0
selected
-
1.
Inhibiting insulin resistance mechanisms by DTS phytocompound: an experimental study on metabolic syndrome-prone adipocytes.
Catanzaro, R, Lorenzetti, A, Allegri, F, Yadav, H, Solimene, U, Kumaraju, AK, Minelli, E, Tomella, C, Polimeni, A, Marotta, F
Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis. 2012;(2):95-102
Abstract
The present study was designed to determine whether DTS a phytocompound endowed with antioxidant properties, could beneficially modulate nitric oxide (NO) production stimulated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in adipocytes. Combined stimulation (CS-treatment) exerted by using 5 microg/ml of LPS together with 100 ng/ml of TNF-alpha significantly enhanced NO production in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Preincubation of the adipocytes with DTS (10-30 mM) inhibited such phenomenon in a dose-dependent fashion. The production of NO was decreased by 52% at the concentration of 30mM of DTS. The decrease in NO production by DTS was associated also with a decrease in inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) protein and iNOS mRNA expression. Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappaB) was significantly enhanced by CS-treatment, while the pretreatment with 30 mM of DTS prevented the activity by 27%. IL-6 production in 3T3-L1 adipocytes was markedly increased by CS stimulus, and the enhanced secretion of IL-6 was suppressed in a dose-dependent manner by DTS. These results suggest that DTS regulates iNOS expression and NO production in adipocytes through the modulating activation of NF-kappaB and may have a potential clinical application within protocols designed for treating metabolic syndrome. (www.actabiomedica.it).
-
2.
Effect of rosuvastatin monotherapy or in combination with fenofibrate or ω-3 fatty acids on lipoprotein subfraction profile in patients with mixed dyslipidaemia and metabolic syndrome.
Agouridis, AP, Kostapanos, MS, Tsimihodimos, V, Kostara, C, Mikhailidis, DP, Bairaktari, ET, Tselepis, AD, Elisaf, MS
International journal of clinical practice. 2012;(9):843-53
Abstract
BACKGROUND Raised triglycerides (TG), decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels and a predominance of small dense low density lipoproteins (sdLDL) are characteristics of the metabolic syndrome (MetS). OBJECTIVE To compare the effect of high-dose rosuvastatin monotherapy with moderate dosing combined with fenofibrate or ω-3 fatty acids on the lipoprotein subfraction profile in patients with mixed dyslipidaemia and MetS. METHODS We previously randomised patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > 160 and TG > 200 mg/dl to rosuvastatin monotherapy 40 mg/day (R group, n = 30) or rosuvastatin 10 mg/day combined with fenofibrate 200 mg/day (RF group, n = 30) or ω-3 fatty acids 2 g/day (Rω group, n = 30). In the present study, only patients with MetS were included (24, 23 and 24 in the R, RF and Rω groups respectively). At baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment, the lipoprotein subfraction profile was determined by polyacrylamide 3% gel electrophoresis. RESULTS The mean LDL size was significantly increased in all groups. This change was more prominent with RF than with other treatments in parallel with its greater hypotriglyceridemic capacity (p < 0.05 compared with R and Rω). A decrease in insulin resistance by RF was also noted. Only RF significantly raised HDL-C levels (by 7.7%, p < 0.05) by increasing the cholesterol of small HDL particles. The cholesterol of larger HDL subclasses was significantly increased by R and Rω. CONCLUSIONS All regimens increased mean LDL size; RF was the most effective. A differential effect of treatments was noted on the HDL subfraction profile.
-
3.
Comparative study of low doses of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on lipid and glycemic control in patients with metabolic syndrome and hypercholesterolemia.
Park, JS, Kim, YJ, Choi, JY, Kim, YN, Hong, TJ, Kim, DS, Kim, KY, Jeong, MH, Chae, JK, Oh, SK, et al
The Korean journal of internal medicine. 2010;(1):27-35
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: This multicenter, open-labeled, randomized trial was performed to compare the effects of rosuvastatin 10 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg on lipid and glycemic control in Korean patients with nondiabetic metabolic syndrome. METHODS In total, 351 patients who met the modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) criteria for metabolic syndrome with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels > or = 130 mg/dL were randomized to receive either rosuvastatin 10 mg (n = 173) or atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 178) for over 6 weeks. RESULTS After 6 weeks of treatment, greater reductions in total cholesterol (- 35.94 +/- 11.38 vs. - 30.07 +/- 10.46%, p < 0.001), LDL-C (48.04 +/- 14.45 vs. 39.52 +/- 14.42%, p < 0.001), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (- 42.93 +/- 13.15 vs. - 35.52 +/- 11.76%, p < 0.001), and apolipoprotein-B (- 38.7 +/- 18.85 vs. - 32.57 +/- 17.56%, p = 0.002) levels were observed in the rosuvastatin group as compared to the atorvastatin group. Overall, the percentage of patients attaining the NCEP ATP III goal was higher with rosuvastatin as compared to atorvastatin (87.64 vs. 69.88%, p < 0.001). Changes in glucose and insulin levels, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index were not significantly different between the two groups. The safety and tolerability of the two agents were similar. CONCLUSIONS Rosuvastatin 10 mg was more effective than atorvastatin 10 mg in achieving NCEP ATP III LDL-C goals in patients with nondiabetic metabolic syndrome, especially in those with lower NCEP ATP III target level goals.
-
4.
A comparative study with rosuvastatin in subjects with metabolic syndrome: results of the COMETS study.
Stalenhoef, AF, Ballantyne, CM, Sarti, C, Murin, J, Tonstad, S, Rose, H, Wilpshaar, W
European heart journal. 2005;(24):2664-72
Abstract
AIMS: The efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, and placebo were compared in patients with the metabolic syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients with the metabolic syndrome with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > or =3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dL) and multiple risk factors conferring a 10-year coronary heart disease risk score of >10% were randomized (2:2:1) to receive rosuvastatin 10 mg, atorvastatin 10 mg, or placebo for 6 weeks. Subsequently, the rosuvastatin 10 mg and placebo groups received rosuvastatin 20 mg and the atorvastatin 10 mg group received atorvastatin 20 mg for 6 weeks. LDL-C was reduced significantly more in patients receiving rosuvastatin 10 mg when compared with those receiving atorvastatin 10 mg at 6 weeks [intention-to-treat (ITT) population by randomized treatment: 41.7 vs. 35.7%, P < 0.001; ITT population by as-allocated treatment: 42.7 vs. 36.6%, P < 0.001]. Significant LDL-C reductions were also observed in patients receiving rosuvastatin when compared with those receiving atorvastatin at 12 weeks (48.9 vs. 42.5%, P < 0.001). More patients achieved LDL-C goals with rosuvastatin when compared with atorvastatin. Rosuvastatin increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol significantly more than atorvastatin. Treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION At equivalent doses, rosuvastatin had a significantly greater effect than atorvastatin in lowering LDL-C and improving the lipid profile and was well tolerated in patients with the metabolic syndrome.