1.
The effect of berberine supplementation on obesity indices: A dose- response meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Xiong, P, Niu, L, Talaei, S, Kord-Varkaneh, H, Clark, CCT, Găman, MA, Rahmani, J, Dorosti, M, Mousavi, SM, Zarezadeh, M, et al
Complementary therapies in clinical practice. 2020;:101113
Abstract
BACKGROUND and purpose: Clinical studies investigating the effects of berberine supplementation on anthropometric indices in humans have generated inconsistent results. Thus, the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to clarify the effects of berberine supplementation on obesity indices in human subjects. METHODS Several online medical databases were systematically searched up to February 2019. All clinical trials exploring the effects of berberine supplementation on indices of obesity were included. The combined weighted mean difference (WMD) of eligible studies was assessed using a random-effects model. We evaluated publication bias by using the Egger's test. RESULTS Overall, 10 studies were included. The combined outcomes suggested a significant influence of berberine administration on body mass index (BMI) (WMD: -0.29 kg/m2, 95% CI: -0.51 to -0.08, p = 0.006) and waist circumference (WC) (WMD: -2.75 cm, 95% CI: -4.88 to -0.62, p = 0.01). However, berberine supplementation yielded no significant decline in body weight (BW) (WMD: -0.11 kg, 95% CI: -0.99 to 0.76, p = 0.79). Following the dose-response evaluation, berberine intake was found to significantly reduce BMI (r = -0.02) and WC (r = -0.72) based on treatment duration. CONCLUSION The results of the current study support the use of berberine supplementation for the improvement of obesity indices.
2.
Efficacy and safety of the selective 11β-HSD-1 inhibitors MK-0736 and MK-0916 in overweight and obese patients with hypertension.
Shah, S, Hermanowski-Vosatka, A, Gibson, K, Ruck, RA, Jia, G, Zhang, J, Hwang, PM, Ryan, NW, Langdon, RB, Feig, PU
Journal of the American Society of Hypertension : JASH. 2011;(3):166-76
Abstract
11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD1) may be involved in several abnormalities associated with the metabolic syndrome. This study evaluated the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of two 11β-HSD1 inhibitors, MK-0736 and MK-0916, in overweight-to-obese hypertensive patients. Patients aged 18-75 years with sitting diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP) 90-104 mm Hg, systolic BP <160 mm Hg (after washout of prior antihypertensive medications), and BMI ≥27 to <41 kg/m(2) were randomized to receive 2 or 7 mg/d MK-0736, 6 mg/d MK-0916, or placebo for 12 weeks (n = 51-54/group). Patients with BMI ≥20 to <27 kg/m(2) received 6 mg/d MK-0916 or placebo for 24 weeks (n = 19/group). The primary endpoint was placebo-adjusted change from baseline in trough SiDBP in patients treated for 12 weeks with 7 mg/d MK-0736. The primary endpoint was not met (placebo-adjusted reduction = 2.2 mm Hg; P = .157). With 7 mg/d MK-0736, placebo-adjusted LDL-C decreased by 12.3%, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 6.3%, and body weight by 1.4 kg. Both 11β-HSD1 inhibitors were generally well tolerated. In overweight-to-obese patients with hypertension, reduction in SiDBP with MK-0736 was not statistically significant. Nonetheless, MK-0736 was well tolerated and did appear to modestly improve other BP endpoints, LDL-C, and body weight.
3.
Lorcaserin, a 5-HT(2C) receptor agonist, reduces body weight by decreasing energy intake without influencing energy expenditure.
Martin, CK, Redman, LM, Zhang, J, Sanchez, M, Anderson, CM, Smith, SR, Ravussin, E
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2011;(3):837-45
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
CONTEXT Lorcaserin, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(2C) receptor agonist, reduces body weight. It is unclear whether weight loss is due to reduced energy intake (EI) or also to enhanced energy expenditure (EE). OBJECTIVE This study tested the effect of lorcaserin on EI and EE. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTION In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 57 (39 women) overweight and obese (body mass index, 27-45 kg/m(2)) adults were randomized to placebo (n = 28) or 10 mg twice daily lorcaserin (n = 29) for 56 d. Weight maintenance was imposed during d 1-7. Beginning on d 8, participants followed a diet and exercise plan targeting a 600 kcal/d deficit. OUTCOMES At baseline and after 7 and 56 d of treatment, we measured body weight, body composition (dual x-ray absorptiometry), blood pressure, heart rate, EI at lunch and dinner, subjective appetite ratings, and 24-h EE and 24-h-respiratory quotient (RQ), measured by indirect calorimetry in a respiratory chamber. RESULTS After 7 d of weight maintenance, EI was significantly (P < 0.01) reduced with lorcaserin but not placebo (mean ± sem for lorcaserin, -286 ± 86 kcal; placebo, -147 ± 89 kcal). After 56 d, lorcaserin resulted in significantly larger reductions in body weight (lorcaserin, -3.8 ± 0.4 kg; placebo, -2.2 ± 0.5 kg; P < 0.01), EI (lorcaserin, -470 ± 87 kcal; placebo, -205 ± 91 kcal; P < .05), and appetite ratings than in placebo. Changes in 24-h EE and 24-h RQ did not differ between groups, even after 24-h EE was adjusted for body weight and composition. Compared with placebo, lorcaserin had no effect on systolic or diastolic blood pressure or heart rate after 56 d. CONCLUSIONS Lorcaserin reduces body weight through reduced EI, not altered EE or RQ.