-
1.
Therapeutic lifestyle change intervention improved metabolic syndrome criteria and is complementary to amlodipine/atorvastatin.
Sallam, HS, Tuvdendorj, DR, Jialal, I, Chandalia, M, Abate, N
Journal of diabetes and its complications. 2020;(3):107480
Abstract
AIMS: To examine whether addition of amlodipine (5 mg)/atorvastatin (10 mg) A/A to Therapeutic Lifestyle change intervention (TLC) would beneficially modulate Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) and oxidized low-density lipoprotein (Ox-LDL) levels. METHODS Patients with MetS (n = 53) were randomized to TLC + placebo or TLC + A/A for 12 months. Anthropometric measurements, blood pressure (BP), lipid profile, plasma Ox-LDL, and area under the curve of free fatty acid (AUCFFA) during oral glucose tolerance test, a marker of adipose tissue health, were assessed before and after the intervention. RESULTS Twenty-six patients completed the study with an overall improvement of MetS (p = 0.02). TLC + placebo was beneficial in reversing MetS comparable to TLC + A/A (54% vs. 39%; p = 0.08). Both treatments decreased systolic BP (p ≤ 0.01). TLC + A/A also decreased diastolic BP and triglyceride levels. The changes in Ox-LDL levels directly correlated with changes in weight in the TLC-placebo group (r = 0.64; p = 0.04). AUCFFA determined the loss of fat mass (r = 0.472, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS 1) Addition of A/A has the advantage of improving the lipid profile and BP; but TLC alone was comparable to TLC + A/A in improving MetS; 2) weight change determines the TLC-associated change in Ox-LDL levels; and 3) AT metabolic health is a significant predictor of TLC-associated loss of body fat mass.
-
2.
Efficacy and safety of saroglitazar in managing hypertriglyceridemia in type-2 diabetes: A meta-analysis.
Dutta, D, Bhattacharya, S, Surana, V, Aggarwal, S, Singla, R, Khandelwal, D, Sharma, M
Diabetes & metabolic syndrome. 2020;(6):1759-1768
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Saroglitazar is commonly used in India for managing hypertriglyceridemia in diabetes. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of saroglitazar in hypertriglyceridemia. METHODS Electronic databases were searched for RCTs involving diabetes patients receiving saroglitazar in intervention arm, and placebo/lipid/diabetes medication in the control arm. Primary outcome was to evaluate change in serum triglyceride and HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate changes in other lipid parameters, glycaemia and adverse effects. Analysis for lipid and glycaemic parameters were done separately for controls receiving anti-lipid medications (statins/fibrates) [active control group (ACG)] and those receiving placebo/diabetes medications [passive control group (PCG)]. RESULTS Following 12 weeks therapy, individuals receiving saroglitazar had significantly lower triglycerides when compared to PCG [MD -71.67 mg/dl (95% CI: -123.67 to -19.66 mg/dl); P < 0.01; I2 = 91% (considerable heterogeneity); low certainty of evidence (LCE)], but not ACG [MD -37.38 mg/dl (95% CI: -84.55-9.79 mg/dl; P = 0.12; I2 = 98% (considerable heterogeneity); LCE]. Individuals receiving saroglitazar had significantly lower fasting glucose when compared to PCG [MD -24.61 mg/dl (95% CI: -44.13 to -5.09 mg/dl); P = 0.01; I2 = 65% (moderate heterogeneity); LCE], but not ACG [MD -13.5 mg/dl (95% CI: -33.1-6.10 mg/dl; P = 0.18; I2 = 98% (considerable heterogeneity); LCE]. HbA1c, total cholesterol, LDL-C, apolipoprotein-B and HDL-C were not significantly different among study groups. Creatinine was significantly higher in patients receiving saroglitazar as compared to controls [MD 0.12 mg/dl (95% CI: 0.04-0.21 mg/dl); P < 0.01; I2 = 29% (low heterogeneity); high certainty of evidence]. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis reinforces the excellent triglyceride lowering of saroglitazar, but highlights significant increase in creatinine.
-
3.
Age, abdominal obesity, and baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein are associated with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B responses to ezetimibe/simvastatin and atorvastatin in patients with metabolic syndrome.
