1.
Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials.
Anh, NH, Kim, SJ, Long, NP, Min, JE, Yoon, YC, Lee, EG, Kim, M, Kim, TJ, Yang, YY, Son, EY, et al
Nutrients. 2020;(1)
Abstract
Clinical applications of ginger with an expectation of clinical benefits are receiving significant attention. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive discussion in terms of the clinical effects of ginger in all reported areas. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline, randomized controlled trials on the effects of ginger were investigated. Accordingly, 109 eligible papers were fully extracted in terms of study design, population characteristics, evaluation systems, adverse effects, and main outcomes. The reporting quality of the included studies was assessed based on the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials and integrated together with studies that investigated the same subjects. The included studies that examined the improvement of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, inflammation, metabolic syndromes, digestive function, and colorectal cancer's markers were consistently supported, whereas other expected functions were relatively controversial. Nevertheless, only 43 clinical trials (39.4%) met the criterion of having a 'high quality of evidence.' In addition to the quality assessment result, small populations and unstandardized evaluation systems were the observed shortcomings in ginger clinical trials. Further studies with adequate designs are warranted to validate the reported clinical functions of ginger.
2.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and colorectal cancer.
Mikolasevic, I, Orlic, L, Stimac, D, Hrstic, I, Jakopcic, I, Milic, S
Postgraduate medical journal. 2017;(1097):153-158
Abstract
As a significant cause of cancer death worldwide, colorectal cancer (CRC) is still one of the most common cancers in the world. The most efficient strategies to reduce CRC incidence include identifying risk factors for CRC and performing a preventive colonoscopy in high-risk populations. Some well-established risk factors for CRC development include hereditary syndromes and inflammatory bowel disease. Of note, in recent years, attention has been given to new evidence indicating that more than 75%-95% of CRC occurs in individuals with little or no genetic risk. For these individuals, the risk for CRC is associated with their lifestyle and dietary factors, including central obesity, overweight and physical inactivity. Recently, evidence demonstrated a connection between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and CRC. Insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome (MetS) are common risks that NAFLD and colorectal neoplasms share. The incidence of NAFLD is increasing in parallel with an increasing prevalence of MetS and obesity. Consequently, the question arises: will the incidence of CRC increase together with this dramatic increase in obesity, MetS and ultimately NAFLD prevalence? Recent studies of adenomatous polyps, CRC and NAFLD are discussed in this manuscript.
3.
Metabolic syndrome and its association with colorectal cancer: a review.
Siddiqui, AA
The American journal of the medical sciences. 2011;(3):227-31
Abstract
Currently, significant amount of epidemiologic evidence is present to suggest that metabolic syndrome increases the risk of developing colorectal cancer. This evidence is based on studies of the evaluate determinants of the metabolic syndrome (obesity), clinical consequences of metabolic syndrome (type 2 diabetes and hypertension) and serum component of metabolic syndrome (hypertriglyceridemia, hyperglycemia and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), as well as markers of hyperinsulinemia. Although the exact pathogenesis of this relationship is unknown, it seems that hyperinsulinemia may play a pivotal role in increasing CRC risk.