1.
Nutrition and Exercise Interventions to Improve Body Composition for Persons with Overweight or Obesity Near Retirement Age: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Eglseer, D, Traxler, M, Embacher, S, Reiter, L, Schoufour, JD, Weijs, PJM, Voortman, T, Boirie, Y, Cruz-Jentoft, A, Bauer, S
Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.). 2023;14(3):516-538
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity is characterised by excessive fat accumulation that often occurs during the process of aging. Aging is accompanied not only by a gradual increase in body fat stores but also a decrease in muscle mass, muscle function, and water retention. The aim of this study was to assess which nutrition and exercise interventions are most effective for improving the body composition (fat mass and muscle mass), body mass index, and waist circumference in persons with overweight or obesity near retirement age (55 to 70 years of age). This study was a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomised controlled trials of sixty-six studies. Results of the NMA showed that the most effective strategy to improve body composition, i.e., losing fat without increasing risk of sarcopenia in persons with obesity around retirement age, was combining energy restriction with resistance training or with mixed exercise (resistance combined with aerobic exercise) and/or high-protein intake. In fact, without training, an energy-restricted diet with or without added protein helped individuals lose fat mass but also tended to result in losses of muscle mass. Authors conclude that an energy-restricted diet alone probably contributes to the development of sarcopenic obesity in persons of retirement age. Thus, to simultaneously lose weight and maintain muscle mass, authors recommend a combination of energy restriction and resistance training.
Abstract
The retirement phase is an opportunity to integrate healthy (nutrition/exercise) habits into daily life. We conducted this systematic review to assess which nutrition and exercise interventions most effectively improve body composition (fat/muscle mass), body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference (WC) in persons with obesity/overweight near retirement age (ages 55-70 y). We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials, searching 4 databases from their inception up to July 12, 2022. The NMA was based on a random effects model, pooled mean differences, standardized mean differences, their 95% confidence intervals, and correlations with multi-arm studies. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also conducted. Ninety-two studies were included, 66 of which with 4957 participants could be used for the NMA. Identified interventions were clustered into 12 groups: no intervention, energy restriction (i.e., 500-1000 kcal), energy restriction plus high-protein intake (1.1-1.7 g/kg/body weight), intermittent fasting, mixed exercise (aerobic and resistance), resistance training, aerobic training, high protein plus resistance training, energy restriction plus high protein plus exercise, energy restriction plus resistance training, energy restriction plus aerobic training, and energy restriction plus mixed exercise. Intervention durations ranged from 8 wk to 6 mo. Body fat was reduced with energy restriction plus any exercise or plus high-protein intake. Energy restriction alone was less effective and tended to decrease muscle mass. Muscle mass was only significantly increased with mixed exercise. All other interventions including exercise effectively preserved muscle mass. A BMI and/or WC decrease was achieved with all interventions except aerobic training/resistance training alone or resistance training plus high protein. Overall, the most effective strategy for nearly all outcomes was combining energy restriction with resistance training or mixed exercise and high protein. Health care professionals involved in the management of persons with obesity need to be aware that an energy-restricted diet alone may contribute to sarcopenic obesity in persons near retirement age. This network meta-analysis is registered at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ as CRD42021276465.
2.
Effect of Intermittent Fasting Diet on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism and Insulin Resistance in Patients with Impaired Glucose and Lipid Metabolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Yuan, X, Wang, J, Yang, S, Gao, M, Cao, L, Li, X, Hong, D, Tian, S, Sun, C
International journal of endocrinology. 2022;2022:6999907
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes, and neurological conditions. The imbalance in glucose and lipid metabolism and hypertension characterises the development of these chronic diseases. Intermittent fasting (IF) has been considered an effective dietary strategy for reducing the risk of obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, and CVD. This systematic review and meta-analysis include ten randomised controlled trials to evaluate the effects of IF intervention on glucose and lipid metabolism in people with metabolic syndrome. IF intervention regulated glucose metabolism by improving fasting blood glucose, glycosylated haemoglobin, insulin, and insulin resistance. IF intervention also positively impacted the body mass index and waist circumference. The total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein levels, and triglyceride levels also improved, followed by the IF, showing the impact on lipid metabolism. Further robust studies are required due to heterogeneity between the included studies in type of IF, duration, the health status of participants, ethnicity, and outcome measurements. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis to understand the therapeutic effect of IF intervention on glycolipid metabolism in people with metabolic syndrome.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- IF does not require calorie restriction which may result in greater compliance
- IF does not restrict macronutrients such as CHO and fats, so may avoid the exclusion of key nutrients e.g. healthy fats and wholegrains.
