1.
An Energy-Reduced Mediterranean Diet, Physical Activity, and Body Composition: An Interim Subgroup Analysis of the PREDIMED-Plus Randomized Clinical Trial.
Konieczna, J, Ruiz-Canela, M, Galmes-Panades, AM, Abete, I, Babio, N, Fiol, M, Martín-Sánchez, V, Estruch, R, Vidal, J, Buil-Cosiales, P, et al
JAMA network open. 2023;6(10):e2337994
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The Mediterranean diet (MedDiet), which focuses on whole grains, lean meat, fruits, vegetables, and low amounts of minimally processed foods has been shown in previous research to improve body composition and decrease fat storage around the middle. This randomised control trial of 1556 older adults aimed to determine the effects of combining a 30% lower energy version of the MedDiet in combination with physical exercise on body composition. After 3 years, the results showed that compared to a normal MedDiet without exercise, the lower energy version in combination with exercise improved body composition by decreasing total fat, and the fat stored around the organs and increasing muscle mass. However, benefits were more pronounced after 1 year and decreased slightly at 3 years. It was concluded that a low energy MedDiet in combination with physical activity may be able to improve the body composition of overweight and older adults with obesity. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to recommend a low energy MedDiet to older adults to promote weight loss, whilst attenuating muscle loss associated with ageing.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- The addition of exercise to an energy-reduced diet, which focuses on whole grains, healthy fats, lean protein, and fruits and vegetables can emphasise positive effects on body composition in older adults.
- However, there is a loss of lean mass associated with this type of diet (contrary to author conclusions) and measures should be taken to monitor and increase protein intake to prevent or limit this loss.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This study aimed to determine the long-term effects of an energy reduced MedDiet in combination with physical activity on body composition.
Methods
- This is a predetermined 3-year interim analysis of a 6-year single-blind, randomised control trial of 1556 individuals aged 55-75 who are overweight or obese with metabolic syndrome.
- 760 individuals on 30% energy reduced MedDiet with limited processed foods, plus 45 minutes walking 6 days per week and behavioural and motivational support. [Intervention group]
- 761 on standard MedDiet without physical activity. [Control]
Results
Within group comparisons showed that individuals in the intervention group lost (P value represents baseline vs year 3):
- Total fat mass percentage (1-year vs baseline, −1.14%; 95% CI, −1.32% to −0.96%; 3-year vs baseline, −0.52%; 95% CI, −0.71% to −0.33% P=<0.001)
- Absolute visceral fat (1-year vs baseline, −154 g; 95% CI, −191 to −116 g; 3-year vs baseline, −75.1 g, 95% CI, −115 to −35.3 g P=<0.001)
- Absolute total fat after 1 year (mean change at 1 year vs baseline, −1677 g; 95% CI, −1930 to −1424 g) but regained some at year 3 (mean change at 3 years vs baseline, −1018 g; 95% CI, −1280 to −756 g P=<0.001)
- Absolute lean mass (mean change at 1 year vs baseline −300 g; 95% CI, −439 to −162 g) with further losses at year 3 (−626 g; 95% CI, −770 to −483 g P=0.001).
Within group comparisons also showed significantly increased:
- Total lean mass percentage, which was greater at year 1 than year 3 (1-year vs baseline, 1.07%; 95%CI, 0.90%-1.25%; 3-year vs baseline, 0.47%; 95% CI, 0.29%-0.65% P=<0.001).
As a result of total fat loss and some lean mass in the intervention group, the lean:fat mass ratio improved and was unchanged in the control group (between group differences (P=<0.001).
Compared to women, men may find the MedDiet + exercise more beneficial as it was shown that body composition changes were slightly more pronounced in men.
Conclusion
An energy-reduced MedDiet plus exercise emphasised positive changes to body composition compared to standard MedDiet in older adults who are overweight or have obesity.
Clinical practice applications:
- The recommendation of a reduced energy MedDiet in combination with physical activity to older people who are overweight or obese may improve body composition.
- Although lean mass loss slowed between years 1 and 3, other practices should be employed to attenuate the loss of lean mass associated with an energy-reduced MedDiet and ageing.
Considerations for future research:
- The research has not yet concluded but when it does, it will address the incidence of cardiovascular disease along with body composition changes.
- It will also look at long-term effects of the diet to determine longevity.
