-
1.
Comparison of concurrent treatment with vitamin K2 and risedronate compared with treatment with risedronate alone in patients with osteoporosis: Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial-03.
Tanaka, S, Miyazaki, T, Uemura, Y, Miyakawa, N, Gorai, I, Nakamura, T, Fukunaga, M, Ohashi, Y, Ohta, H, Mori, S, et al
Journal of bone and mineral metabolism. 2017;(4):385-395
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of concurrent treatment with vitamin K2 and risedronate compared with treatment with risedronate alone in patients with osteoporosis and to explore subsets of patients for which concurrent treatment is particularly efficacious. Women with osteoporosis aged 65 years or older were recruited from 123 institutes in Japan and allocated to take either vitamin K2 (45 mg/day) and risedronate (2.5 mg/day or 17.5 mg/week) or risedronate (2.5 mg/day or 17.5 mg/week) alone. The primary end point was the incidence of any fracture (vertebral and nonvertebral). The secondary end points were bone mineral density, height, undercarboxylated osteocalcin concentration, quality of life, and safety. Over a 2-year follow-up, vertebral or nonvertebral fractures occurred in 117 or 22 sites respectively among 931 patients in the risedronate and vitamin K2 group and in 104 or 26 sites respectively among 943 patients in the risedronate alone group. The rates of any incident fracture were similar between the two groups (incidence rate ratio 1.074, 95 % confidence interval 0.811-1.422, p = 0.62), implying that the primary end point was not met. There were no differences in the degree of increase in bone mineral density between the two groups. Undercarboxylated osteocalcin concentration decreased from 5.81 ± 3.93 ng/mL to 2.59 ± 1.52 ng/mL at 6 months in the risedronate and vitamin K2 group, whereas the change in the risedronate alone group was minimal (from 5.96 ± 4.36 ng/mL to 4.05 ± 3.40 ng/mL at 6 months) (p < 0.01). The treatment discontinuation rate was higher in the risedronate and vitamin K2 group than in the risedronate alone group (10.0 % vs 6.7 %). No unknown adverse drug reactions were reported. In conclusion, concurrent treatment with vitamin K2 and risedronate was not efficacious compared with monotherapy with risedronate in terms of fracture prevention.
-
2.
Renal Phosphate Reabsorption is Correlated with the Increase in Lumbar Bone Mineral Density in Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Teriparatide.
Takeuchi, Y, Kuroda, T, Sugimoto, T, Shiraki, M, Nakamura, T
Calcified tissue international. 2016;(2):186-92
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
In order to assess the changes in serum calcium and phosphate and the changes in renal tubular phosphate reabsorption (TmP/GFR) and to evaluate the association between these indices and the increase in bone mineral density (BMD) with once-weekly intermittent administration of teriparatide (TPTD), the results from the teriparatide once-weekly efficacy research (TOWER) trial were re-analyzed. The TOWER trial studied postmenopausal women and older men with osteoporosis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive TPTD 56.5 μg or placebo for 72 weeks. Of these patients, the present study investigated those whose calcium and phosphate levels and lumbar BMD (L-BMD) were measured (TPTD group, n = 153 and Placebo group, n = 137). The TPTD group had significantly lower serum phosphate, calcium-phosphate product, and TmP/GFR at weeks 4, 24, 48, and 72 and urinary fractional calcium excretion (FECa) at weeks 12, 48, and 72 (p < 0.05). In the TPTD group, the serum phosphate and TmP/GFR during early treatment (4, and 12 weeks) showed a significant positive correlation with the percent change in L-BMD at weeks 48 and 72. Based on multivariate analysis corrected for age, BMI, and L-BMD at the start of treatment, serum phosphate and TmP/GFR at week 4 showed a significant correlation with the percent change in L-BMD. This study suggests that the L-BMD response to once-weekly long-term TPTD treatment is associated with circulating phosphate or with the status of its renal reabsorption. Preventing decrease in serum phosphate levels may be important in acquiring greater L-BMD with once-weekly TPTD.
-
3.
