. RESULTS Eleven prospective studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that the ORR (RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.32-2.00, p < 0.05) and DCR (RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.18-1.41, p < 0.05) of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel was significantly higher than that of the paclitaxel/docetaxel group for advanced NSCLC, respectively. The drug-related adverse reaction was not statistically different between apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel with regard to the hand-foot syndrome, gastrointestinal reaction, thrombocytopenia, anemia and leukocytopenia (pall > 0.05) except for hypertension (RR = 3.60, 95% CI: 1.26-10.31, p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis also indicated that the hypertension and hand-foot syndrome in apatinib + paclitaxel/docetaxel were higher than that of the paclitaxel/docetaxel group with a statistical difference (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel was superior to paclitaxel/docetaxel for ORR and DCR. However, combined treatment with apatinib appears to increase the risk of a patient developing an adverse reaction, especially hypertension and hand-foot syndrome.
2.
Inhibition of SOX15 Sensitizes Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma Cells to Paclitaxel.
Zhang, M, Wang, J, Gao, T, Chen, X, Xu, Y, Yu, X, Guo, X, Zhuang, R, Li, Z, Wu, H, et al
Current molecular medicine. 2019;(5):349-356
Abstract
BACKGROUND SOX15 is a crucial transcription factor involved in the regulation of embryonic development and in the cell fate determination. It is also an important mediator of tumorigenesis in cancer. METHODS Here, we sought to explore the expression patterns and biological functions of SOX15 in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC). SOX15 was found aberrantly overexpressed in ESCC tumors. RESULTS Experimentally, inhibition of SOX15 through RNAi suppressed cell proliferation in ESCC cells and sensitized cancer cells to paclitaxel, but not to Cisplatin. Moreover, inhibition of SOX15 significantly repressed the expression of genes associated with WNT and NOTCH signaling pathways, which may contribute to the increased sensitivity to paclitaxel. CONCLUSION In conclusion, the current study revealed that inhibition of SOX15 in ESCC cells sensitizes the ESCC cells to paclitaxel, suggesting that the SOX15 expression level may predict the therapeutic outcomes for paclitaxel treatment for ESCC.