- Future research could focus on how to limit lean mass loss through the possibility of changing the type of exercise that accompanies the MedDiet.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Strategies targeting body composition may help prevent chronic diseases in persons with excess weight, but randomized clinical trials evaluating lifestyle interventions have rarely reported effects on directly quantified body composition. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of a lifestyle weight-loss intervention on changes in overall and regional body composition. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The ongoing Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea-Plus (PREDIMED-Plus) randomized clinical trial is designed to test the effect of the intervention on cardiovascular disease prevention after 8 years of follow-up. The trial is being conducted in 23 Spanish research centers and includes men and women (age 55-75 years) with body mass index between 27 and 40 and metabolic syndrome. The trial reported herein is an interim subgroup analysis of the intermediate outcome body composition after 3-year follow-up, and data analysis was conducted from February 1 to November 30, 2022. Of 6874 total PREDIMED-Plus participants, a subsample of 1521 individuals, coming from centers with access to a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry device, underwent body composition measurements at 3 time points. INTERVENTION Participants were randomly allocated to a multifactorial intervention based on an energy-reduced Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) and increased physical activity (PA) or to a control group based on usual care, with advice to follow an ad libitum MedDiet, but no physical activity promotion. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The outcomes (continuous) were 3-year changes in total fat and lean mass (expressed as percentages of body mass) and visceral fat (in grams), tested using multivariable linear mixed-effects models. Clinical relevance of changes in body components (dichotomous) was assessed based on 5% or more improvements in baseline values, using logistic regression. Main analyses were performed in the evaluable population (completers only) and in sensitivity analyses, multiple imputation was performed to include data of participants lost to follow-up (intention-to-treat analyses). RESULTS A total of 1521 individuals were included (mean [SD] age, 65.3 [5.0] years; 52.1% men). In comparison with the control group (n=761), participants in the intervention arm (n=760) showed greater reductions in the percentage of total fat (between group differences after 1-year, -0.94% [95% CI, -1.19 to -0.69]; 3 years, -0.38% [95% CI, -0.64 to -0.12] and visceral fat storage after 1 year, -126 g [95% CI, -179 to -73.3 g]; 3 years, -70.4 g [95% CI, -126 to -15.2 g] and greater increases in the percentage of total lean mass at 1 year, 0.88% [95% CI, 0.63%-1.12%]; 3-years 0.34% [95% CI, 0.09%-0.60%]). The intervention group was more likely to show improvements of 5% or more in baseline body components (absolute risk reduction after 1 year, 13% for total fat mass, 11% for total lean mass, and 14% for visceral fat mass; after 3-years: 6% for total fat mass, 6% for total lean mass, and 8% for visceral fat mass). The number of participants needed to treat was between 12 and 17 to attain at least 1 individual with possibly clinically meaningful improvements in body composition. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this trial suggest a weight-loss lifestyle intervention based on an energy-reduced MedDiet and physical activity significantly reduced total and visceral fat and attenuated age-related losses of lean mass in older adults with overweight or obesity and metabolic syndrome. Continued follow-up is warranted to confirm the long-term consequences of these changes on cardiovascular clinical end points. TRIAL REGISTRATION isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN89898870.
2.
Effect of Intermittent Fasting Diet on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism and Insulin Resistance in Patients with Impaired Glucose and Lipid Metabolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Yuan, X, Wang, J, Yang, S, Gao, M, Cao, L, Li, X, Hong, D, Tian, S, Sun, C
International journal of endocrinology. 2022;2022:6999907
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes, and neurological conditions. The imbalance in glucose and lipid metabolism and hypertension characterises the development of these chronic diseases. Intermittent fasting (IF) has been considered an effective dietary strategy for reducing the risk of obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, and CVD. This systematic review and meta-analysis include ten randomised controlled trials to evaluate the effects of IF intervention on glucose and lipid metabolism in people with metabolic syndrome. IF intervention regulated glucose metabolism by improving fasting blood glucose, glycosylated haemoglobin, insulin, and insulin resistance. IF intervention also positively impacted the body mass index and waist circumference. The total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein levels, and triglyceride levels also improved, followed by the IF, showing the impact on lipid metabolism. Further robust studies are required due to heterogeneity between the included studies in type of IF, duration, the health status of participants, ethnicity, and outcome measurements. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis to understand the therapeutic effect of IF intervention on glycolipid metabolism in people with metabolic syndrome.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- IF does not require calorie restriction which may result in greater compliance
- IF does not restrict macronutrients such as CHO and fats, so may avoid the exclusion of key nutrients e.g. healthy fats and wholegrains.
