1.
Fasting and refeeding differentially regulate NLRP3 inflammasome activation in human subjects.
Traba, J, Kwarteng-Siaw, M, Okoli, TC, Li, J, Huffstutler, RD, Bray, A, Waclawiw, MA, Han, K, Pelletier, M, Sauve, AA, et al
The Journal of clinical investigation. 2015;125(12):4592-600
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Intermittent fasting and caloric restriction have been shown to have beneficial effects on a particular inflammatory pathway, called NLRP3 inflammasome, which is associated with insulin resistance and asthma. In this highly technical paper the authors report a study which was conducted to confirm whether the beneficial effect of fasting on the NLRP3 inflammatory pathway is mediated via a particular protein called sirtuin and its effects on mitochondria (the energy producing parts of every cell). 19 healthy subjects fasted for 24 hours followed by a set meal. Bloods were drawn after the fast and 1 hour and 3 hours after the meal and evaluated for a number of inflammatory parameters. The NLRP3 inflammasome was less active in the fasted than in the fed state. The investigators established the involvement of sirtuin and mitochondria, as well as other inflammatory pathways in this fasting induced immune modulation.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome is associated with metabolic dysfunction, and intermittent fasting has been shown to improve clinical presentation of NLRP3 inflammasome-linked diseases. As mitochondrial perturbations, which function as a damage-associated molecular pattern, exacerbate NLRP3 inflammasome activation, we investigated whether fasting blunts inflammasome activation via sirtuin-mediated augmentation of mitochondrial integrity. METHODS We performed a clinical study of 19 healthy volunteers. Each subject underwent a 24-hour fast and then was fed a fixed-calorie meal. Blood was drawn during the fasted and fed states and analyzed for NRLP3 inflammasome activation. We enrolled an additional group of 8 healthy volunteers to assess the effects of the sirtuin activator, nicotinamide riboside, on NLRP3 inflammasome activation. RESULTS In the fasting/refeeding study, individuals showed less NLRP3 inflammasome activation in the fasted state compared with that in refed conditions. In a human macrophage line, depletion of the mitochondrial-enriched sirtuin deacetylase SIRT3 increased NLRP3 inflammasome activation in association with excessive mitochondrial ROS production. Furthermore, genetic and pharmacologic SIRT3 activation blunted NLRP3 activity in parallel with enhanced mitochondrial function in cultured cells and in leukocytes extracted from healthy volunteers and from refed individuals but not in those collected during fasting. CONCLUSIONS Together, our data indicate that nutrient levels regulate the NLRP3 inflammasome, in part through SIRT3-mediated mitochondrial homeostatic control. Moreover, these results suggest that deacetylase-dependent inflammasome attenuation may be amenable to targeting in human disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02122575 and NCT00442195. FUNDING Division of Intramural Research, NHLBI of the NIH.
2.
Practicality of intermittent fasting in humans and its effect on oxidative stress and genes related to aging and metabolism.
Wegman, MP, Guo, MH, Bennion, DM, Shankar, MN, Chrzanowski, SM, Goldberg, LA, Xu, J, Williams, TA, Lu, X, Hsu, SI, et al
Rejuvenation research. 2015;18(2):162-72
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
It has been repeatedly shown that calorie restriction is beneficial for health by delaying the onset of age-related diseases. Long term calorie restriction is difficult to maintain. It is thought that benefits are due to increased oxidative stress which triggers expression of protective genes, resulting in an overall health benefit. Intermittent fasting (IF), where days of fasting and feasting are alternated, can result is similar benefits. In this double-crossover, double-blinded, randomised clinical trial seventeen young, healthy adults followed either IF + placebo or IF + antioxidants for three weeks each. The provided food was based on American Dietary Guidelines and the antioxidant supplements were vitamins C and E. Participants ate 25% of calories on fast days and 175% of calories on feast days to achieve overall neutral calorie balance. The aim of the trial was to show if benefits were due to intermittent periods of fasting rather than overall calorie reduction commonly seen with other IF trials. Further, if antioxidant supplements would reduce expression of the protective genes. Markers of oxidative stress and gene expression were measured. Results showed that IF decreases insulin, but IF + antioxidants did not, suggesting that the insulin lowering effect might be triggered by IF oxidative stress. Results also suggested IF mildly raised measured gene expression, including expression of sirtuin 3 (SIRT3), but IF + antioxidant reduced or reversed rises. However, none of the gene expression results were statistically significant, SIRT3 was closest. The authors stated that the findings suggest that IF may have some benefits on metabolism and potentially longevity, even in healthy individuals.
