1.
Prognostic performance of multiple biomarkers in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: analysis from the MERLIN-TIMI 36 trial (Metabolic Efficiency With Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 36).
O'Malley, RG, Bonaca, MP, Scirica, BM, Murphy, SA, Jarolim, P, Sabatine, MS, Braunwald, E, Morrow, DA
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014;(16):1644-53
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic performance of C-terminal provasopressin (copeptin), midregional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), and midregional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) in a large prospective cohort of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). BACKGROUND Copeptin, MR-proADM, and MR-proANP are emerging biomarkers of hemodynamic stress that have been associated with adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in heart failure (HF) and stable ischemic disease. METHODS We measured copeptin, MR-proADM, and MR-proANP concentrations in 4,432 patients with NSTE-ACS who were randomized to treatment with ranolazine or placebo in the MERLIN-TIMI 36 (Metabolic Efficiency With Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 36) trial and followed up for 1 year. RESULTS A high concentration (quartile 4 vs. quartiles 1 to 3) of each biomarker identified an increased risk of CV death or HF(copeptin: 13.2% vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001; MR-proADM: 15.8% vs. 4.1%, p < 0.001; MR-proANP: 17.7% vs. 3.5%, p < 0.001)as well as CV death, HF, and myocardial infarction individually (all p ≤ 0.001). After adjustment for important covariates, each biomarker remained associated with CV death or HF at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio: copeptin, 1.71; MR-proADM, 1.96; MR-proANP, 2.20; all p ≤ 0.001).These biomarkers improved prognostic discrimination and patient re-classification for CV death or HF at 1 year(all categorical NRI >10%, p < 0.001), and maintained independent association with composite CV death or HF when concurrently assessed in a model with clinical indicators plus BNP, cTnI, ST2, PAPP-A, and MPO (each p≤0.01) [corrected]. CONCLUSIONS Copeptin, MR-proADM, and MR-proANP are complementary prognostic markers for CV death and HF in patients with NSTE-ACS that perform as well as or better than established and other emerging biomarkers and warrant further investigation of application for therapeutic decision making. (Metabolic Efficiency With Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes; NCT00099788).
2.
Effects of adjunctive treatment with aripiprazole on body weight and clinical efficacy in schizophrenia patients treated with clozapine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Fleischhacker, WW, Heikkinen, ME, Olié, JP, Landsberg, W, Dewaele, P, McQuade, RD, Loze, JY, Hennicken, D, Kerselaers, W
The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;(8):1115-25
Abstract
Clozapine is associated with significant weight gain and metabolic disturbances. This multicentre, randomized study comprised a double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment phase of 16 wk, and an open-label extension phase of 12 wk. Outpatients who met DSM-IV-TR criteria for schizophrenia, who were not optimally controlled while on stable dosage of clozapine for > or =3 months and had experienced weight gain of > or =2.5 kg while taking clozapine, were randomized (n=207) to aripiprazole at 5-15 mg/d or placebo, in addition to a stable dose of clozapine. The primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in body weight at week 16 (last observation carried forward). Secondary endpoints included clinical efficacy, body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference. A statistically significant difference in weight loss was reported for aripiprazole vs. placebo (-2.53 kg vs. -0.38 kg, respectively, difference=-2.15 kg, p<0.001). Aripiprazole-treated patients also showed BMI (median reduction 0.8 kg/m(2)) and waist circumference reduction (median reduction 2.0 cm) vs. placebo (no change in either parameter, p<0.001 and p=0.001, respectively). Aripiprazole-treated patients had significantly greater reductions in total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. There were no significant differences in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score changes between groups but Clinical Global Impression Improvement and Investigator's Assessment Questionnaire scores favoured aripiprazole over placebo. Safety and tolerability were generally comparable between groups. Combining aripiprazole and clozapine resulted in significant weight, BMI and fasting cholesterol benefits to patients suboptimally treated with clozapine. Improvements may reduce metabolic risk factors associated with clozapine treatment.