- IF may have fewer adverse effects on daily routines and quality of life, which may mean adherence is easier.
- Improved glucose and lipid metabolism may prevent the development of chronic health conditions such as T2D, CVD and cancer.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Management of glucose and lipid metabolism can be achieved through weight reduction using dietary interventions such as very low calorie or CHO diets, which may be effective but difficult to sustain long term. An alternative approach for weight management, improved insulin resistance and subsequent prevention of comorbitities e.g. Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) and cancer, is Intermittent Fasting (IF). such as time restricted or periodic fasting.
This study summarises the effects of IF dietary interventions lasting less than three months in overweight and obese women with Metabolic Syndrome, defined as the presence of any metabolic dysfunction including obesity, hyperglycaemia, dyslipidaemia or hypertension.
The meta-anlaysis was carried out following PRISMA guidelines. A literature search in PubMed and Medline using the keywords obesity/overweight, IF diet, metabolic syndrome, RCT’s and humans resulted in 10 studies with 12 types of intervention for analysis. The following outcomes were evaluated: glucose and lipid metabolism, insulin resistance, weight loss and blood pressure.
Results were analysed in R software using mean differences and 95% confidence intervals, and either random or fixed effects depending on the Cochrane’s Q and I(2) statistics. Funnel plots were inspected for potential bias and Egger’s regression tests for publication bias.
There were significant differences before and after the interventions for all glucose and lipid metabolism markers as well as body weight and systolic blood pressure :
Glucose metabolism:
- Fasting glucose reduced by 0.15mmol/L
- Insulin plasma reduced by 13.25uUI
- HbA1c reduced by 0.08%
- HOMA-IR (insulin resistance index) reduced by 0.31 on average
Lipid metabolism:
- Total cholesterol reduced by 0.32mmol/L
- LDL reduced by 0.22mmol/L
- Triglyceride reduced by 0.04mmol/L
Weight loss:
- Body weight reduced by 1.87kg
- BMI reduced by 0.8kg/m2
- Waist circumference reduced by 2.08cm
Blood pressure:
- Systolic reduced by 2.58mmHg
- Diastolic reduced by 3.12mmHg
Despite limitations of the meta-analysis, this study demonstrates IF has therapeutic effects on those with disordered lipid and glucose metabolism, and may prove to be an effective and sustainable approach.
Clinical practice applications:
- IF may be an effective alternative to restricted calorie or CHO diets for weight management with the associated benefits of glucose and lipid metabolism.
- IF has been shown to have therapeutic effects on individuals with impaired glucose and lipid metabolism.
- IF may be considered as a sustainable lifestyle choice rather than a ‘weight loss’ programme such as a very low calorie diet, which can result in poor quality of life and subsequent reduced adherence.
- Since it may take time for impaired glucose and lipid metabolism to progress to more serious disease states, establishing IF as an early intervention, may be considered as a prudent form of preventative medicine.
- IF has shown to have other health benefits such as reduced blood pressure and may be considered as adjuvant therapy.
Considerations for future research:
- Compares the effects of IF on different ethnicities, sex and age categories
- Evaluates the effect of IF on other disease states e.g. cancer, auto-immune conditions
- Assesses the response of other biomarkers e.g. inflammatory cytokines
- Compares different types and durations of IF on health biomarkers (eg periodic, time restricted)
Abstract
The question of whether or not intermittent fasting diets improve the clinical indicators of glycolipid metabolism remains unclear. This study systematically reviewed the relevant clinical trials to evaluate the effects of intermittent fasting diet on glucose and lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity in patients with metabolic syndrome. To evaluate the effect of intermittent fasting diet intervention on patients with disorders of glucose and lipid metabolism, random-effect or fixed-effect meta-analysis models were used to calculate the average difference before and after intermittent fasting diet intervention and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). After intermittent fasting diet intervention, in terms of glucose metabolism, fasting blood glucose reduced by 0.15 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.23; -0.06), glycosylated hemoglobin reduced by 0.08 (95% CIs: -0.25; -0.10), insulin plasma levels reduced by 13.25 uUI (95% CIs: -16.69; -9.82), and HOMA-IR decreased by 0.31 on an average (95% CIs: -0.44; -0.19). In addition, BMI decreased by 0.8 kg/m2 (95% CIs: -1.32; -0.28), body weight reduced by 1.87 kg (95% CIs: -2.67; -1.07), and the waist circumference decreased by 2.08 cm (95% CIs: -3.06; -1.10). Analysis of lipid metabolism showed that intermittent fasting diet intervention effectively reduced the total cholesterol level by 0.32 mmol/L (95% CIs: -0.60; -0.05), low-density lipoprotein level by 0.22 mmol/L (95% CIs: -0.37; -0.07), and triglyceride level by 0.04 mmol/L (95% CIs: -0.15; -0.07). Intermittent fasting diets have certain therapeutic effects on blood glucose and lipids in patients with metabolic syndrome and significantly improve insulin resistance. It may be considered as an auxiliary treatment to prevent the occurrence and development of chronic diseases.