Abstract
Caloric restriction has consistently been shown to extend life span and ameliorate aging-related diseases. These effects may be due to diet-induced reactive oxygen species acting to up-regulate sirtuins and related protective pathways, which research suggests may be partially inhibited by dietary anti-oxidant supplementation. Because caloric restriction is not sustainable long term for most humans, we investigated an alternative dietary approach, intermittent fasting (IF), which is proposed to act on similar biological pathways. We hypothesized that a modified IF diet, where participants maintain overall energy balance by alternating between days of fasting (25% of normal caloric intake) and feasting (175% of normal), would increase expression of genes associated with aging and reduce oxidative stress and that these effects would be suppressed by anti-oxidant supplementation. To assess the tolerability of the diet and to explore effects on biological mechanisms related to aging and metabolism, we recruited a cohort of 24 healthy individuals in a double-crossover, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Study participants underwent two 3-week treatment periods-IF and IF with anti-oxidant (vitamins C and E) supplementation. We found strict adherence to study-provided diets and that participants found the diet tolerable, with no adverse clinical findings or weight change. We detected a marginal increase (2.7%) in SIRT3 expression due to the IF diet, but no change in expression of other genes or oxidative stress markers analyzed. We also found that IF decreased plasma insulin levels (1.01 μU/mL). Although our study suggests that the IF dieting paradigm is acceptable in healthy individuals, additional research is needed to further assess the potential benefits and risks.
3.
Three 15-min bouts of moderate postmeal walking significantly improves 24-h glycemic control in older people at risk for impaired glucose tolerance.
DiPietro, L, Gribok, A, Stevens, MS, Hamm, LF, Rumpler, W
Diabetes care. 2013;36(10):3262-8
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The insulin response is known to decline with age, which puts older people at risk of hyperglycaemia after eating. Insulin and exercise stimulate the uptake of glucose into skeletal muscle so exercise could aid insulin in age-related impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). This small randomised controlled trial (RCT) used a multiple crossover design to compare the effect of exercise timing and frequency on glycaemia control in older people. The ten trial subjects were at risk of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), but were otherwise healthy with an average age of sixty-nine years old. Subjects were housed in whole room calorimeters, fed three standardised meals a day and glucose levels were monitored. Subjects were randomly assigned to walk on a treadmill for either fifteen minutes after each of the three meals, or walk for forty-five minutes either at mid-morning or mid-afternoon. It was found that that both the morning walk and the post-meal walking decreased 24 hour glucose concentration, whilst the afternoon walk had little impact. Post-meal walking was effective at lowering glucose levels after each meal including dinner, where the other exercise protocols were not. The author concluded that the timing of the exercise may be as important, if not more, than volume. Short (15 minute) bouts of post-meal walking could be manageable for older people and appears to be an effective way of controlling post eating hyperglycaemia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of three 15-min bouts of postmeal walking with 45 min of sustained walking on 24-h glycemic control in older persons at risk for glucose intolerance. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Inactive older (≥60 years of age) participants (N=10) were recruited from the community and were nonsmoking, with a BMI<35 kg/m2 and a fasting blood glucose concentration between 105 and 125 mg dL(-1). Participants completed three randomly ordered exercise protocols spaced 4 weeks apart. Each protocol comprised a 48-h stay in a whole-room calorimeter, with the first day serving as the control day. On the second day, participants engaged in either 1) postmeal walking for 15 min or 45 min of sustained walking performed at 2) 10:30 a.m. or 3) 4:30 p.m. All walking was on a treadmill at an absolute intensity of 3 METs. Interstitial glucose concentrations were determined over 48 h with a continuous glucose monitor. Substrate utilization was measured continuously by respiratory exchange (VCO2/VO2). RESULTS Both sustained morning walking (127±23 vs. 118±14 mg dL(-1)) and postmeal walking (129±24 vs. 116±13 mg dL(-1)) significantly improved 24-h glycemic control relative to the control day (P<0.05). Moreover, postmeal walking was significantly (P<0.01) more effective than 45 min of sustained morning or afternoon walking in lowering 3-h postdinner glucose between the control and experimental day. CONCLUSIONS Short, intermittent bouts of postmeal walking appear to be an effective way to control postprandial hyperglycemia in older people.
