1.
Clinical Efficacy of Creatine Phosphate Sodium and/or Vitamin C in the Treatment of Children with Viral Myocarditis: A Meta-Analysis.
Li, Q, Liu, S, Ma, X, Yu, J
Computational and mathematical methods in medicine. 2022;2022:3840891
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Viral myocarditis (VMC) is a kind of infectious myocardial disease in which viral infection triggers myocardial interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration and adjacent myocardial cell necrosis, further leading to cardiac dysfunction and other systemic damage. The current main treatment of VMC includes antiviral, myocardial nutritional support, and immunomodulatory measures, but conventional treatment (CT) often fails to effectively control the disease, and thus, the recurrence rate is high. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical utility of creatine phosphate sodium (CPS) and/or vitamin C in the treatment of VMC in children. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 studies. A total of 1,957 VMC patients were included, with 968 patients in the control group and 989 patients in the observation group. Results show that compared with the control group who underwent CT therapy alone, the observation group receiving CT therapy together with CPS and/or vitamin C, had better performance in effective rate and better myocardial markers. Authors conclude that their findings may help to guide and standardize the treatment of VMC in children.
Abstract
Background: This study performed a meta-analysis to explore the clinical efficacy of creatine phosphate sodium (CPS) and/or vitamin C for viral myocarditis (VMC) in children, to provide guidance for its clinical treatment. Methods: A literature search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases to obtain published clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CPS and/or vitamin C for VMC in children, with a time span from 2013 to 2022. Relevant data was extracted and meta-analysis was performed using the statistical software Stata 16.0. Results: A total of 723 studies were retrieved and 19 studies were finally included for meta-analysis, with a total of 1,957 patients. The meta-analysis results showed that the observation group (conventional treatment + CPS and/or vitamin C) was superior to the control group (conventional treatment alone) in treatment effective rate (OR = 3.60, 95% CI (2.55, 5.07), and P < 0.001). Additionally, the observation group had lower levels of cardiac troponin-I (SMD = - 2.63, 95% CI (- 3.51, - 1.76), and P < 0.001), creatine kinase isoenzyme (SMD = -2.78, 95% CI (- 3.53, - 2.03), and P < 0.001), lactate dehydrogenase (SMD = -1.95, 95% CI (- 2.49, - 1.42), and P < 0.001), aspartate aminotransferase (SMD = -0.87, 95% CI (- 1.84, 0.09), and P = 0.076), tumor necrosis factor-α (SMD = -3.90, 95% CI (- 4.47, - 3.06), and P < 0.001), and higher superoxide dismutase levels (SMD = 2.48, 95% CI (1.64, 3.33), and P < 0.001). Except aspartate aminotransferase, there were significant differences between the two groups in the other parameters. Conclusion: CPS and/or vitamin C treatment could greatly improve the treatment, protect myocardial function, and relieve inflammatory response in children with VMC.
2.
Dietary Glycemic Index and Load and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: Assessment of Causal Relations.
Livesey, G, Taylor, R, Livesey, HF, Buyken, AE, Jenkins, DJA, Augustin, LSA, Sievenpiper, JL, Barclay, AW, Liu, S, Wolever, TMS, et al
Nutrients. 2019;11(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
It is generally accepted that certain diet and lifestyle choices contribute to a person’s risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D). In this meta-analysis, researchers set out to review previous studies and assess whether there is any evidence that the amount and type of carbohydrate (measured by Glycaemic Index (GI) and Glycaemic Load (GL)) in a person’s diet has a direct influence on their risk of developing T2D. The authors concluded with a high level of confidence that eating high GI and GL foods can lead to a higher risk of developing T2D. They suggest that nutrition advice that favours low GI and GL foods could produce significant cost savings for public healthcare.
Abstract
While dietary factors are important modifiable risk factors for type 2 diabetes (T2D), the causal role of carbohydrate quality in nutrition remains controversial. Dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) have been examined in relation to the risk of T2D in multiple prospective cohort studies. Previous meta-analyses indicate significant relations but consideration of causality has been minimal. Here, the results of our recent meta-analyses of prospective cohort studies of 4 to 26-y follow-up are interpreted in the context of the nine Bradford-Hill criteria for causality, that is: (1) Strength of Association, (2) Consistency, (3) Specificity, (4) Temporality, (5) Biological Gradient, (6) Plausibility, (7) Experimental evidence, (8) Analogy, and (9) Coherence. These criteria necessitated referral to a body of literature wider than prospective cohort studies alone, especially in criteria 6 to 9. In this analysis, all nine of the Hill's criteria were met for GI and GL indicating that we can be confident of a role for GI and GL as causal factors contributing to incident T2D. In addition, neither dietary fiber nor cereal fiber nor wholegrain were found to be reliable or effective surrogate measures of GI or GL. Finally, our cost-benefit analysis suggests food and nutrition advice favors lower GI or GL and would produce significant potential cost savings in national healthcare budgets. The high confidence in causal associations for incident T2D is sufficient to consider inclusion of GI and GL in food and nutrient-based recommendations.