1.
Association between serum vitamin D levels and venous thromboembolism (VTE): A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Wan, J, Yuan, J, Li, X, Bao, Y, Hou, Y, Li, Z, Tan, SC, Low, TY, Chu, Y
Complementary therapies in medicine. 2020;:102579
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although many studies have attempted to unravel the relationship between vitamin D deficiency and the incidence of VTE, the results remained inconsistent. To address this discrepancy, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to precisely disentangle the relationship between serum vitamin D levels and VTE risk. METHODS The Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were searched for all available observational studies that reported the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) based on serum vitamin D levels categories. The search was performed up to March 2020. RESULTS Seven studies were included. The overall analysis showed a significantly increased risk of VTE in subjects with low levels of serum vitamin D compared with those with normal vitamin D levels (RR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.07-1.69; P = 0.011). In a sensitivity analysis, we did not observe a significant effect of any individual study on the combined effect sizes. Nevertheless, significant heterogeneity was present among the studies (Cochrane Q test, p = 0.018, I2 = 61%). In the stratified analysis, low vitamin D levels were positively associated with an increased risk of VTE in prospective population-based studies (RR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.06-1.61; P = 0.010) and in subjects below 60 years old (RR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.07-1.54; P = 0.060). CONCLUSION our systematic review and meta-analysis showed that a low serum vitamin D level was indeed associated with an increased risk of VTE.
2.
A systematic review and adjusted indirect comparison of oral anticoagulants.
Cui, J, Wu, B, Liu, C, Li, Z
Orthopedics. 2014;(11):763-71
Abstract
EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES As a result of reading this article, physicians should be able to: 1. Recognize the high risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. 2. Distinguish the different pharmacological mechanisms of VTE prophylaxis drugs. 3. Delineate the advantages and disadvantages of each VTE prophylaxis drug. 4. Recognize that rivaroxaban is as efficacious as apixaban but can increase the risk of hemorrhage. Patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery are at high risk for developing postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE). The authors analyzed the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban vs low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) as VTE prophylaxis in major orthopedic surgery. Outcomes evaluated included total VTE, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), death, and major bleeding. Rivaroxaban and apixaban are more efficacious than dabigatran and are as safe as dabigatran. Rivaroxaban is as efficacious as apixaban but can increase the risk of hemorrhage.