-
1.
Association between the changes in renal function and serum uric acid levels during multifactorial intervention and clinical outcome in patients with metabolic syndrome. A post hoc analysis of the ATTEMPT study.
Athyros, VG, Karagiannis, A, Ganotakis, ES, Paletas, K, Nicolaou, V, Bacharoudis, G, Tziomalos, K, Alexandrides, T, Liberopoulos, EN, Mikhailidis, DP, et al
Current medical research and opinion. 2011;(8):1659-68
Abstract
AIM: To assess the effects of long-term multifactorial intervention on renal function and serum uric acid (SUA) levels and their association with estimated cardiovascular disease (eCVD) risk and actual CVD events. METHODS This prospective, randomized, target-driven study included 1123 subjects (45.6% men, age 45-65 years) with metabolic syndrome (MetS) but without diabetes or CVD. Patients were randomized to multifactorial treatment. Atorvastatin was titrated from 10-80 mg/day aiming at a low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target of <100 mg/dl (group A) or an LDL-C target of <130 mg/dl (group B). Changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and SUA levels were recorded in all patients and in the subgroup with stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD; eGFR = 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m(2); n = 349). We used ANOVA to compare changes within the same group, unpaired Student t-test to compare results between groups at specific time points, and log-rank test to compare event free survival. RESULTS The eCVD-risk reduction was greater in group A. In the overall study population, eGFR increased by 3.5% (p < 0.001) and SUA levels fell by 5.6% (p < 0.001). In patients from group A with stage 3 CKD (group A1; n = 172), eGFR increased by 11.1% (p < 0.001) from baseline and by 7.5% (p < 0.001) in group B1 (n = 177; p < 0.001 vs. the change in group A1). The corresponding fall in SUA levels was 10.7% in group A1 (p < 0.001 vs. baseline) and 8.3% in group B1 (p < 0.001 vs. baseline and group A1). These changes were mainly attributed to atorvastatin treatment. Among the CKD stage 3 patients there were no CVD events in group A1, while 6 events occurred in group B1 (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS Multifactorial intervention in patients with MetS without established CVD improved renal function and reduced SUA levels. These changes were more prominent in stage 3 CKD patients and might have contributed to the reduction in eCVD risk and clinical events. Original study registration number [ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00416741].
-
2.
Effect of atorvastatin, vitamin E and C on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: is the combination required?
Arendt, BM, Allard, JP
The American journal of gastroenterology. 2011;(1):78-80
Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with the metabolic syndrome. The current standard of care, healthy diet and weight loss, has limited effect. The benefits of pharmacological treatments are unclear due to the difficulty of using liver histology as the main outcome in large randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In this issue, an RCT with atorvastatin and antioxidants (vitamins E+C) vs. placebo shows improvement in liver steatosis based on computed tomography scans. The questions are is this beneficial effect due to the combined treatment or the effect of an individual compound; does this intervention improve nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.
-
3.
Predictors of new-onset diabetes in patients treated with atorvastatin: results from 3 large randomized clinical trials.
Waters, DD, Ho, JE, DeMicco, DA, Breazna, A, Arsenault, BJ, Wun, CC, Kastelein, JJ, Colhoun, H, Barter, P
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2011;(14):1535-45
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We sought to examine the incidence and clinical predictors of new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) within 3 large randomized trials with atorvastatin. BACKGROUND Statin therapy might modestly increase the risk of new-onset T2DM. METHODS We used a standard definition of diabetes and excluded patients with prevalent diabetes at baseline. We identified baseline predictors of new-onset T2DM and compared the event rates in patients with and without new-onset T2DM. RESULTS In the TNT (Treating to New Targets) trial, 351 of 3,798 patients randomized to 80 mg of atorvastatin and 308 of 3,797 randomized to 10 mg developed new-onset T2DM (9.24% vs. 8.11%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94 to 1.29, p = 0.226). In the IDEAL (Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering) trial, 239 of 3,737 patients randomized to atorvastatin 80 mg/day and 208 of 3,724 patients randomized to simvastatin 20 mg/day developed new-onset T2DM (6.40% vs. 5.59%, adjusted HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.43, p = 0.072). In the SPARCL (Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels) trial, new-onset T2DM developed in 166 of 1,905 patients randomized to atorvastatin 80 mg/day and in 115 of 1,898 patients in the placebo group (8.71% vs. 6.06%, adjusted HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.75, p = 0.011). In each of the 3 trials, baseline fasting blood glucose, body mass index, hypertension, and fasting triglycerides were independent predictors of new-onset T2DM. Across the 3 trials, major cardiovascular events occurred in 11.3% of patients with and 10.8% of patients without new-onset T2DM (adjusted HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.35, p = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS High-dose atorvastatin treatment compared with placebo in the SPARCL trial is associated with a slightly increased risk of new-onset T2DM. Baseline fasting glucose level and features of the metabolic syndrome are predictive of new-onset T2DM across the 3 trials.
