1.
The Role of Visceral Adiposity Index as Predictor of Metabolic Syndrome in Obese and Nonobese Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.
de Medeiros, SF, de Medeiros, MAS, Barbosa, BB, Yamamoto, MMW
Metabolic syndrome and related disorders. 2021;(1):18-25
Abstract
Background: To evaluate anthropometric-metabolic biomarkers as predictors of metabolic syndrome (MS) in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) with and without obesity. Methods: This was an observational cross-sectional study. Patients were classified as nonobese-PCOS (body mass index, BMI <30 kg/m2, n = 385), and obese-PCOS (BMI ≥30 kg/m2, n = 261). The anthropometric parameters waist circumference, waist/hip ratio, lean body mass, fat body mass, visceral adiposity index (VAI), lipid accumulating product, and biomarkers of glucose and lipid metabolisms were compared between groups. Binominal logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of MS. Results: Obesity was diagnosed in 40% of all PCOS women (P < 0.001). Blood pressure and anthropometric abnormalities were significantly more frequent in obese-PCOS women (P < 0.001, for all comparisons). Glucose metabolism markers were higher in obese-PCOS compared with nonobese-PCOS (P < 0.001, for all comparisons). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol was lower in obese group than in nonobese group (1.26 mM vs. 1.08 mM, P < 0.001). MS was found in 23 of 385 (6%) nonobese-PCOS and in 116 of 261 (44.4%) obese-PCOS (P < 0.001). VAI was the best predictor of MS in both nonobese-PCOS (OR = 4.1, 95% CI 1.5-11.1) and obese-PCOS (OR = 12.9, 95% CI 5.7-29.0). Conclusions: MS is more prevalent in PCOS women with obesity. VAI was the strongest predictor of MS in both obese and nonobese PCOS women, and can be applied in clinical practice for early detection of risk for MS and precocious intervention in women with PCOS, particularly in obese women.
2.
Visceral adiposity and metabolic syndrome after very high-fat and low-fat isocaloric diets: a randomized controlled trial.
Veum, VL, Laupsa-Borge, J, Eng, Ø, Rostrup, E, Larsen, TH, Nordrehaug, JE, Nygård, OK, Sagen, JV, Gudbrandsen, OA, Dankel, SN, et al
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2017;(1):85-99
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Different aspects of dietary pattern, including macronutrient and food profiles, may affect visceral fat mass and metabolic syndrome. OBJECTIVE We hypothesized that consuming energy primarily from carbohydrate or fat in diets with similar food profiles would differentially affect the ability to reverse visceral adiposity and metabolic syndrome. DESIGN Forty-six men (aged 30-50 y) with body mass index (in kg/m2) >29 and waist circumference >98 cm were randomly assigned to a very high-fat, low-carbohydrate (VHFLC; 73% of energy fat and 10% of energy carbohydrate) or low-fat, high-carbohydrate (LFHC; 30% of energy fat and 53% of energy carbohydrate) diet for 12 wk. The diets were equal in energy (8750 kJ/d), protein (17% of energy), and food profile, emphasizing low-processed, lower-glycemic foods. Fat mass was quantified with computed tomography imaging. RESULTS Recorded intake of carbohydrate and total and saturated fat in the LFHC and VHFLC groups were 51% and 11% of energy, 29% and 71% of energy, and 12% and 34% of energy, respectively, with no difference in protein and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Mean energy intake decreased by 22% and 14% in the LFHC and VHFLC groups. The diets similarly reduced waist circumference (11-13 cm), abdominal subcutaneous fat mass (1650-1850 cm3), visceral fat mass (1350-1650 cm3), and total body weight (11-12 kg). Both groups improved dyslipidemia, with reduced circulating triglycerides, but showed differential responses in total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (decreased in LFHC group only), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (increased in VHFLC group only). The groups showed similar reductions in insulin, insulin C-peptide, glycated hemoglobin, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance. Notably, improvements in circulating metabolic markers in the VHFLC group mainly were observed first after 8 wk, in contrast to more acute and gradual effects in the LFHC group. CONCLUSIONS Consuming energy primarily as carbohydrate or fat for 3 mo did not differentially influence visceral fat and metabolic syndrome in a low-processed, lower-glycemic dietary context. Our data do not support the idea that dietary fat per se promotes ectopic adiposity and cardiometabolic syndrome in humans. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01750021.