0
selected
-
1.
Effect of atorvastatin on lipogenic, inflammatory and thrombogenic markers in women with the metabolic syndrome.
Velarde, GP, Choudhary, N, Bravo-Jaimes, K, Smotherman, C, Sherazi, S, Kraemer, DF
Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD. 2021;(2):634-640
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Specific drug therapy to target the underlying proinflammatory and prothrombotic state in patients with metabolic syndrome (MS) is lacking. We sought to study the effect of high-intensity atorvastatin on markers of lipogenesis, inflammation and thrombogenesis, in women with MS in the absence of cardiovascular disease or diabetes. METHODS AND RESULTS This randomized double-blinded controlled trial included 88 women with MS (according to National Cholesterol Education Panel Adult Treatment Panel III criteria) and low atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk. Participants were randomized to receive atorvastatin 80 mg or matching placebo. Thrombogenic, lipogenic and inflammatory markers were collected at the time of enrollment, after a 6-week dietary run-in phase (time of randomization), and at 6- and 12-weeks after randomization. At 6 weeks post-randomization, there was significant reduction in total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein-B (Apo-B) and Apo-B/Apo-A1 ratio in the atorvastatin arm compared to placebo. This difference persisted at 12-weeks post randomization. There was no significant difference in fasting blood glucose, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, serum leptin, Apo-A1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and platelet activity. A significant increase in vascular adhesion molecule 1 at 6 and 12 weeks was seen within the atorvastatin arm. No difference was observed in blood pressure and waist circumference. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, high-intensity atorvastatin has an early and significant impact on lipoproteins and apolipoproteins but did not lower inflammatory, thrombogenic or biomarkers of platelet activity and aggregation in women with MS. The use of statins for primary prevention in these patients should be further explored.
-
2.
Effectiveness of Lipid-Lowering Statin Therapy in Patients With and Without Psoriasis.
Ports, WC, Fayyad, R, DeMicco, DA, Laskey, R, Wolk, R
Clinical drug investigation. 2017;(8):775-785
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psoriasis is associated with dyslipidemia and metabolic syndrome, and has been linked to an increased cardiovascular risk. The aim of this study was to compare baseline characteristics and effects of statin therapy on lipid levels and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with and without psoriasis. METHODS This post-hoc analysis assessed patients from one primary cardiovascular prevention statin trial (Collaborative AtoRvastatin Diabetes Study [CARDS]) and two secondary cardiovascular prevention statin trials (Treating to New Targets [TNT] and Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering [IDEAL]). Baseline characteristics, lipid changes from baseline, and cardiovascular event rates were analyzed. TNT and IDEAL data were pooled. RESULTS Baseline characteristics and lipid profiles differed minimally in patients with and without psoriasis. In CARDS and TNT/IDEAL, similar apolipoprotein B, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reductions occurred with statin therapy in patients with or without psoriasis. High-dose atorvastatin significantly reduced cardiovascular events vs. standard/low-dose statins in patients without psoriasis in TNT/IDEAL; similar numeric differences in event rates were observed in patients with psoriasis. CONCLUSIONS In this post-hoc analysis, statins improved lipid levels and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with and without psoriasis, supporting statin use in patients with psoriasis. Trial registration (ClinicalTrials.gov) NCT00327418, registered 16 May, 2006; NCT00327691, registered 16 May, 2006; NCT00159835, registered 8 September, 2005.
-
3.
The effects of statins on benign prostatic hyperplasia in elderly patients with metabolic syndrome.
Zhang, X, Zeng, X, Dong, L, Zhao, X, Qu, X
World journal of urology. 2015;(12):2071-7
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effects of simvastatin and atorvastatin in elderly male patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) accompanied by metabolic syndrome (MetS). METHODS Eligible patients aged >60 year with BPH accompanied by MetS were randomly assigned to receive 40 mg of simvastatin daily, 20 mg of atorvastatin daily or placebo (control group) treatment for 12 months. Serum lipids, interleukin 6 (IL-6), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume (PV) and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) were tested before and after treatment. RESULTS The levels of serum total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hs-CRP, IL-6 and IPSS was decreased, serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was increased, and PV was reduced in the patients following treatments with statins. The PV of the patients who received simvastatin were reduced more than those of the patients who received atorvastatin. The decrease in PV was more significant in the obesity patients than in the normal weight patients and in the hyperlipidemia patients than in the normal-lipid patients following the statin interventions. The reduction in PV was positively related to the decreases in the levels of TC and IL-6 and to the increase in the level of HDL-C. CONCLUSIONS Simvastatin and atorvastatin significantly reduced PV, improved lower urinary tract symptoms, and slowed the clinical progression of BPH possibly by lowering cholesterol and anti-inflammatory factors.
-
4.
Influence of metabolic syndrome factors and insulin resistance on the efficacy of ezetimibe/simvastatin and atorvastatin in patients with metabolic syndrome and atherosclerotic coronary heart disease risk.
Rosen, JB, Ballantyne, CM, Hsueh, WA, Lin, J, Shah, AK, Lowe, RS, Tershakovec, AM
Lipids in health and disease. 2015;:103
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metabolic syndrome (MetS) and insulin resistance (IR) are increasing in prevalence, are associated with higher risk for coronary heart disease (CHD), and may potentially influence the responses to lipid-altering drug therapy. This study evaluated the effects of MetS factors (abdominal obesity, depleted high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], and elevated triglycerides, blood pressure, and fasting glucose) and IR on ezetimibe/simvastatin and atorvastatin treatment efficacy in patients with MetS. METHODS This post-hoc analysis of a multicenter, 6-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study of 1128 subjects with hypercholesterolemia, MetS, and moderately high/high CHD risk evaluated the effects of baseline MetS factors/IR on percent change from baseline in lipids, apolipoproteins, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), after treatment with the usual starting doses of ezetimibe/simvastatin (10/20 mg) versus atorvastatin (10 mg, 20 mg) and next higher doses (10/40 mg versus 40 mg). RESULTS Ezetimibe/simvastatin and atorvastatin efficacy was generally consistent across MetS factor/IR subgroups. Ezetimibe/simvastatin produced greater incremental percent reductions in LDL-C, non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, total cholesterol, and lipoprotein ratios for all subgroups, and larger percent increases in HDL-C and apolipoprotein AI for all but non-obese and HDL-C ≥ 40 mg/dL subgroups than atorvastatin at the doses compared. Triglycerides, very-LDL-C, and hs-CRP results were more variable but similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSION The magnitude of lipid-altering effects produced by each treatment regimen was generally similar across all MetS and IR subgroups. Ezetimibe/simvastatin produced greater percent reductions in most lipid fractions than atorvastatin at the dose comparisons studied, and all treatments were generally well tolerated. (Registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00409773).