-
4.
Comparison of 80 versus 10 mg of atorvastatin on occurrence of cardiovascular events after the first event (from the Treating to New Targets [TNT] trial).
LaRosa, JC, Deedwania, PC, Shepherd, J, Wenger, NK, Greten, H, DeMicco, DA, Breazna, A, ,
The American journal of cardiology. 2010;(3):283-7
Abstract
Analyses of randomized clinical trials are usually restricted to examination of time to first event. However, because many patients have multiple events, this approach precludes much potentially useful clinical and economic data. To assess the effect on overall disease burden in the Treating to New Targets (TNT) study, we evaluated the effect of treatment with atorvastatin 80 versus 10 mg in the period after the occurrence of a first cardiovascular event. In TNT, 10,001 patients with stable coronary heart disease received double-blind therapy with atorvastatin 80 or 10 mg and were followed for 4.9 years. Post hoc time-to-event analysis was used to estimate separate hazard ratios for time to any first, second, third, fourth, and fifth recurrent cardiovascular events. During TNT, 3,082 patients had a first recurrent cardiovascular event, with 1,516, 698, 345, and 197 developing second, third, fourth, and fifth recurrent events, respectively. In patients receiving atorvastatin 80 mg, the relative risk of a first recurrent event was significantly decreased compared to those receiving atorvastatin 10 mg. Significant benefit with the 80-mg dose was also observed for second, third, fourth, and fifth recurrent events. Similar findings were recorded in 5,854 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or metabolic syndrome and in 3,809 patients > or = 65 years of age compared to younger patients. In conclusion, treatment with atorvastatin 80 mg continued to significantly decrease the risk of any cardiovascular event over time compared to atorvastatin 10 mg in patients who had survived previous events. In TNT, analyses limited to the primary end point significantly underestimated the decrease in total cardiovascular disease burden achieved by intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering.
-
5.
Comparative study of low doses of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on lipid and glycemic control in patients with metabolic syndrome and hypercholesterolemia.
Park, JS, Kim, YJ, Choi, JY, Kim, YN, Hong, TJ, Kim, DS, Kim, KY, Jeong, MH, Chae, JK, Oh, SK, et al
The Korean journal of internal medicine. 2010;(1):27-35
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: This multicenter, open-labeled, randomized trial was performed to compare the effects of rosuvastatin 10 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg on lipid and glycemic control in Korean patients with nondiabetic metabolic syndrome. METHODS In total, 351 patients who met the modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) criteria for metabolic syndrome with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels > or = 130 mg/dL were randomized to receive either rosuvastatin 10 mg (n = 173) or atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 178) for over 6 weeks. RESULTS After 6 weeks of treatment, greater reductions in total cholesterol (- 35.94 +/- 11.38 vs. - 30.07 +/- 10.46%, p < 0.001), LDL-C (48.04 +/- 14.45 vs. 39.52 +/- 14.42%, p < 0.001), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (- 42.93 +/- 13.15 vs. - 35.52 +/- 11.76%, p < 0.001), and apolipoprotein-B (- 38.7 +/- 18.85 vs. - 32.57 +/- 17.56%, p = 0.002) levels were observed in the rosuvastatin group as compared to the atorvastatin group. Overall, the percentage of patients attaining the NCEP ATP III goal was higher with rosuvastatin as compared to atorvastatin (87.64 vs. 69.88%, p < 0.001). Changes in glucose and insulin levels, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index were not significantly different between the two groups. The safety and tolerability of the two agents were similar. CONCLUSIONS Rosuvastatin 10 mg was more effective than atorvastatin 10 mg in achieving NCEP ATP III LDL-C goals in patients with nondiabetic metabolic syndrome, especially in those with lower NCEP ATP III target level goals.
-
6.
Comparison of the effects of atorvastatin and simvastatin in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A prospective, randomized study.
