-
1.
Lipid Management and 2-Year Clinical Outcomes in Japanese Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: EXPLORE-J.
Nakamura, M, Ako, J, Arai, H, Hirayama, A, Nohara, A, Murakami, Y, Ozaki, A, Harada-Shiba, M
Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. 2021;(12):1307-1322
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIM: The prevalence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease has risen in Japan due to increasing metabolic risk factors, including dyslipidemia. A positive linear correlation between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, incidence of CV events, and preventive effects of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is well established; however, data in Japan are limited. This analysis evaluated current lipid management practices and risk of recurrent CV events in Japanese post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. METHODS EXPLORE-J is a multicenter, 2-year observational study of hospitalized ACS patients in Japan. RESULTS At 2-year follow-up (n=1944, mean age 66 years, 80.3% male), the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; death associated with myocardial infarction/cerebrovascular accident [CVA] and other CV death, non-fatal ACS, and non-fatal CVA requiring hospitalization during the observation period) was 6.2%; respective incidences of CV death, non-fatal ACS, and CVA were 0.7%, 4.5%, and 1.7%. Statin, intensive statin, and ezetimibe were prescribed for 93.6%, 8.2%, and 3.9% at visit (V)1 (Day[D]1+14), and 92.3%, 10.5%, and 11.6% of patients at V5 (D730±30 days), respectively. Mean LDL-C was reduced from first post-ACS measurement (121.3 mg/dL) to V5 (79.8 mg/dL). A limited number of patients achieved LDL-C <70 mg/dL from V1-V5 (14.4%-34.6%); those with a greater LDL-C reduction by V1 had a lower probability of MACE, indicating the benefits of early LDL-C reduction post ACS. CONCLUSIONS Guideline-recommended LDL-C target achievement post ACS in Japan is suboptimal, suggesting the need for LLT intensification. Additional analyses by risk stratification of the study population and the benefits of lipid management are planned.
-
2.
Unmet Need for Adjunctive Dyslipidemia Therapy in Hypertriglyceridemia Management.
Ganda, OP, Bhatt, DL, Mason, RP, Miller, M, Boden, WE
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018;(3):330-343
Abstract
Despite the important role of high-intensity statins in reducing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events in secondary and primary prevention, substantial residual risk persists, particularly among high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, and obesity. Considerable attention is currently directed to the role that elevated triglycerides (TGs) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels play as important mediators of residual atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk, which is further strongly supported by genetic linkage studies. Previous trials with fibrates, niacin, and most cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitors that targeted high-density lipoprotein cholesterol raising, and/or TG lowering, have failed to show conclusive evidence of incremental event reduction after low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were "optimally controlled" with statins. Although omega-3 fatty acids are efficacious in lowering TG levels and may have pleiotropic effects such as reducing plaque instability and proinflammatory mediators of atherogenesis, clinical outcomes data are currently lacking. Several ongoing randomized controlled trials of TG-lowering strategies with an optimal dosage of omega-3 fatty acids are nearing completion.
-
3.
Lp(a) (Lipoprotein(a)) Levels Predict Progression of Carotid Atherosclerosis in Subjects With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease on Intensive Lipid Therapy: An Analysis of the AIM-HIGH (Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome With Low HDL/High Triglycerides: Impact on Global Health Outcomes) Carotid Magnetic Resonance Imaging Substudy-Brief Report.
Hippe, DS, Phan, BAP, Sun, J, Isquith, DA, O'Brien, KD, Crouse, JR, Anderson, T, Huston, J, Marcovina, SM, Hatsukami, TS, et al
Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2018;(3):673-678
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether Lp(a) (lipoprotein(a)) levels and other lipid levels were predictive of progression of atherosclerosis burden as assessed by carotid magnetic resonance imaging in subjects who have been treated with LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol)-lowering therapy and participated in the AIM-HIGH trial (Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome With Low HDL/High Triglycerides: Impact on Global Health Outcomes). APPROACH AND RESULTS AIM-HIGH was a randomized, double-blind study of subjects with established vascular disease, elevated triglycerides, and low HDL-C (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol). One hundred fifty-two AIM-HIGH subjects underwent both baseline and 2-year follow-up carotid artery magnetic resonance imaging. Plaque burden was measured by the percent wall volume (%WV) of the carotid artery. Associations between annualized change in %WV with baseline and on-study (1 year) lipid variables were evaluated using multivariate linear regression and the Bonferroni correction to account for multiple comparisons. Average %WV at baseline was 41.6±6.8% and annualized change in %WV over 2 years ranged from -3.2% to 3.7% per year (mean: 0.2±1.1% per year; P=0.032). Increases in %WV were significantly associated with higher baseline Lp(a) (β=0.34 per 1-SD increase of Lp(a); 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.52; P<0.001) after adjusting for clinical risk factors and other lipid levels. On-study Lp(a) had a similar positive association with %WV progression (β=0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.52; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Despite intensive lipid therapy, aimed at aggressively lowering LDL-C to <70 mg/dL, carotid atherosclerosis continued to progress as assessed by carotid magnetic resonance imaging and that elevated Lp(a) levels were independent predictors of increases in atherosclerosis burden.
