1.
Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Medical Therapy in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients With 3-Vessel Disease.
Jia, S, Zhang, C, Jiang, L, Xu, L, Tian, J, Zhao, X, Feng, X, Wang, D, Zhang, Y, Sun, K, et al
Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society. 2020;(10):1718-1727
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to compare the long-term prognosis of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients with 3-vessel disease (3VD) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or medical therapy (MT).Methods and Results:Overall, 3,928 NSTE-ACS patients with 3VD were consecutively enrolled from April 2004 to February 2011 at Fu Wai Hospital. Patients were followed up for a median of 7.5 years, and were divided into PCI, CABG or MT groups according to their treatment. Compared with patients undergoing PCI, CABG patients had lower rates of myocardial infarction (MI), unplanned revascularization, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and a higher rate of stroke (all P<0.05). Compared with MT, PCI and CABG had lower incidences of all adverse outcomes (all P<0.05), except for a similar rate of stroke between PCI and MT. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed similar results. After adjusting for confounders, CABG was independently associated with a lower risk of cardiac death, revascularization and MACCE compared with PCI (all P<0.05). Compared with MT, PCI reduced long-term risk of death, whereas CABG reduced long-term risk of death, revascularization and MACCE events (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS In NSTE-ACS patients with 3VD, CABG is independently associated with a lower risk of long-term cardiac death, revascularization and MACCE compared with PCI. Patients who received MT alone had the highest risk of long-term MACCE.
2.
Fixed-combination of amlodipine and diuretic chronotherapy in the treatment of essential hypertension: improved blood pressure control with bedtime dosing-a multicenter, open-label randomized study.
Zeng, J, Jia, M, Ran, H, Tang, H, Zhang, Y, Zhang, J, Wang, X, Wang, H, Yang, C, Zeng, C
Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. 2011;(6):767-72
Abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated that individual anti-hypertension medications have different effects when administered in the morning vs. the evening. However, the impact of administration timing on fixed combinations of anti-hypertensive medications on blood pressure control is still unknown. In the present study, we examined the administration time-dependent effects of a fixed combination of amlodipine and diuretics (amlodipine complex) on blood pressure in hypertensive subjects. Eighty patients from Chongqing City were enrolled in this study. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive a single pill (amlodipine complex, each tablet containing amlodipine 5 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg), either in the morning (0800 hours, n=40) or at bedtime (2200 hours, n=40). Blood pressure was measured by ambulatory monitoring every 20 min during the day and every 30 min at night for 24 consecutive hours before and after the 12 weeks of treatment. Following treatment, the 24-h mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were reduced significantly in both the morning and bedtime groups. However, the morning blood pressure surge was reduced to a greater degree in the bedtime group. In addition, the nocturnal blood pressure and the 24 h mean blood pressure were lower in the bedtime group. More patients converted from having a non-dipper to dipper blood pressure in the bedtime group. These findings confirm that amlodipine complexes have different efficiencies depending on treatment time. Administration of amlodipine complexes at bedtime could optimize the anti-hypertensive effect by augmenting blood pressure-lowering effects, increasing the diurnal/nocturnal ratio of blood pressure, normalizing the blood pressure pattern and minimizing the morning blood pressure surge.
3.
The combination of amlodipine and angiotensin receptor blocker or diuretics in high-risk hypertensive patients: rationale, design and baseline characteristics.
Wang, W, Ma, L, Zhang, Y, Deng, Q, Liu, M, Liu, L
Journal of human hypertension. 2011;(4):271-7
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
The Chinese Hypertension Intervention Efficacy Study (CHIEF) is a multi-centre randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the effects of amlodipine+angiotensin II receptor blocker and amlodipine+diuretics on the incidence of cardiovascular events, represented as a composite of non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death events in high-risk Chinese hypertensive patients. The study also evaluates the long-term effects of lipid-lowering treatment and lifestyle modification. From October 2007 to October 2008, 13,542 patients were enrolled into the study in 180 centres in China. Patients will be followed up for 4 years. There was no difference in baseline characteristics between the two blood pressure arms.
4.
Effect of cilnidipine on left ventricular function in hypertensive patients as assessed by tissue Doppler Tei index.
Tan, HW, Li, L, Zhang, W, Ma, ZY, Zhong, XZ, Zhang, Y
Journal of human hypertension. 2006;(8):618-24
Abstract
Tissue Doppler Tei index is pointed to be more effective in the evaluation of global cardiac function than systolic and diastolic measurements alone in various heart diseases. This study was designed to assess the effect of cilnidipine on left ventricular function in hypertensive patients by using this index. A group of 40 hypertensives (mean age 55+/-8 years, range: 35-65) and 16 controls (mean age 52+/-9 years, range: 36-65) were included. Hypertensives were classified into non-left ventricular hypertrophy (NLVH) group (25 patients) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) group (15 patients), and treated with cilnidipine for 2 months. Before and after treatment, the participants were examined by echocardiography. Tissue Doppler Tei index was calculated as diastolic time interval measured from end of late diastole to origin of early diastole (a') minus systolic Sm duration (b') divided by b', that is Tei index = (a'-b')/b'. Thirty-seven hypertensive patients finished the treatment. Tei index was significantly higher in NLVH and LVH groups than in control group, and in LVH group than in NLVH group (0.44+/-0.07 vs 0.28+/-0.06, P < 0.001; 0.51+/-0.13 vs 0.28+/-0.06, P < 0.001; 0.51+/-0.13 vs 0.44+/-0.07, P < 0.05). After treatment, Tei index was significantly decreased (0.40+/-0.11 vs 0.46+/-0.10, P < 0.0001); systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were also decreased significantly. In conclusion, Tei index is impaired in hypertensives before development of ventricular hypertrophy and impairment is more prominent in hypertrophy. Cilnidipine can improve left ventricular function. Tissue Doppler Tei index is gaining importance in evaluating LV function after drug intervention in hypertensive patients.