3.
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Fasting and Lifestyle Modification in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome: Effects on Patient-Reported Outcomes.
Jeitler, M, Lauche, R, Hohmann, C, Choi, KA, Schneider, N, Steckhan, N, Rathjens, F, Anheyer, D, Paul, A, von Scheidt, C, et al
Nutrients. 2022;14(17)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a condition characterized by the presence of at least three cardiovascular risk factors, such as abdominal obesity, hypertension, insulin resistance, and dyslipidaemia. The aim of this study was to assess effects of fasting followed by the Mind-Body Medicine in Integrative and Complementary Medicine (MICOM) lifestyle modification intervention in patients with MetS on patient-reported outcomes, compared to a lifestyle modification intervention only. This study is a single-blind, bicentre, randomized controlled study. Patients (n=145) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio into one of the 2 groups: fasting and lifestyle modification or the lifestyle modification. They started with 2 vegan days (max. 1200 kcal/day), followed by 5 days of fasting (max. 350 kcal/day), and a stepwise reintroduction of food. Then they participated in the 10-week MICOM comprehensive multimodal lifestyle modification intervention with weekly 6-h sessions. Results show that after the multimodal lifestyle modification intervention, there were improvements for all outcome measures, namely quality of life, anxiety, depression, stress, mood as well as self-efficacy, mindfulness, and self-compassion, which persisted at the follow-up after 24 weeks. Authors conclude that their findings show beneficial and clinically relevant effects of fasting and intensified lifestyle modification on quality of life and psychological parameters.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
For clients with Metabolic syndrome a 5-day fast consisting of max. 350 kcal/day, in conjunction with therapies that focus on improved emotional, mental, social, spiritual, and behavioural factors may directly affect health and support improved mood.
Therapies include mindfulness and specific group training rooted in psycho-neuroendocrinology, and the use of formal meditation and gentle yoga exercises. As well as nutritional education included lectures, cooking workshops, as well as group support.
Bottom line: The use of complimentary therapies such as mindfulness, yoga and medication in conjunction with nutritional advice and may be effective to support improved mood in clients with Metabolic syndrome.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a condition characterised by the presence of at least three cardiovascular risk factors such as abdominal obesity, hypertension, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia.
The authors refer to epidemiological studies that have identified the role of psychological risk factors such as psychosocial stress, depression and anxiety in patients with MetS and cardiovascular disease.
This single-blind, bi-centre RCT assessed the effects of fasting followed by a comprehensive lifestyle modification program MICOM (Mind-Body Medicine in Integrative and Complementary Medicine) in 145 participants with Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) (62.8% women; 59.7 ± 9.3 years) randomised to:
1. 5-day fasting followed by 10 weeks of lifestyle modification (F + LM; modified DASH diet, exercise, mindfulness; n = 73) or
2. 10 weeks of lifestyle modification only (LM; n = 72)
The study duration was 24 weeks occurring from April 2014 to December 2014, with the last follow-up assessment in December 2015. 73 Participants were randomised into an F + LM group and 72 participants into an LM group between the ages of 59 and 60.
Outcomes were assessed at weeks 0, 1, 12, and 24, for quality of life (Short-Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire, SF-36), anxiety/depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS), stress (Cohen Perceived Stress Scale, CPSS), mood (Profile of Mood States, POMS), self-efficacy (General Self-Efficacy Scale, GSE), mindfulness (Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale, MAAS), and self-compassion (Self-Compassion Scale, SCS).
