1.
Role of Probiotics in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Does Gut Microbiota Matter?
Xie, C, Halegoua-DeMarzio, D
Nutrients. 2019;11(11)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterised by an excessive accumulation of fat in the liver tissue, without excessive alcohol consumption, and appears to be related to metabolic syndrome. It is thought to have a prevalence of 25% globally and there are no pharmacological treatments available. This review discusses the connection between the gut microbiota (GM) and NAFLD. Various mechanisms by which the GM may be involved in the development of NAFLD are discussed. As probiotics and prebiotics can normalise GM and reverse dysbiosis their use may benefit patients with NAFLD. This has been confirmed in animal models. The authors review 26 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of probiotics and/or prebiotics in the treatment of NAFLD which evaluate biochemical markers, as well as five meta-analyses, and found that overall there is strong evidence that probiotics and/or prebiotics can lower ALT and AST (markers of NAFLD), although results for other biochemical markers were mixed. They also reviewed RCTs assessing NAFLD by imaging and histological means, and again found benefits from probiotic and/or prebiotic supplementation.
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the hepatic consequence of metabolic syndrome, which often also includes obesity, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. The connection between gut microbiota (GM) and NAFLD has attracted significant attention in recent years. Data has shown that GM affects hepatic lipid metabolism and influences the balance between pro/anti-inflammatory effectors in the liver. Although studies reveal the association between GM dysbiosis and NAFLD, decoding the mechanisms of gut dysbiosis resulting in NAFLD remains challenging. The potential pathophysiology that links GM dysbiosis to NAFLD can be summarized as: (1) disrupting the balance between energy harvest and expenditure, (2) promoting hepatic inflammation (impairing intestinal integrity, facilitating endotoxemia, and initiating inflammatory cascades with cytokines releasing), and (3) altered biochemistry metabolism and GM-related metabolites (i.e., bile acid, short-chain fatty acids, aromatic amino acid derivatives, branched-chain amino acids, choline, ethanol). Due to the hypothesis that probiotics/synbiotics could normalize GM and reverse dysbiosis, there have been efforts to investigate the therapeutic effect of probiotics/synbiotics in patients with NAFLD. Recent randomized clinical trials suggest that probiotics/synbiotics could improve transaminases, hepatic steatosis, and reduce hepatic inflammation. Despite these promising results, future studies are necessary to understand the full role GM plays in NAFLD development and progression. Additionally, further data is needed to unravel probiotics/synbiotics efficacy, safety, and sustainability as a novel pharmacologic approaches to NAFLD.
2.
A controlled trial of gluten-free diet in patients with irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhea: effects on bowel frequency and intestinal function.
Vazquez-Roque, MI, Camilleri, M, Smyrk, T, Murray, JA, Marietta, E, O'Neill, J, Carlson, P, Lamsam, J, Janzow, D, Eckert, D, et al
Gastroenterology. 2013;144(5):903-911.e3
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The relationship between gluten exposure and diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) is not well understood. Non-celiac IBS-D patients who are positive for HLA-DQ2/8 genes associated with CD can show symptom improvement on a gluten-free diet (GFD). The aim of this 4-week parallel randomized controlled clinical trial in HLA-DQ2/8 positive and negative patients with IBS-D was to assess the effects of a gluten-containing diet (GCD) compared to a GFD on bowel function, gut transit, small bowel (SB) and colonic barrier functions as measured by two-sugar excretion permeability test and mRNA expression of TJ proteins in mucosa of the small bowel (SB) and rectosigmoid (RS) derived by biopsy. Immune response to diets was also measured as cytokine production from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Patient were recruited from the Mayo clinic’s database of IBS suffers, and invited to participate. Patients with diagnosed CD were excluded. Genotype analysis was performed for HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8. 