0
selected
-
1.
Prognostic performance of multiple biomarkers in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: analysis from the MERLIN-TIMI 36 trial (Metabolic Efficiency With Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 36).
O'Malley, RG, Bonaca, MP, Scirica, BM, Murphy, SA, Jarolim, P, Sabatine, MS, Braunwald, E, Morrow, DA
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014;(16):1644-53
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic performance of C-terminal provasopressin (copeptin), midregional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), and midregional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) in a large prospective cohort of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). BACKGROUND Copeptin, MR-proADM, and MR-proANP are emerging biomarkers of hemodynamic stress that have been associated with adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in heart failure (HF) and stable ischemic disease. METHODS We measured copeptin, MR-proADM, and MR-proANP concentrations in 4,432 patients with NSTE-ACS who were randomized to treatment with ranolazine or placebo in the MERLIN-TIMI 36 (Metabolic Efficiency With Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 36) trial and followed up for 1 year. RESULTS A high concentration (quartile 4 vs. quartiles 1 to 3) of each biomarker identified an increased risk of CV death or HF(copeptin: 13.2% vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001; MR-proADM: 15.8% vs. 4.1%, p < 0.001; MR-proANP: 17.7% vs. 3.5%, p < 0.001)as well as CV death, HF, and myocardial infarction individually (all p ≤ 0.001). After adjustment for important covariates, each biomarker remained associated with CV death or HF at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio: copeptin, 1.71; MR-proADM, 1.96; MR-proANP, 2.20; all p ≤ 0.001).These biomarkers improved prognostic discrimination and patient re-classification for CV death or HF at 1 year(all categorical NRI >10%, p < 0.001), and maintained independent association with composite CV death or HF when concurrently assessed in a model with clinical indicators plus BNP, cTnI, ST2, PAPP-A, and MPO (each p≤0.01) [corrected]. CONCLUSIONS Copeptin, MR-proADM, and MR-proANP are complementary prognostic markers for CV death and HF in patients with NSTE-ACS that perform as well as or better than established and other emerging biomarkers and warrant further investigation of application for therapeutic decision making. (Metabolic Efficiency With Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes; NCT00099788).
-
2.
B-type natriuretic peptide and the effect of ranolazine in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: observations from the MERLIN-TIMI 36 (Metabolic Efficiency With Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 36) trial.
Morrow, DA, Scirica, BM, Sabatine, MS, de Lemos, JA, Murphy, SA, Jarolim, P, Theroux, P, Bode, C, Braunwald, E
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010;(12):1189-1196
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We designed a prospective evaluation of the interaction between B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and the effect of ranolazine in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) as part of a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial. BACKGROUND Ranolazine is believed to exert anti-ischemic effects by reducing myocardial sodium and calcium overload and consequently ventricular wall stress. BNP increases in response to increased wall stress and is a strong risk indicator in ACS. METHODS We measured plasma BNP in all available baseline samples (n = 4,543) among patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS randomized to ranolazine or placebo in the MERLIN-TIMI 36 (Metabolic Efficiency With Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 36) trial and followed them for a mean of 343 days. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and recurrent ischemia. BNP elevation was defined as >80 pg/ml. RESULTS Patients with elevated BNP (n = 1,935) were at significantly higher risk of the primary trial end point (26.4% vs. 20.4%, p < 0.0001), cardiovascular death (8.0% vs. 2.1%, p < 0.001), and myocardial infarction (10.6% vs. 5.8%, p < 0.001) at 1 year. In patients with BNP >80 pg/ml, ranolazine reduced the primary end point (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66 to 0.94, p = 0.009). The effect of ranolazine in patients with BNP >80 pg/ml was directionally similar for recurrent ischemia (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.98; p = 0.04) and cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.05, p = 0.12). There was no detectable effect in those with low BNP (p interaction value = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that ranolazine may have enhanced efficacy in high-risk patients with ACS identified by increased BNP. The interaction of biomarkers of hemodynamic stress and the effects of ranolazine warrants additional investigation. (Metabolic Efficiency With Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes; NCT00099788).
-
3.
Antipsychotic switching for people with schizophrenia who have neuroleptic-induced weight or metabolic problems.
