1.
Diagnostic accuracy of HbA1c in diabetes between Eastern and Western.
Yan, S, Liu, S, Zhao, Y, Zhang, W, Sun, X, Li, J, Jiang, F, Ju, J, Lang, N, Zhang, Y, et al
European journal of clinical investigation. 2013;(7):716-26
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2010, the American Diabetes Association recommended the use of HbA1c as a diagnostic criterion for diabetes. However, HbA1c is not an accepted diagnostic tool for diabetes in Eastern Asia, because genetic differences compromise the standardization of the diagnostic cut-off point. OBJECTIVES This study evaluated differences in the use of HbA1c for diagnosing diabetes in Eastern and Western populations and investigated whether HbA1c cut-off point of ≥ 6.5% is diagnostic of diabetes in patients from Eastern Asia. METHODS Literature was obtained from MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of each HbA1c cut-off point were extracted and compared between Western and Eastern populations. Differences in the cut-off point for diagnosing diabetes in each region were compared by examining differences in the area under summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves. RESULTS Twelve publications from Eastern countries (n = 59,735) and 13 from Western countries (n = 22,954) were included in the analysis. Areas under SROC curves in the Eastern and Western groups were 0.9331 and 0.9120, respectively (P = 0.98). The cut-off point of the highest Youden index was 6.0%. At the HbA1c cut-off point of 6.5%, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 58.7% and 98.4% for Eastern countries and 65.5% and 98.1% for Western countries, respectively. CONCLUSIONS HbA1c exhibits the same diagnostic value for diabetes in Eastern and Western populations. In both populations, HbA1c levels > 6.0% identify the population at high risk of diabetes, and HbA1c > 6.5% is diagnostic of clinically established diabetes.
2.
HbA1c measured in stored erythrocytes and mortality rate among middle-aged and older women.
Levitan, EB, Liu, S, Stampfer, MJ, Cook, NR, Rexrode, KM, Ridker, PM, Buring, JE, Manson, JE
Diabetologia. 2008;(2):267-75
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS Diabetes is known to increase mortality rate, but the degree to which mild hyperglycaemia may be associated with the risk of death is uncertain. We examined the association between HbA1c measured in stored erythrocytes and mortality rate in women with and without diabetes. METHODS We conducted a cohort study of 27,210 women>or=45 years old with no history of cardiovascular disease or cancer who participated in the Women's Health Study, a randomised trial of vitamin E and aspirin. RESULTS Over a median of 10 years of follow-up, 706 women died. Proportional hazards models adjusted for age, smoking, hypertension, blood lipids, exercise, postmenopausal hormone use, multivitamin use and C-reactive protein were used to estimate the relative risk of mortality. Among women without a diagnosis of diabetes and HbA1c<5.60%, those in the top quintile (HbA1c 5.19-5.59%) had a relative risk of mortality of 1.28 (95% CI 0.98-1.69, p value for linear trend=0.14) compared with those with HbA1c 2.27-4.79%. Women with HbA1c 5.60-5.99% and no diagnosis of diabetes had a 54% increased risk of mortality (95% CI 1-136%) compared with those with HbA1c 2.27-4.79%. HbA1c was significantly associated with mortality across the range 4.50-7.00% (p value for linear trend=0.02); a test of deviation from linearity was not statistically significant (p=0.67). Diabetic women had more than twice the mortality risk of non-diabetic women. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION This study provides further evidence that chronic mild hyperglycaemia, even in the absence of diagnosed diabetes, is associated with increased risk of mortality. ClinicalTrials.gov ID no.: NCT00000479.