- IF may have fewer adverse effects on daily routines and quality of life, which may mean adherence is easier.
- Improved glucose and lipid metabolism may prevent the development of chronic health conditions such as T2D, CVD and cancer.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Management of glucose and lipid metabolism can be achieved through weight reduction using dietary interventions such as very low calorie or CHO diets, which may be effective but difficult to sustain long term. An alternative approach for weight management, improved insulin resistance and subsequent prevention of comorbitities e.g. Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) and cancer, is Intermittent Fasting (IF). such as time restricted or periodic fasting.
This study summarises the effects of IF dietary interventions lasting less than three months in overweight and obese women with Metabolic Syndrome, defined as the presence of any metabolic dysfunction including obesity, hyperglycaemia, dyslipidaemia or hypertension.
The meta-anlaysis was carried out following PRISMA guidelines. A literature search in PubMed and Medline using the keywords obesity/overweight, IF diet, metabolic syndrome, RCT’s and humans resulted in 10 studies with 12 types of intervention for analysis. The following outcomes were evaluated: glucose and lipid metabolism, insulin resistance, weight loss and blood pressure.
Results were analysed in R software using mean differences and 95% confidence intervals, and either random or fixed effects depending on the Cochrane’s Q and I(2) statistics. Funnel plots were inspected for potential bias and Egger’s regression tests for publication bias.
There were significant differences before and after the interventions for all glucose and lipid metabolism markers as well as body weight and systolic blood pressure :
Glucose metabolism:
- Fasting glucose reduced by 0.15mmol/L
- Insulin plasma reduced by 13.25uUI
- HbA1c reduced by 0.08%
- HOMA-IR (insulin resistance index) reduced by 0.31 on average
Lipid metabolism:
- Total cholesterol reduced by 0.32mmol/L
- LDL reduced by 0.22mmol/L
- Triglyceride reduced by 0.04mmol/L
Weight loss:
- Body weight reduced by 1.87kg
- BMI reduced by 0.8kg/m2
- Waist circumference reduced by 2.08cm
Blood pressure:
- Systolic reduced by 2.58mmHg
- Diastolic reduced by 3.12mmHg
Despite limitations of the meta-analysis, this study demonstrates IF has therapeutic effects on those with disordered lipid and glucose metabolism, and may prove to be an effective and sustainable approach.
Clinical practice applications:
- IF may be an effective alternative to restricted calorie or CHO diets for weight management with the associated benefits of glucose and lipid metabolism.
- IF has been shown to have therapeutic effects on individuals with impaired glucose and lipid metabolism.
- IF may be considered as a sustainable lifestyle choice rather than a ‘weight loss’ programme such as a very low calorie diet, which can result in poor quality of life and subsequent reduced adherence.
- Since it may take time for impaired glucose and lipid metabolism to progress to more serious disease states, establishing IF as an early intervention, may be considered as a prudent form of preventative medicine.
- IF has shown to have other health benefits such as reduced blood pressure and may be considered as adjuvant therapy.
