1.
Calcium-Induced Autonomic Denervation in Patients With Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation.
Wang, H, Zhang, Y, Xin, F, Jiang, H, Tao, D, Jin, Y, He, Y, Wang, Q, Po, SS
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2021;(1):57-67
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is associated with worse long-term cardiovascular outcomes. OBJECTIVES This study hypothesized that injecting calcium chloride (CaCl2) into the major atrial ganglionated plexi (GPs) during isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) can reduce the incidence of POAF by calcium-induced autonomic neurotoxicity. METHODS This proof-of-concept study randomized 200 patients undergoing isolated, off-pump CABG to CaCl2 (n = 100) or sodium chloride (sham, n = 100) injection. Two milliliters of CaCl2 (5%) or sodium chloride (0.9%) was injected into the 4 major atrial GPs during CABG. All patients received 7-day continuous telemetry and Holter monitoring. The primary outcome was incidence of POAF (≥30 s) in 7 days. Secondary outcomes included length of hospitalization, POAF burden, average ventricular rate during AF, plasma level of inflammatory markers, and actionable antiarrhythmic therapy to treat POAF. RESULTS The POAF incidence was reduced from 36% to 15% (hazard ratio: 0.366; 95% confidence interval: 0.211 to 0.635; p = 0.001). Length of hospitalization did not differ between the 2 groups. POAF burden (first 7 post-operative days), the use of amiodarone or esmolol, and the incidence of atrial couplets and nonsustained atrial tachyarrhythmias were significantly reduced in the CaCl2 group. Heart rate variability data showed a decrease in both high-frequency and low-frequency power in the CaCl2 group with a preserved low-frequency/high-frequency ratio, suggesting that the sympathetic/parasympathetic balance was not perturbed by CaCl2 injection. CONCLUSIONS Injection of CaCl2 into the 4 major atrial GPs reduced the POAF hazard by 63%. Inhibition of GP function by Ca-mediated neurotoxicity may underlie the therapeutic effect. (Calcium Autonomic Denervation Prevents Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation; ChiCTR1800019276).
2.
[Laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer without incision at abdomen versus traditional laparoscopic resection: A Meta-analysis].
Yang, X, Su, W, Deng, Z, Wang, Q, Xu, X, Cao, J
Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences. 2017;(1):88-97
Abstract
To evaluate the safety, feasibility and effectiveness of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal cancer without incision at abdomen vs the traditional laparoscopic resection.
Methods: We retrieved literature published from August, 2005 to August, 2015 to compare laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer without incision at abdomen with the traditional laparoscopic resection. The clinical indicators were extracted from literature met inclusion criteria. The RevMan 5.3 software with a Meta-analysis was used.
Results: Seven literature with a total of 621 patients, including 262 in laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal cancer without auxiliary incision at abdomen group (NOSE group) and 359 in conventional laparoscopic colorectal resection group (LAP group), were enrolled. The Meta-analysis showed that the total complication rate in the NOSE group was significantly less than that in the LAP group (OR=0.31, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.53, P<0.05). Complications of incision in the NOSE group were less than those in the LAP group (OR= 0.15, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.40, P=0.0002). Postoperative bleeding (OR=1.52, 95% CI 0.38 to 6.18, P=0.55), intestinal obstruction (OR= 0.30, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.98, P=0.05), anastomotic complications (OR=0.92, 95% CI 0.28 to 3.07, P=0.89), and other related complications (OR=0.63, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.66, P=0.35) showed no significant difference between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Hospitalization (MD=-0.66, 95% CI -1.33 to 0.01, P=0.05), duration of surgery (MD=14.78, 95% CI -1.75 to 31.31, P=0.08), bleeding amount (MD=-12.81, 95% CI -40.36 to 14.74, P=0.36), the tumor size (SMD=-0.40, 95% CI -0.87 to 0.08, P=0.10), the number of lymph node dissection (MD=-0.49, 95% CI 1.80 to 0.82, P=0.46), and the recurrence of 2-year follow-up (OR=1.15, 95% CI 0.38 to 3.50, P=0.81) were not statistically significant between the 2 groups. Time of gas passage (SMD=-0.62, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.42, P<0.001) and time of regular diet after surgery (SMD=-0.60, 95% CI -1.15 to 0.05, P=0.03) in the NOSE group were earlier than those in the LAP group. The postoperative pain score (MD=-1.49, 95% CI -1.97 to -1.01, P<0.001) in the NOSE group was significantly lower than that in the LAP group. Cosmetic surgery in the NOSE group had a higher index (MD=1.37, 95% CI 0.59 to 2.14, P=0.0005) compared with that in the LAP group.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer without auxiliary incision at abdomen can obviously reduce the incidence of incision complications, and the patients can recover early and incision is showed more cosmetic. The method is safe, feasible, and effective.
3.
Post-Gastric Bypass Hyperinsulinemic Hypoglycemia: Fructose is a Carbohydrate Which Can Be Safely Consumed.
Bantle, AE, Wang, Q, Bantle, JP
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2015;(8):3097-102
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
CONTEXT Postprandial hypoglycemia after gastric bypass surgery is a serious problem. Available treatments are often ineffective. OBJECTIVE The objective was to test the hypotheses that injection of rapid-acting insulin before a high-carbohydrate meal or replacement of other carbohydrates with fructose in the meal would prevent hypoglycemia. DESIGN This was a randomized, crossover trial comparing a high-carbohydrate meal with premeal saline injection (control), a high-carbohydrate meal with premeal insulin injection, and a high-fructose meal with total carbohydrate content similar to the control meal. SETTING The setting was an academic medical center. PATIENTS Ten patients with post-gastric bypass hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia participated. INTERVENTIONS Interventions included lispro insulin injected before test meals and replacement of other carbohydrates with fructose in test meals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The main outcome measure was plasma glucose < 60 mg/dL after test meals. RESULTS After the control meal, mean peak glucose and insulin were 173 ± 47 mg/dL and 134 ± 55 mU/L, respectively; mean glucose nadir was 44 ± 15 mg/dL; and eight of 10 subjects demonstrated glucose < 60 mg/dL. Five subjects demonstrated a glucose nadir < 40 mg/dL. There were no significant differences in the corresponding values after premeal insulin treatment, except that the mean glucose nadir of 34 ± 10 mg/dL was lower (P < .05). After the fructose meal, mean peak postprandial glucose and insulin were 117 ± 20 mg/dL and 45 ± 31 mU/L, respectively (both P < .001 for comparison with control), mean glucose nadir was 67 ± 10 mg/dL (P < .001), and two of 10 subjects demonstrated glucose < 60 mg/dL (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS People with post-gastric bypass hypoglycemia can consume a meal sweetened with fructose with little risk of hypoglycemia. Treatment with rapid-acting insulin before a carbohydrate-containing meal did not prevent hypoglycemia.