0
selected
-
1.
Association of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema with renal function in southern Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a single-centre observational study.
Zhuang, X, Cao, D, Yang, D, Zeng, Y, Yu, H, Wang, J, Kuang, J, Xie, J, Zhang, S, Zhang, L
BMJ open. 2019;(9):e031194
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The association of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular oedema (DME) with renal function in southern Chinese patients with diabetes is poorly understood. So we aimed to study the correlation between stage of DR and DME with stage of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and stage of urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and to explore the systemic risk factors for DR and DME. DESIGN AND SETTING This single-centre retrospective observational study was conducted from December 2017 to November 2018. PARTICIPANTS 413 southern Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. OUTCOME MEASURES The correlations between stage of DR and DME with stage of eGFR/UACR were assessed by Spearman's or χ² analyses and represented with histograms. Risk factors associated with the occurrence of DR and DME were performed by logistic regression and represented with nomograms. RESULTS Stage of DR had a positive correlation with stage of eGFR (r=0.264, p<0.001) and stage of UACR (r=0.542, p<0.001). With the stage of eGFR/UACR being more severe, the prevalence of DME became higher as well (both p<0.001). The risk factors for DR were DM duration (OR 1.072; 95% CI 1.032 to 1.114; p<0.001), stage of UACR (OR 2.001; 95% CI 1.567 to 2.555; p<0.001) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (OR 1.301; 95% CI 1.139 to 1.485; p<0.001), while risk factors for DME were stage of UACR (OR 2.308; 95% CI 1.815 to 2.934; p<0.001) and LDL (OR 1.460; 95% CI 1.123 to 1.875; p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS Among southern Chinese patients, stage of DR and DME were positively correlated with renal function, while stage of UACR performed a better relevance than stage of eGFR.
-
2.
Comparisons of weight changes between sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors treatment and glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs treatment in type 2 diabetes patients: A meta-analysis.
Cai, X, Ji, L, Chen, Y, Yang, W, Zhou, L, Han, X, Zhang, S, Ji, L
Journal of diabetes investigation. 2017;(4):510-517
Abstract
AIMS/INTRODUCTION To evaluate the efficacy of weight changes from baseline of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors treatment and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogs treatment after comparisons with a placebo in type 2 diabetes patients, and the associated factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Studies were searched from when recording began, June 2004, until June 2015, and re-searched in July 2016, and placebo-controlled randomized trials in type 2 diabetes patients with a study length of ≥12 weeks were included. RESULTS A total of 97 randomized controlled trials were included. Compared with a placebo, treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a significantly greater decrease in weight change from baseline (weighted mean differences -2.01 kg, 95% confidence interval -2.18 to -1.83 kg, P < 0.001). Compared with a placebo, changes with GLP -1 treatment were also associated with a comparable decrease in weight change from baseline (weighted mean differences -1.59 kg, 95% confidence interval -1.86 to -1.32 kg, P < 0.001). Meta-regression analysis showed that the baseline age, sex, baseline glycated hemoglobin, diabetes duration or baseline body mass index were not associated with the weight change from baseline in SGLT2 inhibitors or in GLP-1 treatment corrected by placebo. Comparisons of weight changes from baseline corrected by placebo between SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 treatment showed that the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS According to the present meta-analysis, treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors and treatment with GLP-1 analogs led to comparable weight changes from baseline, which are both with significance when compared with placebo treatment.
-
3.
Influence of vitamin E supplementation on glycaemic control: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Xu, R, Zhang, S, Tao, A, Chen, G, Zhang, M
PloS one. 2014;(4):e95008
Abstract
Observational studies have revealed that higher serum vitamin E concentrations and increased vitamin E intake and vitamin E supplementation are associated with beneficial effects on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, whether vitamin E supplementation exerts a definitive effect on glycaemic control remains unclear. This article involves a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of vitamin E to better characterise its impact on HbA1c, fasting glucose and fasting insulin. PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were electronically searched from the earliest possible date through April 2013 for all relevant studies. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was calculated for net changes using fixed-effects or random-effects models. Standard methods for assessing statistical heterogeneity and publication bias were used. Fourteen randomised controlled trials involving individual data on 714 subjects were collected in this meta-analysis. Increased vitamin E supplementation did not result in significant benefits in glycaemic control as measured by reductions in HbA1c, fasting glucose and fasting insulin. Subgroup analyses revealed a significant reduction in HbA1c (-0.58%, 95% CI -0.83 to -0.34) and fasting insulin (-9.0 pmol/l, 95% CI -15.90 to -2.10) compared with controls in patients with low baseline vitamin E status. Subgroup analyses also demonstrated that the outcomes may have been influenced by the vitamin E dosage, study duration, ethnic group, serum HbA1c concentration, and fasting glucose control status. In conclusion, there is currently insufficient evidence to support a potential beneficial effect of vitamin E supplementation on improvements of HbA1c and fasting glucose and insulin concentrations in subjects with T2DM.
-
4.
Metabolic effects of fluoxetine in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.
Ye, Z, Chen, L, Yang, Z, Li, Q, Huang, Y, He, M, Zhang, S, Zhang, Z, Wang, X, Zhao, W, et al
PloS one. 2011;(7):e21551
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of obesity and diabetes is increasing dramatically throughout the world. Studies have shown that excess adiposity is a critical predictor of new onset T2DM. This meta-analysis is aimed to assess the metabolic effects of fluoxetine in T2DM. METHODS AND FINDINGS Electronic search was conducted in the database Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library, from inception through to March 2011. A systematic review of the studies on the metabolic effects of fluoxetine in T2DM was performed. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and its 95% CI were calculated from the raw data extracted from the original literature. The software Review Manager (version 4.3.1) and Stata (version 11.0) were applied for meta-analysis. Five randomized, placebo-controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. According to WMD calculation, fluoxetine therapy led to 4.27 Kg of weight loss (95%CI 2.58-5.97, P<0.000 01), 1.41 mmol/L of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) decrement (95%CI 0.19-2.64, P = 0.02) and 0.54 mmol/L of triglyceride (TG) reduction (95%CI 0.35-0.73, P<0.000 01) compared with placebo. Moreover, fluoxetine therapy produced 0.78% of HbA1c decrement (95%CI -0.23-1.78). However, this effect was not statistically significant (P = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS Short period of fluoxetine therapy can lead to weight loss as well as reduction of FPG, HbA1c and TG in T2DM.