-
1.
Transcriptome Alterations in Liver Metastases of Colorectal Cancer After Acquired Resistance to Cetuximab.
Li, Z, Chen, Y, Ren, WU, Hu, S, Tan, Z, Wang, Y, Chen, Y, Zhang, J, Wu, J, Li, T, et al
Cancer genomics & proteomics. 2019;(3):207-219
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: Cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy is recommended as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with wild-type RAS. However, drug resistance to cetuximab exists widely in mCRC and reduces the prognosis of patients. Although some genomic alterations have been demonstrated to drive acquired resistance to cetuximab, the overall compendium of inherent molecular mechanisms is still incomplete. MATERIALS AND METHODS Four liver metastasis biopsies were collected from two mCRC patients who were treated with cetuximab in combination with 5-fluororacil plus leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimen. RESULTS Transcriptomic analysis revealed global gene expression alterations between paired samples prior to treatment and after acquired resistance. Further bioinformatics analysis discovered differentially expressed protein-coding genes/lncRNAs/miRNAs, potential miRNA-mRNA regulatory networks and lncRNA-mRNA competing endogenous RNA network, which may be potential biomarkers or play roles during the process of acquired resistance to cetuximab. CONCLUSION Our study contributes to deciphering the molecular mechanisms of acquired resistance to cetuximab.
-
2.
Tumor calcification as a prognostic factor in cetuximab plus chemotherapy-treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Zhou, Y, Zhang, J, Dan Pu, , Bi, F, Chen, Y, Liu, J, Li, Q, Gou, H, Wu, B, Qiu, M
Anti-cancer drugs. 2019;(2):195-200
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the correlation between survival and tumor calcification in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received cetuximab combined with chemotherapy. The study was a single-center retrospective analysis that enrolled 111 patients who had received therapy between April 2011 and October 2016. Tumor calcification and treatment efficacy were evaluated independently by radiologists on the basis of computed tomography scans. Clinical characteristics and follow-up data were collected from electronic medical records. Correlations between tumor calcification and clinical characteristics, tumor response rate, and patient survival were analyzed. Among the 111 enrolled patients, 27 had tumor calcification [27/111 (24.3%)]. The median progression-free survival was significantly longer for patients with tumor calcification than for those without calcification (9.3 vs. 6.2 months, P=0.022). Patients with tumor calcification also had a higher objective response rate (55.6 vs. 31%, P=0.021) and better overall survival (21.9 vs. 16.5 months, P=0.084). The correlation between calcification features and prognosis showed that patients with an increasing number of calcifications after treatment had a significantly longer median overall survival (22.9 vs. 9.1 months, P=0.033). Simultaneously, new liver metastases and multiple calcifications also showed a trend toward better overall survival. There were also no significant correlations between clinical characteristics (sex, age, gene mutation, primary tumor location, pathological type, blood test result) and survival (Supplementary Table 1, Supplemental digital content 1, http://links.lww.com/ACD/A280). Tumor calcification is associated with a better treatment outcome and is a potential prognostic marker.
-
3.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With mFOLFOXIRI Without Routine Use of Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
Zhang, J, Huang, M, Cai, Y, Wang, L, Xiao, J, Lan, P, Hu, H, Wu, X, Ling, J, Peng, J, et al
Clinical colorectal cancer. 2019;(4):238-244
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) achieves low local recurrence rates in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), it raises a lot of concerns about long-term anal and sexual functions. We explored the efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) in patients with LARC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with LARC evaluated by pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were enrolled in this trial. All received 4 to 6 cycles of mFOLFOXIRI. MRI was performed to assess clinical response after chemotherapy. Patients with mesorectal fascia-positive or ycT4a/b after re-evaluation would receive radiation before surgery, whereas responders would have immediate total mesorectal excision (TME). Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) was recommended. The primary endpoint was the proportion of tumor downstaging to ypT0-2N0M0. The secondary endpoints were pathologic complete response rate (pCR), 3-year disease-free survival rate, and safety. RESULTS Overall, 106 patients were enrolled and received neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI chemotherapy. A total of 103 participants underwent TME surgery. Among 103 patients who completed at least 4 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy, 2 received short-term radiation before TME, and 12 underwent long-term CRT after MRI evaluation. The pCR rate was 20.4%, and the tumor downstaging rate was 42.7%. Among patients without preoperative long-term radiotherapy, the pCR rate and tumor downstaging rate were 17.4% and 41.3%, respectively. Among the per-protocol population, the tumor downstaging rate was 48.1%, and the pCR rate was 20.3%. The chemotherapy-related toxicity was well-tolerated. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI and selective radiation does not seem to compromise outcomes in LARC. It could be a reasonable alternative to CRT in previously untreated patients with LARC.