22 patients were placed on the GCD (11 HLA-DQ2/8–negative and 11 HLA-DQ2/8–positive) and 23 on the GFD (12 HLA-DQ2/8−negative and 11 HLA-DQ2/8–positive. All meals and snacks were ingested or prepared in the Mayo Clinic. Patients were advised to eat only the foods provided by the study dieticians. Gluten-free and gluten-containing meals were prepared using the same macronutrient content (20% protein, 30% fat, 50% carb). Compliance to the diet was assessed by direct questioning by the dietitians and reported to be excellent. All patients were ingesting gluten in their diet prior to starting the study. At 4-weeks, a statistically significant decrease in stool frequency of subjects on GFD compared to subjects on GCD (p=0.04) was seen. This effect was more pronounced in subjects who were HLA-DQ2 or 8 positive (p=0.019) There was no significant diet effect (GFD vs. GCD) on, daily stool form, ease of passage or gastric emptying. The GCD was associated with higher small bowel (SB) permeability (based on 0–2 hr levels of mannitol (p=0.028) and lactulose:mannitol ratio (P=0.0012)). SB permeability was greater in HLA-DQ2/8–positive than −negative patients (P=.018). No significant differences in colonic permeability were observed. Significant diet-associated changes in occludin expression in SB mucosa in the HLA-DQ2 or 8 positive group were seen (p=0.017). Expressions of tight junction proteins (zonulin (ZO-1), occludin, and claudin-1 mRNA) in colonic mucosa were significantly lower in GCD relative to GFD in the overall groups, particularly in subjects with HLA-DQ2 or 8 positive status. Cytokine response was higher (interleukin-10) in response to GCD than GFD (unrelated to HLA genotype). A limitation in the quantification of TJ protein expression is that it was solely based on PCR (mRNA expression). In future, other methods should be included to directly identify these proteins and their distribution. The inability to document alterations in colonic permeability using the 2-sugar excretion profile from 8 to 24 hours is a limitation. This may be due to lack of sensitivity of the lactulose and mannitol excretion test, for example, due to the metabolism of both sugars by colonic bacteria. Another limitation is that the mechanism for improvement in stool frequency on a GFD in the absence of changes in colonic transit was not elucidated by our studies. This study does not specifically address the effects of gluten protein per se, and it is possible that other proteins in wheat flour may be responsible for the changes observed. The author concludes that this study provide mechanistic explanations for the observation that gluten withdrawal may improve patient symptoms in IBS. The data also partially explains that the biological effects of gluten were associated with HLA-DQ2 or 8 genotype. The relationship of dietary factors, innate and adaptive immune responses and mucosal interactions in IBS-D deserve further study. Further clinical studies evaluating the effects of gluten withdrawal in patients with IBS-D are needed.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) could benefit from a gluten-free diet (GFD). METHODS We performed a randomized controlled 4-week trial of a gluten-containing diet (GCD) or GFD in 45 patients with IBS-D; genotype analysis was performed for HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8. Twenty-two patients were placed on the GCD (11 HLA-DQ2/8 negative and 11 HLA-DQ2/8 positive) and 23 patients were placed on the GFD (12 HLA-DQ2/8 negative and 11 HLA-DQ2/8 positive). We measured bowel function daily, small-bowel (SB) and colonic transit, mucosal permeability (by lactulose and mannitol excretion), and cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells after exposure to gluten and rice. We collected rectosigmoid biopsy specimens from 28 patients, analyzed levels of messenger RNAs encoding tight junction proteins, and performed H&E staining and immunohistochemical analyses. Analysis of covariance models was used to compare data from the GCD and GFD groups. RESULTS Subjects on the GCD had more bowel movements per day (P = .04); the GCD had a greater effect on bowel movements per day of HLA-DQ2/8-positive than HLA-DQ2/8-negative patients (P = .019). The GCD was associated with higher SB permeability (based on 0-2 h levels of mannitol and the lactulose:mannitol ratio); SB permeability was greater in HLA-DQ2/8-positive than HLA-DQ2/8-negative patients (P = .018). No significant differences in colonic permeability were observed. Patients on the GCD had a small decrease in expression of zonula occludens 1 in SB mucosa and significant decreases in expression of zonula occludens 1, claudin-1, and occludin in rectosigmoid mucosa; the effects of the GCD on expression were significantly greater in HLA-DQ2/8-positive patients. The GCD vs the GFD had no significant effects on transit or histology. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells produced higher levels of interleukin-10, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and transforming growth factor-α in response to gluten than rice (unrelated to HLA genotype). CONCLUSIONS Gluten alters bowel barrier functions in patients with IBS-D, particularly in HLA-DQ2/8-positive patients. These findings reveal a reversible mechanism for the disorder. Clinical trials.govNCT01094041.