1.
Randomized controlled trial of N-acetylcysteine versus l-carnitine among women with clomiphene-citrate-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome.
El Sharkwy, IA, Abd El Aziz, WM
International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2019;(1):59-64
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare clinical and metabolic profiles between N-acetylcysteine and l-carnitine among women with clomiphene citrate (CC)-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS A randomized trial at Zagazig University between January 2017 and March 2018. Women with CC-resistant PCOS were allocated randomly to receive CC plus N-acetylcysteine or CC plus l-carnitine. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate; secondary outcomes were ovulation rate and metabolic changes. RESULTS Overall, 162 women completed the study (N-acetylcysteine group, n=82; l-carnitine group, n=80). After 3 months, there was no difference in pregnancy (P=0.15), ovulation (P=0.21), or spontaneous abortion (P=0.11) rates between the two groups. There was no significant decrease in BMI in either group (both P>0.05). There were improvements in menstrual pattern, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, free testosterone, and insulin resistance markers in both groups (all P<0.05). An improvement in lipid profile was observed only in the l-carnitine group (P<0.001). N-Acetylcysteine treatment led to significantly greater improvement in free testosterone and insulin resistance parameters as compared with l-carnitine (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Both N-acetylcysteine and l-carnitine were equally effective in improving pregnancy and ovulation rates among women with CC-resistant PCOS. However, N-acetylcysteine was superior in ameliorating insulin resistance and only l-carnitine improved lipid profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03164421.
2.
Effects of adjunctive N-acetylcysteine on depressive symptoms: Modulation by baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.
Porcu, M, Urbano, MR, Verri, WA, Barbosa, DS, Baracat, M, Vargas, HO, Machado, RCBR, Pescim, RR, Nunes, SOV
Psychiatry research. 2018;:268-274
Abstract
UNLABELLED Outcomes in a RCTs of 12 weeks of theclinical efficacy of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) as an adjunctive treatment on depression and anxiety symptoms and its effects on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels. A wide array of measures were made. The 17-item version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17); the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A); Sheehan Disability Scale; Quality of Life; Clinical Global Impression (CGI); anthropometrics measures; and vital signs and biochemical laboratory. There were no significant differences among the groups regarding demographic, clinical features, use of medication, metabolic syndrome and comorbidities. From baseline to week 12, individuals receiving NAC, versus placebo, had a statistically significant reduction in depressive symptoms on HDRS17 (p < 0.01) and anxiety symptoms on HAM-A (p = 0.04), but only for individuals with levels of hs-CRP > 3 mg/L at baseline. Individuals receiving NAC with baseline levels of hs-CRP > 3 mg/L, had more significant reduction in uric acid levels compared to individuals with baseline levels of hs-CRP ≤ 3 mg/L on week 12. Participants receiving placebogained significantly more weight during the 12 weeks for baseline levels of hs-CRP ≤ 3 mg/L and hs-CRP > 3 mg/L, and individuals receiving NAC in both groups did not have significant weight change during the 12 weeks. No individuals were withdrawn from the study because of adverse event. NAC group exhibited significantly greater reduction on hs-CRP levels than placebo group from baseline to week 12. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier; NCT02252341.