Kaya, C, Pabuccu, R, Cengiz, SD, Dünder, I
Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association. 2010;(3):161-6
Abstract
UNLABELLED Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is associated with hyperandrogenism, insulin resistance (IR), and chronic inflammation. Simvastatin improves endocrine/clinical aspects of PCOS and decreases systemic inflammation in PCOS. There have been no comparative studies carried out regarding the effects of different statin treatment in PCOS. We aimed to assess the effects of two different statin treatments on various metabolic, endocrine, oxidative and inflammatory factors in PCOS. DESIGN Prospective, randomized clinical trial METHODS Sixty-four (64) women with PCOS were included in the study. Group 1 had (atorvastatin, 20lmg daily; n=32) or group 2 had (simvastatin, 20l mg daily n=32). The metabolic, endocrine, inflammatory and oxidative profiles were evaluated. RESULTS Group 1 resulted in a significant reduction in the HOMA index and fasting insulin (-26.9+/-9.6%, -26.2+/-10.8%, P<0.01, respectively).CRP levels decreased by 63.6+/-15.9% in group 1 (P<0.01), whereas in the group 2 it decreased by 34.6+/-10.7% (P<0.05). Serum levels of LH declined by 19.1+/-4.5% (P<0.05) in the group 1 and by 39.3+/-11.9% (P<0.01) in the group 2. FAI decreased by -20+/-9.9% in group 1 (P<0.05) and it decreased by -38.7+/-13.8% in the group 2 (P<0.01). MDA levels decreased by 32.6+/-9.6% in group 1 (P<0.05), whereas in the group 2 it decreased by 30.3+/-10.9% (P<0.01). HOMA index and fasting insulin showed a reduction but not reached statistically significance in the group 2 (8.3+/-1.9%, 3.0+/-0.8%, P>0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION Both the statins are effective in reducing inflammation, hyperandrogenemia, oxidative stress and metabolic parameters. While atorvastatin has more noticeable effects on fasting insulin and insulin sensitivity, simvastatin has a dominant effect on total T in PCOS women.
-
7.
Atorvastatin and fenofibrate have comparable effects on VLDL-apolipoprotein C-III kinetics in men with the metabolic syndrome.
Chan, DC, Watts, GF, Ooi, EM, Ji, J, Johnson, AG, Barrett, PH
Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2008;(10):1831-7
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is characterized by insulin resistance and dyslipidemia that may accelerate atherosclerosis. Disturbed apolipoprotein (apo) C-III metabolism may account for dyslipidemia in these subjects. Atorvastatin and fenofibrate decrease plasma apoC-III, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. METHODS AND RESULTS The effects of atorvastatin (40 mg/d) and fenofibrate (200 mg/d) on the kinetics of very-low density lipoprotein (VLDL)-apoC-III were investigated in a crossover trial of 11 MetS men. VLDL-apoC-III kinetics were studied, after intravenous d(3)-leucine administration using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and compartmental modeling. Compared with placebo, both atorvastatin and fenofibrate significantly decreased (P<0.001) plasma concentrations of triglyceride, apoB, apoB-48, and total apoC-III. Atorvastatin, not fenofibrate, significantly decreased plasma apoA-V concentrations (P<0.05). Both agents significantly increased the fractional catabolic rate (+32% and +30%, respectively) and reduced the production rate of VLDL-apoC-III (-20% and -24%, respectively), accounting for a significant reduction in VLDL-apoC-III concentrations (-41% and -39%, respectively). Total plasma apoC-III production rates were not significantly altered by the 2 agents. Neither treatment altered insulin resistance and body weight. CONCLUSIONS Both atorvastatin and fenofibrate have dual regulatory effects on VLDL-apoC-III kinetics in MetS; reduced production and increased fractional catabolism of VLDL-apoC-III may explain the triglyceride-lowering effect of these agents.
-
8.
Comparison effect of atorvastatin (10 versus 80 mg) on biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in subjects with metabolic syndrome.
Singh, U, Devaraj, S, Jialal, I, Siegel, D
The American journal of cardiology. 2008;(3):321-5
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Metabolic syndrome (MS), characterized by low-grade inflammation, confers an increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Statins, in addition to having lipid-lowering effects, have pleiotropic effects and decrease biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress. The Treating to New Target Study showed a greater decrease in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and cardiovascular events with atorvastatin 80 mg versus 10 mg in patients with MS with coronary heart disease. However, part of this benefit could be caused by the greater pleiotropic effects of the higher dose of atorvastatin. The dose-response effect of atorvastatin on biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress has not been investigated in subjects with MS. Thus, the dose-response effect of atorvastatin on biomarkers of inflammation (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hs-CRP], matrix metalloproteinase-9, and nuclear factor-kappaB [NF-kB] activity) and oxidative stress (oxidized LDL, urinary nitrotyrosine, F2-isoprostanes, and monocyte superoxide release) was tested in a randomized double-blind clinical trial in subjects with MS. Seventy subjects were randomly assigned to receive placebo or atorvastatin 10 or 80 mg/day for 12 weeks. A strong dose-response (atorvastatin 10 compared with 80 mg, p <0.05) was observed for changes in total, LDL (32% and 44% reduction), non-high-density lipoprotein (28% and 40% reduction), and oxidized LDL cholesterol (24% and 39% reduction) at atorvastatin 10 and 80 mg, respectively. Hs-CRP, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and NF-kB significantly decreased in the 80-mg atorvastatin group compared with baseline. In conclusion, this randomized trial of subjects with MS showed the superiority of atorvastatin 80 mg compared with its 10-mg dose in decreasing oxidized LDL, hs-CRP, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and NF-kB activity.