Robinson, JG, Ballantyne, CM, Hsueh, WA, Rosen, JB, Lin, J, Shah, AK, Tomassini, JE, Lowe, RS, Tershakovec, AM
Journal of clinical lipidology. 2013;(4):292-303
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment response to lipid-lowering therapy can vary in patients with the metabolic syndrome (MetS) due to various patient demographic and baseline characteristics. OBJECTIVE This study assessed the relationships between baseline characteristics and changes in lipid variables, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and attainment of prespecified low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels in MetS patients treated with ezetimibe/simvastatin and atorvastatin. METHODS This is a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, 6-week parallel study in >1000 hypercholesterolemic subjects (median age of 59 years) with MetS and moderately high/high coronary heart disease risk who were treated with ezetimibe/simvastatin (10/20 and 10/40 mg) or atorvastatin (10, 20, 40 mg). Factors that could affect these treatments were assessed by multivariate analysis. RESULTS Increasing age, abdominal obesity (waist circumference ≥ 40/35 inches for men/women), and lower baseline hs-CRP were significant predictors of greater reductions in LDL-C, non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol but not for changes in HDL-C or apolipoprotein AI; effects of race and baseline triglycerides, non-HDL-C, LDL-C, or HDL-C levels were more limited. Age ≥ 65 years (versus <65 years) was also associated with significantly greater attainment of all LDL-C and non-HDL-C targets, whereas abdominal obesity, gender (female > male) and lower baseline LDL-C, non-HDL-C, triglycerides, and hs-CRP were associated with improved attainment for some of these targets. Blood pressure, fasting glucose, Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance tertiles, and diabetes did not predict response for any efficacy variable. Ezetimibe/simvastatin treatment (versus atorvastatin) was a significant predictor for change in most efficacy variables. CONCLUSIONS Treatment responses to ezetimibe/simvastatin and atorvastatin in at-risk patients with the MetS were related to age (≥ 65 years), abdominal obesity, and lower baseline hs-CRP. Ezetimibe/simvastatin treatment was found to be consistently more effective than atorvastatin at the specified dose comparisons across these subgroups. The clinical value of predictive factors requires further study in outcome trials.
-
4.
Clustering of metabolic syndrome components attenuates coronary plaque regression during intensive statin therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome: the JAPAN-ACS subanalysis study.
Takashima, H, Ozaki, Y, Morimoto, T, Kimura, T, Hiro, T, Miyauchi, K, Nakagawa, Y, Yamagishi, M, Daida, H, Mizuno, T, et al
Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society. 2012;(12):2840-7
Abstract
BACKGROUND The JAPAN-ACS (Japan Assessment of Pitavastatin and Atorvastatin in Acute Coronary Syndrome) trial showed that intensive statin therapy could induce significant coronary plaque regression in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We evaluated the impact of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components on coronary plaque regression in the JAPAN-ACS patients. METHODS AND RESULTS Serial intravascular ultrasound measurements over 8-12 months were performed in 242 ACS patients receiving pitavastatin or atorvastatin. Patients were divided into groups according to the presence of MetS or the number of MetS components. Although the percent change in plaque volume (%PV) was not significantly different between the MetS (n=119) and non-MetS (n=123) groups (P=0.50), it was significantly associated with an increasing number of MetS components (component 0: -24.0%, n=7; components 1: -20.8%, n=31; components 2: -16.1%, n=69; components 3: -18.7%, n=83; components 4: -13.5%, n=52; P=0.037 for trend). The percent change in body mass index (%BMI) significantly correlated with %PV (r=0.15, P=0.021), especially in the MetS components 4 group (r=0.35, P=0.017). In addition, %BMI was an independent predictor of plaque regression after adjustment for the changes of low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and HbA(1c). CONCLUSIONS The clustering of MetS components, but not the presence of MetS itself, could attenuate coronary plaque regression during intensive statin therapy in ACS patients. Therefore, to achieve a greater degree of plaque regression, it is necessary to treat to each MetS component and use lifestyle modification.
-
5.
Long-term impact of multifactorial treatment on new-onset diabetes and related cardiovascular events in metabolic syndrome: a post hoc ATTEMPT analysis.
Athyros, VG, Elisaf, MS, Alexandrides, T, Achimastos, A, Ganotakis, E, Bilianou, E, Karagiannis, A, Liberopoulos, EN, Tziomalos, K, Mikhailidis, DP, et al
Angiology. 2012;(5):358-66
Abstract
This post hoc analysis of the Assessing The Treatment Effect in Metabolic Syndrome Without Perceptible diabeTes (ATTEMPT) study assesses the 3½ year incidence of new-onset diabetes (NOD) and related cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS), after multifactorial (lifestyle and drug, including atorvastatin) intervention. Patients were randomized to group A (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] target < 100 mg/dL) and group B (< 130 mg/dL). The incidence of NOD during the 42-month follow-up was very low, 0.83 to 1.00/100 patient-years in patients with MetS and MetS with impaired fasting glucose, respectively. Older age, increased waist circumference, and persistent MetS were determinants of NOD. One CVD nonfatal event occurred in the 28 patients with NOD. Our findings suggest that treating the characteristics of MetS is achievable and beneficial. New-onset diabetes incidence and CVD events were negligible and not different from what is expected in the general population.
