1.
Alternate Day Fasting Improves Physiological and Molecular Markers of Aging in Healthy, Non-obese Humans.
Stekovic, S, Hofer, SJ, Tripolt, N, Aon, MA, Royer, P, Pein, L, Stadler, JT, Pendl, T, Prietl, B, Url, J, et al
Cell metabolism. 2019;30(3):462-476.e6
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Intermittent fasting and calorie restriction are believed to reduce cardiometabolic risk factors and increase longevity. Fasting alternate days (ADF) involves fasting for 36 hours and eating ad libitum for 12 hours. Thirty healthy participants were randomly assigned to a long-term ADF intervention group for ≥6 months against sixty participants in the control group. After completing the cross-sectional study arm, sixty healthy participants in the control group were randomly assigned to either a four-week short-term ADF intervention group or a control group with an ad libitum diet. Study participants adhered well to the fasting regimen. Both short-term and long-term ADF intervention groups showed a significant reduction in calorie intake, improvements in anthropometric and cardiovascular parameters including reduced BMI, substantial reduction in trunk fat, lower heart rate, increased serum β-hydroxybutyrate which is cardioprotective and anti-ageing, reduced circulating triiodothyronine (fT3) levels which indicate longevity. Short-term ADF reduced systolic and diastolic pressure, mean arterial pressure, pulse pressure, and pulse wave velocity. Long-term ADF intervention reduced circulating total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), and triglycerides, the age-related biomarker sICAM-1 for disease and inflammation, and improved lipid and amino acid metabolites. ADF did not affect insulin sensitivity. Although red blood cells and iron levels were altered, ADF interventions were not associated with iron deficiency. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the cardioprotective and anti-ageing properties of ADF. However, further long-term robust studies are required to evaluate the effect of long-term ADF on bone health.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Short duration (<4 weeks) alternate day fasting may be an effective way to implement caloric restriction, improve body composition and reduce cardiovascular disease risk in healthy non-overweight adults.
- >6 months alternate fasting does not appear to be associated with reduced bone mass, bone mineral density of the lumbar spine region, white blood cell counts, ferritin and transferrin when compared to healthy controls.
- Both short term and long term alternate day fasting may reduce triiodothyronine in healthy adults. Low levels of fT3 without thyroid gland dysfunction has been associated with longevity in humans.
- Alternate day fasting should be performed alongside a trained clinician to reduce the risk of adverse effects due to critical medical conditions.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Animal models have consistently demonstrated the healthspan and lifespan benefits of caloric restriction. However, chronic caloric restriction in humans has proven difficult to maintain.
Intermittent fasting may serve as a more manageable alternative to continuous caloric restriction. This randomised controlled trial and cross sectional analysis aimed to investigate the effects of alternate day fasting (ADF) on heart rate, blood pressure, cholesterol levels, CVD risk, body composition, and the metabolome and proteome of healthy, non-overweight adults (cohort median age between 48 and 52 years).
Methods
Prior to the enrollment of the study a cross sectional analysis was conducted on healthy adults engaged in long term (>6 months) alternate day fasting (n=30) and a control group (n=60).
The 60 participants from the cross sectional analysis control group were then randomised to either a 4 week ADF group or a control group. In both the >6 months and 4 weeks of ADF groups, participants were instructed to eat every second-day ad libitum, but to completely exclude solid and liquid foods and caloric beverages on fasting days.
Results
The cross sectional analysis identified that the alternate day fasting group:
- Consumed fewer calories vs the control group (−28.56%, p=0.0002).
- Had lower levels of circulating total cholesterol (p=0.004), LDL (p=0.011), VLDL (p=0.009), triglycerides (p=0.010) and a lower heart rate (p=0.040) vs the control group.
- Lower levels of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) (p value 0.048), an age-associated inflammatory marker.
- Reduced circulating triiodothyronine (p<0.001) compared to the control group.
- In the metabolome, 54 out of 113 detected significantly modified metabolites (p value < 0.05) were at least 20% higher after 36 h of fasting, of which the majority (>95%) were lipids or free fatty acids, including polyunsaturated free fatty acids (PUFAs), α-tocopherol, and a type of vitamin E. 49 metabolites were at least 20% lower, consisting mainly (44.9%) of amino acids or related metabolites. Low levels of circulating amino acids have been found to increase lifespan in model organisms. The authors concluded that the elevation in fatty acids may be due to increased lipolysis from adipose tissue while the reduction in amino acids may be the result of increased gluconeogenesis.
- 13 out of 2,089 significantly (p value < 0.05) modulated protein hits within the PBMC proteome showed an increase of ≥15%, while the remaining proteins were downregulated after 36 h of fasting. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) performed on the PBMC proteome unveiled changes in pathways related to lipid metabolism, pathways related to energy metabolism and stress response.
Following the 4 week intervention the alternate day fasting group demonstrated:
- Reduced caloric intake from baseline vs. the control group (−37.40% vs. −8.22%, p=0.0012).
- Greater reductions in body weight (−3.5kg vs −0.2kg, p<0.0001), BMI (−1.23kg/m2 vs −0.02kg/m2, p<0.0001) and improvements in their fat to lean mass ratio (−6.3% ± 5.0 percentage points, p value < 0.0001).
- Reduced systolic (−4.5mmHg, p=0.006) and diastolic (−2.5mmHg, p=0.03) blood pressure, heart rate (-4.5 b/min, p=0.0019), arterial (−3mmHg, p=0.0087) and pulse pressure (−2.5mmHg, p=0.0088) as well as pulse wave velocity (−1.538%, p=0.0362). Pulse wave velocity measures the rate at which pressure moves down the vessel wall and is a measure of arterial stiffness.