-
4.
Efficacy and Tolerability of First-Line Cetuximab Plus Leucovorin, Fluorouracil, and Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) Versus FOLFOX-4 in Patients With RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Open-Label, Randomized, Phase III TAILOR Trial.
Qin, S, Li, J, Wang, L, Xu, J, Cheng, Y, Bai, Y, Li, W, Xu, N, Lin, LZ, Wu, Q, et al
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2018;(30):3031-3039
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE Cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy is a standard-of-care first-line treatment regimen for patients with RAS wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, the efficacy of cetuximab plus leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) has never before been proven in a controlled and randomized phase III trial. To our knowledge, the TAILOR trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01228734) is the first randomized, multicenter, phase III study of the addition of cetuximab to first-line FOLFOX prospectively choosing a RAS wt population and thus providing confirmative data for the efficacy and safety of cetuximab plus FOLFOX versus FOLFOX alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS TAILOR is an open-label, randomized (1:1), multicenter, phase III trial in patients from China comparing FOLFOX-4 with or without cetuximab in RAS wt (KRAS/NRAS, exons 2 to 4) mCRC. The primary end point of TAILOR was progression-free survival time; secondary end points included overall survival time, overall response rate, and safety and tolerability. RESULTS In the modified intent-to-treat population of 393 patients with RAS wt mCRC, adding cetuximab to FOLFOX-4 significantly improved the primary end point of progression-free survival time compared with FOLFOX-4 alone (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.89; P = .004; median, 9.2 v 7.4 months, respectively), as well as the secondary end points of overall survival time (current assessment after 300 events: hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.96; P = .02; median, 20.7 v 17.8 months, respectively) and overall response rate (odds ratio, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.61 to 3.61; P < .001; 61.1% v 39.5%, respectively). Treatment was well tolerated, and there were no new or unexpected safety findings. CONCLUSION The TAILOR study met all of its objectives and relevant clinical end points, confirming cetuximab in combination with FOLFOX as an effective standard-of-care first-line treatment regimen for patients with RAS wt mCRC.
-
5.
RESILIENCE: Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind Trial Comparing Sorafenib With Capecitabine Versus Placebo With Capecitabine in Locally Advanced or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.
Baselga, J, Zamagni, C, Gómez, P, Bermejo, B, Nagai, SE, Melichar, B, Chan, A, Mángel, L, Bergh, J, Costa, F, et al
Clinical breast cancer. 2017;(8):585-594.e4
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic/antiproliferative activity. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, we assessed first- or second-line capecitabine with sorafenib or placebo in patients with locally advanced/metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer resistant to a taxane and anthracycline and with known estrogen/progesterone receptor status. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 537 patients were randomized to capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally twice per day for days 1 to 14 every 21 days with oral sorafenib 600 mg/d or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Patients were stratified according to hormone receptor status, previous chemotherapies for metastatic breast cancer, and geographic region. RESULTS Treatment with sorafenib with capecitabine, compared with capecitabine with placebo, did not prolong median PFS (5.5 vs. 5.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.973; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.779-1.217; P = .811) or overall survival (OS; 18.9 vs. 20.3 months; HR, 1.195; 95% CI, 0.943-1.513; P = .140); or enhance overall response rate (ORR; 13.5% vs. 15.5%; P = .515). Any grade toxicities (sorafenib vs. placebo) included palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES; 79.2% vs. 59.6%), diarrhea (47.3% vs. 37.8%), mucosal inflammation (15.4% vs. 6.7%), and hypertension (26.2% vs. 5.6%). Grade 3/4 toxicities included PPES (15.4% vs. 7.1%), diarrhea (4.2% vs. 6.4%), and vomiting (3.5% vs. 0.7%). CONCLUSION The combination of sorafenib with capecitabine did not improve PFS, OS, or ORR in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Rates of Grade 3 toxicities were higher in the sorafenib arm.
