1.
The Effects of Time-Restricted Eating versus Standard Dietary Advice on Weight, Metabolic Health and the Consumption of Processed Food: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial in Community-Based Adults.
Phillips, NE, Mareschal, J, Schwab, N, Manoogian, ENC, Borloz, S, Ostinelli, G, Gauthier-Jaques, A, Umwali, S, Gonzalez Rodriguez, E, Aeberli, D, et al
Nutrients. 2021;13(3)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Metabolic syndrome (MS) is a collection of conditions such as obesity, high blood pressure and impaired ability to balance blood sugars, that increase the sufferers risk of diabetes, stroke, and heart disease. Weight loss and lifestyle modifications are the main recommendations to improve MS. Intermittent fasting is a dietary regime that involves restricting the intake of food to certain times of the day, without restricting calories and has been shown in animal and human studies to result in fat loss and an increased ability to balance blood sugars. This randomised control trial of 218 adults over 6 months aimed to firstly determine relationships between eating duration, unprocessed and processed foods, and lifestyle factors on health and secondly to determine if a 12-hour time restricted eating pattern leads to an improvement in MS. The results showed that higher consumption of processed foods was associated with poorer metabolic health. A 12-hour restricted eating pattern resulted in weight loss, whereas individuals on a standard daily eating pattern did not, however differences between the two groups were not significant. Other measures of metabolic health failed to show any differences between the two groups. It was concluded that a 12-hour restricted eating pattern was feasible over 6 months, however further research is needed to assess if a more restricted time would result in greater weight loss. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that a restricted eating pattern may be of benefit to those with MS, however further research would be needed to determine the optimal timeframe.
Abstract
Weight loss is key to controlling the increasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) and its components, i.e., central obesity, hypertension, prediabetes and dyslipidaemia. The goals of our study were two-fold. First, we characterised the relationships between eating duration, unprocessed and processed food consumption and metabolic health. During 4 weeks of observation, 213 adults used a smartphone application to record food and drink consumption, which was annotated for food processing levels following the NOVA classification. Low consumption of unprocessed food and low physical activity showed significant associations with multiple MS components. Second, in a pragmatic randomised controlled trial, we compared the metabolic benefits of 12 h time-restricted eating (TRE) to standard dietary advice (SDA) in 54 adults with an eating duration > 14 h and at least one MS component. After 6 months, those randomised to TRE lost 1.6% of initial body weight (SD 2.9, p = 0.01), compared to the absence of weight loss with SDA (-1.1%, SD 3.5, p = 0.19). There was no significant difference in weight loss between TRE and SDA (between-group difference -0.88%, 95% confidence interval -3.1 to 1.3, p = 0.43). Our results show the potential of smartphone records to predict metabolic health and highlight that further research is needed to improve individual responses to TRE such as a shorter eating window or its actual clock time.
2.
Three 15-min bouts of moderate postmeal walking significantly improves 24-h glycemic control in older people at risk for impaired glucose tolerance.
DiPietro, L, Gribok, A, Stevens, MS, Hamm, LF, Rumpler, W
Diabetes care. 2013;36(10):3262-8
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The insulin response is known to decline with age, which puts older people at risk of hyperglycaemia after eating. Insulin and exercise stimulate the uptake of glucose into skeletal muscle so exercise could aid insulin in age-related impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). This small randomised controlled trial (RCT) used a multiple crossover design to compare the effect of exercise timing and frequency on glycaemia control in older people. The ten trial subjects were at risk of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), but were otherwise healthy with an average age of sixty-nine years old. Subjects were housed in whole room calorimeters, fed three standardised meals a day and glucose levels were monitored. Subjects were randomly assigned to walk on a treadmill for either fifteen minutes after each of the three meals, or walk for forty-five minutes either at mid-morning or mid-afternoon. It was found that that both the morning walk and the post-meal walking decreased 24 hour glucose concentration, whilst the afternoon walk had little impact. Post-meal walking was effective at lowering glucose levels after each meal including dinner, where the other exercise protocols were not. The author concluded that the timing of the exercise may be as important, if not more, than volume. Short (15 minute) bouts of post-meal walking could be manageable for older people and appears to be an effective way of controlling post eating hyperglycaemia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of three 15-min bouts of postmeal walking with 45 min of sustained walking on 24-h glycemic control in older persons at risk for glucose intolerance. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Inactive older (≥60 years of age) participants (N=10) were recruited from the community and were nonsmoking, with a BMI<35 kg/m2 and a fasting blood glucose concentration between 105 and 125 mg dL(-1). Participants completed three randomly ordered exercise protocols spaced 4 weeks apart. Each protocol comprised a 48-h stay in a whole-room calorimeter, with the first day serving as the control day. On the second day, participants engaged in either 1) postmeal walking for 15 min or 45 min of sustained walking performed at 2) 10:30 a.m. or 3) 4:30 p.m. All walking was on a treadmill at an absolute intensity of 3 METs. Interstitial glucose concentrations were determined over 48 h with a continuous glucose monitor. Substrate utilization was measured continuously by respiratory exchange (VCO2/VO2). RESULTS Both sustained morning walking (127±23 vs. 118±14 mg dL(-1)) and postmeal walking (129±24 vs. 116±13 mg dL(-1)) significantly improved 24-h glycemic control relative to the control day (P<0.05). Moreover, postmeal walking was significantly (P<0.01) more effective than 45 min of sustained morning or afternoon walking in lowering 3-h postdinner glucose between the control and experimental day. CONCLUSIONS Short, intermittent bouts of postmeal walking appear to be an effective way to control postprandial hyperglycemia in older people.