- Reduced circulating triiodothyronine (p<0.001) from baseline values.
Clinical practice applications:
The cross sectional analysis did not identify any differences in the long-term (>6 months) alternate day fasting group and control group in bone mass, bone mineral density of the lumbar spine region, white blood cell counts, ferritin and transferrin when compared to healthy controls. RBC counts and iron metabolism markers in the blood plasma (hematocrit, haemoglobin, iron, and transferrin saturation), were lower in the >6 months of ADF group but stayed within the reference range.
The randomised controlled trial demonstrated that alternate day fasting may be an effective intervention to reduce caloric intake, improve body composition and reduce cardiovascular disease risk in healthy non-overweight adults within 4 weeks.
Compliance rate was high with only 1 drop out in the alternate day fasting group of the randomised controlled trial.
Both the 4 week intervention and long-term (>6 month) analysis identified a reduction in triiodothyronine amongst the ADF groups. Low levels of triiodothyronine in absence of thyroid gland dysfunction has been associated with longevity in humans.
Considerations for future research:
- Future larger studies in non-healthy and/or overweight/obese populations would be useful to determine safety and efficacy of alternate day fasting within that population group.
- Further studies comparing alternate day fasting with continuous caloric restriction would be useful to identify which intervention is most beneficial for body composition and cardioprotection.
- Subgroup analysis of diet composition and diet quality may help to identify the most appropriate/inappropriate diet to compliment alternate day fasting.
- Longer duration randomised controlled trials are needed to identify any health risks or deficiencies which may develop with long term caloric restriction and alternate day fasting.
Abstract
Caloric restriction and intermittent fasting are known to prolong life- and healthspan in model organisms, while their effects on humans are less well studied. In a randomized controlled trial study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02673515), we show that 4 weeks of strict alternate day fasting (ADF) improved markers of general health in healthy, middle-aged humans while causing a 37% calorie reduction on average. No adverse effects occurred even after >6 months. ADF improved cardiovascular markers, reduced fat mass (particularly the trunk fat), improving the fat-to-lean ratio, and increased β-hydroxybutyrate, even on non-fasting days. On fasting days, the pro-aging amino-acid methionine, among others, was periodically depleted, while polyunsaturated fatty acids were elevated. We found reduced levels sICAM-1 (an age-associated inflammatory marker), low-density lipoprotein, and the metabolic regulator triiodothyronine after long-term ADF. These results shed light on the physiological impact of ADF and supports its safety. ADF could eventually become a clinically relevant intervention.
2.
Cardiovascular Health Benefits of Specific Vegetable Types: A Narrative Review.
Blekkenhorst, LC, Sim, M, Bondonno, CP, Bondonno, NP, Ward, NC, Prince, RL, Devine, A, Lewis, JR, Hodgson, JM
Nutrients. 2018;10(5)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Diets high in vegetables are linked with a lower incidence of chronic disease. Some vegetables may have much larger health benefits in comparison to others, and therefore dietary guidelines could be developed to include targeted advice on consuming specific types of vegetables with the greatest health benefits. This review of observational studies focused on the cardiovascular health benefits of specific vegetable types. Vegetables discussed in this review were grouped into the following types: leafy green, cruciferous, alliums, yellow-orange-red and legumes. These vegetables contain many nutrients and phytochemicals that have been proposed to have benefits for cardiovascular health. The authors looked at the results from nearly 100 observational studies. Most of the studies were carried out on older adults; some were focussed on a single gender (male or female), and some were mixed. Follow up periods in the studies ranged from 3 years to 28 years. Most of the studies relied on food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) to estimate vegetable consumption, and many did not define the size of a vegetable portion in grams. The percentage of studies demonstrating significant benefits of vegetable consumption on CVD ranged from 25% for legumes to 43% for leafy greens. The strongest beneficial effects on CVD risk were seen for leafy green and cruciferous vegetables. The authors concluded that the evidence in this review suggests intake of leafy green and cruciferous vegetables may confer strong cardiovascular health benefits. Increasing vegetable intake, with a focus on leafy green and cruciferous vegetables may provide the greatest benefits.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
Educator for various organizations, such as Institute for Functional Medicine, American Academy for Anti-Aging Medicine
Take Home Message:
- Green leafy vegetables and cruciferous vegetables were found to most impactful for cardiovascular health.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
X
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
This review highlights the role of specific types of vegetables based on color and nutrients for cardiovascular health benefit.
Clinical practice applications:
The authors investigated whether some vegetable types were more relevant for cardiovascular-related issues than others. Based on their review of the scientific literature, green, leafy vegetables and cruciferous vegetables were found to be most impactful.
Considerations for future research:
This review suggests that more research is needed to understand how certain plant foods, vegetables, and phytochemicals may be functionally important for certain organ systems.
Abstract
Adequate vegetable consumption is one of the cornerstones of a healthy diet. The recommendation to increase vegetable intake is part of most dietary guidelines. Despite widespread and long-running public health messages to increase vegetable intake, similar to other countries worldwide, less than 1 in 10 adult Australians manage to meet target advice. Dietary guidelines are predominantly based on studies linking diets high in vegetables with lower risk of chronic diseases. Identifying vegetables with the strongest health benefits and incorporating these into dietary recommendations may enhance public health initiatives around vegetable intake. These enhanced public health initiatives would be targeted at reducing the risk of chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Specific vegetable types contain high levels of particular nutrients and phytochemicals linked with cardiovascular health benefits. However, it is not clear if increasing intake of these specific vegetable types will result in larger benefits on risk of chronic diseases. This review presents an overview of the evidence for the relationships of specific types of vegetables, including leafy green, cruciferous, allium, yellow-orange-red and legumes, with subclinical and clinical CVD outcomes in observational epidemiological studies.