-
4.
How to assess and manage cardiovascular risk associated with lipid alterations beyond LDL.
Averna, M, Stroes, E, ,
Atherosclerosis. Supplements. 2017;:16-24
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The maintenance of clinically recommended levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) through a statin therapy is a gold standard in the management of patients with dyslipidaemia and cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, even when LDL-C levels are at or below clinically recommended target levels, residual cardiovascular (CV) risk still remains. Therefore, assessing lipoproteins beyond LDL-C in managing CV risk is imperative. METHODS A working group of clinical experts have assessed the role of lipoproteins other than LDL-C in identifying the CV risk in patients with dyslipidaemia and CVD and in the management of atherogenic dyslipidaemia associated with a number of other diseases. The recommendations, in line with the European guidelines, are presented. RESULTS A thorough evaluation of clinical data by the expert working group resulted in recommendations to consider non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoprotein B (apoB), remnant cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) as biomarkers of residual CV risk in patients with CVD. Elevated Lp(a) levels were also suggested to be a causal factor. The experts highlighted the significance of non-HDL-C and triglycerides (TG) in atherogenic dyslipidaemia associated with type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and familial combined hyperlipidaemia (FCH). The working group recommended combinatorial therapeutic approaches in high-risk patients, including agents impacting on TG and HDL-C levels. CONCLUSIONS Evaluation of a lipoprotein landscape when LDL-C levels remain low strongly supports the role of non-HDL-C, Lp(a) and TGs in identifying patients with increased residual risk of CV and in selecting their treatment strategy.
-
5.
TRIGLYCERIDES, ATHEROSCLEROSIS, AND CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOME STUDIES: FOCUS ON OMEGA-3 FATTY ACIDS.
Handelsman, Y, Shapiro, MD
Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. 2017;(1):100-112
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of the roles of triglycerides and triglyceride-lowering agents in atherosclerosis in the context of cardiovascular outcomes studies. METHODS We reviewed the published literature as well as ClinicalTrials.gov entries for ongoing studies. RESULTS Despite improved atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) outcomes with statin therapy, residual risk remains. Epidemiologic data and recent genetic insights provide compelling evidence that triglycerides are in the causal pathway for the development of atherosclerosis, thereby renewing interest in targeting triglycerides to improve ASCVD outcomes. Fibrates, niacin, and omega-3 fatty acids (OM3FAs) are three classes of triglyceride-lowering drugs. Outcome studies with triglyceride-lowering agents have been inconsistent. With regard to OM3FAs, the JELIS study showed that eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) significantly reduced major coronary events in statin-treated hypercholesterolemic patients. Regarding other agents, extended-release niacin and fenofibrate are no longer recommended as statin add-on therapy (by some guidelines, though not all) because of the lack of convincing evidence from outcome studies. Notably, subgroup analyses from the outcome studies have generated the hypothesis that triglyceride lowering may provide benefit in statin-treated patients with persistent hypertriglyceridemia. Two ongoing OM3FA outcome studies (REDUCE-IT and STRENGTH) are testing this hypothesis in high-risk, statin-treated patients with triglyceride levels of 200 to 500 mg/dL. CONCLUSION There is consistent evidence that triglycerides are in the causal pathway of atherosclerosis but inconsistent evidence from cardiovascular outcomes studies as to whether triglyceride-lowering agents reduce cardiovascular risk. Ongoing outcomes studies will determine the role of triglyceride lowering in statin-treated patients with high-dose prescription OM3FAs in terms of improved ASCVD outcomes. ABBREVIATIONS AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists ACCORD = Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes AIM-HIGH = Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome with Low HDL/High Triglycerides: Impact on Global Health Outcomes apo = apolipoprotein ASCEND = A Study of Cardiovascular Events in Diabetes ASCVD = atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease BIP = Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention CHD = coronary heart disease CI = confidence interval CV = cardiovascular CVD = cardiovascular disease DHA = docosahexaenoic acid DO-IT = Diet and Omega-3 Intervention Trial EPA = eicosapentaenoic acid FIELD = Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes GISSI-HF = GISSI-Heart Failure HDL-C = high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol HPS2-THRIVE = Heart Protection Study 2-Treatment of HDL to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events HR = hazard ratio JELIS = Japan Eicosapentaenoic Acid Lipid Intervention Study LDL = low-density lipoprotein LDL-C = low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol MI = myocardial infarction OM3FAs = omega-3 fatty acids VITAL = Vitamin D and Omega-3 Trial.
