1.
Liver fat is reduced by an isoenergetic MUFA diet in a controlled randomized study in type 2 diabetic patients.
Bozzetto, L, Prinster, A, Annuzzi, G, Costagliola, L, Mangione, A, Vitelli, A, Mazzarella, R, Longobardo, M, Mancini, M, Vigorito, C, et al
Diabetes care. 2012;(7):1429-35
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of qualitative dietary changes and the interaction with aerobic exercise training on liver fat content independent of weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS With use of a factorial 2 × 2 randomized parallel-group design, 37 men and 8 women, aged 35-70 years, with type 2 diabetes in satisfactory blood glucose control on diet or diet plus metformin treatment were assigned to one of the following groups for an 8-week period: 1) high-carbohydrate/high-fiber/low-glycemic index diet (CHO/fiber group), 2) high-MUFA diet (MUFA group), 3) high-carbohydrate/high-fiber/low-glycemic index diet plus physical activity program (CHO/fiber+Ex group), and 4) high-MUFA diet plus physical activity program (MUFA+Ex group). Before and after intervention, hepatic fat content was measured by (1)H NMR. RESULTS Dietary compliance was optimal and body weight remained stable in all groups. Liver fat content decreased more in MUFA (-29%) and MUFA+Ex (-25%) groups than in CHO/fiber (-4%) and CHO/fiber+Ex groups (-6%). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, including baseline values as covariate, showed a significant effect on liver fat content for diet (P = 0.006), with no effects for exercise training (P = 0.789) or diet-exercise interaction (P = 0.712). CONCLUSIONS An isocaloric diet enriched in MUFA compared with a diet higher in carbohydrate and fiber was associated with a clinically relevant reduction of hepatic fat content in type 2 diabetic patients independent of an aerobic training program and should be considered for the nutritional management of hepatic steatosis in people with type 2 diabetes.
2.
Liver fat in obesity: role of type 2 diabetes mellitus and adipose tissue distribution.
Bozzetto, L, Prinster, A, Mancini, M, Giacco, R, De Natale, C, Salvatore, M, Riccardi, G, Rivellese, AA, Annuzzi, G
European journal of clinical investigation. 2011;(1):39-44
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fatty liver is commonly associated with insulin-resistant conditions, often related to increased abdominal visceral fat. Our objective was to elucidate the specific roles of obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, insulin-resistance and abdominal fat distribution. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study population comprised 13 diabetic obese (DO), 10 nondiabetic obese (NDO), and nine normal-weight control (C) men aged 28-65 years, with normal plasma triglyceride levels. DO were in good glycaemic control (HbA1c = 6·8 ± 0·8%) (M ± SD) with diet (n = 8) or diet + metformin (n = 5). Liver fat content was measured by (1) H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy, abdominal fat distribution by magnetic resonance imaging and insulin sensitivity by hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp. RESULTS DO and NDO subjects had similar whole-body insulin resistance, BMI and waist circumference, higher than those of C subjects (P < 0·001). DO had more liver fat (11·9 ± 7·0%) than NDO (5·2 ± 2·8%, P < 0·05) and C (1·6 ± 1·0%, P < 0·001). Abdominal fat was greater in DO and NDO than in C (visceral: DO 3184 ± 843, NDO 2843 ± 1378 vs. C 1212 ± 587 cm(3), P < 0·001; subcutaneous: DO 4029 ± 362, NDO 5197 ± 1398 vs. C 2312 ± 626 cm(3), P < 0·001), visceral fat being not significantly different between the two obese groups, and subcutaneous fat significantly less in DO than in NDO (P < 0·05). CONCLUSIONS Type 2 diabetes is associated with increased fat accumulation in the liver, independent of obesity and whole-body insulin resistance. The increased liver fat in DO patients may be part of an altered regional fat distribution that includes an inadequate subcutaneous fat storing capacity, rather than simply being a consequence of increased abdominal visceral content.