1.
Effects of weight stigma in news media on physical activity, dietary and weight loss intentions and behaviour.
Lambert, ER, Koutoukidis, DA, Jackson, SE
Obesity research & clinical practice. 2019;(6):571-578
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the effect of weight stigma in news media on (a) intentions to increase physical activity (PA), improve diet quality and lose weight, and (b) changes in PA, diet quality and body mass index (BMI) over one month, in (i) women of all weight categories and (ii) a subsample of women living with obesity. METHODS UK-based women (N=172; subgroup with obesity N=81) were assigned to read an experimental (weight stigma; N=75) or control (smoking stigma; N=97) news article. Questionnaires were administered immediately after, and one month subsequently to collect information on BMI, PA, diet quality, intentions, past stigma, and diet and PA self-efficacy. Logistic and linear regression analyses were used to assess the effect of weight stigma on all outcome variables. RESULTS In the whole sample, there was no significant effect of weight stigma on any primary or secondary outcome. In women with obesity, there was no significant effect of weight stigma on diet quality (0.26 units, 95% CI: -0.36 to 0.87) or PA (-1.83 units, 95% CI: -11.11 to 7.44) at follow up, but exposure to weight stigma was associated with a significant increase in BMI at 1-month follow-up (1.15kg/m2, 95% CI: 0.38 to 1.92) compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS In people with obesity, exposure to weight-stigmatising media may contribute to increased BMI over time. Larger trials with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.
2.
The weight-inclusive versus weight-normative approach to health: evaluating the evidence for prioritizing well-being over weight loss.
Tylka, TL, Annunziato, RA, Burgard, D, DanÃelsdóttir, S, Shuman, E, Davis, C, Calogero, RM
Journal of obesity. 2014;:983495
Abstract
Using an ethical lens, this review evaluates two methods of working within patient care and public health: the weight-normative approach (emphasis on weight and weight loss when defining health and well-being) and the weight-inclusive approach (emphasis on viewing health and well-being as multifaceted while directing efforts toward improving health access and reducing weight stigma). Data reveal that the weight-normative approach is not effective for most people because of high rates of weight regain and cycling from weight loss interventions, which are linked to adverse health and well-being. Its predominant focus on weight may also foster stigma in health care and society, and data show that weight stigma is also linked to adverse health and well-being. In contrast, data support a weight-inclusive approach, which is included in models such as Health at Every Size for improving physical (e.g., blood pressure), behavioral (e.g., binge eating), and psychological (e.g., depression) indices, as well as acceptability of public health messages. Therefore, the weight-inclusive approach upholds nonmaleficience and beneficience, whereas the weight-normative approach does not. We offer a theoretical framework that organizes the research included in this review and discuss how it can guide research efforts and help health professionals intervene with their patients and community.