Efficacy of combined treatment with alendronate (ALN) and eldecalcitol, a new active vitamin D analog, compared to that of concomitant ALN, vitamin D plus calcium treatment in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis.
Sakai, A, Ito, M, Tomomitsu, T, Tsurukami, H, Ikeda, S, Fukuda, F, Mizunuma, H, Inoue, T, Saito, H, Nakamura, T, et al
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2015;(3):1193-202
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
UNLABELLED Combined treatment with alendronate and eldecalcitol was found to be more effective in reducing the bone turnover markers and increasing bone mineral density than alendronate treatment with vitamin D3 and calcium supplementation in the osteoporotic patients. INTRODUCTION We compared the clinical efficacy and safety of combined treatment with alendronate plus eldecalcitol (ALN + ELD) with those of treatment with ALN plus vitamin D and calcium (ALN + VitD). METHODS Osteoporotic 219 patients were randomly assigned to the ALN + ELD, or the ALN + VitD group. Primary endpoint was the inter-group differences in lumbar spine BMD (L-BMD) at patient's last visit. Secondary endpoints included the differences in BMD at other sites and the bone turnover marker (BTM) levels. RESULTS L-BMD, total hip BMD and femoral neck (FN-BMD) increased from baseline by 7.30, 2.41, and 2.70 % in the ALN + ELD group, and by 6.52, 2.27, and 1.18% in the ALN + VitD group, respectively. Inter-group differences of the L-BMD and total hip BMD values were not significant. The increase of the FN-BMD was larger in the ALN + ELD group than the ALN + VitD group. Reductions of the BTMs were greater in the ALN + ELD group than the ALN + VitD group. Interaction of the percent increase of the L-BMD with the baseline values of the BTMs was observed in the ALN + VitD group only. The increases of the FN-BMD in patients with lower baseline values of type-I-collagen C-telopeptide (sCTX) and serum 25(OH) D levels <20 ng/mL were significantly larger in the ALN + ELD group than the other group. CONCLUSION Combination treatment of ALN plus ELD was more effective in reducing the BTMs and increasing the FN-BMD than ALN treatment with vitamin D3 and calcium.
-
4.
Vertebral fracture risk after once-weekly teriparatide injections: follow-up study of Teriparatide Once-Weekly Efficacy Research (TOWER) trial.
Sugimoto, T, Shiraki, M, Nakano, T, Kishimoto, H, Ito, M, Fukunaga, M, Hagino, H, Sone, T, Kuroda, T, Nakamura, T
Current medical research and opinion. 2013;(3):195-203
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate fracture risk and bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with primary osteoporosis, 1 year after completing 72 weeks of weekly teriparatide injections. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS After 72 weeks of teriparatide injections or placebo (original trial), treatment was unblinded and subjects were subsequently treated with bisphosphonates or other therapeutic regimens at the discretion of their physicians and followed for 1 year. Spine radiographs and BMD measurements at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Incident vertebral fracture rate. RESULTS A total of 465 patients were enrolled and 447 (96.1%) completed the study. In the 1 year follow-up period, new morphometric vertebral fractures occurred in 7/203 (3.4%) in the post-teriparatide group and 33/241 (13.7%) in the post-placebo group (relative risk [RR]: 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10 to 0.52, P < 0.05). The cumulative incidences from the start of the original trial were 4.9% and 22.8%, respectively (RR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.36, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in incidences of vertebral fractures between subsequent therapeutic regimens in the post-teriparatide group. In subjects treated with bisphosphonates, mean BMD values further significantly increased by 9.6%, 2.9%, and 4.1% at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The reduced risk of vertebral fracture was sustained for 1 year after completion of 72 weeks of weekly teriparatide injections. The effects did not differ between subsequent therapeutic regimens. BMD gains continued with sequential bisphosphonate treatment, but not with the other sequential therapeutic regimens. Bisphosphonates seem to be a useful choice as a subsequent treatment to weekly teriparatide. LIMITATION This study was an observational follow-up study and the regimens of subsequent medication after discontinuation of the original TOWER trial were not randomly allocated.
-
5.