4.
Oral sensory and cephalic hormonal responses to fat and non-fat liquids in bulimia nervosa.
Bello, NT, Coughlin, JW, Redgrave, GW, Moran, TH, Guarda, AS
Physiology & behavior. 2010;99(5):611-7
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Bulimia nervosa (BN) is characterised by episodes of compulsive binge eating and compensatory behaviours such as restriction/fasting, over exercising or self-induced purging. Research suggests that sufferers may have alterations in their food evaluations and the cephalic phase of eating. This study explores whether the oral sensory responses from high fat liquids compared to non-fat liquids were different in BN subjects compared to healthy controls. The hormonal responses to each liquid were qualified by measuring glucose, insulin, ghrelin and pancreatic polypeptides (which have been found to be associated with cephalic phase of eating solid foods). Subjective hunger levels were also measured. Participants were 10 women aged between 18 and 42 years, and the control group consisted of 11 women without an eating disorder. The study found not significant differences between the fat and non-fat liquids in terms of hunger levels or hormonal responses. However, there were differences between the BN group and the control. BN compared to controls had higher levels of hunger at baseline. BN's also rated the liquids 'fattier' tasting regardless of the fat content of the liquids and also reported a 'fear of swallowing' more than the control group. There were also differences between the BN and control group in baseline hormonal levels - BN's had significantly elevated ghrelin and pancreatic polypeptide levels. BN's also had elevated ghrelin levels throughout. The authors concluded that BN women have different orosensory responses that are not influenced by opioid receptor antagonism, evident in hormonal responses, or dependent on the fat content of a similarly textured liquid.
Abstract
Sensory evaluation of food involves endogenous opioid mechanisms. Bulimics typically limit their food choices to low-fat "safe foods" and intermittently lose control and binge on high-fat "risk foods". The aim of this study was to determine whether the oral sensory effects of a fat versus a non-fat milk product (i.e., traditional versus non-fat half-and-half) resulted in different subjective and hormonal responses in bulimic women (n=10) compared with healthy women (n=11). Naltrexone (50mg PO) or placebo was administered 1h before, and blood sampling began 30 min prior to and 29 min after, a 3 min portion controlled modified sham-feeding trial. Following an overnight fast, three morning trials (fat, naltrexone; fat, placebo; and non-fat, placebo) were administered in a random double-blind fashion separated by at least 3 days. Overall, there were no differences between Fat and Non-Fat trials. Hunger ratings (p<0.001) and pancreatic polypeptide levels (p<0.05) were higher for bulimics at baseline. Bulimics also had overall higher ratings for nausea (p<0.05), fatty taste (p<0.01), and fear of swallowing (p<0.005). Bulimics had approximately 40% higher total ghrelin levels at all time points (p<0.001). Hormones and glucose levels were not altered by the modified sham-feeding paradigm. Naltrexone, however, resulted in an overall increase in blood glucose and decrease in ghrelin levels in both groups (p<0.05, for both). These data suggest that bulimic women have different orosensory responses that are not influenced by opioid receptor antagonism, evident in hormonal responses, or dependent on the fat content of a similarly textured liquid.