Considerations for future research:
- Compares the effects of IF on different ethnicities, sex and age categories
- Evaluates the effect of IF on other disease states e.g. cancer, auto-immune conditions
- Assesses the response of other biomarkers e.g. inflammatory cytokines
- Compares different types and durations of IF on health biomarkers (eg periodic, time restricted)
Abstract
The question of whether or not intermittent fasting diets improve the clinical indicators of glycolipid metabolism remains unclear. This study systematically reviewed the relevant clinical trials to evaluate the effects of intermittent fasting diet on glucose and lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity in patients with metabolic syndrome. To evaluate the effect of intermittent fasting diet intervention on patients with disorders of glucose and lipid metabolism, random-effect or fixed-effect meta-analysis models were used to calculate the average difference before and after intermittent fasting diet intervention and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). After intermittent fasting diet intervention, in terms of glucose metabolism, fasting blood glucose reduced by 0.15 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.23; -0.06), glycosylated hemoglobin reduced by 0.08 (95% CIs: -0.25; -0.10), insulin plasma levels reduced by 13.25 uUI (95% CIs: -16.69; -9.82), and HOMA-IR decreased by 0.31 on an average (95% CIs: -0.44; -0.19). In addition, BMI decreased by 0.8 kg/m2 (95% CIs: -1.32; -0.28), body weight reduced by 1.87 kg (95% CIs: -2.67; -1.07), and the waist circumference decreased by 2.08 cm (95% CIs: -3.06; -1.10). Analysis of lipid metabolism showed that intermittent fasting diet intervention effectively reduced the total cholesterol level by 0.32 mmol/L (95% CIs: -0.60; -0.05), low-density lipoprotein level by 0.22 mmol/L (95% CIs: -0.37; -0.07), and triglyceride level by 0.04 mmol/L (95% CIs: -0.15; -0.07). Intermittent fasting diets have certain therapeutic effects on blood glucose and lipids in patients with metabolic syndrome and significantly improve insulin resistance. It may be considered as an auxiliary treatment to prevent the occurrence and development of chronic diseases.
3.
Comparison of the Effects of Intermittent Energy Restriction and Continuous Energy Restriction among Adults with Overweight or Obesity: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Wang, J, Wang, F, Chen, H, Liu, L, Zhang, S, Luo, W, Wang, G, Hu, X
Nutrients. 2022;14(11)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, and some forms of cancer. 38% of people worldwide are overweight, and 20% are obese. To combat obesity and associated comorbidities, calorie restriction (CR) is found to be a cost-effective non-pharmacological intervention. Intermittent energy restriction (IER) and continuous energy restriction (CER) are two forms of CR characterised by notable calorie restriction and normal energy intake phases. Forms of IER included in this research are the 5:2 diet, alternate-day fasting (ADF), and time-restricted feeding (TRF). For weight loss, CER limits calorie intake by 15-40%. A total of eleven randomised controlled studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of IER protocols with CER in reducing weight, BMI and waist circumferences in overweight or obese individuals. Improvements in anthropometric parameters were not different between IER and CER. A long-term robust study is necessary to evaluate the effects of IER and CER on improving anthropometric and metabolic parameters due to the limitations and heterogeneity of current research evidence. Nevertheless, healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the role of IER and CER in weight loss and their clinical relevance for improving overall health and lifespan.
Abstract
There is considerable heterogeneity across the evidence regarding the effects of intermittent energy restriction and continuous energy restriction among adults with overweight or obesity which presents difficulties for healthcare decision-makers and individuals. This overview of systematic reviews aimed to evaluate and synthesize the existing evidence regarding the comparison of the two interventions. We conducted a search strategy in eight databases from the databases' inception to December 2021. The quality of 12 systematic reviews was assessed with A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). One review was rated as high quality, 1 as moderate, 4 as low, and 6 as critically low. A meta-analysis of the original studies was conducted for comparison of primary intermittent energy restriction protocols with continuous energy restriction. Intermittent energy restriction did not seem to be more effective in weight loss compared with continuous energy restriction. The advantages of intermittent energy restriction in reducing BMI and waist circumference and improvement of body composition were not determined due to insufficient evidence. The evidence quality of systematic reviews and original trials remains to be improved in future studies.