1.
Ertugliflozin plus sitagliptin versus either individual agent over 52 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin: The VERTIS FACTORIAL randomized trial.
Pratley, RE, Eldor, R, Raji, A, Golm, G, Huyck, SB, Qiu, Y, Sunga, S, Johnson, J, Terra, SG, Mancuso, JP, et al
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2018;(5):1111-1120
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin and sitagliptin co-administration vs the individual agents in patients with type 2 diabetes who are inadequately controlled with metformin. METHODS In this study (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02099110), patients with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥7.5% and ≤11.0% (≥58 and ≤97 mmol/mol) with metformin ≥1500 mg/d (n = 1233) were randomized to ertugliflozin 5 (E5) or 15 (E15) mg/d, sitagliptin 100 mg/d (S100) or to co-administration of E5/S100 or E15/S100. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 26. RESULTS At Week 26, least squares mean HbA1c reductions from baseline were greater with E5/S100 (-1.5%) and E15/S100 (-1.5%) than with individual agents (-1.0%, -1.1% and -1.1% for E5, E15 and S100, respectively; P < .001 for all comparisons). HbA1c <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) was achieved by 26.4%, 31.9%, 32.8%, 52.3% and 49.2% of patients in the E5, E15, S100, E5/S100 and E15/S100 groups, respectively. Fasting plasma glucose reductions were significantly greater with E5/S100 and E15/S100 compared with individual agents. Body weight and systolic blood pressure (SBP) significantly decreased with E5/S100 and E15/S100 vs S100 alone. Glycaemic control, body weight and SBP effects of ertugliflozin were maintained to Week 52. Genital mycotic infections were more common among ertugliflozin-treated patients compared with those treated with S100. Incidences of symptomatic hypoglycaemia and adverse events related to hypovolaemia or urinary tract infection were similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS In patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes while using metformin, co-administration of ertugliflozin and sitagliptin provided more effective glycaemic control through 52 weeks compared with the individual agents.
2.
Glycaemic outcomes of an Individualized treatMent aPproach for oldER vulnerable patIents: A randomized, controlled stUdy in type 2 diabetes Mellitus (IMPERIUM).
Heller, SR, Pratley, RE, Sinclair, A, Festa, A, Kiljański, J, Brusko, CS, Duan, R, Heine, RJ
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2018;(1):148-156
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIMS: To compare the glycaemic outcomes of 2 glucose-lowering treatment strategies in vulnerable (moderately ill and/or frail) patients aged ≥65 years with type 2 diabetes whose individual HbA1c targets were not met with diet/exercise and/or oral anti-hyperglycaemic medications (OAMs). METHODS The primary endpoint of this study was a composite of achieving/maintaining individualized HbA1c targets without "clinically significant" hypoglycaemia (severe hypoglycaemia or repeated hypoglycaemia causing interruption of patients' activities or blood glucose <54 mg/dL). Strategy-A comprised glucose-dependent therapies (n = 99) with a non-sulphonylurea OAM and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist as the first injectable. Strategy-B comprised non-glucose-dependent therapies (n = 93) with sulphonylurea as the preferred OAM and insulin glargine as the first injectable. RESULTS There was no significant difference between Strategy-A and Strategy-B in percentages of patients achieving the primary endpoint (64.5% vs 54.9%; P = .190). Mean incidences (A vs B) of total (10.2% vs 53.8%), documented symptomatic (5.1% vs 36.6%), and asymptomatic (8.2% vs 32.3%) hypoglycaemia were lower for Strategy-A (P < .001 each). Proportions of patients achieving/maintaining HbA1c target (A, 63.3% vs B, 55.9%) were similar. CONCLUSION Similar proportions of older, vulnerable aged ≥65 years patients with type 2 diabetes achieved/maintained glycaemic treatment goals without clinically significant hypoglycaemia with Strategies A or B. However, Strategy-A resulted in lower risk of total, documented symptomatic, and asymptomatic hypoglycaemia. These results identify an approach of potential clinical benefit in this age group and will inform future clinical research in older patients with type 2 diabetes.
3.
Circulating levels of miR-7, miR-152 and miR-192 respond to vitamin D supplementation in adults with prediabetes and correlate with improvements in glycemic control.
Nunez Lopez, YO, Pittas, AG, Pratley, RE, Seyhan, AA
The Journal of nutritional biochemistry. 2017;:117-122
Abstract
Vitamin D may play an important role in modifying the risk of type 2 diabetes. Supplementation with cholecalciferol has been shown to improve β cell function and to attenuate the rise in glycated hemoglobin in people at high risk of diabetes. We examined whether circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) reflect disease progression and/or respond to vitamin D supplementation. We measured plasma levels of select miRNAs implicated in diabetes in people with prediabetes treated either with placebo (n=21) or 2000 U of cholecalciferol daily (n=21) for 4 months in the Calcium and Vitamin D for Diabetes Mellitus trial and compared the baseline-adjusted changes after correcting for age, body mass index, race, time of study entry (season) and baseline disposition index. Circulating levels of miR-7 (sixfold reduction, P=.01), miR-152 (1.5-fold increase, P=.03), and miR-192 (1.7-fold reduction, P=.026) displayed significant treatment-by-time interactions between the placebo- and the vitamin-D-treated groups. Plasma levels of miR-7 were reduced in the vitamin D and increased in the placebo group. The change in miR-152 positively correlated with the change in levels of the circulating metabolite 25-hydroxyvitamin D (r=0.33, P=.046) and negatively correlated with the change in glycated hemoglobin (r=-0.37, P=.024). The change in miR-192 positively correlated with the change in fasting glucose (r=0.41, P<.011). In conclusion, reduction of circulating miR-7 and miR-192, accompanied by elevation of miR-152, reflects a beneficial metabolic response to vitamin D treatment in people with prediabetes. These miRNAs may be useful biomarkers in diabetes prevention trials and other studies of vitamin D.