-
6.
Association between the changes in renal function and serum uric acid levels during multifactorial intervention and clinical outcome in patients with metabolic syndrome. A post hoc analysis of the ATTEMPT study.
Athyros, VG, Karagiannis, A, Ganotakis, ES, Paletas, K, Nicolaou, V, Bacharoudis, G, Tziomalos, K, Alexandrides, T, Liberopoulos, EN, Mikhailidis, DP, et al
Current medical research and opinion. 2011;(8):1659-68
Abstract
AIM: To assess the effects of long-term multifactorial intervention on renal function and serum uric acid (SUA) levels and their association with estimated cardiovascular disease (eCVD) risk and actual CVD events. METHODS This prospective, randomized, target-driven study included 1123 subjects (45.6% men, age 45-65 years) with metabolic syndrome (MetS) but without diabetes or CVD. Patients were randomized to multifactorial treatment. Atorvastatin was titrated from 10-80 mg/day aiming at a low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target of <100 mg/dl (group A) or an LDL-C target of <130 mg/dl (group B). Changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and SUA levels were recorded in all patients and in the subgroup with stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD; eGFR = 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m(2); n = 349). We used ANOVA to compare changes within the same group, unpaired Student t-test to compare results between groups at specific time points, and log-rank test to compare event free survival. RESULTS The eCVD-risk reduction was greater in group A. In the overall study population, eGFR increased by 3.5% (p < 0.001) and SUA levels fell by 5.6% (p < 0.001). In patients from group A with stage 3 CKD (group A1; n = 172), eGFR increased by 11.1% (p < 0.001) from baseline and by 7.5% (p < 0.001) in group B1 (n = 177; p < 0.001 vs. the change in group A1). The corresponding fall in SUA levels was 10.7% in group A1 (p < 0.001 vs. baseline) and 8.3% in group B1 (p < 0.001 vs. baseline and group A1). These changes were mainly attributed to atorvastatin treatment. Among the CKD stage 3 patients there were no CVD events in group A1, while 6 events occurred in group B1 (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS Multifactorial intervention in patients with MetS without established CVD improved renal function and reduced SUA levels. These changes were more prominent in stage 3 CKD patients and might have contributed to the reduction in eCVD risk and clinical events. Original study registration number [ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00416741].
-
7.
Effect of atorvastatin, vitamin E and C on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: is the combination required?
Arendt, BM, Allard, JP
The American journal of gastroenterology. 2011;(1):78-80
Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with the metabolic syndrome. The current standard of care, healthy diet and weight loss, has limited effect. The benefits of pharmacological treatments are unclear due to the difficulty of using liver histology as the main outcome in large randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In this issue, an RCT with atorvastatin and antioxidants (vitamins E+C) vs. placebo shows improvement in liver steatosis based on computed tomography scans. The questions are is this beneficial effect due to the combined treatment or the effect of an individual compound; does this intervention improve nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.
-
8.
Risk of stroke and cardiovascular events after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack in patients with type 2 diabetes or metabolic syndrome: secondary analysis of the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial.
Callahan, A, Amarenco, P, Goldstein, LB, Sillesen, H, Messig, M, Samsa, GP, Altafullah, I, Ledbetter, LY, MacLeod, MJ, Scott, R, et al
Archives of neurology. 2011;(10):1245-51
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a secondary analysis of the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial, which tested the effect of treatment with atorvastatin in reducing stroke in subjects with a recent stroke or transient ischemic attack, to explore the effects of treatment in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus or metabolic syndrome (MetS). METHODS The 4731 subjects enrolled in the SPARCL trial were classified as having type 2 diabetes mellitus at enrollment (n = 794), MetS retrospectively (n = 642), or neither diabetes nor MetS (n = 3295, the reference group) based on data collected at baseline. Cox regression models were used to determine whether the effect of treatment on the primary end point (combined risk of nonfatal and fatal stroke) and secondary end points (major coronary events, major cardiovascular events, any coronary heart disease event, and any revascularization procedure) varied based on the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus or MetS. RESULTS Subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus had increased risks of stroke (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-1.98; P < .001), major cardiovascular events (HR = 1.66; 95% CI, 1.39-1.97; P < .001), and revascularization procedures (HR = 2.39; 95% CI, 1.78-3.19; P < .001) compared with the reference group. Subjects with MetS were not at increased risk for stroke (P = .78) or major cardiovascular events (P = .38) but more frequently had revascularization procedures (HR = 1.78; 95% CI, 1.26-2.5; P = .001). There were no treatment × subgroup interactions for the SPARCL primary end point (P = .47). CONCLUSIONS The SPARCL subjects with type 2 diabetes were at higher risk for recurrent stroke and cardiovascular events. This exploratory analysis found no difference in the effect of statin treatment in reducing these events in subjects with or without type 2 diabetes or MetS. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00147602.