-
6.
A multi-center phase II study and biomarker analysis of combined cetuximab and modified FOLFIRI as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.
Liu, X, Guo, W, Zhang, W, Yin, J, Zhang, J, Zhu, X, Liu, T, Chen, Z, Wang, B, Chang, J, et al
BMC cancer. 2017;(1):188
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab combined with modified FOLFIRI (mFOLFIRI) as a second-line treatment in metastatic gastric cancer patients and to identify potential biomarkers of clinical outcomes. METHODS All 61 patients received an initial intravenous (IV) dose of cetuximab (400 mg/m2) and weekly doses (250 mg/m2) thereafter, starting on day 1. On day 2 of each 14-day period, patients received IV irinotecan (180 mg/m2), leucovorin (200 mg/m2), and an IV bolus dose of 5-FU (400 mg/m2) followed by a continuous infusion of 5-FU (2400 mg/m2) for 46 h. The primary endpoint was time-to-progression (TTP). RESULTS The response rate (RR) was 33.3% among 54 evaluable patients. In the intention-to-treat analysis, median TTP was 4.6 months (95% confidential interval [CI]: 3.6-5.6 months) and median overall survival (OS) was 8.6 months (95% CI: 7.3-9.9 months). In univariate analyses, plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels were correlated with clinical outcome. In patients with low (≤12.6 pg/ml) and high (>12.6 pg/ml) baseline plasma VEGF levels, RR values were 55.0% and 5.3%, respectively (P = 0.001); median TTP values were 6.9 months and 2.8 months, respectively (P = 0.0005); and median OS values were 12 months and 5 months, respectively (P <0.0001). None of these patients exhibited KRAS, BRAF, or PIK3CA mutations. CONCLUSIONS Combination therapy comprising cetuximab and mFOLFIRI was well tolerated and active as a second-line treatment for patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Patients with low baseline plasma VEGF levels were associated with better clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT00699881 . Registered 17 June 2008 (retrospectively registered).
-
7.
Effects of cytokine-induced killer cell treatment in colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective study.
Zhang, J, Zhu, L, Zhang, Q, He, X, Yin, Y, Gu, Y, Guo, R, Lu, K, Liu, L, Liu, P, et al
Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie. 2014;(6):715-20
Abstract
Cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells are ex vivo generated heterogeneous NK-like T-lymphocytes, which have anti-tumor effects in vitro and in vivo. This present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of autologous CIK cell immunotherapy on the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and immune cells were assessed. We found that the percentages of CD8(+), CD3(+) CD56(+), CD3(-) CD56(+) cell subsets were significantly increased from 19.7±6.3%, 13.8±7.9%, 1.0±1.2% to 35.8±11.6% (P<0.001), 20.9±12.5 (P<0.001), 14.4±9.5% (P<0.001), respectively in the CIK group after 14 days of incubation. The median PFS and median OS in the CIK group were 25.8 months and 41.3 months respectively, while 12.0 months and 30.8 months in the control group. The PFS and OS curves of the CIK group and control group indicated that there were also statistically differences between two groups in PFS (log-rank, P=0.01) and OS (log-rank, P=0.037). Our results indicate that CIK cell immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy can reduce the recurrence rate and promote the survival time of patients with colorectal cancer.
-
8.
Combined cancer therapy with non-conventional drugs: all roads lead to AMPK.