-
9.
Is atorvastatin superior to other statins? Analysis of the clinical trials with atorvastatin having cardiovascular endpoints.
Doggrell, SA
Reviews on recent clinical trials. 2006;(2):143-53
Abstract
Placebo-controlled clinical trials have shown that atorvastatin is beneficial in patients with myocardial ischemia, established coronary artery disease, hypertension and 3 other cardiovascular risk factors (e.g. left-ventricular hypertrophy, type 2 diabetes, smoking), and in diabetes, but not in patients with calcific aortic stenosis. Recently, intensive low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol lowering with atorvastatin 80 mg/day has been shown to have a greater clinical benefit than atorvastatin 10 mg/day in patients with coronary heart disease and one other high-risk factor (previous myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization or angina), and to be superior to moderate lipid lowering with pravastatin (40 mg/day) in patients with an acute coronary syndrome. However, a smaller study comparing lovastatin 5 mg/day with atorvastatin 80 mg/day was unable to detect any difference in outcomes in patients with stable coronary disease, despite the greater LDL-cholesterol lowering with the atorvastatin, possibly because it was not powered to do so. In a retrospective cohort study, atorvastatin 10 mg/day, pravastatin 20 mg/day, simvastatin 20 mg/day, lovastatin 20 mg/day and fluvastatin 20 mg/day had similar efficacy as secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction. At present, the evidence from clinical trials is favouring the intensity of the effect on LDL-cholesterol and/or C-reactive protein (CRP) with atorvastatin 80 mg, rather than the use of atorvastatin per se, when greater benefits are observed with the 80 mg dose of atorvastatin compared to other statins. Thus, at present, it is not clear whether atorvastatin is superior to other statins in some indications (coronary heart disease, acute coronary syndromes) or whether it is the intensive lipid lowering that is responsible for the superiority. Atorvastatin has little or no ability to increase high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, and this may be a disadvantage in patients with metabolic syndrome or diabetes, where low HDL-cholesterol is a key feature. Thus, other statins should probably be preferred to atorvastatin in patients with diabetes/metabolic syndrome. Alternatively, atorvastatin can be used in combination with a fibrate to increase HDL-cholesterol in patients with diabetes/metabolic syndrome.
-
10.
A comparative study with rosuvastatin in subjects with metabolic syndrome: results of the COMETS study.
Stalenhoef, AF, Ballantyne, CM, Sarti, C, Murin, J, Tonstad, S, Rose, H, Wilpshaar, W
European heart journal. 2005;(24):2664-72
Abstract
AIMS: The efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, and placebo were compared in patients with the metabolic syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients with the metabolic syndrome with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > or =3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dL) and multiple risk factors conferring a 10-year coronary heart disease risk score of >10% were randomized (2:2:1) to receive rosuvastatin 10 mg, atorvastatin 10 mg, or placebo for 6 weeks. Subsequently, the rosuvastatin 10 mg and placebo groups received rosuvastatin 20 mg and the atorvastatin 10 mg group received atorvastatin 20 mg for 6 weeks. LDL-C was reduced significantly more in patients receiving rosuvastatin 10 mg when compared with those receiving atorvastatin 10 mg at 6 weeks [intention-to-treat (ITT) population by randomized treatment: 41.7 vs. 35.7%, P < 0.001; ITT population by as-allocated treatment: 42.7 vs. 36.6%, P < 0.001]. Significant LDL-C reductions were also observed in patients receiving rosuvastatin when compared with those receiving atorvastatin at 12 weeks (48.9 vs. 42.5%, P < 0.001). More patients achieved LDL-C goals with rosuvastatin when compared with atorvastatin. Rosuvastatin increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol significantly more than atorvastatin. Treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION At equivalent doses, rosuvastatin had a significantly greater effect than atorvastatin in lowering LDL-C and improving the lipid profile and was well tolerated in patients with the metabolic syndrome.