Efficacy and safety of monthly oral minodronate in patients with involutional osteoporosis.
Okazaki, R, Hagino, H, Ito, M, Sone, T, Nakamura, T, Mizunuma, H, Fukunaga, M, Shiraki, M, Nishizawa, Y, Ohashi, Y, et al
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2012;(6):1737-45
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
UNLABELLED Monthly minodronate at 30 or 50 mg had similar efficacy as 1 mg daily in terms of change in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers with similar safety profiles. This new regimen provides patients with a new option for taking minodronate. INTRODUCTION Minodronate at a daily oral dose of 1 mg has been proven to have antivertebral fracture efficacy. In the present study, the efficacy and safety of oral minodronate at monthly doses of either 30 mg or 50 mg were compared with a daily dose of 1 mg. METHODS A total of 692 patients with involutional osteoporosis were randomized to receive minodronate at either 30 or 50 mg monthly or a daily dose of 1 mg. The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline in lumbar spine (LS) BMD at 12 months. Total hip BMD, bone turnover markers, serum calcium (Ca), and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels were also evaluated. RESULTS Minodronate at monthly doses of 30 or 50 mg were noninferior to the 1 mg daily dose in terms of change in LS-BMD. Changes in total hip BMD were also comparable. Although a transient decrease in serum Ca and increase in PTH levels were observed in all three groups at slightly different magnitudes and time courses, changes in bone turnover markers were comparable among the different dosage groups with a similar time course. Safety profiles were also comparable. CONCLUSION Minodronate at monthly doses of 30 or 50 mg has similar efficacy to the daily 1 mg dose in terms of BMD and bone turnover markers with similar tolerability.
-
6.
Design of a pragmatic approach to evaluate the effectiveness of concurrent treatment for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures: rationale, aims and organization of a Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT) initiated by the Research Group of Adequate Treatment of Osteoporosis (A-TOP).
Shiraki, M, Kuroda, T, Miyakawa, N, Fujinawa, N, Tanzawa, K, Ishizuka, A, Tanaka, S, Tanaka, Y, Hosoi, T, Itoi, E, et al
Journal of bone and mineral metabolism. 2011;(1):37-43
Abstract
The aim of osteoporosis treatment is to prevent future fractures. Although concurrent treatment has been used very frequently for osteoporosis in clinical practice, there are no data on accurate and verified effectiveness of concurrent treatment for fracture prevention in patients with osteoporosis. To clarify the clinical usefulness of concurrent treatment, the Japan Osteoporosis Society has authorized the establishment of the A-TOP (Adequate Treatment of Osteoporosis) research group. The objective of this research is to establish a design for a clinical trial to prove whether concurrent treatment using both alfacalcidol (1-alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol) and alendronate is more effective as compared to treatment using alendronate alone in terms of fracture prevention. The present study was named JOINT (Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial) and is based on a method using national, prospective, randomized, open-labeled, blinded endpoints focusing on postmenopausal osteoporosis with a high risk for fracture. The patients were mainly selected by practitioners and allocated randomly by a central registration system into two groups, of which one received 5 mg/day of alendronate alone, and the other received 1 μg/day of 1-alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol (alfacalcidol) in addition to the alendronate. The endpoints focused primarily on fracture prevention, and the patients' quality of life (QOL) and change in body height, as well as adherence and the adverse events of the treatments were evaluated secondarily. To obtain sufficient statistical power in the events during a 2-year observation period, the patients who are expected to have higher risk were selected to participate in this study, and it was decided that the final plan would involve 890 patients per group (two-sided alpha = 0.05, power = 0.8). Data collection began in November 2003. Correspondence regarding the registration of the investigator and the progress of the study was conducted through a web system from the Public Health Research Foundation to practitioners.
-
7.
Effects of alendronate plus alfacalcidol in osteoporosis patients with a high risk of fracture: the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT) - 02.
