0
selected
-
1.
Sodium Benzoate, a D-Amino Acid Oxidase Inhibitor, Added to Clozapine for the Treatment of Schizophrenia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Lin, CH, Lin, CH, Chang, YC, Huang, YJ, Chen, PW, Yang, HT, Lane, HY
Biological psychiatry. 2018;(6):422-432
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clozapine is the last-line antipsychotic agent for refractory schizophrenia. To date, there is no convincing evidence for augmentation on clozapine. Activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, including inhibition of D-amino acid oxidase that may metabolize D-amino acids, has been reported to be beneficial for patients receiving antipsychotics other than clozapine. This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of a D-amino acid oxidase inhibitor, sodium benzoate, for schizophrenia patients who had poor response to clozapine. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Sixty schizophrenia inpatients that had been stabilized with clozapine were allocated into three groups for 6 weeks' add-on treatment of 1 g/day sodium benzoate, 2 g/day sodium benzoate, or placebo. The primary outcome measures were Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, Quality of Life Scale, and Global Assessment of Functioning. Side effects and cognitive functions were also measured. RESULTS Both doses of sodium benzoate produced better improvement than placebo in the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms. The 2 g/day sodium benzoate also produced better improvement than placebo in PANSS-total score, PANSS-positive score, and Quality of Life Scale. Sodium benzoate was well tolerated without evident side effects. The changes of catalase, an antioxidant, were different among the three groups and correlated with the improvement of PANSS-total score and PANSS-positive score in the sodium benzoate group. CONCLUSIONS Sodium benzoate adjuvant therapy improved symptomatology of patients with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the optimal dose and treatment duration as well as the mechanisms of sodium benzoate for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia.
-
2.
ITI-007 for the Treatment of Schizophrenia: A 4-Week Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.
Lieberman, JA, Davis, RE, Correll, CU, Goff, DC, Kane, JM, Tamminga, CA, Mates, S, Vanover, KE
Biological psychiatry. 2016;(12):952-61
Abstract
BACKGROUND An urgent need exists for new treatments of schizophrenia that are effective against a broad range of symptoms and free of limiting safety issues. ITI-007 is a new molecular entity with a pharmacologic profile that combines dose-related monoamine modulation with phosphorylation of intracellular signaling proteins. METHODS A phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and active-controlled trial was conducted at eight sites in the United States with randomization of 335 acutely psychotic adults with schizophrenia. ITI-007 (60 mg and 120 mg), placebo, and risperidone, included for assay sensitivity, were evaluated as monotherapy for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score, with secondary analyses conducted on symptom subscales. RESULTS ITI-007 60 mg (p = .017, effect size = .4) and risperidone (p = .013, effect size = .4) demonstrated antipsychotic efficacy superiority over placebo on the primary end point. The results of secondary analyses reflected improvements in negative and depressive symptoms by ITI-007 60 mg. ITI-007 120 mg did not separate from placebo. However, both doses of ITI-007 were well tolerated in this patient population, as evidenced by low discontinuation and adverse event rates, and were associated with a benign metabolic profile as evidenced by significantly lower levels of prolactin, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, and triglycerides than risperidone. CONCLUSIONS The mechanistically novel investigational drug ITI-007 was effective for the treatment of schizophrenia and comparable with placebo on safety measures in this trial. Secondary analyses indicated that ITI-007 improved negative and depression symptoms and might have expanded therapeutic efficacy in comparison with current antipsychotic drugs.
-
3.
Lurasidone in the treatment of schizophrenia: a 6-week, placebo-controlled study.
Ogasa, M, Kimura, T, Nakamura, M, Guarino, J
Psychopharmacology. 2013;(3):519-30
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
RATIONALE There is an unmet need in the treatment of schizophrenia for effective medications with fewer adverse effects. OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone, an atypical antipsychotic, for the treatment of schizophrenia. METHODS Patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia were randomized to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with once-daily, fixed-dose lurasidone 40 mg (N = 50), lurasidone 120 mg (N = 49), or placebo (N = 50). The primary efficacy measure was mean change from baseline to day 42 (last observation carried forward) in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale derived (BPRSd) from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). RESULTS Mean change in BPRSd was significantly greater in patients receiving lurasidone 40 and 120 mg/day versus placebo (-9.4 and -11.0 versus -3.8; p = 0.018 and 0.004, respectively). Treatment with lurasidone 120 mg/day was superior to placebo across all secondary measures, including PANSS total (p = 0.009), PANSS positive (p = 0.005), PANSS negative (p = 0.011), and PANSS general psychopathology (p = 0.023) subscales and Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S; p = 0.001). Treatment with lurasidone 40 mg/day was superior to placebo on the PANSS positive subscale (p = 0.018) and CGI-S (p = 0.002). The most common adverse events for patients receiving lurasidone were nausea (16.2 versus 4.0 % for placebo) and sedation (16.2 versus 10.0 % for placebo). Minimal changes in weight, cholesterol, triglyceride, and glucose levels were observed. CONCLUSIONS In this study, which was limited by a relatively high discontinuation rate, lurasidone provided effective treatment for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic schizophrenia and had minimal effects on weight and metabolic parameters.
-
4.
Switching from quetiapine to ziprasidone: a sixteen-week, open-label, multicenter study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of ziprasidone in outpatient subjects with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
Karayal, ON, Glue, P, Bachinsky, M, Stewart, M, Chappell, P, Kolluri, S, Cavus, I
Journal of psychiatric practice. 2011;(2):100-9
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of switching from quetiapine to ziprasidone on weight, safety, and effectiveness METHODS In this study, 241 subjects with schizophrenia or schizo affective disorder who had been treated with quetiapine (≥300 mg/day) for ≥3 months with either suboptimal efficacy or poor tolerability were enrolled in a 16-week, open-label, flexible-dose trial, with a 16-week follow-up (total 32 weeks). Quetiapine was tapered and discontinued over the course of 2 weeks, while ziprasidone was titrated up and dosed at 40-80 mg b.i.d. The primary endpoint was weight change (kg) from baseline at 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints were change in waist/hip circumference, lipid profile, fasting glucose, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Additional secondary endpoints included changes in scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impressions Improvement and Severity Scales (CGI-I and CGI-S), the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (ScoRS), and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Safety measures included adverse event (AE) reporting and administration of the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS). RESULTS At week 16, there was a small but statistically significant decrease in weight, with a mean change from baseline of -0.73 kg (1-sided 95% upper confidence bound=-0.33) using the last observation carried forward [LOCF] approach. There were small mean decreases in levels of total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL), and triglycerides at week 16, but no change in fasting glucose or HbA1c. At week 16, there were also significant changes indicating improvement in the secondary clinical assessments, including the PANSS scores, CGI-S, CDSS, SCoRS and GAF. There was no change in the AIMS. AEs included insomnia (12.4%), somnolence (13.7%), and nausea (9.1%). CONCLUSION Subjects switching from quetiapine to ziprasidone showed a small but significant decrease in weight as well as improved lipid profiles, regardless of their metabolic status and disease severity at baseline. Subjects also showed improvement in clinical symptoms and in cognitive functioning. Ziprasidone, with a comparatively neutral metabolic profile relative to other antipsychotics, may be an effective treatment alternative for patients experiencing weight gain or lack of tolerability with quetiapine.