Weight loss with a low-carbohydrate, Mediterranean, or low-fat diet.

The New England journal of medicine. 2008;359(3):229-41

Plain language summary

Most trials comparing the effectiveness of weight-loss regimes are carried out over short durations. This trial explored the effectiveness of three dietary protocols (low carbohydrate, Mediterranean diet and low fat) on weight loss over 2 years. The study randomly allocated 322 moderately obese subjects to one of the three dietary regimes. The mean weight loss for the 272 people completing the study after 2 years was significantly different between the groups; 3.3kg for the low fat group, 4.6kg for the Mediterranean diet group and 5.5kg for the low carbohydrate group. Diabetic subjects in the Mediterranean group achieved more favourable fasting blood sugar and insulin levels compared to the low fat group. The low carbohydrate group achieved the most favourable outcomes in terms of their lipid profiles compared to the other groups. The authors concluded that the Mediterranean diet and low carbohydrate diets may be effective alternatives to low fat regimes; they achieved weight-loss and also some metabolic benefits.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Trials comparing the effectiveness and safety of weight-loss diets are frequently limited by short follow-up times and high dropout rates. METHODS In this 2-year trial, we randomly assigned 322 moderately obese subjects (mean age, 52 years; mean body-mass index [the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters], 31; male sex, 86%) to one of three diets: low-fat, restricted-calorie; Mediterranean, restricted-calorie; or low-carbohydrate, non-restricted-calorie. RESULTS The rate of adherence to a study diet was 95.4% at 1 year and 84.6% at 2 years. The Mediterranean-diet group consumed the largest amounts of dietary fiber and had the highest ratio of monounsaturated to saturated fat (P<0.05 for all comparisons among treatment groups). The low-carbohydrate group consumed the smallest amount of carbohydrates and the largest amounts of fat, protein, and cholesterol and had the highest percentage of participants with detectable urinary ketones (P<0.05 for all comparisons among treatment groups). The mean weight loss was 2.9 kg for the low-fat group, 4.4 kg for the Mediterranean-diet group, and 4.7 kg for the low-carbohydrate group (P<0.001 for the interaction between diet group and time); among the 272 participants who completed the intervention, the mean weight losses were 3.3 kg, 4.6 kg, and 5.5 kg, respectively. The relative reduction in the ratio of total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 20% in the low-carbohydrate group and 12% in the low-fat group (P=0.01). Among the 36 subjects with diabetes, changes in fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels were more favorable among those assigned to the Mediterranean diet than among those assigned to the low-fat diet (P<0.001 for the interaction among diabetes and Mediterranean diet and time with respect to fasting glucose levels). CONCLUSIONS Mediterranean and low-carbohydrate diets may be effective alternatives to low-fat diets. The more favorable effects on lipids (with the low-carbohydrate diet) and on glycemic control (with the Mediterranean diet) suggest that personal preferences and metabolic considerations might inform individualized tailoring of dietary interventions. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00160108.)

Lifestyle medicine

Fundamental Clinical Imbalances : Hormonal ; Immune and inflammation
Patient Centred Factors : Triggers/Specific dietary regime
Environmental Inputs : Diet
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Nutrition
Functional Laboratory Testing : Blood
Bioactive Substances : High-sensitivity C-reactive protein ; CRP

Methodological quality

Jadad score : 2
Allocation concealment : Yes

Metadata

Nutrition Evidence keywords : High-sensitivity C-reactive protein ; CRP