0
selected
-
1.
Intradialytic Nutrition and Hemodialysis Prescriptions: A Personalized Stepwise Approach.
Piccoli, GB, Lippi, F, Fois, A, Gendrot, L, Nielsen, L, Vigreux, J, Chatrenet, A, D'Alessandro, C, Cabiddu, G, Cupisti, A
Nutrients. 2020;(3)
Abstract
Dialysis and nutrition are two sides of the same coin-dialysis depurates metabolic waste that is typically produced by food intake. Hence, dietetic restrictions are commonly imposed in order to limit potassium and phosphate and avoid fluid overload. Conversely, malnutrition is a major challenge and, albeit to differing degrees, all nutritional markers are associated with survival. Dialysis-related malnutrition has a multifactorial origin related to uremic syndrome and comorbidities but also to dialysis treatment. Both an insufficient dialysis dose and excessive removal are contributing factors. It is thus not surprising that dialysis alone, without proper nutritional management, often fails to be effective in combatting malnutrition. While composite indexes can be used to identify patients with poor prognosis, none is fully satisfactory, and the definitions of malnutrition and protein energy wasting are still controversial. Furthermore, most nutritional markers and interventions were assessed in hemodialysis patients, while hemodiafiltration and peritoneal dialysis have been less extensively studied. The significant loss of albumin in these two dialysis modalities makes it extremely difficult to interpret common markers and scores. Despite these problems, hemodialysis sessions represent a valuable opportunity to monitor nutritional status and prescribe nutritional interventions, and several approaches have been tried. In this concept paper, we review the current evidence on intradialytic nutrition and propose an algorithm for adapting nutritional interventions to individual patients.
-
2.
SGLT2 inhibitors and the kidney: Effects and mechanisms.
Tsimihodimos, V, Filippatos, TD, Elisaf, MS
Diabetes & metabolic syndrome. 2018;(6):1117-1123
Abstract
AIMS: Numerous clinical trials have shown that sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors exert a favorable effect on the indices of renal function (albuminuria, glomerular filtration rate decline over time) and the incidence of hard renal endpoints such as renal death or time to initiation of renal replacement therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this review, we describe in detail the evidence regarding the nephroprotective mechanisms of SGLT2 inhibitors and describe the risk factors that may predispose to the development of acute kidney injury in patients receiving these drugs. RESULTS Although the impact of these drugs on renal hemodynamics seems to represent the most important renoprotective mechanism of action, many other effects of these compounds, including beneficial effects on metabolism and blood pressure, have been proposed to contribute to the observed clinical benefit. CONCLUSIONS SGLT2 inhibitors clearly act beneficially in terms of kidney function with many proposed mechanisms.
-
3.
Novel therapeutic agents and strategies for the management of chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorder.
Connor, A
Postgraduate medical journal. 2009;(1003):274-9
Abstract
Abnormalities in the serum concentrations of calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone and vitamin D develop with declining renal function, leading in turn to renal osteodystrophy. Observational data now suggest that these disturbances in bone and mineral metabolism play an important role in the development of vascular calcification and subsequent cardiovascular disease, contributing to the high burden of cardiovascular disease within this population. A new nomenclature-"chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorder"-has been introduced to describe this broader clinical syndrome and reflect the new emphasis that has been placed upon its management. This article describes the current therapeutic options for this condition, focusing particularly on the novel medications and strategies that have recently been introduced, and highlighting promising therapeutic possibilities for the future.
-
4.
Dyslipidaemia and cardiorenal disease: mechanisms, therapeutic opportunities and clinical trials.
Chan, DT, Irish, AB, Dogra, GK, Watts, GF
Atherosclerosis. 2008;(2):823-34
Abstract
Dyslipidaemia is an important risk factor for the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). CKD generates an atherogenic lipid profile, characterised by high triglycerides, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and accumulation of small dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles, comparable to that in the metabolic syndrome. These changes are due specifically to the effects of CKD on key enzymes, transfer proteins and receptors involved in lipid metabolism. Dyslipidaemia is further compounded by dialysis, immunosuppressive drugs, and concomitant diseases such as diabetes mellitus. Post hoc analyses from large intervention trials suggest the benefit of statins in patients with early CKD, but prospective clinical trials in haemodialysis (HD) and renal transplant recipients have not conclusively shown improvements in hard cardiovascular end-points. The lack of efficacy of statins in late-stage CKD could be a consequence of other disease processes, such as calcific arteriopathy and insulin resistance, which are not modified by lipid-lowering agents. Despite uncertainty and pending the results of ongoing statin trials such as Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP) and AURORA (A study to evaluate the Use of Rosuvastatin in subjects On Regular haemodialysis: an Assessment of survival and cardiovascular events), major international guidelines continue to support statin therapy in CKD and renal transplant patients to reduce cardiovascular risk burden. Because of increased risk of toxicity, particularly myopathy, statins and other lipid-regulating agents should be used cautiously in CKD and renal transplant recipients.
-
5.
Calcium channel blockers and renal protection: insights from the latest clinical trials.
Segura, J, GarcĂa-Donaire, JA, Ruilope, LM
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN. 2005;:S64-6
Abstract
Calcium channel blockers have been widely used in clinical practice because of their antihypertensive capacity. Prevention of renal damage is a very important aim of antihypertensive therapy. This is particularly so taking into account the high prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the general population. Recent data have shown that CKD is related to the absence of adequate BP control and also to the clustering of other cardiovascular risk factors seen in the metabolic syndrome. The knowledge of the capacities of the different antihypertensive drugs or their combinations to simultaneously control BP while protecting the kidney and avoiding the facilitation of metabolic alterations is warranted. Recent data from the Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment trial, Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial, and African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK) allow the conclusion that in hypertensive patients with preserved renal function or with CKD, calcium channel blockers are effective antihypertensive drugs to be considered alone or in combination with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker.
-
6.
Whither goest Kt/V?
Gotch, FA, Sargent, JA, Keen, ML
Kidney international. Supplement. 2000;:S3-18
Abstract
Uremia is characterized by gross contamination of body water with a wide spectrum of retained solutes normally excreted by the kidney. The rationale for dialysis therapy is that these retained solutes have concentration-dependent toxicity, which can be ameliorated through removal by dialysis. Apart from the well-established clinical consequences of abnormalities in fluid, electrolyte, acid base metabolism, and retained beta 2-microglobulin (beta 2 m), there is very little understanding of solute-specific uremic toxicity. Evidence is reviewed to demonstrate the following: (1) Many aspects of the uremic syndrome are controlled by adequate dialysis of low molecular weight solutes. (2) Urea can serve as a generic molecule to quantitate the fractional clearance of body water by dialysis (Kt/V) of retained low molecular weight solutes. (3) Urea has no concentration-dependent toxicity, and the generation rate of putative toxic low molecular weight solutes is not proportional to urea generation. The major clinical consequences and controversies stemming from these interrelationships are reviewed. Kinetic approaches to determine Kt/V dose equivalency between intermittent and continuous dialysis therapy are reviewed. We conclude that Kt/V can and will be generalized to describe the kinetics of other solutes such as beta2m as our knowledge of uremic toxicity grows, and hence, it is predicted that it will goeth and goeth and goeth.