-
6.
Hypertriglyceridemia: the importance of identifying patients at risk.
Kushner, PA, Cobble, ME
Postgraduate medicine. 2016;(8):848-858
Abstract
This review aims to explain risk factors, consequences, and management strategies recommended for patients with hypertriglyceridemia. A search of PubMed was performed: 'Hypertriglyceridemia'[Majr], limited to English-language and published in the 5 years up to April 2016. Abstracts of the 680 results were screened for inclusion. Reference lists of publications included were also screened for inclusion. Approximately 25% of the United States population has elevated (≥150 mg/dL) triglycerides (TG) putting them at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and pancreatitis. Risk factors for hypertriglyceridemia include genetics, lifestyle and diet, renal disease, endocrine disorders, and certain medications. Guidelines recommend that all patients with hypertriglyceridemia are advised on lifestyle modification to reduce TG to <150 mg/dL; a reduction in body weight of 5-10% can reduce TG by approximately 20%. For patients with TG <400 mg/dL, the primary goal is to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, with most guidelines recommending statin therapy. When TG is ≥500 mg/dL the primary goal is to reduce TG levels to lower the risk of pancreatitis. Statin therapy (if LDL-C is elevated) in combination with a fibrate, or long-chain omega-3 fatty acid may be required. The Food and Drug Administration withdrew approval for niacin and some fibrates in combination with statins in April 2016 citing unfavorable benefit-risk profiles. With the increasing incidence of associated conditions (e.g. obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes mellitus), it is likely that primary care physicians will encounter more patients with hypertriglyceridemia.
-
7.
[Diabetic dyslipidaemia and the atherosclerosis].
Márk, L, Dani, G
Orvosi hetilap. 2016;(19):746-52
Abstract
The incidence and the public health importance of diabetes mellitus are growing continuously. Despite the improvement observed in recent years, the leading cause of morbidity and mortality of diabetics are cardiovascular diseases. The diagnosis of diabetes mellitus constitutes such a high risk as the known presence of vascular disease. Diabetic dyslipidaemia is characterised by high fasting and postprandial triglyceride levels, low HDL level, and slightly elevated LDL-cholesterol with domination of atherogenic small dense LDL. These are not independent components of the atherogenic dyslipidaemia, but are closely linked to each other. Beside the known harmful effects of low HDL and small dense LDL, recent findings confirmed the atherogenicity of the triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and their remnants. It has been shown that the key of this process is the overproduction and delayed clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in the liver. In this metabolism the lipoprotein lipase has a determining role; its function is accelerated by ApoA5 and attenuated by ApoC3. The null mutations of the ApoC3 results in a reduced risk of myocardial infarction, the loss-of-function mutation of ApoA5 was associated with a 60% elevation of triglyceride level and 2.2-times increased risk of myocardial infarction. In case of diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance, obesity, metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease the non-HDL-cholesterol is a better marker of the risk than the LDL-cholesterol. Its value can be calculated by subtraction of HDL-cholesterol from total cholesterol. Target values of non-HDL-cholesterol can be obtained by adding 0.8 mmol/L to the LDL-cholesterol targets (this means 3.3 mmol/L in high, and 2.6 mmol/L in very high risk patients). The drugs of first choice in the treatment of diabetic dyslipidaemia are statins. Nevertheless, it is known that even if statin therapy is optimal (treated to target), a considerable residual (lipid) risk remains. For its reduction treatment of low HDL-cholesterol and high triglyceride levels is obvious by the administration of fibrates. In addition to statin therapy, fenofibrate can be recommended.
