Potential influence of the microbiome environment in patients with biliary tract cancer and implications for therapy.

Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute Cancer Biomarker Centre, University of Manchester, Alderley Park, UK. The Library, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Mairead.McNamara@nhs.net. Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. Mairead.McNamara@nhs.net.

British journal of cancer. 2022;(5):693-705

Abstract

Biliary tract cancers, including intra- and extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma as well as gallbladder cancer, are associated with poor prognosis and the majority of patients present with advanced-stage, non-resectable disease at diagnosis. Biliary tract cancer may develop through an accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations and can be influenced by microbial exposure. Furthermore, the liver and biliary tract are exposed to the gastrointestinal microbiome through the gut-liver axis. The availability of next-generation sequencing technology has led to an increase in studies investigating the relationship between microbiota and human disease. In particular, the interplay between the microbiome, the tumour micro-environment and response to systemic therapy is a prospering area of interest. Given the poor outcomes for patients with biliary tract cancer, this emerging field of research, through which new biomarkers may be identified, offers potential as a tool for early diagnosis, prognostication or even as a future therapeutic target. This review summarises the available evidence on the microbiome environment in patients with biliary tract cancer, including a discussion around confounding factors, implications for therapy and proposed future directions.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Review

Metadata

MeSH terms : Bacteria