1.
Effect of a lifestyle intervention in obese infertile women on cardiometabolic health and quality of life: A randomized controlled trial.
van Dammen, L, Wekker, V, van Oers, AM, Mutsaerts, MAQ, Painter, RC, Zwinderman, AH, Groen, H, van de Beek, C, Muller Kobold, AC, Kuchenbecker, WKH, et al
PloS one. 2018;13(1):e0190662
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity is linked to increase in cardiovascular and related disease risk factors. The rate of prevalence of obesity in childbearing women is on the increase. Based on these data one of the largest randomised control multicentre Lifestyle study was conducted. The aim of this study was to look into the effects of lifestyle intervention on cardio metabolic risk factors in childbearing obese women. The intervention goal was weight loss of 5-10% within six month. The intervention included caloric restriction and moderate physical activity. The result from the study showed lifestyle intervention among obese infertile women improved cardio metabolic health and also their physical quality of life. The authors concluded that based on data from this study infertile obese women, especially prior to infertility treatment, should be informed of the positive effects of lifestyle intervention of diet and physical activity.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of obesity, an important cardiometabolic risk factor, is rising in women. Lifestyle improvements are the first step in treatment of obesity, but the success depends on factors like timing and motivation. Women are especially receptive to advice about lifestyle before and during pregnancy. Therefore, we hypothesize that the pre-pregnancy period provides the perfect window of opportunity to improve cardiometabolic health and quality of life of obese infertile women, by means of a lifestyle intervention. METHODS AND FINDINGS Between 2009-2012, 577 infertile women between 18 and 39 years of age, with a Body Mass Index of ≥ 29 kg/m2, were randomized to a six month lifestyle intervention preceding infertility treatment, or to direct infertility treatment. The goal of the intervention was 5-10% weight loss or a BMI < 29 kg/m2. Cardiometabolic outcomes included weight, waist- and hip circumference, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting glucose and insulin, HOMA-IR, hs-CRP, lipids and metabolic syndrome. All outcomes were measured by research nurses at randomization, 3 and 6 months. Self-reported quality of life was also measured at 12 months. Three participants withdrew their informed consent, and 63 participants discontinued the intervention program. Intention to treat analysis was conducted. Mixed effects regression models analyses were performed. Results are displayed as estimated mean differences between intervention and control group. Weight (-3.1 kg 95% CI: -4.0 to -2.2 kg; P < .001), waist circumference (-2.4 cm 95% CI: -3.6 to -1.1 cm; P < .001), hip circumference (-3.0 95% CI: -4.2 to -1.9 cm; P < .001), BMI (-1.2 kg/m2 95% CI: -1.5 to -0.8 kg/m2; P < .001), systolic blood pressure (-2.8 mmHg 95% CI: -5.0 to -0.7 mmHg; P = .01) and HOMA-IR (-0.5 95% CI: -0.8 to -0.1; P = .01) were lower in the intervention group compared to controls. Hs-CRP and lipids did not differ between groups. The odds ratio for metabolic syndrome in the intervention group was 0.53 (95% CI: 0.33 to 0.85; P < .01) compared to controls. Physical QoL scores were higher in the lifestyle intervention group (2.2 95% CI: 0.9 to 3.5; P = .001) while mental QoL scores did not differ. CONCLUSIONS In obese infertile women, a lifestyle intervention prior to infertility treatment improves cardiometabolic health and self-reported physical quality of life (LIFEstyle study: Netherlands Trial Register: NTR1530).
2.
Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Obesity-Induced Insulin Resistance: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Cefalo, CMA, Conte, C, Sorice, GP, Moffa, S, Sun, VA, Cinti, F, Salomone, E, Muscogiuri, G, Brocchi, AAG, Pontecorvi, A, et al
Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 2018;26(4):651-657
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Vitamin D concentration has been inversely associated with impaired glucose regulation, insulin resistance and risk of metabolic dysfunction. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether Vitamin D supplementation could improve insulin sensitivity in patients with a high risk of diabetes. The study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The participants with obesity were supplemented with Vitamin D or placebo on top of a hypocaloric diet. Results indicate that Vitamin D supplementation combined with weight loss is linked with a significant improvement in insulin sensitivity in vitamin D deficient participants with obesity.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim was to investigate whether vitamin D supplementation, combined with a hypocaloric diet, could have an independent effect on insulin sensitivity in subjects with both overweight and hypovitaminosis D. Changes from baseline in anthropometric parameters, body composition, glucose tolerance, and insulin secretion were considered as secondary outcomes. METHODS Eighteen volunteers who were nondiabetic and vitamin D deficient and had BMI > 25 kg/m2 were randomized (1:1) in a double-blind manner to a hypocaloric diet + either oral cholecalciferol at 25,000 IU/wk or placebo for 3 months. Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp to measure insulin sensitivity was performed at baseline and after intervention. RESULTS Body weight in both groups decreased significantly (-7.5% in the vitamin D group and -10% in the placebo group; P < 0.05 for both), with no between-group differences. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in the vitamin D group increased considerably (from 36.7 ± 13.2 nmol/L to 74.8 ± 18.7 nmol/L; P < 0.001). Insulin sensitivity in the vitamin D group improved (from 4.6 ± 2.0 to 6.9 ± 3.3 mg·kg-1 ·min-1 ; P < 0.001), whereas no changes were observed in the placebo group (from 4.9 ± 1.1 to 5.1 ± 0.3 mg·kg-1 ·min-1 ; P = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS Cholecalciferol supplementation, combined with a weight loss program, significantly improves insulin sensitivity in healthy subjects with obesity and might represent a personalized approach for insulin-resistant subjects with obesity.