-
9.
Assessing the treatment effect in metabolic syndrome without perceptible diabetes (ATTEMPT): a prospective-randomized study in middle aged men and women.
Athyros, VG, Ganotakis, E, Kolovou, GD, Nicolaou, V, Achimastos, A, Bilianou, E, Alexandrides, T, Karagiannis, A, Paletas, K, Liberopoulos, EN, et al
Current vascular pharmacology. 2011;(6):647-57
Abstract
AIM: To assess the reduction in estimated cardiovascular disease (e-CVD) risk after multifactorial treatment for 6 months and follow this change during the next 3-years. PATIENTS-METHODS This prospective, randomized, target driven study included 1,123 subjects (512/611 men/women, aged 45-65 years) with metabolic syndrome (MetS) without diabetes or CVD referred to specialist outpatient clinics. Patients were randomized to two treatment groups: group A with low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target of < 100 mg/dl and group B with a target of < 130 mg/dl. Atorvastatin was used in both groups on top of optimal multifactorial treatment, (quinapril, amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension, metformin for impaired fasting glucose, and orlistat for obesity). The e-CVD risk was calculated using the Framingham, the PROCAM and Reynold's equations. RESULTS Reductions in e-CVD risk at 6 months were > 50%in all patients, but were superior in group A and in women. Reductions were even greater during the next 3-years and were mainly attributed to changes in lipid profile. Actual CVD events were 1 in group A and 13 in group B; p=0.0012. CONCLUSIONS Attaining the treatment target of LDL-C < 100 mg/dl within multifactorial treatment of MetS by expert clinics, is achievable and beneficial even in patients without diabetes or known CVD. This induces a considerable e-CVD risk reduction in MetS patients. Actual CVD events were negligible, suggesting that e-CVD risk overestimates actual CVD risk in MetS, at least in patients achieving LDL-C < 100 mg/dl [ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00416741].
-
10.
Predictors of new-onset diabetes in patients treated with atorvastatin: results from 3 large randomized clinical trials.
Waters, DD, Ho, JE, DeMicco, DA, Breazna, A, Arsenault, BJ, Wun, CC, Kastelein, JJ, Colhoun, H, Barter, P
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2011;(14):1535-45
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We sought to examine the incidence and clinical predictors of new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) within 3 large randomized trials with atorvastatin. BACKGROUND Statin therapy might modestly increase the risk of new-onset T2DM. METHODS We used a standard definition of diabetes and excluded patients with prevalent diabetes at baseline. We identified baseline predictors of new-onset T2DM and compared the event rates in patients with and without new-onset T2DM. RESULTS In the TNT (Treating to New Targets) trial, 351 of 3,798 patients randomized to 80 mg of atorvastatin and 308 of 3,797 randomized to 10 mg developed new-onset T2DM (9.24% vs. 8.11%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94 to 1.29, p = 0.226). In the IDEAL (Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering) trial, 239 of 3,737 patients randomized to atorvastatin 80 mg/day and 208 of 3,724 patients randomized to simvastatin 20 mg/day developed new-onset T2DM (6.40% vs. 5.59%, adjusted HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.43, p = 0.072). In the SPARCL (Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels) trial, new-onset T2DM developed in 166 of 1,905 patients randomized to atorvastatin 80 mg/day and in 115 of 1,898 patients in the placebo group (8.71% vs. 6.06%, adjusted HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.75, p = 0.011). In each of the 3 trials, baseline fasting blood glucose, body mass index, hypertension, and fasting triglycerides were independent predictors of new-onset T2DM. Across the 3 trials, major cardiovascular events occurred in 11.3% of patients with and 10.8% of patients without new-onset T2DM (adjusted HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.35, p = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS High-dose atorvastatin treatment compared with placebo in the SPARCL trial is associated with a slightly increased risk of new-onset T2DM. Baseline fasting glucose level and features of the metabolic syndrome are predictive of new-onset T2DM across the 3 trials.