At week 1, POMS depression and fatigue scores were significantly lower in F + LM compared to LM. At week 12, most self-report outcomes improved in both groups—only POMS vigour was significantly higher in F + LM than in LM. Most of the beneficial effects within the groups persisted at week 24.
Clinical practice applications:
This randomised controlled trial highlights fasting-induced mood-modulating effects in the short term (<24 months).
LM induced several positive effects on quality of life and psychological parameters in participants with MetS.
The compliance rate for this study was good and there were no adverse effects reported suggesting a potentially effective lifestyle modification intervention for adults with metabolic syndrome.
The authors did note the extent to which participants adhered to the program by using stress reduction techniques at home was not assessed.
Considerations for future research:
MBM lifestyle modification intervention led to an improvement of self-efficacy, mindfulness, and self-compassion.
Further studies to explore explanatory models for the effects of MBM are needed.
Mediating variables on mindfulness, self-efficacy, and compassion, and the effects on physical and psychological parameters, need to be examined more closely.
Future studies could use condition-specific questionnaires in addition to generic ones, which have previously been used to facilitate the comparison of the study results with those in the population.
Abstract
Lifestyle interventions can have a positive impact on quality of life and psychological parameters in patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS). In this randomized controlled trial, 145 participants with MetS (62.8% women; 59.7 ± 9.3 years) were randomized to (1) 5-day fasting followed by 10 weeks of lifestyle modification (F + LM; modified DASH diet, exercise, mindfulness; n = 73) or (2) 10 weeks of lifestyle modification only (LM; n = 72). Outcomes were assessed at weeks 0, 1, 12, and 24, and included quality of life (Short-Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire, SF-36), anxiety/depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS), stress (Cohen Perceived Stress Scale, CPSS), mood (Profile of Mood States, POMS), self-efficacy (General Self-Efficacy Scale, GSE), mindfulness (Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale, MAAS), and self-compassion (Self-Compassion Scale, SCS). At week 1, POMS depression and fatigue scores were significantly lower in F + LM compared to LM. At week 12, most self-report outcomes improved in both groups-only POMS vigor was significantly higher in F + LM than in LM. Most of the beneficial effects within the groups persisted at week 24. Fasting can induce mood-modulating effects in the short term. LM induced several positive effects on quality of life and psychological parameters in patients with MetS.
4.
Effect of sleep duration on dietary intake, desire to eat, measures of food intake and metabolic hormones: A systematic review of clinical trials.
Soltanieh, S, Solgi, S, Ansari, M, Santos, HO, Abbasi, B
Clinical nutrition ESPEN. 2021;45:55-65
-
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Adequate sleep is crucial to health. Yet, sleep disturbances have become very common in modern societies. A lack of sleep is linked to increased risk for several chronic diseases such as diabetes, high blood pressure, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, appetite-regulating hormones can be disrupted by sleep shortages, which is thought to drive chronic overeating, leading to weight gain, obesity and its associated health consequences. This review examined the relationship between sleep duration and food consumption and energy intake, whilst also monitoring changes in body weight and appetite-regulating hormones. The review encompassed 50 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 3387 participants, including 1079 children and adolescents and 2308 adults. The findings suggested that sleep shortages contribute to significant increases in calorie intake, fat intake, increased body weight, appetite, hunger, more frequent eating and bigger portion sizes. In this review lack of sleep did not change protein and carbohydrate intake. Nor did lack of sleep make people exert more or less energy overall, however, a variance amongst ethnic groups was observed here. There was not enough evidence for changes in metabolic rate, so the review assumed no significant effect. When viewed collectively, the appetite-regulating hormones of leptin and ghrelin, the stress hormone cortisol and the sugar-regulating hormone insulin were not significantly influenced by sleep duration. However, there seemed to be a wide variance of outcomes when looking at individual studies' results. In conclusion, the authors reiterated the importance of sleep for health maintenance, advocating for a minimum of 7 hours of sleep per day for adults and that, despite busy modern lifestyles, sleep optimisation strategies should be prioritised. Less than 6 hours of sleep per day increases the risk of health consequences, like weight gain and metabolic disorders and sleep management should be considered part of their treatment protocols.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Reduced sleep duration may serve as a mediator for weight gain in part due to increased appetite, increased fat intake and disruptions to energy balance.