-
8.
Effects of niacin and omega-3 fatty acids on the apolipoproteins in overweight patients with elevated triglycerides and reduced HDL cholesterol.
Savinova, OV, Fillaus, K, Harris, WS, Shearer, GC
Atherosclerosis. 2015;(2):520-5
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Prescription omega-3 acid ethyl esters (P-OM3) and extended release niacin (ERN) both have beneficial effects on plasma lipids and lipoproteins. The purpose of this study was to describe the effects of mono- and combination (Combo) therapy of these agents in patients with the metabolic syndrome. METHODS Very low density (VLDL), intermediate/low density (IDL/LDL, hereafter LDL), and high density lipoproteins (HDL) were isolated from 56 overweight patients with elevated triglyceride/HDL-C ratios at baseline and after 16 weeks of treatment with placebo, ERN (2g/day), P-OM3 (4g/day), or Combo and then analyzed by quantitative electrophoresis for apolipoproteins (apo) A1, A2, B, C2, C3 and E. Total plasma concentrations and the ratios of each apo with apoB (in VLDL and LDL) and with apoA1 (in HDL) were calculated. An apoC3 glycosylation index (a ratio between di- and mono-sialylated isoforms) was also determined in plasma and in each lipoprotein fraction. RESULTS ERN reduced plasma apoB (-11%, p < 0.05). Combo increased LDL apoE/apoB ratio (64%, p < 0.01) and LDL apoA1/apoB (91%, p < 0.05). ERN increased the apoC3 glycosylation index only in HDL (37%, p < 0.05), whereas P-OM3 and Combo increased the index in whole plasma (48% and 49%, respectively, p < 0.05 for both) and in every lipoprotein class (VLDL: 26%, p < 0.01 and 26%, p < 0.05; LDL: 55%, p < 0.01 and 61%, p < 0.01; HDL: 43%, p < 0.001 and 44%, p < 0.001, respectively). All findings were significant after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking, medications, and baseline apo value. CONCLUSIONS ERN produced a beneficial reduction in plasma apoB. The enrichment of LDL with apoE and apoA1 was unique to the Combo group and might be beneficial owing to the atheroprotective properties of apoE and HDL2 (a likely source of apoA1 in LDL fraction). The effect of therapies on the apoC3 glycosylation index is a novel finding, the implications of which will require further study.
-
9.
Molecular sources of residual cardiovascular risk, clinical signals, and innovative solutions: relationship with subclinical disease, undertreatment, and poor adherence: implications of new evidence upon optimizing cardiovascular patient outcomes.
Kones, R
Vascular health and risk management. 2013;:617-70
Abstract
Residual risk, the ongoing appreciable risk of major cardiovascular events (MCVE) in statin-treated patients who have achieved evidence-based lipid goals, remains a concern among cardiologists. Factors that contribute to this continuing risk are atherogenic non-low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles and atherogenic processes unrelated to LDL cholesterol, including other risk factors, the inherent properties of statin drugs, and patient characteristics, ie, genetics and behaviors. In addition, providers, health care systems, the community, public policies, and the environment play a role. Major statin studies suggest an average 28% reduction in LDL cholesterol and a 31% reduction in relative risk, leaving a residual risk of about 69%. Incomplete reductions in risk, and failure to improve conditions that create risk, may result in ongoing progression of atherosclerosis, with new and recurring lesions in original and distant culprit sites, remodeling, arrhythmias, rehospitalizations, invasive procedures, and terminal disability. As a result, identification of additional agents to reduce residual risk, particularly administered together with statin drugs, has been an ongoing quest. The current model of atherosclerosis involves many steps during which disease may progress independently of guideline-defined elevations in LDL cholesterol. Differences in genetic responsiveness to statin therapy, differences in ability of the endothelium to regenerate and repair, and differences in susceptibility to nonlipid risk factors, such as tobacco smoking, hypertension, and molecular changes associated with obesity and diabetes, may all create residual risk. A large number of inflammatory and metabolic processes may also provide eventual therapeutic targets to lower residual risk. Classically, epidemiologic and other evidence suggested that raising high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol would be cardioprotective. When LDL cholesterol is aggressively lowered to targets, low HDL cholesterol levels are still inversely related to MCVE. The efflux capacity, or ability to relocate cholesterol out of macrophages, is believed to be a major antiatherogenic mechanism responsible for reduction in MCVE mediated in part by healthy HDL. HDL cholesterol is a complex molecule with antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic, antiplatelet, and vasodilatory properties, among which is protection of LDL from oxidation. HDL-associated paraoxonase-1 has a major effect on endothelial function. Further, HDL promotes endothelial repair and progenitor cell health, and supports production of nitric oxide. HDL from patients with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and autoimmune disease may fail to protect or even become proinflammatory or pro-oxidant. Mendelian randomization and other clinical studies in which raising HDL cholesterol has not been beneficial suggest that high plasma levels do not necessarily reduce cardiovascular risk. These data, coupled with extensive preclinical information about the functional heterogeneity of HDL, challenge the "HDL hypothesis", ie, raising HDL cholesterol per se will reduce MCVE. After the equivocal AIM-HIGH (Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome With Low HDL/High Triglycerides: Impact on Global Health Outcomes) study and withdrawal of two major cholesteryl ester transfer protein compounds, one for off-target adverse effects and the other for lack of efficacy, development continues for two other agents, ie, anacetrapib and evacetrapib, both of which lower LDL cholesterol substantially. The negative but controversial HPS2-THRIVE (the Heart Protection Study 2-Treatment of HDL to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events) trial casts further doubt on the HDL cholesterol hypothesis. The growing impression that HDL functionality, rather than abundance, is clinically important is supported by experimental evidence highlighting the conditional pleiotropic actions of HDL. Non-HDL cholesterol reflects the cholesterol in all atherogenic particles containing apolipoprotein B, and has outperformed LDL cholesterol as a lipid marker of cardiovascular risk and future mortality. In addition to including a measure of residual risk, the advantages of using non-HDL cholesterol as a primary lipid target are now compelling. Reinterpretation of data from the Treating to New Targets study suggests that better control of smoking, body weight, hypertension, and diabetes will help lower residual risk. Although much improved, control of risk factors other than LDL cholesterol currently remains inadequate due to shortfalls in compliance with guidelines and poor patient adherence. More efficient and greater use of proven simple therapies, such as aspirin, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers, combined with statin therapy, may be more fruitful in improving outcomes than using other complex therapies. Comprehensive, intensive, multimechanistic, global, and national programs using primordial, primary, and secondary prevention to lower the total level of cardiovascular risk are necessary.
-
10.
Demystifying the management of hypertriglyceridaemia.
Watts, GF, Ooi, EM, Chan, DC
Nature reviews. Cardiology. 2013;(11):648-61
Abstract
Hypertriglyceridaemia (typical triglyceride level 1.7-5.0 mmol/l) is caused by interactions between many genetic and nongenetic factors, and is a common risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Patients with hypertriglyceridaemia usually present with obesity, insulin resistance, hepatic steatosis, ectopic fat deposition, and diabetes mellitus. Hypertriglyceridaemia reflects the accumulation in plasma of proatherogenic lipoproteins, triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TRL) remnants, and small, dense LDL particles. Mendelian randomization studies and research on inherited dyslipidaemias, such as type III dysbetalipoproteinaemia, testify that TRLs are causally related to atherosclerotic CVD. Extreme hypertriglyceridaemia (a triglyceride level >20 mmol/l) is rare, often monogenic in aetiology, and frequently causes pancreatitis. Treatment of hypertriglyceridaemia relies on correcting secondary factors and unhealthy lifestyle habits, particularly poor diet and lack of exercise. Pharmacotherapy is indicated for patients with established CVD or individuals at moderate-to-high risk of CVD, primarily those with metabolic syndrome or diabetes. Statins are the cornerstone of treatment, followed by fibrates and n-3 fatty acids, to achieve recommended therapeutic levels of plasma LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein (apo) B-100. The case for using niacin has been weakened by the results of clinical trials, but needs further investigation. Extreme hypertriglyceridaemia requires strict dietary measures, and patients with a diagnosis of genetic lipoprotein lipase deficiency might benefit from LPL gene replacement therapy. Several therapies for regulating TRL metabolism, including inhibitors of diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase and microsomal triglyceride transfer protein, and apoC-III antisense oligonucleotides, merit further investigation in patients with hypertriglyceridaemia.