Mukundan, A, Faulkner, G, Cohn, T, Remington, G
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2010;(12):CD006629
Abstract
BACKGROUND Weight gain is common for people with schizophrenia and this has serious implications for a patient's health and well being. Switching strategies have been recommended as a management option. OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of antipsychotic medication switching as a strategy for reducing or preventing weight gain and metabolic problems in people with schizophrenia. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched key databases and the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's trials register (January 2005 and June 2007), reference sections within relevant papers and contacted the first author of each relevant study and other experts to collect further information. SELECTION CRITERIA All clinical randomised controlled trials comparing switching of antipsychotic medication as an intervention for antipsychotic induced weight gain and metabolic problems with continuation of medication and/or other weight loss treatments (pharmacological and non pharmacological) in people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like illnesses. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Studies were reliably selected, quality assessed and data extracted. For dichotomous data we calculated risk ratio (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis, based on a fixed-effect model. The primary outcome measures were weight loss, metabolic syndrome, relapse and general mental state. MAIN RESULTS We included four studies for the review with a total of 636 participants. All except one study had a duration of 26 weeks or less. There was a mean weight loss of 1.94 kg (2 RCT, n = 287, CI -3.9 to 0.08) when switched to aripiprazole or quetiapine from olanzapine. BMI also decreased when switched to quetiapine (1 RCT, n = 129, MD -0.52 CI -1.26 to 0.22) and aripiprazole (1 RCT, n = 173, RR 0.28 CI 0.13 to 0.57) from olanzapine.Fasting blood glucose showed a significant decrease when switched to aripiprazole or quetiapine from olanzapine. (2 RCT, MD -2.53 n = 280 CI -2.94 to -2.11). One RCT also showed a favourable lipid profile when switched to aripiprazole but these measures were reported as percentage changes, rather than means with standard deviation.People are less likely to leave the study early if they remain on olanzapine compared to switching to quetiapine or aripiprazole.There was no significant difference in outcomes of mental state, global state, and adverse events between groups which switched medications and those that remained on previous medication. Three different switching strategies were compared and no strategy was found to be superior to the others for outcomes of weight gain, mental state and global state. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Evidence from this review suggests that switching antipsychotic medication to one with lesser potential for causing weight gain or metabolic problems could be an effective way to manage these side effects, but the data were weak due to the limited number of trials in this area and small sample sizes. Poor reporting of data also hindered using some trials and outcomes. There was no difference in mental state, global state and other treatment related adverse events between switching to another medication and continuing on the previous one. When the three switching strategies were compared none of them had an advantage over the others in their effects on the primary outcomes considered in this review. Better designed trials with adequate power would provide more convincing evidence for using medication switching as an intervention strategy.
-
4.
Effects of adjunctive treatment with aripiprazole on body weight and clinical efficacy in schizophrenia patients treated with clozapine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Fleischhacker, WW, Heikkinen, ME, Olié, JP, Landsberg, W, Dewaele, P, McQuade, RD, Loze, JY, Hennicken, D, Kerselaers, W
The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;(8):1115-25
Abstract
Clozapine is associated with significant weight gain and metabolic disturbances. This multicentre, randomized study comprised a double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment phase of 16 wk, and an open-label extension phase of 12 wk. Outpatients who met DSM-IV-TR criteria for schizophrenia, who were not optimally controlled while on stable dosage of clozapine for > or =3 months and had experienced weight gain of > or =2.5 kg while taking clozapine, were randomized (n=207) to aripiprazole at 5-15 mg/d or placebo, in addition to a stable dose of clozapine. The primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in body weight at week 16 (last observation carried forward). Secondary endpoints included clinical efficacy, body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference. A statistically significant difference in weight loss was reported for aripiprazole vs. placebo (-2.53 kg vs. -0.38 kg, respectively, difference=-2.15 kg, p<0.001). Aripiprazole-treated patients also showed BMI (median reduction 0.8 kg/m(2)) and waist circumference reduction (median reduction 2.0 cm) vs. placebo (no change in either parameter, p<0.001 and p=0.001, respectively). Aripiprazole-treated patients had significantly greater reductions in total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. There were no significant differences in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score changes between groups but Clinical Global Impression Improvement and Investigator's Assessment Questionnaire scores favoured aripiprazole over placebo. Safety and tolerability were generally comparable between groups. Combining aripiprazole and clozapine resulted in significant weight, BMI and fasting cholesterol benefits to patients suboptimally treated with clozapine. Improvements may reduce metabolic risk factors associated with clozapine treatment.