- Enhancing sleep quality may serve to support weight loss protocols.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Short sleep duration and disruptions to circadian rhythm have been associated with being overweight and obese. It has been suggested that sleep restriction may interfere with appetite regulating hormones leading to increased appetite and disrupted energy balance.
This study aimed to systematically review studies exploring the relationship between sleep duration and food consumption, energy intake, anthropometric characteristics and appetite-regulating hormones.
Methods
This systematic review included 50 randomised controlled trials including 3,387 participants.
Results
Energy intake
- 13 out of 30 the included studies found that short sleep conditions led to higher energy intake.
- 1 study identified that sleep restriction resulted in a 15.3% and 9.2% increase in energy intake in both women and men.
- 3 studies noted that prolonging sleep duration led to a reduction in energy intake.
- 1 study reported a reduction in energy intake after sleep restriction (P=0.031).
Fat consumption
- 9 studies out of 22 identified a significant association between short sleep and increased fat consumption.
- 7 studies did not identify a difference between groups.
- 3 studies noted a decrease in fat consumption following prolonged sleep (P<0.001, P<0.05, P=0.04).
Hunger and appetite
- 11 studies out of 17 observed that sleep restriction resulted in increased hunger ratings.
- 3 studies found an increase in appetite following sleep restriction (P<0.01) with 3 finding no difference..
- 1 study reported a decrease in appetite following sleep restriction.
- 2 studies noted that portion sizes increased as a result of sleep restriction (P<0.01).
- 1 study reported an increase in eating occasions following restricted sleep compared to habitual sleep (6.08 vs 4.96).
Body weight
- 6 studies out of 14 found no effect of sleep loss on body weight.
- 4 studies identified that sleep restriction led to weight gain (P<0.001, P<0.05, P=0.14, P=0.031).
- 2 studies reported weight loss following increased sleep duration (P<0.001).
Ghrelin and leptin
- Leptin and ghrelin levels were generally not found to be influenced by sleep duration, with the exception of a few studies.
Clinical practice applications:
Reduced sleep duration may promote weight gain by:
- Increasing energy intake.
- Increasing fat consumption.
- Increasing hunger and appetite.
- Increasing portion sizes and eating occasions.
Prolonging sleep duration may support weight loss by:
- Reducing energy intake.
- Reducing fat intake.
Considerations for future research:
- Mixed results on the influence of sleep restriction on appetite regulating hormones, leptin and ghrelin.
- Some studies noted the negative impact of sleep restriction on leptin and ghrelin concentrations, collectively shortened sleep duration did not appear to influence these hormones.
- Further sleep restriction studies exploring additional appetite regulating hormones and neuropeptides and the reward system may provide a more definitive understanding of the underlying mechanism for reduced sleep duration to disrupt the appetite and energy balance and promote weight gain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Sleep, as well as diet and physical activity, plays a significant role in growth, maturation, health, and regulation of energy homeostasis. Recently, there is increasing evidence indicating a possible causal association between sleep duration and energy balance. We aimed to examine the relationship between sleep duration and food consumption, energy intake, anthropometric characteristics, and appetite-regulating hormones by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS Electronic literature searches were conducted on Medline, Web of Science, and Google Scholar until July 2020. The search was conducted with the following words: "Sleep Duration", "Circadian Rhythm", "Sleep Disorders" in combination with "Obesity", "Overweight", "Abdominal Obesity", "Physical Activity", "Energy Intake", "Body Mass Index", "Lipid Metabolism", "Caloric Restriction", Leptin, "Weight Gain", and "Appetite Regulation" using human studies.methods RESULTS After screening 708 abstracts, 50 RCTs (7 on children or adolescents and 43 on adults) were identified and met the inclusion criteria. In general, the findings suggested that sleep restriction may leads to a significant increment in energy intake, fat intake, body weight, appetite, hunger, eating occasions, and portion size, while protein and carbohydrate consumption, total energy expenditure, and respiratory quotient remained unaffected as a result of sleep restriction. Serum leptin, ghrelin, and cortisol concentrations were not influenced by sleep duration as well. CONCLUSION Insufficient sleep can be considered as a contributing factor for energy imbalance, weight gain, and metabolic disorders and it is suggested that to tackle disordered eating it may be necessary to pay more attention to sleep duration.