Orimo, H, Nakamura, T, Fukunaga, M, Ohta, H, Hosoi, T, Uemura, Y, Kuroda, T, Miyakawa, N, Ohashi, Y, Shiraki, M, et al
Current medical research and opinion. 2011;(6):1273-84
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The authors conducted a randomized controlled trial to clarify the efficacy and safety of alendronate plus alfacalcidol versus alendronate alone in a clinical setting. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Eligible patients were postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis who were aged 70 years or older and had several risk factors for incident fractures. The primary endpoint was prevention of incident fractures, and the anti-fracture efficacy was evaluated in relation to the baseline serum 25(OH)D level. RESULTS A total of 2164 patients were randomized to alendronate plus alfacalcidol (combination therapy) or alendronate alone (monotherapy). Although the overall difference in the incidence of vertebral fracture between the two groups was not significant, the combination therapy group had a significantly reduced risk of vertebral fractures after the first 6 months (HR, 0.53). In subgroup analyses, the combination therapy group was superior in the strata of number of prevalent vertebral fractures of ≥2 (HR, 0.51) and grade 3 of prevalent vertebral fractures (HR, 0.55). The rate of non-vertebral weight-bearing bone fractures was significantly lower in the combination therapy group than in the monotherapy group during the follow-up period (HR, 0.31). A lower baseline 25(OH)D level was associated with a higher incidence of non-vertebral weight-bearing bone fractures (HR, 3.42) despite alendronate use. Although one patient given the combination therapy had mild hypercalcemia, serious hypercalcemia and unknown adverse events were not encountered. Because of the limitations presented in this study, these results may not apply to female patients with longer than 2 years of treatments, and to male osteoporosis patients. CONCLUSIONS The combination therapy was no more effective for overall vertebral fracture prevention. However, subgroup analysis has shown that it was more effective for fracture prevention in patients with severe vertebral deformity, multiple prevalent vertebral fractures, and for non-vertebral weight-bearing bone fracture prevention.
-
8.
Efficacy and tolerability of once-weekly administration of 17.5 mg risedronate in Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis: a comparison with 2.5-mg once-daily dosage regimen.
Kishimoto, H, Fukunaga, M, Kushida, K, Shiraki, M, Itabashi, A, Nawata, H, Nakamura, T, Ohta, H, Takaoka, K, Ohashi, Y, et al
Journal of bone and mineral metabolism. 2006;(5):405-13
Abstract
In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind controlled trial, the efficacy and safety of once-weekly dosing with 17.5 mg risedronate was compared with once-daily dosing with 2.5 mg risedronate in Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis. A total of 496 patients were randomized to receive either once-weekly (n = 249) or once-daily (n = 247) treatment. All patients were supplemented with 200 mg/day calcium. Following 48 weeks of treatment, the mean (+/-SD) percent changes, from baseline, in the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine (L2-L4 BMD) in the once-weekly and once-daily treatment groups were 5.36 +/- 4.27% and 5.87 +/- 4.47%, respectively. The difference between the groups was -0.5% (95% confidence interval: -1.35% to 0.35%), demonstrating that the effect on BMD of once-weekly treatment was not inferior to that of once-daily treatment. The time-course reductions in biochemical markers of bone resorption (urinary N- and C-telopeptide of type I collagen) and bone formation (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) were similar for the two dosing regimens. There were no differences in the incidence of new vertebral fractures or the worsening of existing fractures between the once-weekly (2.2%) and once-daily (2.7%) dosing regimens. No significant differences were observed between the two dosing regimens in the incidence or the type of adverse events. However, 10.1% of the patients in the once-daily group withdrew due to adverse events as compared to 5.2% in the once-weekly group. Moreover, drug-related adverse events, including upper gastrointestinal disorders and abnormal changes in laboratory parameters, tended to be less in the once-weekly dosing regimen than in the once-daily dosing regimen. In conclusion, once-weekly oral dosing with 17.5 mg risedronate was well tolerated in Japanese osteoporotic patients, and showed equivalent efficacy to once-daily oral dosing with 2.5 mg risedronate. This once-weekly regimen is expected to provide a more convenient therapeutic option as an alternative to daily dosing and to enhance patient compliance in long-term therapy for osteoporosis.