0
selected
-
1.
Postprandial effects of long-term niacin/laropiprant use on glucose and lipid metabolism and on cardiovascular risk in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Aye, MM, Kilpatrick, ES, Afolabi, P, Wootton, SA, Rigby, AS, Coady, AM, Sandeman, DD, Atkin, SL
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2014;(6):545-52
Abstract
AIM: This study investigated the effect of long-term niacin/laropiprant therapy on CV risk and IR in obese women with PCOS. METHODS In this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, 13 and 12 PCOS women completed a 12 week course of niacin/laropiprant or placebo, respectively. Fasted subjects had an endothelial function test (EndoPat2000) and then consumed a mixed meal with blood sampled postprandially for 6 h before and after intervention. RESULTS By 12 weeks, niacin/laropiprant lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) (13%) and increased HDL-c (17%). Despite a reduction in fasting triglycerides (21%), the drug had no effect on their postprandial rise (2.69 ± 1.44 vs. 2.49 ± 1.14 mmol/l, p = 0.72). However, following the mixed meal, plasma glucose area under the response curve increased from 13.1 ± 2.9 to 14.0 ± 2.8 mmol/l, p = 0.05, as a consequence of both increased insulin resistance [HOMA-IR: 2.2 (1.2, 4.2) vs. 3.8(1.3, 5.5), p = 0.02] and a reduced acute insulin response to glucose [424 (211, 975) vs. 257(122, 418) pmol/mmol, p = 0.04]. Niacin/laropiprant did not improve RHI (1.97 ± 0.40 vs. 2.05 ± 0.58, p = 0.33) or hsCRP. CONCLUSIONS In PCOS, niacin/laropiprant had a significant negative impact on postprandial glucose and no improvement in postprandial hypertriglyceridaemia, with at least the former mediated through increased IR and reduced β-cell function. This data may help explain why the improvement in fasting lipids has not translated into improved CV risk markers in PCOS.
-
2.
Extended-release niacin/laropiprant effects on lipoprotein subfractions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Bays, H, Giezek, H, McKenney, JM, O'Neill, EA, Tershakovec, AM
Metabolic syndrome and related disorders. 2012;(4):260-6
Abstract
BACKGROUND A potentially atherogenic lipid profile often found in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) includes increased concentrations of small, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) and decreased concentration of medium/large high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles. Extended-release niacin/laropiprant (ERN/LRPT) lowers LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides (TG), and raises HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) levels with attenuation of niacin-induced flushing. METHODS Plasma HDL, LDL, IDL, very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), and chylomicron particle concentration and size at were evaluated at baseline and week 12 using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The data were acquired from a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study including 796 patients with T2DM treated with either 1 tablet of ERN 1 gram/LRPT 20 mg or matching placebo daily, increased after 4 weeks to 2 tablets daily. RESULTS ERN/LRPT significantly (P≤0.001 for all) reduced LDL-C 17.9% and TG 23.1%, and increased HDL-C levels 23.2%. Compared to placebo, ERN/LRPT decreased LDL, IDL, VLDL, and chylomicron particle concentrations [median concentration of smallest LDL particles decreased 16.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -22.3, -10.9, whereas the largest LDL particles decreased 11.0%, 95% CI -18.7, -3.2, and total VLDL/chylomicron mean plasma particle concentration decreased 34.7%, 95% CI -41.3, -28.1]. Compared to placebo, ERN/LRPT shifted the distribution of HDL particle diameter from smaller to larger (median concentration of the largest HDL particles increased 32.7% (95% CI 25.30, 40.58), whereas concentration of the smallest HDL particles decreased 8.2% (95% CI -11.29, -5.06). CONCLUSIONS Compared with placebo in patients with T2DM, ERN/LRPT shifted the lipoprotein profile toward a potentially less atherogenic pattern with reduced atherogenic LDL and IDL particle concentrations, and increased large HDL plasma particle concentrations. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00485758).
-
3.
Graft loss risk in renal transplant recipients with metabolic syndrome: subgroup analyses of the ALERT trial.
Soveri, I, Abedini, S, Holdaas, H, Jardine, A, Eriksson, N, Fellström, B
Journal of nephrology. 2012;(2):245-54
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several nonimmunologic risk factors for late renal graft loss (RGL) are also known components of metabolic syndrome (MS). We aimed to study MS as a risk factor for RGL. Also, the effect of statin treatment in reducing renal risk in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) with MS was studied. METHODS Nondiabetic RTRs (n=1,706) from the ALERT trial were followed for 7-8 years. MS was defined according to National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III definition with waist girth replaced by BMI ≥30 (calculated as kg/m(2)). Renal end points included death-censored RGL and graft loss or doubling of serum creatinine. RESULTS During the follow-up, 284 patients experienced RGL, and there were 343 cases of graft loss or doubling of serum creatinine. Those with MS had increased risk for RGL (relative risk = 1.28, 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.63; p=0.047), but not for the combined end point. After adjustment for other known and potential risk factors, MS was no longer associated with increased risk for RGL. The association between MS and RGL risk was attenuated once adjustment for creatinine was made. Statin treatment did not reduce the risk for renal end points in RTRs with or without MS. CONCLUSION MS had no independent association with RGL risk. Adjustment for renal function attenuated the association between MS and RGL.
-
4.
Metabolic parameters in the short- and long-term treatment of schizophrenia with sertindole or risperidone.
De Hert, M, Mittoux, A, He, Y, Peuskens, J
European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience. 2011;(4):231-9
Abstract
The presence of the metabolic syndrome is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and diabetes. The short- and long-term metabolic safety of sertindole was compared to that of risperidone in a subset of patients enrolled in the sertindole cohort prospective (SCoP) study, an open randomized study. In 261 randomized patients, there were moderate increases in mean weight, BMI, and waist circumference during treatment with either sertindole or risperidone; after 12 weeks, the increase in weight was 1.3 and 1.1 kg, respectively, and after 36 weeks, it was 2.2 and 2.0 kg, respectively. From baseline to last assessment (up to 60 weeks), weight gains of 1.8 and 1.7 kg for sertindole and risperidone, respectively, were observed. Similar proportions of patients (sertindole: 17% versus risperidone: 16%) had weight increases ≥7% from baseline to last assessment. The mean changes from baseline in triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, plasma glucose and blood pressure were small and not clinically relevant in both treatment groups. No patient in either of the groups developed type 2 diabetes during the study. At last assessment, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (International Diabetes Federation) was 17% in the sertindole group and 26% in the risperidone group and the incidence of metabolic syndrome was 7% in the sertindole group and 10% in the risperidone group. Treatment with either sertindole or risperidone did not appear to be associated with an increased comparative risk of developing metabolic syndrome. In general, the metabolic effects of sertindole and risperidone were similar.