Chen, S, Zhu, X, Lai, X, Xiao, T, Wen, A, Zhang, J
Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry. 2014;(8):642-54
Abstract
AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a key energy sensor that regulates cellular energy homeostasis. AMPK activation is associated with decreased phosphorylation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and S6 kinase and causes a general reduction in mRNA translation and protein synthesis. Therefore, AMPK is a novel target for anticancer therapy. Metformin and aspirin are two traditional drugs that are widely used as anti-diabetes and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), respectively. Much evidence has confirmed that these two drugs demonstrated encouraging anti-cancer properties. Most importantly, both inhibited tumor proliferation and were mainly dependent on the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway. In addition, several other drugs, such as resveratrol, berberine, statins, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and capsaicin, have provided a similar capacity for tumor inhibition, and the anti-cancer effects of most of them were mainly the result of AMPK activation. In the current review, we summarize the literature on combination therapy based on these non-classical drugs and their potential mechanisms for activating AMPK. Combinations of these drugs will provide a novel cancer therapeutic regimen.
-
9.
Prognostic and predictive role of JWA and XRCC1 expressions in gastric cancer.
Wang, S, Wu, X, Chen, Y, Zhang, J, Ding, J, Zhou, Y, He, S, Tan, Y, Qiang, F, Bai, J, et al
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2012;(10):2987-96
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the expression pattern and significance of DNA repair genes JWA and X-ray repair cross complement group 1 (XRCC1) in gastric cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Expressions of JWA and XRCC1 were assessed by immunohistochemistry in a training cohort and they went into a second testing cohort and finally to a validating cohort. Prognostic and predictive role of JWA and XRCC1 expression status in cases treated with surgery alone or combined with adjuvant chemotherapy was evaluated, respectively. RESULTS JWA and XRCC1 protein levels were significantly downregulated in gastric cancer lesions compared with adjacent noncancerous tissues. Low tumoral JWA or XRCC1 expression significantly correlated with shorter overall survival (OS), as well as with clinicopathologic characteristics in patients without adjuvant treatment. Multivariate regression analysis showed that low JWA and XRCC1 expressions, separately and together, were independent negative markers of OS. Adjuvant fluorouracil-leucovorin-oxaliplatin (FLO) significantly improved OS compared with surgery alone (log-rank test, P = 0.01). However, this effect was evident only in the JWA or XRCC1 low expression group (HR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.26-0.73; P = 0.002, and HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26-0.75; P = 0.002, respectively); Adjuvant fluorouracil-leucovorin-platinol (FLP) did not improve OS, except in the patients with low JWA and XRCC1 expressions (P = 0.010 for JWA and 0.024 for XRCC1, respectively). CONCLUSIONS JWA and XRCC1 protein expressions in tumor are novel candidate prognostic markers and predictive factors for benefit from adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy (FLO or FLP) in resectable human gastric carcinoma.
-
10.
Phase II study of oxaliplatin plus leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients.
Sun, S, Wang, LP, Zhang, J, Yang, XY, Zhang, QL, Jia, Z, Hu, XC, Wang, BY
Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England). 2012;(2):418-24
Abstract
The aim of this phase II study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients heavily pretreated with anthracyclines, taxanes, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and capecitabine. Sixty-two women who had received at least 3 above-mentioned drug classes were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-h infusion on day 1, LV 200 mg/m(2) as a 2-h infusion followed by bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) on day 1, and a continuous infusion of 5-FU 1,200 mg/m(2) for 44 h. The median patient age was 52 years with a median of two involved organs, and the metastases were mostly in the lung (53.2%), lymph nodes (51.6%), and liver (45.2%). Patients had a median of three prior chemotherapy regimens. Forty-five patients (72.6%) had prior exposure to all 5 classes of drugs. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, 60 patients were assessable for responses and 11 patients achieved a partial response (PR), giving an overall response rate (ORR) of 18.3%. Twenty-one (35%) patients had stable disease (SD), and of these, 8 achieved long SD (13.3%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 10 months. Toxicity was mild to moderate with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and neuropathy occurring in 14 (22.6%), 9 (14.5%), and 3 (4.8%) patients, respectively. The study demonstrated that the combination of oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV was a well-tolerated salvage regimen with moderate activity in patients with heavily pretreated MBC.